Holy ******* shit! Now I don't think that you're playing stupid any more. I told you that I do not read the bible, I do not own a bible, I have no interest in discussing the bible. The point that I made, and documented was that there are peope who believe that the bible condones discrimination.
Just more of your idiotic bullshit ending with a stupid question. How the **** is any form of discrimination going to achieve equality?
Just more stupidity. No it is not discrimination. The straight woman is not rejecting the gay woman because she is gay. She is rejected the gay woman because she does not have sex with women. Plus a street corner is not a place of business that is expected to serve everyone. Personal choice. Cut the crap already
abortion and same sex marriage are NOT constitutionally protected rights, that is what you libs always miss. If you think they are, then post the language from the constitution listing them as rights.
The fact that they are not enumerated rights does not mean that they are not rights. Constitutional law has long recognised unenmerated rights that flow from the explicit rights
There is no “right to privacy.” Lunacy.
No...you say when the scotus ruled on obergefell, that it was law, so if scotus overturns it, then, yes, it is a repeal, or possibly a replacement for the previous ruling, which would mean it's now the new law.
Ok, since you have documented it, please post those peoples quotes, I want to see what THEY say as their reasoning for discrimination is. I want to see where they use their religion as a way to discriminate against black people.
"OOOOOHHH...just as i thought...you're a hypocrite and don't want to answer the question!!"
So what you're saying is, the prostitute can choose not to participate in an activity with a gay person, and that's OK, but if a baker doesn't want to participate in an activity with a gay person, then that's a crime?
Really? None at all? Because you say so. 2 logical falacies in 6 words. 1. Appeal to ignorance 2. Appeal to authority
Good ******* grief! Don't you ever get tire of blathering? It is all just words. It is what it is. I would acknowledge that they REPEALED CASE LAW that was considered settle law. I would not RESPECT it or ACCEPT IT because they would have overturned a decision that was based on sound constitutional grounds and which will upend coutless lives just to satisfy their idological blood lust.
Do you own damned homework! I did enough to make my case
Because the United States Constitution contains no such text, and the 10th Amendment dictates what happens when the Constitution is silent on a topic.
So you are a textualist. and in a in a small minority of constitutional wonks . The Tenth Amendment amendment that reserves to the states is not absolute and does not allow for states to flaut either inumerated or implied rights.
That is exactly what I am saying. I can't help it if your too stupid to understand the difference. The prostitute does not iengage in same sex relationships and that is her right, It is her body. The baker is not being asked to do any such thing.
Idiot! She does not do gay sex! it is about her sexual orientation. She is not refusing the lesbian out of an imosity or dislike of here as a person. I still don't know if you are really that stupid , or just playing a sick game here .
Baking a ******* cake is not participating in the wedding and he did infact reject them because they are gay
That "participation" vs discrimination is just pure an d utter bullshit. The baker engaged in discrimination. Period. YOU are the hypocrit and using word games to justify it. And while you claim that your bible does not condone discrimination against gays and blacks, there are many who disagree.
Discrimination requires no justification.
