Ted Cruz is the man.

[Pete7469]

Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against Ted Cruz personally, he may actually be the best choice among a field of bad choices, I think the United States can do better but those worthy of the job won't run (or are dead).

As far as "practicing his craft" he's a lawyer and as far as I'm concerned lawyers are useless.

Generally speaking I view lawyers as parasites, worse than "useless".

There's an honest handful in the bunch though.

 

[Davros]

Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against Ted Cruz personally, he may actually be the best choice among a field of bad choices, I think the United States can do better but those worthy of the job won't run (or are dead).

As far as "practicing his craft" he's a lawyer and as far as I'm concerned lawyers are useless.

Generally speaking I view lawyers as parasites, worse than "useless".

There's an honest handful in the bunch though.

What makes you think Cruz is honest? Because he says what you want to hear?

 

[Pete7469]

All I know is I'm glad there are regulations to limit pollution. The capitalists don't care about the environments they plunder as long as they can make their corporate decisions in far away, climate controlled, air filtered office buildings.

Cruz wants fracking regulation to be purely the purview of the states. So in Texas there will be polluted water.

He also wants fracking in our national parks. Leave the parks alone, you jackasses.

That's intellectually dishonest, NO ONE is willing to do significant damage to the environment because they'll lose whatever profits come out of it in courts. This attitude that rich corporate people are monsters willing to destroy the earth for money is asinine. They have to live here too, and they know that even if the bureaucrooks don't come after them, lawyers will.

I don't see a problem in getting resources out of parks. Perhaps you're picturing drilling rigs in a playground. After the extraction is done, the companies will have to return the site to it's natural state.

 

[Pete7469]

What makes you think Cruz is honest? Because he says what you want to hear?

Because he hasn't done anything to violate my trust, like the moonbat messiah did yet libtards don't seem to put much value in honesty.

Remember obozo saying he would cut the deficit in half and close gitmo?

 

[Cecilie1200]

You mean burdensome regulations like preventing corporations from polluting our air and water?

That's bullshit and you know it. No one wants that done.

We do need regulation reform, and to eliminate redundant bureaucracies.

What do you think unregulated fracking does to our water?

I think the question is, what do YOU think it does, and what's your proof?

Cruz wants to remove regulations from fracking. Do you trust corporations to fracking responsibly if they are not required to? I sure don't. History shows that resource extraction companies don't give a damn about the environment unless they're forced to give a damn.

History shows that environmental activist groups are egregiously dishonest sacks of shit, but I'll bet money you're not aware of that, don't care, or both.

All I know is I'm glad there are regulations to limit pollution. The capitalists don't care about the environments they plunder as long as they can make their corporate decisions in far away, climate controlled, air filtered office buildings.

Cruz wants fracking regulation to be purely the purview of the states. So in Texas there will be polluted water.

He also wants fracking in our national parks. Leave the parks alone, you jackasses.

You'd have been more accurate if you'd followed "All I know is . . ." with nothing, because that's really all you know.

 

[Davros]

All I know is I'm glad there are regulations to limit pollution. The capitalists don't care about the environments they plunder as long as they can make their corporate decisions in far away, climate controlled, air filtered office buildings.

Cruz wants fracking regulation to be purely the purview of the states. So in Texas there will be polluted water.

He also wants fracking in our national parks. Leave the parks alone, you jackasses.

That's intellectually dishonest, NO ONE is willing to do significant damage to the environment because they'll lose whatever profits come out of it in courts. This attitude that rich corporate people are monsters willing to destroy the earth for money is asinine. They have to live here too, and they know that even if the bureaucrooks don't come after them, lawyers will.

I don't see a problem in getting resources out of parks. Perhaps you're picturing drilling rigs in a playground. After the extraction is done, the companies will have to return the site to it's natural state.

There are thousands of examples of corporations ruining the environment by negligent cost cutting measures or simply not caring. Many come from back in the day when the government didn't care about the environment either. But it continues today.
World's top firms cause $2.2tn of environmental damage, report estimates

As to your other point ... bullshit. Leave our national parks alone, jackasses.

 

[Davros]

What makes you think Cruz is honest? Because he says what you want to hear?

Because he hasn't done anything to violate my trust, like the moonbat messiah did yet libtards don't seem to put much value in honesty.

Remember obozo saying he would cut the deficit in half and close gitmo?

Cruz lies like the whole lot of politicians. It is documented.

Ted Cruz's file | PolitiFact Texas

Ted Cruz's Claim to Truth Is a Big Fat Lie

 

[Davros]

You mean burdensome regulations like preventing corporations from polluting our air and water?

That's bullshit and you know it. No one wants that done.

We do need regulation reform, and to eliminate redundant bureaucracies.

What do you think unregulated fracking does to our water?

I think the question is, what do YOU think it does, and what's your proof?

Cruz wants to remove regulations from fracking. Do you trust corporations to fracking responsibly if they are not required to? I sure don't. History shows that resource extraction companies don't give a damn about the environment unless they're forced to give a damn.

History shows that environmental activist groups are egregiously dishonest sacks of shit, but I'll bet money you're not aware of that, don't care, or both.

All I know is I'm glad there are regulations to limit pollution. The capitalists don't care about the environments they plunder as long as they can make their corporate decisions in far away, climate controlled, air filtered office buildings.

Cruz wants fracking regulation to be purely the purview of the states. So in Texas there will be polluted water.

He also wants fracking in our national parks. Leave the parks alone, you jackasses.

You'd have been more accurate if you'd followed "All I know is . . ." with nothing, because that's really all you know.

I've forgotten more than you've ever known.

 

[Pete7469]

Cruz lies like the whole lot of politicians. It is documented.

Ted Cruz's file | PolitiFact Texas

Ted Cruz's Claim to Truth Is a Big Fat Lie

I'll believe something politifact prints when they start dissecting the volumes of lies told by democrooks.

Politifact is a leftist agitprop office and very little it publishes should be taken seriously. HuffPo speaks for itself, you're an idiot if you believe anything they print.

 

[Davros]

Cruz lies like the whole lot of politicians. It is documented.

Ted Cruz's file | PolitiFact Texas

Ted Cruz's Claim to Truth Is a Big Fat Lie

I'll believe something politifact prints when they start dissecting the volumes of lies told by democrooks.

Politifact is a leftist agitprop office and very little it publishes should be taken seriously. HuffPo speaks for itself, you're an idiot if you believe anything they print.

Suit yourself.

 

[Pete7469]

There are thousands of examples of corporations ruining the environment by negligent cost cutting measures or simply not caring. Many come from back in the day when the government didn't care about the environment either. But it continues today.
World's top firms cause $2.2tn of environmental damage, report estimates

As to your other point ... bullshit. Leave our national parks alone, jackasses.

I know there are thousands of bullshit stories about "evil corporations" wiping out elven habitat. The Keebler Elves have been extinct since Nabisco wiped them out in the 1970's because they didn't want the competition.

Gimmie a fuckin break. The UN reports something about the libtard whipping boys known as "Capitalists" destroying the environment and you just gobble it up.

The fact remains, in the US companies will get sued into oblivion even if bureaucrooks don't sanction companies for pollution. We have the most pristine environment in the industrialized world. If the chinks and wogs let global corporations shit all over them, how is it our problem?

Furthermore is that really all you got against Ted Cruz? You really have no problem with burdensome taxation, an executive who rewrites laws, allows their AG to cover up and stonewall investigations and empowers a bureaucracy to regulate something you exhale?

Do you huff aerosols?

 

[Siete]

Teddie ... another "The Man" who won't even get a whiff of the GOP nomination ..

but hey, RW's love losers.

 

[g5000]

Let the record show that as usual, Rush is right.

In fact, I challenge anybody reading this to make an objective case there is a more principled candidate in the race than Mr. Cruz — because you can’t.

Sanders is at least as principled as Cruz, if not more. Just on the other end of the spectrum.

I respect both for their steadfastness, even though I disagree with them.

 

[Toro]

The most principled conservative is Trump.

Nobody is as principled as Trump!

 

[Indeependent]

Where Donald Trump and Ted Cruz Completely Disagree on Immigration

Sells out Americans at the drop of a Contributor's Dime? Screw Cruz.

 

[Pete7469]

Where Donald Trump and Ted Cruz Completely Disagree on Immigration

Sells out Americans at the drop of a Contributor's Dime? Screw Cruz.

Legal immigration isn't a problem for me. We need the labor, and having LEGAL immigrants will ensure they're paid at least the minimum wage and contribute too the SS Tax. Companies want cheaper labor, and I don't see why it's a problem. These people will come in, earn money and buy shit.

Do we need a good plan to assimilate them? Of course we do. If criminal illegals and welfare parasites are thrown out and kept out we can allow more legal ones in.

 

[Cecilie1200]

That's bullshit and you know it. No one wants that done.

We do need regulation reform, and to eliminate redundant bureaucracies.

What do you think unregulated fracking does to our water?

I think the question is, what do YOU think it does, and what's your proof?

Cruz wants to remove regulations from fracking. Do you trust corporations to fracking responsibly if they are not required to? I sure don't. History shows that resource extraction companies don't give a damn about the environment unless they're forced to give a damn.

History shows that environmental activist groups are egregiously dishonest sacks of shit, but I'll bet money you're not aware of that, don't care, or both.

All I know is I'm glad there are regulations to limit pollution. The capitalists don't care about the environments they plunder as long as they can make their corporate decisions in far away, climate controlled, air filtered office buildings.

Cruz wants fracking regulation to be purely the purview of the states. So in Texas there will be polluted water.

He also wants fracking in our national parks. Leave the parks alone, you jackasses.

You'd have been more accurate if you'd followed "All I know is . . ." with nothing, because that's really all you know.

I've forgotten more than you've ever known.

So the problem is that you're senile, rather than just being a dumbass? Thanks for sharing.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Teddie ... another "The Man" who won't even get a whiff of the GOP nomination ..

but hey, RW's love losers.

Uh huh. The Democrats are running a proud socialist and a hag that's being investigated for federal crimes, and WE are the ones with loser candidates? In your dreams.

 

[oreo]

Let the record show that as usual, Rush is right.

In fact, I challenge anybody reading this to make an objective case there is a more principled candidate in the race than Mr. Cruz — because you can’t. I also work for an organization called Conservative Review, which gives regularly scheduled proctology exams to the records of politicians by charting how they vote on a full spectrum of conservative issues via our “liberty scorecard.” Mr. Cruz currently has our second-highest score at 96 percent, which is second only to Mike Lee.

I've been a Ted Cruz fan since he ran for the senate. His candidacy upset the ambitions of RINO David Dewhurst and he has stuck to the principles he campaigned on. Very few political whores go to DC and govern as they said they would. Cruz has maintained a top tier slot, not rising or falling and I truly hope he is the GOP nominee.


[/QUOTE

Please don't tell me you're a Reich wing radio talk show fan. Rush Limbaugh, Shawn Hannity, Mark Levin are "entertainers." They get on the radio to entertain their audiences--who typically don't want to take the time to do their own homework on the candidates they support. They prey on political ignorance for ratings. They are required to keep their audiences at a certain level of hysteria for ratings--which equals mo MONEY.

This is where the Trump pom-pom rallies are played out. None of them have disclosed to you that Donald Trump is so liberal--he might as well be running on the Democrat ticket. He has a well defined history of supporting liberal democrat policies.
Column: Trump exploits rational political ignorance

I still blame blame Rush Limbaugh for our 2012 loss. This when he went on a rant about Sandra Plumb--(someone we would have never known about) who ended up on the Democrat National Convention stage giving a speech. All because Limbaugh wanted to go into a rage over the cost of birth control pills and called her a slut. Since that day I have not turned his program back on.

Ted Cruz is not electable in this country. He's too far right. Women nor Hispanics would ever vote for him. Rush Limbaugh, Shawn Hannity & Mark Levin won't tell you that either. If they did-- you would turn off the radio--meaning LESS money. Here is a very good article about Ted Cruz in Real Clear Politics. You should read this:
What Ted Cruz Really Stands For | RealClearPolitics

In fact you should read both of those articles.

 

[oreo]

Let the record show that as usual, Rush is right.

In fact, I challenge anybody reading this to make an objective case there is a more principled candidate in the race than Mr. Cruz — because you can’t. I also work for an organization called Conservative Review, which gives regularly scheduled proctology exams to the records of politicians by charting how they vote on a full spectrum of conservative issues via our “liberty scorecard.” Mr. Cruz currently has our second-highest score at 96 percent, which is second only to Mike Lee.

I've been a Ted Cruz fan since he ran for the senate. His candidacy upset the ambitions of RINO David Dewhurst and he has stuck to the principles he campaigned on. Very few political whores go to DC and govern as they said they would. Cruz has maintained a top tier slot, not rising or falling and I truly hope he is the GOP nominee.


[/QUOTE

Please don't tell me you're a Reich wing radio talk show fan. Rush Limbaugh, Shawn Hannity, Mark Levin are "entertainers." They get on the radio to entertain their audiences--who typically don't want to take the time to do their own homework on the candidates they support. They prey on political ignorance for ratings. They are required to keep their audiences at a certain level of hysteria for ratings--which equals mo MONEY.

This is where the Trump pom-pom rallies are played out. None of them have disclosed to you that Donald Trump is so liberal--he might as well be running on the Democrat ticket. He has a well defined history of supporting liberal democrat policies.
Column: Trump exploits rational political ignorance

I still blame blame Rush Limbaugh for our 2012 loss. This when he went on a rant about Sandra Plumb--(someone we would have never known about) who ended up on the Democrat National Convention stage giving a speech. All because Limbaugh wanted to go into a rage over the cost of birth control pills and called her a slut. Since that day I have not turned his program again.

Ted Cruz is not electable in this country. There is nothing Principled about him. Ted Cruz is doiong this for Ted Cruz. He's too far right. Women nor Hispanics would ever vote for him. There is NOTHING principled about Ted Cruz. Ted Cruz is in this for Ted Cruz.
What Ted Cruz Really Stands For | RealClearPolitics

Rush Limbaugh, Shawn Hannity & Mark Levin won't tell you that either. If they did-- you would turn off the radio--meaning LESS money. Here is a very good article about Ted Cruz in Real Clear Politics. You should read this:

A little more reading & less talk radio goes a very long way.

You should read both those articles