Terrorist Snipers Open Fire on IDF Soldiers

Sally

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2012
Messages
12,135
Reaction score
1,316
Points
245
I guess there are those on this forum who feel the IDF should never fire back. In fact, they probably don't think the IDF should have fired their rifles into the air to scare off the snipers.

Terrorist Snipers Open Fire on IDF Soldiers
Posted by: Lea Speyer April 9, 2014 , 10:20 am


Terrorist snipers in the Gaza Strip opened fire on IDF troops stationed near the Israel-Gaza border Wednesday morning. The soldiers, who were near the Israeli community of Kissufim, responded back by firing rounds into the air to warn and scare off the snipers.


Read more at Terrorist Snipers Open Fire on IDF Soldiers | Breaking Israel News
 
I guess there are those on this forum who feel the IDF should never fire back. In fact, they probably don't think the IDF should have fired their rifles into the air to scare off the snipers.

Terrorist Snipers Open Fire on IDF Soldiers
Posted by: Lea Speyer April 9, 2014 , 10:20 am


Terrorist snipers in the Gaza Strip opened fire on IDF troops stationed near the Israel-Gaza border Wednesday morning. The soldiers, who were near the Israeli community of Kissufim, responded back by firing rounds into the air to warn and scare off the snipers.


Read more at Terrorist Snipers Open Fire on IDF Soldiers | Breaking Israel News

Attacks on soldiers are not terrorism.

What kind of Propaganda sites do you read?
 
Sniper attacks are for pussies who know that they can't fight for real because they suck at war and have already lost.
 
I guess there are those on this forum who feel the IDF should never fire back. In fact, they probably don't think the IDF should have fired their rifles into the air to scare off the snipers.

Terrorist Snipers Open Fire on IDF Soldiers
Posted by: Lea Speyer April 9, 2014 , 10:20 am


Terrorist snipers in the Gaza Strip opened fire on IDF troops stationed near the Israel-Gaza border Wednesday morning. The soldiers, who were near the Israeli community of Kissufim, responded back by firing rounds into the air to warn and scare off the snipers.


Read more at Terrorist Snipers Open Fire on IDF Soldiers | Breaking Israel News

Attacks on soldiers are not terrorism.

What kind of Propaganda sites do you read?

Is that what you call resistance ??
 
I guess there are those on this forum who feel the IDF should never fire back. In fact, they probably don't think the IDF should have fired their rifles into the air to scare off the snipers.

Terrorist Snipers Open Fire on IDF Soldiers
Posted by: Lea Speyer April 9, 2014 , 10:20 am


Terrorist snipers in the Gaza Strip opened fire on IDF troops stationed near the Israel-Gaza border Wednesday morning. The soldiers, who were near the Israeli community of Kissufim, responded back by firing rounds into the air to warn and scare off the snipers.


Read more at Terrorist Snipers Open Fire on IDF Soldiers | Breaking Israel News

Attacks on soldiers are not terrorism.

What kind of Propaganda sites do you read?

Is that what you call resistance ??

Occupation troops are legitimate targets.

Israel shoots Palestinian farmers across that same fence.
 
Very disturbing report, Sally. I guess Hamas posing as fisherman to get close enough to murder IDF isn't enough. They need snipers now too. It never ceases to amaze me how many ways these guys can reveal their cowardly nature! Posing as fisherman, using children as sandbags under gunfire, wearing their wives burkas, what's next?
 
I guess there are those on this forum who feel the IDF should never fire back. In fact, they probably don't think the IDF should have fired their rifles into the air to scare off the snipers.

Terrorist Snipers Open Fire on IDF Soldiers
Posted by: Lea Speyer April 9, 2014 , 10:20 am


Terrorist snipers in the Gaza Strip opened fire on IDF troops stationed near the Israel-Gaza border Wednesday morning. The soldiers, who were near the Israeli community of Kissufim, responded back by firing rounds into the air to warn and scare off the snipers.


Read more at Terrorist Snipers Open Fire on IDF Soldiers | Breaking Israel News

Attacks on soldiers are not terrorism.

What kind of Propaganda sites do you read?

One closer to the truth than HamasRUs.com.

Isn't it the one you take articles from?
 
I thought this said "terrorist strippers" for a second. :rofl:

m0168.gif
 
I guess there are those on this forum who feel the IDF should never fire back. In fact, they probably don't think the IDF should have fired their rifles into the air to scare off the snipers.

Terrorist Snipers Open Fire on IDF Soldiers
Posted by: Lea Speyer April 9, 2014 , 10:20 am


Terrorist snipers in the Gaza Strip opened fire on IDF troops stationed near the Israel-Gaza border Wednesday morning. The soldiers, who were near the Israeli community of Kissufim, responded back by firing rounds into the air to warn and scare off the snipers.


Read more at Terrorist Snipers Open Fire on IDF Soldiers | Breaking Israel News

Attacks on soldiers are not terrorism.

What kind of Propaganda sites do you read?

One closer to the truth than HamasRUs.com.

Isn't it the one you take articles from?

You have to forgive the Hamas representative in the U.S. who still considers himself a refugee. He would just love the Israelis to roll over and never fight back so that his brethren can rule over that one tiny piece of land along with that huge amount of land they already govern in the Middle East.
 
P F Tinmore, et al,

Our friend "P F Tinmore" has a minor point here, in that, the use of the descriptor "terrorist" is not defined.

I guess there are those on this forum who feel the IDF should never fire back. In fact, they probably don't think the IDF should have fired their rifles into the air to scare off the snipers.

Terrorist Snipers Open Fire on IDF Soldiers
Posted by: Lea Speyer April 9, 2014 , 10:20 am

Terrorist snipers in the Gaza Strip opened fire on IDF troops stationed near the Israel-Gaza border Wednesday morning. The soldiers, who were near the Israeli community of Kissufim, responded back by firing rounds into the air to warn and scare off the snipers.

Read more at Terrorist Snipers Open Fire on IDF Soldiers | Breaking Israel News

Attacks on soldiers are not terrorism.

What kind of Propaganda sites do you read?
(OBSERVATION)

Convention (IV) relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War. Geneva said:
Article 5
Where in occupied territory an individual protected person is detained as a spy or saboteur, or as a person under definite suspicion of activity hostile to the security of the Occupying Power, such person shall, in those cases where absolute military security so requires, be regarded as having forfeited rights of communication under the present Convention.​

Article 68
Protected persons who commit an offence which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power, but which does not constitute an attempt on the life or limb of members of the occupying forces or administration, nor a grave collective danger, nor seriously damage the property of the occupying forces or administration or the installations used by them, shall be liable to internment or simple imprisonment, provided the duration of such internment or imprisonment is proportionate to the offence committed. Furthermore, internment or imprisonment shall, for such offences, be the only measure adopted for depriving protected persons of liberty. The courts provided for under Article 66 of the present Convention may at their discretion convert a sentence of imprisonment to one of internment for the same period.

The penal provisions promulgated by the Occupying Power in accordance with Articles 64 and 65 may impose the death penalty against a protected person only in cases where the person is guilty of espionage, of serious acts of sabotage against the military installations of the Occupying Power or of intentional offences which have caused the death of one or more persons, provided that such offences were punishable by death under the law of the occupied territory in force before the occupation began.​

SOURCE: ICRC GCIV
(COMMENT)

Oddly enough, the Arab Palestinians just signed (2 April 2014) the Geneva Conventions.

In this case, "serious acts of sabotage against the military installations of the Occupying Power or of intentional offences which have caused the death of one or more persons, provided that such offences were punishable by death under the law of the occupied territory in force before the occupation began."

The Arab Palestinian has NO special authority of dispensation to commit violent acts against the Occupation Power, no matter what the cause.

In this case, it is not terrorism, even though it might sound like it. This is merely another act of criminal activity (murder/attempted murder) to add to the past practices and history of criminal behaviors established by the Arab Palestinian.

Make no mistake: This is a punishable act and criminal offense by the Hostile Arab Palestinian.

Most Respectfully,
R
 
P F Tinmore, et al,

Our friend "P F Tinmore" has a minor point here, in that, the use of the descriptor "terrorist" is not defined.

I guess there are those on this forum who feel the IDF should never fire back. In fact, they probably don't think the IDF should have fired their rifles into the air to scare off the snipers.

Terrorist Snipers Open Fire on IDF Soldiers
Posted by: Lea Speyer April 9, 2014 , 10:20 am

Terrorist snipers in the Gaza Strip opened fire on IDF troops stationed near the Israel-Gaza border Wednesday morning. The soldiers, who were near the Israeli community of Kissufim, responded back by firing rounds into the air to warn and scare off the snipers.

Read more at Terrorist Snipers Open Fire on IDF Soldiers | Breaking Israel News

Attacks on soldiers are not terrorism.

What kind of Propaganda sites do you read?
(OBSERVATION)

Convention (IV) relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War. Geneva said:
Article 5
Where in occupied territory an individual protected person is detained as a spy or saboteur, or as a person under definite suspicion of activity hostile to the security of the Occupying Power, such person shall, in those cases where absolute military security so requires, be regarded as having forfeited rights of communication under the present Convention.​

Article 68
Protected persons who commit an offence which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power, but which does not constitute an attempt on the life or limb of members of the occupying forces or administration, nor a grave collective danger, nor seriously damage the property of the occupying forces or administration or the installations used by them, shall be liable to internment or simple imprisonment, provided the duration of such internment or imprisonment is proportionate to the offence committed. Furthermore, internment or imprisonment shall, for such offences, be the only measure adopted for depriving protected persons of liberty. The courts provided for under Article 66 of the present Convention may at their discretion convert a sentence of imprisonment to one of internment for the same period.

The penal provisions promulgated by the Occupying Power in accordance with Articles 64 and 65 may impose the death penalty against a protected person only in cases where the person is guilty of espionage, of serious acts of sabotage against the military installations of the Occupying Power or of intentional offences which have caused the death of one or more persons, provided that such offences were punishable by death under the law of the occupied territory in force before the occupation began.​

SOURCE: ICRC GCIV
(COMMENT)

Oddly enough, the Arab Palestinians just signed (2 April 2014) the Geneva Conventions.

In this case, "serious acts of sabotage against the military installations of the Occupying Power or of intentional offences which have caused the death of one or more persons, provided that such offences were punishable by death under the law of the occupied territory in force before the occupation began."

The Arab Palestinian has NO special authority of dispensation to commit violent acts against the Occupation Power, no matter what the cause.

In this case, it is not terrorism, even though it might sound like it. This is merely another act of criminal activity (murder/attempted murder) to add to the past practices and history of criminal behaviors established by the Arab Palestinian.

Make no mistake: This is a punishable act and criminal offense by the Hostile Arab Palestinian.

Most Respectfully,
R

So tell us Rocco, does this mean the Israeli's can keep stealing land by annexation?
 
I don't get it, the Palestinians just can't win. If they attack civilians they are terrorists, if they attack occupation troops they are terrorists. While I believe that the Palestinians should adopt a Gandhi style peaceful resistance approach as a more productive tactic, attacking occupation troops is what occupied people are allowed to do under International law.
 
I don't get it, the Palestinians just can't win. If they attack civilians they are terrorists, if they attack occupation troops they are terrorists. While I believe that the Palestinians should adopt a Gandhi style peaceful resistance approach as a more productive tactic, attacking occupation troops is what occupied people are allowed to do under International law.

Simple double talk...
 
Ok but what does attacking troops accomplish??? Nothing!

Except if you kill a soldier you will go to jail for life or be killed yourself.
Even if you injure the soldier, you will be severely punished.

So, is it worth it??

I guess if you're an Islamic extremist, then killing Jews/Israelis is always worth it because doing so will please Allah.
 
Last edited:
15th post
pbel, et al,

Other than the Jerusalem portion, what was annexed?

P F Tinmore, et al,

Our friend "P F Tinmore" has a minor point here, in that, the use of the descriptor "terrorist" is not defined.

Attacks on soldiers are not terrorism.

What kind of Propaganda sites do you read?
(OBSERVATION)

Convention (IV) relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War. Geneva said:
Article 5
Where in occupied territory an individual protected person is detained as a spy or saboteur, or as a person under definite suspicion of activity hostile to the security of the Occupying Power, such person shall, in those cases where absolute military security so requires, be regarded as having forfeited rights of communication under the present Convention.​

Article 68
Protected persons who commit an offence which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power, but which does not constitute an attempt on the life or limb of members of the occupying forces or administration, nor a grave collective danger, nor seriously damage the property of the occupying forces or administration or the installations used by them, shall be liable to internment or simple imprisonment, provided the duration of such internment or imprisonment is proportionate to the offence committed. Furthermore, internment or imprisonment shall, for such offences, be the only measure adopted for depriving protected persons of liberty. The courts provided for under Article 66 of the present Convention may at their discretion convert a sentence of imprisonment to one of internment for the same period.

The penal provisions promulgated by the Occupying Power in accordance with Articles 64 and 65 may impose the death penalty against a protected person only in cases where the person is guilty of espionage, of serious acts of sabotage against the military installations of the Occupying Power or of intentional offences which have caused the death of one or more persons, provided that such offences were punishable by death under the law of the occupied territory in force before the occupation began.​

SOURCE: ICRC GCIV
(COMMENT)

Oddly enough, the Arab Palestinians just signed (2 April 2014) the Geneva Conventions.

In this case, "serious acts of sabotage against the military installations of the Occupying Power or of intentional offences which have caused the death of one or more persons, provided that such offences were punishable by death under the law of the occupied territory in force before the occupation began."

The Arab Palestinian has NO special authority of dispensation to commit violent acts against the Occupation Power, no matter what the cause.

In this case, it is not terrorism, even though it might sound like it. This is merely another act of criminal activity (murder/attempted murder) to add to the past practices and history of criminal behaviors established by the Arab Palestinian.

Make no mistake: This is a punishable act and criminal offense by the Hostile Arab Palestinian.

Most Respectfully,
R

So tell us Rocco, does this mean the Israeli's can keep stealing land by annexation?
(COMMENT)

The Israelis have not annexed the West Bank settlements. So what are we discussing?

Most Respectfully,
R
 
pbel, et al,

Other than the Jerusalem portion, what was annexed?

P F Tinmore, et al,

Our friend "P F Tinmore" has a minor point here, in that, the use of the descriptor "terrorist" is not defined.


(OBSERVATION)


(COMMENT)

Oddly enough, the Arab Palestinians just signed (2 April 2014) the Geneva Conventions.

In this case, "serious acts of sabotage against the military installations of the Occupying Power or of intentional offences which have caused the death of one or more persons, provided that such offences were punishable by death under the law of the occupied territory in force before the occupation began."

The Arab Palestinian has NO special authority of dispensation to commit violent acts against the Occupation Power, no matter what the cause.

In this case, it is not terrorism, even though it might sound like it. This is merely another act of criminal activity (murder/attempted murder) to add to the past practices and history of criminal behaviors established by the Arab Palestinian.

Make no mistake: This is a punishable act and criminal offense by the Hostile Arab Palestinian.

Most Respectfully,
R

So tell us Rocco, does this mean the Israeli's can keep stealing land by annexation?
(COMMENT)

The Israelis have not annexed the West Bank settlements. So what are we discussing?

Most Respectfully,
R

Pbel's delusions.....
 
I guess there are those on this forum who feel the IDF should never fire back. In fact, they probably don't think the IDF should have fired their rifles into the air to scare off the snipers.

Terrorist Snipers Open Fire on IDF Soldiers
Posted by: Lea Speyer April 9, 2014 , 10:20 am


Terrorist snipers in the Gaza Strip opened fire on IDF troops stationed near the Israel-Gaza border Wednesday morning. The soldiers, who were near the Israeli community of Kissufim, responded back by firing rounds into the air to warn and scare off the snipers.


Read more at Terrorist Snipers Open Fire on IDF Soldiers | Breaking Israel News
Targeting the IDF is not terrorism, it's resistance.
 
Ok but what does attacking troops accomplish??? Nothing!

Except if you a soldier you will go to jail for life or be killed yourself.
Even if you injure the soldier, you will be severely punished.

So, is it worth it??

I guess if you're an Islamic extremist, then killing Jews/Israelis is always worth it because doing so will please Allah.

When the opponent is far stronger, it doesn't accomplish anything. It is stupid. The Jews in the Warsaw ghetto shot at the Germans, it was stupid, but they did it anyway and they were absolutely right in doing it. It was not worth it for the Jews, but it was right.
 
Back
Top Bottom