Yup... you've lost it.
Hey, here try to get you back on track.
"Freedom".... "the Constitution"... "Founding Fathers!"
Seriously, man, these catchphrases always help defend the indefensible...
You know how you like to say you're not a Communist?
You're wrong.
No, I just don't see the problem the way you do.
Here's how I see the problem.
First, is health care a consumer commodity, that only those who earn it should have access to, or a fundimental public service that everyone should have access to? The answer to this question is obviously the latter. The stupidity that we let poor people die of treatable diseases because they are poor is a very bad reflection on us as a society.
Second, once we've established the first point (and frankly, it's not even one your side is really arguing, other than the few fringe nutbags) then the question becomes, what is the best way to assure everyone has access? The rest of the world has figured this out. They have single payer in Canada, the UK, Japan, France. Germany and Holland have a series of private and public programs that cover everyone.
ObamaCare is a half-measure that reflects our system is very hard to reform and we have very entrenched special interests protecting a status quo they really can't defend. But it's also a failing one. Employers were having a hard time keeping up with their foreign competitors whose government have already figured this out.
So really, I see it as an incremental step in the right direction.