Teaching Kids About Climate Change

[GreenBean]

The recent student demonstrations about Climate Change brought predictable reactions from the political Left and Right. The Right attributed the demonstrations to children being brainwashed by Leftist teachers, and the Left commended the little darlings for speaking out about a vital crisis, potentially impacting all of humanity.

Ahem...

But shouldn't it be possible to develop a basic set of "things" that students ought to be taught on this subject, without muddying the water with hyperbole, exaggerations, unhealthy dismissiveness, political agendae, and so forth?

(1) The climate is gradually changing now, as it always does. It is slowly getting warmer, and human activity is accelerating the process. The human emissions that are most contributory to the "greenhouse effect" are well known, and controllable to some extent.

(2) The extent and impacts of the future climate changes over a given period of years is a matter of considerable debate. Projections of the past 50 years have been uniformly exaggerated, most conspicuously the melting of polar icecaps, rising of sea levels, and the incidence of severe weather events, none of which is actually borne out by the available data.

(3) Climate change will be long-lasting and very gradual. Most will be dealt with through engineering solutions (sea walls, desalination, irrigation, etc.), and in the worst cases, movement of populations away from vulnerable, sea-level habitations. No one's home will be swept away overnight due to rising seas. They will have moved long before that is even possible.

(4) Much of the activity that generates "greenhouse gases" can be reduced or eliminated with known measures, however, there are many greenhouse-gas-generating activities such as transportation, manufacturing, and agriculture that would require major upheavals and changes to life activities to reduce significantly.

(5) Some geographical areas will benefit from a warming climate, some will see little difference, and some will be harmed significantly. It would be beneficial to examine all three for future planning.

(6) Don't believe everything you hear or read. Many, if not most, people spreading the story of Climate Change have a political agenda that affects the information they distribute. Do your own research, and look for actual data and not opinions.

(7) No Americans living today will die from the effects of Climate Change. Don't worry about it.

The silenced: meet the climate whistleblowers muzzled by Trump

Six whistleblowers and ex-government scientists describe how the Trump administration made them bury climate science – and why they won’t stay quiet

by Oliver Milman

And every one is a far left climate fool.... Or is it Tool... You really need to look at their science before you believe any of these people.

Far left? Really? How do you know that? You don't . You just decided that based on the fact that you don't like what they are saying. Admit it. They are career scientists and not driven by politics.

I did look at the science, You need to look at their stories. Again I ask, if their science is so faulty, why try to silence them rather that having an honest and open debate on the issue. Why is the Trump administration afraid of them?

Reading politicized pseudo-propoganda disguised as science does not make you a scientist anymore than going to McDonald’s makes you a hamburger. Here's a scientific FACT for you - Some days you’re the bug, other days you’re the windshield - why do you insist on allways being the bug - do you have masochistic tendencies ??? Or is that another form of sexual dysphoria from the queer loving Northeast ?

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Trump Trolling Tuesday. “Much to my surprise, the little Swedish climate brat became even more tedious as Monday wore on. We’ve not been subjected to that kind of ubiquity on social media since the last time Hillary Clinton was caught fondling a mango at Whole Foods by one of her ‘neighbors’.”

You should have more respect for your betters, both Gretta and Clinton. Now lets see if you can come up with something intelligent and appropriate.

The Left's exploitation of her is child abuse.

Horseshit! No one is exploiting her. Child abuse is ignoring the effects that climate change will have on the children of tomorrow

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

The recent student demonstrations about Climate Change brought predictable reactions from the political Left and Right. The Right attributed the demonstrations to children being brainwashed by Leftist teachers, and the Left commended the little darlings for speaking out about a vital crisis, potentially impacting all of humanity.

Ahem...

But shouldn't it be possible to develop a basic set of "things" that students ought to be taught on this subject, without muddying the water with hyperbole, exaggerations, unhealthy dismissiveness, political agendae, and so forth?

(1) The climate is gradually changing now, as it always does. It is slowly getting warmer, and human activity is accelerating the process. The human emissions that are most contributory to the "greenhouse effect" are well known, and controllable to some extent.

(2) The extent and impacts of the future climate changes over a given period of years is a matter of considerable debate. Projections of the past 50 years have been uniformly exaggerated, most conspicuously the melting of polar icecaps, rising of sea levels, and the incidence of severe weather events, none of which is actually borne out by the available data.

(3) Climate change will be long-lasting and very gradual. Most will be dealt with through engineering solutions (sea walls, desalination, irrigation, etc.), and in the worst cases, movement of populations away from vulnerable, sea-level habitations. No one's home will be swept away overnight due to rising seas. They will have moved long before that is even possible.

(4) Much of the activity that generates "greenhouse gases" can be reduced or eliminated with known measures, however, there are many greenhouse-gas-generating activities such as transportation, manufacturing, and agriculture that would require major upheavals and changes to life activities to reduce significantly.

(5) Some geographical areas will benefit from a warming climate, some will see little difference, and some will be harmed significantly. It would be beneficial to examine all three for future planning.

(6) Don't believe everything you hear or read. Many, if not most, people spreading the story of Climate Change have a political agenda that affects the information they distribute. Do your own research, and look for actual data and not opinions.

(7) No Americans living today will die from the effects of Climate Change. Don't worry about it.

The silenced: meet the climate whistleblowers muzzled by Trump

Six whistleblowers and ex-government scientists describe how the Trump administration made them bury climate science – and why they won’t stay quiet

by Oliver Milman

Six unhappy bureaucrats is nothing compared to the vilification of any scientist that dares to speak their mind in opposition to the climate change industrial complex.

They are not bureaucrats ! They are scientists! And they are unhappy because they are not being allowed to do their work . The deniers that we vilify are in the pockets of the corporations or are beholden to the religious right who believes that only god can change the climate

 

[Natural Citizen]

Horseshit! No one is exploiting her.

Sure they are. She has nothing to say that adults haven't taught to her. Her One.org handlers are by her side pretty much every place she goes. The funny thing about it is that it's backfiring monumentally. lol.

Thing about manufactured opposition is that it's so transparent.

 

[Zorro!]

Trump Trolling Tuesday. “Much to my surprise, the little Swedish climate brat became even more tedious as Monday wore on. We’ve not been subjected to that kind of ubiquity on social media since the last time Hillary Clinton was caught fondling a mango at Whole Foods by one of her ‘neighbors’.”

You should have more respect for your betters, both Gretta and Clinton. Now lets see if you can come up with something intelligent and appropriate.

The Left's exploitation of her is child abuse.

Horseshit! No one is exploiting her. Child abuse is ignoring the effects that climate change will have on the children of tomorrow

Yeah right. This poor girl suffers from something on the Autism Spectrum and these propagandizing clowns have her trembling with fear that she will never grow into a adulthood. A bald-faced lie and everyone with a brain knows it. Everyone involved should be hanging their heads in shame and begging for forgiveness.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Trump Trolling Tuesday. “Much to my surprise, the little Swedish climate brat became even more tedious as Monday wore on. We’ve not been subjected to that kind of ubiquity on social media since the last time Hillary Clinton was caught fondling a mango at Whole Foods by one of her ‘neighbors’.”

You should have more respect for your betters, both Gretta and Clinton. Now lets see if you can come up with something intelligent and appropriate.

The Left's exploitation of her is child abuse.

Horseshit! No one is exploiting her. Child abuse is ignoring the effects that climate change will have on the children of tomorrow

Yeah right. This poor girl suffers from something on the Autism Spectrum and these propagandizing clowns have her trembling with fear that she will never grow into a adulthood. A bald-faced lie and everyone with a brain knows it. Everyone involved should be hanging their heads in shame and begging for forgiveness.

Unlike you, she is all ready an adult-and fearless


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[baileyn45]

The recent student demonstrations about Climate Change brought predictable reactions from the political Left and Right. The Right attributed the demonstrations to children being brainwashed by Leftist teachers, and the Left commended the little darlings for speaking out about a vital crisis, potentially impacting all of humanity.

Ahem...

But shouldn't it be possible to develop a basic set of "things" that students ought to be taught on this subject, without muddying the water with hyperbole, exaggerations, unhealthy dismissiveness, political agendae, and so forth?

(1) The climate is gradually changing now, as it always does. It is slowly getting warmer, and human activity is accelerating the process. The human emissions that are most contributory to the "greenhouse effect" are well known, and controllable to some extent.

(2) The extent and impacts of the future climate changes over a given period of years is a matter of considerable debate. Projections of the past 50 years have been uniformly exaggerated, most conspicuously the melting of polar icecaps, rising of sea levels, and the incidence of severe weather events, none of which is actually borne out by the available data.

(3) Climate change will be long-lasting and very gradual. Most will be dealt with through engineering solutions (sea walls, desalination, irrigation, etc.), and in the worst cases, movement of populations away from vulnerable, sea-level habitations. No one's home will be swept away overnight due to rising seas. They will have moved long before that is even possible.

(4) Much of the activity that generates "greenhouse gases" can be reduced or eliminated with known measures, however, there are many greenhouse-gas-generating activities such as transportation, manufacturing, and agriculture that would require major upheavals and changes to life activities to reduce significantly.

(5) Some geographical areas will benefit from a warming climate, some will see little difference, and some will be harmed significantly. It would be beneficial to examine all three for future planning.

(6) Don't believe everything you hear or read. Many, if not most, people spreading the story of Climate Change have a political agenda that affects the information they distribute. Do your own research, and look for actual data and not opinions.

(7) No Americans living today will die from the effects of Climate Change. Don't worry about it.

The silenced: meet the climate whistleblowers muzzled by Trump

Six whistleblowers and ex-government scientists describe how the Trump administration made them bury climate science – and why they won’t stay quiet

by Oliver Milman

Six unhappy bureaucrats is nothing compared to the vilification of any scientist that dares to speak their mind in opposition to the climate change industrial complex.

They are not bureaucrats ! They are scientists! And they are unhappy because they are not being allowed to do their work . The deniers that we vilify are in the pockets of the corporations or are beholden to the religious right who believes that only god can change the climate

And meanwhile the alarmists are feeding at the govt trough. Go through the six of them, there isn't one that's actually in a position to add to the climate debate. Meanwhile phds in relevant fields are ridiculed and attacked for actually wanting to discuss the science.

 

[Zorro!]

The recent student demonstrations about Climate Change brought predictable reactions from the political Left and Right. The Right attributed the demonstrations to children being brainwashed by Leftist teachers, and the Left commended the little darlings for speaking out about a vital crisis, potentially impacting all of humanity.

Ahem...

But shouldn't it be possible to develop a basic set of "things" that students ought to be taught on this subject, without muddying the water with hyperbole, exaggerations, unhealthy dismissiveness, political agendae, and so forth?

(1) The climate is gradually changing now, as it always does. It is slowly getting warmer, and human activity is accelerating the process. The human emissions that are most contributory to the "greenhouse effect" are well known, and controllable to some extent.

(2) The extent and impacts of the future climate changes over a given period of years is a matter of considerable debate. Projections of the past 50 years have been uniformly exaggerated, most conspicuously the melting of polar icecaps, rising of sea levels, and the incidence of severe weather events, none of which is actually borne out by the available data.

(3) Climate change will be long-lasting and very gradual. Most will be dealt with through engineering solutions (sea walls, desalination, irrigation, etc.), and in the worst cases, movement of populations away from vulnerable, sea-level habitations. No one's home will be swept away overnight due to rising seas. They will have moved long before that is even possible.

(4) Much of the activity that generates "greenhouse gases" can be reduced or eliminated with known measures, however, there are many greenhouse-gas-generating activities such as transportation, manufacturing, and agriculture that would require major upheavals and changes to life activities to reduce significantly.

(5) Some geographical areas will benefit from a warming climate, some will see little difference, and some will be harmed significantly. It would be beneficial to examine all three for future planning.

(6) Don't believe everything you hear or read. Many, if not most, people spreading the story of Climate Change have a political agenda that affects the information they distribute. Do your own research, and look for actual data and not opinions.

(7) No Americans living today will die from the effects of Climate Change. Don't worry about it.

The silenced: meet the climate whistleblowers muzzled by Trump

Six whistleblowers and ex-government scientists describe how the Trump administration made them bury climate science – and why they won’t stay quiet

by Oliver Milman

Six unhappy bureaucrats is nothing compared to the vilification of any scientist that dares to speak their mind in opposition to the climate change industrial complex.

They are not bureaucrats ! They are scientists! And they are unhappy because they are not being allowed to do their work . The deniers that we vilify are in the pockets of the corporations or are beholden to the religious right who believes that only god can change the climate

And meanwhile the alarmists are feeding at the govt trough. Go through the six of them, there isn't one that's actually in a position to add to the climate debate. Meanwhile phds in relevant fields are ridiculed and attacked for actually wanting to discuss the science.

They can't discus the science and prevail, so they attack those that disagree with them with the passion of the Zealous attacking what they view as heresy.

 

[skye]

By all means teach ....but

not by these kind of people....please!!!!!!

 

[Pilot1]

I buy Carbon Credits from my own Carbon Credit company. Tell the kids to do the same thing. Everybody wins!

 

[GreenBean]

Global warming is a hoax. That's what they need to know

Tell that to Gretta. She will lay you out cold like she did to the so called world "leaders " at the UN

Greta Thunberg To World Leaders At UN Climate Summit: 'How Dare You!' | HuffPost

Teen activist Greta Thunberg delivered a powerful rebuke to world leaders at the United Nations Climate Action Summit on Monday, accusing them of turning a blind eye to global climate problems in exchange for profits and temporary economic growth.

“I shouldn’t be standing here. I should be back in school on the other side of the ocean. Yet you all come to me for hope? How dare you! You have stolen my dreams and my childhood with your empty words,” the 16-year-old Swede said while appearing to fight back tears.

Like many teenagers Greta is stuffed with her own self importance. No one comes to her for hope. She is filled with teen age angst not hope. She needs to go home and get laid by her boyfriend. You have stolen my dreams. Ohhh the draaammmmaaa. It's hormones give her a hanky and a candy bar

have never seen a girl so young and with so many mental disorders treated by so many adults as a guru

What is so fascinating about this Thunberg cult is not just that she’s believed so fervently even though she’s wrong.

But Thunberg has something very rare as well — a sense of absolute certainty. She shows not the slightest doubt and forgives not the slightest compromise. This allows followers who are tormented with doubt and burden of freedom to relax into her totalitarian certainty.

And in Thunberg’s case, that certainty comes from what normally would be seen as a disability.

If we can believe a book by her mother, opera soprano and Eurovision contestant Malena Ernman, Thunberg went two months without eating when she was 11.

She suffered years of depression and anxiety attacks and was finally diagnosed with Asperger’s syndrome, high-functioning autism, and Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. Her intense fear of the climate is not surprising from someone with disorders which intensify fears. --- Andrew Bolt

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

The recent student demonstrations about Climate Change brought predictable reactions from the political Left and Right. The Right attributed the demonstrations to children being brainwashed by Leftist teachers, and the Left commended the little darlings for speaking out about a vital crisis, potentially impacting all of humanity.

Ahem...

But shouldn't it be possible to develop a basic set of "things" that students ought to be taught on this subject, without muddying the water with hyperbole, exaggerations, unhealthy dismissiveness, political agendae, and so forth?

(1) The climate is gradually changing now, as it always does. It is slowly getting warmer, and human activity is accelerating the process. The human emissions that are most contributory to the "greenhouse effect" are well known, and controllable to some extent.

(2) The extent and impacts of the future climate changes over a given period of years is a matter of considerable debate. Projections of the past 50 years have been uniformly exaggerated, most conspicuously the melting of polar icecaps, rising of sea levels, and the incidence of severe weather events, none of which is actually borne out by the available data.

(3) Climate change will be long-lasting and very gradual. Most will be dealt with through engineering solutions (sea walls, desalination, irrigation, etc.), and in the worst cases, movement of populations away from vulnerable, sea-level habitations. No one's home will be swept away overnight due to rising seas. They will have moved long before that is even possible.

(4) Much of the activity that generates "greenhouse gases" can be reduced or eliminated with known measures, however, there are many greenhouse-gas-generating activities such as transportation, manufacturing, and agriculture that would require major upheavals and changes to life activities to reduce significantly.

(5) Some geographical areas will benefit from a warming climate, some will see little difference, and some will be harmed significantly. It would be beneficial to examine all three for future planning.

(6) Don't believe everything you hear or read. Many, if not most, people spreading the story of Climate Change have a political agenda that affects the information they distribute. Do your own research, and look for actual data and not opinions.

(7) No Americans living today will die from the effects of Climate Change. Don't worry about it.

The silenced: meet the climate whistleblowers muzzled by Trump

Six whistleblowers and ex-government scientists describe how the Trump administration made them bury climate science – and why they won’t stay quiet

by Oliver Milman

Six unhappy bureaucrats is nothing compared to the vilification of any scientist that dares to speak their mind in opposition to the climate change industrial complex.

They are not bureaucrats ! They are scientists! And they are unhappy because they are not being allowed to do their work . The deniers that we vilify are in the pockets of the corporations or are beholden to the religious right who believes that only god can change the climate

And meanwhile the alarmists are feeding at the govt trough. Go through the six of them, there isn't one that's actually in a position to add to the climate debate. Meanwhile phds in relevant fields are ridiculed and attacked for actually wanting to discuss the science.

The World’s Oceans Are in Danger, Major Climate Change Report Warns

WASHINGTON — Earth’s oceans are under severe strain from climate change, a major new United Nations report warns, threatening everything from the ability to harvest seafood to the well-being of hundreds of millions of people living along the coasts.

Rising temperatures are contributing to a drop in fish populations in many regions, and oxygen levels in the ocean are declining while acidity levels are on the rise, posing risks to important marine ecosystems, according to the report issued Wednesday by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a group of scientists convened by the United Nations to guide world leaders in

 

[GreenBean]

The recent student demonstrations about Climate Change brought predictable reactions from the political Left and Right. The Right attributed the demonstrations to children being brainwashed by Leftist teachers, and the Left commended the little darlings for speaking out about a vital crisis, potentially impacting all of humanity.

Ahem...

But shouldn't it be possible to develop a basic set of "things" that students ought to be taught on this subject, without muddying the water with hyperbole, exaggerations, unhealthy dismissiveness, political agendae, and so forth?

(1) The climate is gradually changing now, as it always does. It is slowly getting warmer, and human activity is accelerating the process. The human emissions that are most contributory to the "greenhouse effect" are well known, and controllable to some extent.

(2) The extent and impacts of the future climate changes over a given period of years is a matter of considerable debate. Projections of the past 50 years have been uniformly exaggerated, most conspicuously the melting of polar icecaps, rising of sea levels, and the incidence of severe weather events, none of which is actually borne out by the available data.

(3) Climate change will be long-lasting and very gradual. Most will be dealt with through engineering solutions (sea walls, desalination, irrigation, etc.), and in the worst cases, movement of populations away from vulnerable, sea-level habitations. No one's home will be swept away overnight due to rising seas. They will have moved long before that is even possible.

(4) Much of the activity that generates "greenhouse gases" can be reduced or eliminated with known measures, however, there are many greenhouse-gas-generating activities such as transportation, manufacturing, and agriculture that would require major upheavals and changes to life activities to reduce significantly.

(5) Some geographical areas will benefit from a warming climate, some will see little difference, and some will be harmed significantly. It would be beneficial to examine all three for future planning.

(6) Don't believe everything you hear or read. Many, if not most, people spreading the story of Climate Change have a political agenda that affects the information they distribute. Do your own research, and look for actual data and not opinions.

(7) No Americans living today will die from the effects of Climate Change. Don't worry about it.

The silenced: meet the climate whistleblowers muzzled by Trump

Six whistleblowers and ex-government scientists describe how the Trump administration made them bury climate science – and why they won’t stay quiet

by Oliver Milman

Six unhappy bureaucrats is nothing compared to the vilification of any scientist that dares to speak their mind in opposition to the climate change industrial complex.

They are not bureaucrats ! They are scientists! And they are unhappy because they are not being allowed to do their work . The deniers that we vilify are in the pockets of the corporations or are beholden to the religious right who believes that only god can change the climate

And meanwhile the alarmists are feeding at the govt trough. Go through the six of them, there isn't one that's actually in a position to add to the climate debate. Meanwhile phds in relevant fields are ridiculed and attacked for actually wanting to discuss the science.

The World’s Oceans Are in Danger, Major Climate Change Report Warns

WASHINGTON — Earth’s oceans are under severe strain from climate change, a major new United Nations report warns, threatening everything from the ability to harvest seafood to the well-being of hundreds of millions of people living along the coasts.

Rising temperatures are contributing to a drop in fish populations in many regions, and oxygen levels in the ocean are declining while acidity levels are on the rise, posing risks to important marine ecosystems, according to the report issued Wednesday by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a group of scientists convened by the United Nations to guide world leaders in

Gore predicted sea levels would rise 20 feet by 2100, at the current rate we will see about a foot by 2100. 80% of the tide gauges show less rise than the official “global average”. Many show no rise in sea level at all, and almost none show any acceleration over the past 20 years.

"At most, global average sea level is rising at a rate equivalent to 2-3 inches per century.

Sea level is measured both by tide gauges and, since 1992, by satellite altimetry. One of the keepers of the satellite record told Professor Mörner that the record had been interfered with to show sea level rising, because the raw data from the satellites showed no increase in global sea level at all." http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/reprint/sea_level_not_rising.pdf

 

[Zorro!]

Global warming is a hoax. That's what they need to know

Tell that to Gretta. She will lay you out cold like she did to the so called world "leaders " at the UN

Greta Thunberg To World Leaders At UN Climate Summit: 'How Dare You!' | HuffPost

Teen activist Greta Thunberg delivered a powerful rebuke to world leaders at the United Nations Climate Action Summit on Monday, accusing them of turning a blind eye to global climate problems in exchange for profits and temporary economic growth.

“I shouldn’t be standing here. I should be back in school on the other side of the ocean. Yet you all come to me for hope? How dare you! You have stolen my dreams and my childhood with your empty words,” the 16-year-old Swede said while appearing to fight back tears.

Like many teenagers Greta is stuffed with her own self importance. No one comes to her for hope. She is filled with teen age angst not hope. She needs to go home and get laid by her boyfriend. You have stolen my dreams. Ohhh the draaammmmaaa. It's hormones give her a hanky and a candy bar

have never seen a girl so young and with so many mental disorders treated by so many adults as a guru

What is so fascinating about this Thunberg cult is not just that she’s believed so fervently even though she’s wrong.

But Thunberg has something very rare as well — a sense of absolute certainty. She shows not the slightest doubt and forgives not the slightest compromise. This allows followers who are tormented with doubt and burden of freedom to relax into her totalitarian certainty.

And in Thunberg’s case, that certainty comes from what normally would be seen as a disability.

If we can believe a book by her mother, opera soprano and Eurovision contestant Malena Ernman, Thunberg went two months without eating when she was 11.

She suffered years of depression and anxiety attacks and was finally diagnosed with Asperger’s syndrome, high-functioning autism, and Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. Her intense fear of the climate is not surprising from someone with disorders which intensify fears. --- Andrew Bolt

She is how the Left idealizes themselves: Pure, innocent, correct on every point and not to be doubted or questioned. The abuse of her exceeds by many magnitudes even Cindy Sheehan, and when she is no longer of use to them they will promptly and without remorse discard her.

 

[baileyn45]

The recent student demonstrations about Climate Change brought predictable reactions from the political Left and Right. The Right attributed the demonstrations to children being brainwashed by Leftist teachers, and the Left commended the little darlings for speaking out about a vital crisis, potentially impacting all of humanity.

Ahem...

But shouldn't it be possible to develop a basic set of "things" that students ought to be taught on this subject, without muddying the water with hyperbole, exaggerations, unhealthy dismissiveness, political agendae, and so forth?

(1) The climate is gradually changing now, as it always does. It is slowly getting warmer, and human activity is accelerating the process. The human emissions that are most contributory to the "greenhouse effect" are well known, and controllable to some extent.

(2) The extent and impacts of the future climate changes over a given period of years is a matter of considerable debate. Projections of the past 50 years have been uniformly exaggerated, most conspicuously the melting of polar icecaps, rising of sea levels, and the incidence of severe weather events, none of which is actually borne out by the available data.

(3) Climate change will be long-lasting and very gradual. Most will be dealt with through engineering solutions (sea walls, desalination, irrigation, etc.), and in the worst cases, movement of populations away from vulnerable, sea-level habitations. No one's home will be swept away overnight due to rising seas. They will have moved long before that is even possible.

(4) Much of the activity that generates "greenhouse gases" can be reduced or eliminated with known measures, however, there are many greenhouse-gas-generating activities such as transportation, manufacturing, and agriculture that would require major upheavals and changes to life activities to reduce significantly.

(5) Some geographical areas will benefit from a warming climate, some will see little difference, and some will be harmed significantly. It would be beneficial to examine all three for future planning.

(6) Don't believe everything you hear or read. Many, if not most, people spreading the story of Climate Change have a political agenda that affects the information they distribute. Do your own research, and look for actual data and not opinions.

(7) No Americans living today will die from the effects of Climate Change. Don't worry about it.

The silenced: meet the climate whistleblowers muzzled by Trump

Six whistleblowers and ex-government scientists describe how the Trump administration made them bury climate science – and why they won’t stay quiet

by Oliver Milman

Six unhappy bureaucrats is nothing compared to the vilification of any scientist that dares to speak their mind in opposition to the climate change industrial complex.

They are not bureaucrats ! They are scientists! And they are unhappy because they are not being allowed to do their work . The deniers that we vilify are in the pockets of the corporations or are beholden to the religious right who believes that only god can change the climate

And meanwhile the alarmists are feeding at the govt trough. Go through the six of them, there isn't one that's actually in a position to add to the climate debate. Meanwhile phds in relevant fields are ridiculed and attacked for actually wanting to discuss the science.

The World’s Oceans Are in Danger, Major Climate Change Report Warns

WASHINGTON — Earth’s oceans are under severe strain from climate change, a major new United Nations report warns, threatening everything from the ability to harvest seafood to the well-being of hundreds of millions of people living along the coasts.

Rising temperatures are contributing to a drop in fish populations in many regions, and oxygen levels in the ocean are declining while acidity levels are on the rise, posing risks to important marine ecosystems, according to the report issued Wednesday by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a group of scientists convened by the United Nations to guide world leaders in

Is there nothing that can't be blamed on CO2? As far as fish populations, do you think overfishing might have an effect? Agricultural runoff? No it all has to be CO2. Warming oceans do contribute to changes in fish populations in specific areas.
Here's an excerpt from an article describing the phenomenon....

"Reports from fishermen, seal hunters and explorers, he declared, all point to a radical change in climate conditions and hitherto unheard-of temperatures in the Arctic zone. Exploration expeditions report that scarcely any ice has been met with as far north as 81 degrees 29 minutes. Soundings to a depth of 3,100 meters showed the gulf stream still very warm.
Great masses of ice have been replaced by moraines of earth and stones, the report continued, while at many points well known glaciers have entirely disappeared. Very few seals and no white fish are found in the eastern Arctic, while vast shoals of herring and smelts, which have never before ventured so far north, are being encountered in the old seal fishing grounds."

Of course this article is from Nov, 1922.

As far as acidification, you do know that the principal study that proposes this has been attacked for cherry picking data. The study begins its' data in 1988. Here's the data going back 100 years.

Gee, I wonder why they started in 1988.

Oxygen depletion levels, from what I've read, are regional and attributed to ag runoff. Same old story, ignore all other environmental issues and concentrate solely on CO2.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

The silenced: meet the climate whistleblowers muzzled by Trump

Six whistleblowers and ex-government scientists describe how the Trump administration made them bury climate science – and why they won’t stay quiet

by Oliver Milman

Six unhappy bureaucrats is nothing compared to the vilification of any scientist that dares to speak their mind in opposition to the climate change industrial complex.

They are not bureaucrats ! They are scientists! And they are unhappy because they are not being allowed to do their work . The deniers that we vilify are in the pockets of the corporations or are beholden to the religious right who believes that only god can change the climate

And meanwhile the alarmists are feeding at the govt trough. Go through the six of them, there isn't one that's actually in a position to add to the climate debate. Meanwhile phds in relevant fields are ridiculed and attacked for actually wanting to discuss the science.

The World’s Oceans Are in Danger, Major Climate Change Report Warns

WASHINGTON — Earth’s oceans are under severe strain from climate change, a major new United Nations report warns, threatening everything from the ability to harvest seafood to the well-being of hundreds of millions of people living along the coasts.

Rising temperatures are contributing to a drop in fish populations in many regions, and oxygen levels in the ocean are declining while acidity levels are on the rise, posing risks to important marine ecosystems, according to the report issued Wednesday by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a group of scientists convened by the United Nations to guide world leaders in

Is there nothing that can't be blamed on CO2? As far as fish populations, do you think overfishing might have an effect? Agricultural runoff? No it all has to be CO2. Warming oceans do contribute to changes in fish populations in specific areas.
Here's an excerpt from an article describing the phenomenon....

"Reports from fishermen, seal hunters and explorers, he declared, all point to a radical change in climate conditions and hitherto unheard-of temperatures in the Arctic zone. Exploration expeditions report that scarcely any ice has been met with as far north as 81 degrees 29 minutes. Soundings to a depth of 3,100 meters showed the gulf stream still very warm.
Great masses of ice have been replaced by moraines of earth and stones, the report continued, while at many points well known glaciers have entirely disappeared. Very few seals and no white fish are found in the eastern Arctic, while vast shoals of herring and smelts, which have never before ventured so far north, are being encountered in the old seal fishing grounds."

Of course this article is from Nov, 1922.

As far as acidification, you do know that the principal study that proposes this has been attacked for cherry picking data. The study begins its' data in 1988. Here's the data going back 100 years.

Gee, I wonder why they started in 1988.

Oxygen depletion levels, from what I've read, are regional and attributed to ag runoff. Same old story, ignore all other environmental issues and concentrate solely on CO2.

First of all slick. it's customary to provide a link when you post articles . Could it be that you don't want us to know the true origin or the who story. Nah! You climate change deniers are such an honest bunch

But oh look, see what I found

Global Warming: 1922
A

s interesting as this nearly century-old article might be from a modern perspective, however, it isn’t substantive evidence either for or against the concept of anthropogenic global warming. As documented elsewhere, the warming phenomena observed in 1922 proved to be indicative only of a local event in Spitzbergen, not a trend applicable to the Arctic as a whole.

Snopes.com

In addition, there is no baseline date and we have no way of knowing how the declines seen then compare to what is happening now. And no one ever said that it is only carbon, but carbon is a big factor and the decline is accellarating.

Then you state that the studies that support climate change as a result of human activity are "cherry picked" but again you provide no link and no evidence. Get your shit together!

 

[GreenBean]

Six unhappy bureaucrats is nothing compared to the vilification of any scientist that dares to speak their mind in opposition to the climate change industrial complex.

They are not bureaucrats ! They are scientists! And they are unhappy because they are not being allowed to do their work . The deniers that we vilify are in the pockets of the corporations or are beholden to the religious right who believes that only god can change the climate

And meanwhile the alarmists are feeding at the govt trough. Go through the six of them, there isn't one that's actually in a position to add to the climate debate. Meanwhile phds in relevant fields are ridiculed and attacked for actually wanting to discuss the science.

The World’s Oceans Are in Danger, Major Climate Change Report Warns

WASHINGTON — Earth’s oceans are under severe strain from climate change, a major new United Nations report warns, threatening everything from the ability to harvest seafood to the well-being of hundreds of millions of people living along the coasts.

Rising temperatures are contributing to a drop in fish populations in many regions, and oxygen levels in the ocean are declining while acidity levels are on the rise, posing risks to important marine ecosystems, according to the report issued Wednesday by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a group of scientists convened by the United Nations to guide world leaders in

Is there nothing that can't be blamed on CO2? As far as fish populations, do you think overfishing might have an effect? Agricultural runoff? No it all has to be CO2. Warming oceans do contribute to changes in fish populations in specific areas.
Here's an excerpt from an article describing the phenomenon....

"Reports from fishermen, seal hunters and explorers, he declared, all point to a radical change in climate conditions and hitherto unheard-of temperatures in the Arctic zone. Exploration expeditions report that scarcely any ice has been met with as far north as 81 degrees 29 minutes. Soundings to a depth of 3,100 meters showed the gulf stream still very warm.
Great masses of ice have been replaced by moraines of earth and stones, the report continued, while at many points well known glaciers have entirely disappeared. Very few seals and no white fish are found in the eastern Arctic, while vast shoals of herring and smelts, which have never before ventured so far north, are being encountered in the old seal fishing grounds."

Of course this article is from Nov, 1922.

As far as acidification, you do know that the principal study that proposes this has been attacked for cherry picking data. The study begins its' data in 1988. Here's the data going back 100 years.

Gee, I wonder why they started in 1988.

Oxygen depletion levels, from what I've read, are regional and attributed to ag runoff. Same old story, ignore all other environmental issues and concentrate solely on CO2.

First of all slick. it's customary to provide a link when you post articles . Could it be that you don't want us to know the true origin or the who story. Nah! You climate change deniers are such an honest bunch

But oh look, see what I found

Global Warming: 1922
A

s interesting as this nearly century-old article might be from a modern perspective, however, it isn’t substantive evidence either for or against the concept of anthropogenic global warming. As documented elsewhere, the warming phenomena observed in 1922 proved to be indicative only of a local event in Spitzbergen, not a trend applicable to the Arctic as a whole.

Snopes.com

In addition, there is no baseline date and we have no way of knowing how the declines seen then compare to what is happening now. And no one ever said that it is only carbon, but carbon is a big factor and the decline is accellarating.

Then you state that the studies that support climate change as a result of human activity are "cherry picked" but again you provide no link and no evidence. Get your shit together!

True he failed to provide a link .. poor protocol ... 30 lashes with a wet noodle....tsk tsk tsk ... but so far as factual data and irrefutable logic is concerned He blows your argument out of the water ... looks like you're the bug on the windshield agaiin little fella

 

[Zorro!]

The silenced: meet the climate whistleblowers muzzled by Trump

Six whistleblowers and ex-government scientists describe how the Trump administration made them bury climate science – and why they won’t stay quiet

by Oliver Milman

Six unhappy bureaucrats is nothing compared to the vilification of any scientist that dares to speak their mind in opposition to the climate change industrial complex.

They are not bureaucrats ! They are scientists! And they are unhappy because they are not being allowed to do their work . The deniers that we vilify are in the pockets of the corporations or are beholden to the religious right who believes that only god can change the climate

And meanwhile the alarmists are feeding at the govt trough. Go through the six of them, there isn't one that's actually in a position to add to the climate debate. Meanwhile phds in relevant fields are ridiculed and attacked for actually wanting to discuss the science.

The World’s Oceans Are in Danger, Major Climate Change Report Warns

WASHINGTON — Earth’s oceans are under severe strain from climate change, a major new United Nations report warns, threatening everything from the ability to harvest seafood to the well-being of hundreds of millions of people living along the coasts.

Rising temperatures are contributing to a drop in fish populations in many regions, and oxygen levels in the ocean are declining while acidity levels are on the rise, posing risks to important marine ecosystems, according to the report issued Wednesday by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a group of scientists convened by the United Nations to guide world leaders in

Is there nothing that can't be blamed on CO2? As far as fish populations, do you think overfishing might have an effect? Agricultural runoff? No it all has to be CO2. Warming oceans do contribute to changes in fish populations in specific areas.
Here's an excerpt from an article describing the phenomenon....

"Reports from fishermen, seal hunters and explorers, he declared, all point to a radical change in climate conditions and hitherto unheard-of temperatures in the Arctic zone. Exploration expeditions report that scarcely any ice has been met with as far north as 81 degrees 29 minutes. Soundings to a depth of 3,100 meters showed the gulf stream still very warm.
Great masses of ice have been replaced by moraines of earth and stones, the report continued, while at many points well known glaciers have entirely disappeared. Very few seals and no white fish are found in the eastern Arctic, while vast shoals of herring and smelts, which have never before ventured so far north, are being encountered in the old seal fishing grounds."

Of course this article is from Nov, 1922.

As far as acidification, you do know that the principal study that proposes this has been attacked for cherry picking data. The study begins its' data in 1988. Here's the data going back 100 years.

Gee, I wonder why they started in 1988.

Oxygen depletion levels, from what I've read, are regional and attributed to ag runoff. Same old story, ignore all other environmental issues and concentrate solely on CO2.

We have REAL pollution problems, like ag run-off, mines that need to be cleaned up, old radiation dumps, plastics heavy metals and so forth. They have no real interest in all that and anyone that wants to focus on something other than REAL pollution, should do so with private money.

 

[baileyn45]

Six unhappy bureaucrats is nothing compared to the vilification of any scientist that dares to speak their mind in opposition to the climate change industrial complex.

They are not bureaucrats ! They are scientists! And they are unhappy because they are not being allowed to do their work . The deniers that we vilify are in the pockets of the corporations or are beholden to the religious right who believes that only god can change the climate

And meanwhile the alarmists are feeding at the govt trough. Go through the six of them, there isn't one that's actually in a position to add to the climate debate. Meanwhile phds in relevant fields are ridiculed and attacked for actually wanting to discuss the science.

The World’s Oceans Are in Danger, Major Climate Change Report Warns

WASHINGTON — Earth’s oceans are under severe strain from climate change, a major new United Nations report warns, threatening everything from the ability to harvest seafood to the well-being of hundreds of millions of people living along the coasts.

Rising temperatures are contributing to a drop in fish populations in many regions, and oxygen levels in the ocean are declining while acidity levels are on the rise, posing risks to important marine ecosystems, according to the report issued Wednesday by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a group of scientists convened by the United Nations to guide world leaders in

Is there nothing that can't be blamed on CO2? As far as fish populations, do you think overfishing might have an effect? Agricultural runoff? No it all has to be CO2. Warming oceans do contribute to changes in fish populations in specific areas.
Here's an excerpt from an article describing the phenomenon....

"Reports from fishermen, seal hunters and explorers, he declared, all point to a radical change in climate conditions and hitherto unheard-of temperatures in the Arctic zone. Exploration expeditions report that scarcely any ice has been met with as far north as 81 degrees 29 minutes. Soundings to a depth of 3,100 meters showed the gulf stream still very warm.
Great masses of ice have been replaced by moraines of earth and stones, the report continued, while at many points well known glaciers have entirely disappeared. Very few seals and no white fish are found in the eastern Arctic, while vast shoals of herring and smelts, which have never before ventured so far north, are being encountered in the old seal fishing grounds."

Of course this article is from Nov, 1922.

As far as acidification, you do know that the principal study that proposes this has been attacked for cherry picking data. The study begins its' data in 1988. Here's the data going back 100 years.

Gee, I wonder why they started in 1988.

Oxygen depletion levels, from what I've read, are regional and attributed to ag runoff. Same old story, ignore all other environmental issues and concentrate solely on CO2.

First of all slick. it's customary to provide a link when you post articles . Could it be that you don't want us to know the true origin or the who story. Nah! You climate change deniers are such an honest bunch

But oh look, see what I found

Global Warming: 1922
A

s interesting as this nearly century-old article might be from a modern perspective, however, it isn’t substantive evidence either for or against the concept of anthropogenic global warming. As documented elsewhere, the warming phenomena observed in 1922 proved to be indicative only of a local event in Spitzbergen, not a trend applicable to the Arctic as a whole.

Snopes.com

In addition, there is no baseline date and we have no way of knowing how the declines seen then compare to what is happening now. And no one ever said that it is only carbon, but carbon is a big factor and the decline is accellarating.

Then you state that the studies that support climate change as a result of human activity are "cherry picked" but again you provide no link and no evidence. Get your shit together!

Here's a link explaining the cherry picking of acidification data.

Evidence discovered that 'ocean acidification' scare may be as fraudulent as 'global warming'

Here are the charts showing the cherry picking. Although cherry picking isn't quite strong enough.

Note that the ph data starts in 1989.

Here's another chart utilized by the same scientists, Note that this one charts ph going back to 1850, even though there is data only back to 1910. The people involved have admitted that on the chart below the data before 1989 is from a model. Of course they didn't tell anyone they used a model until after being called on it.

Here's a link of the scientist using this chart in official publications.

https://www.pmel.noaa.gov/pubs/PDF/feel2899/feel2899.pdf

Here's the data going back to 1910 that I posted earlier. This is from actual data with the above modelled data in pink.

There complete with links.

 

[Muhammed]

Global warming is a hoax. That's what they need to know

Tell that to Gretta. She will lay you out cold like she did to the so called world "leaders " at the UN

Greta Thunberg To World Leaders At UN Climate Summit: 'How Dare You!' | HuffPost

Teen activist Greta Thunberg delivered a powerful rebuke to world leaders at the United Nations Climate Action Summit on Monday, accusing them of turning a blind eye to global climate problems in exchange for profits and temporary economic growth.

“I shouldn’t be standing here. I should be back in school on the other side of the ocean. Yet you all come to me for hope? How dare you! You have stolen my dreams and my childhood with your empty words,” the 16-year-old Swede said while appearing to fight back tears.

Actually she just looked like a pathetic, brainwashed and mentally ill victim of child abuse.