TDS Now An Officially Recognized Mental Health Illness

Oh, she had an excuse? I thought she was excused because she was too dumb to know that she had committed a crime. And you still have to show that TRUMP! knowingly included an unauthorized person on the chat. We KNOW Hillary deliberately used an unsecured server.

See, I know that you're desperate to make this look like dogs and cats living together and sunspots all at the same time while of course totally excusing Hillary of anything and everything, but you're just not going to get very far with it.

A crime? How serious of a crime? Because before Trump made it a felony, it wasn't a felony. And when Trump broke the law, it was. Because he made it a felony.

What is Trump's excuse? I'm not talking about the chat. Trump's entire team used private emails and phones in his first term to do official business. That's what's crazy about how they treated Hillary. And you don't even care or realize it.

Trump broke this law when he was hording classified documents in Mara Lago. Remember this:

Trump is expected to be charged over his handling of classified documents

In what might be a particularly ironic outcome, if Trump is charged for mishandling classified documents, it would be under felony legislation that he signed while president.

"The law HE SIGNED upgrades the crime of wrongly handling classified material from a misdemeanor to a felony.

"Trump signed the bill after spending the 2016 presidential campaign accusing Hillary Clinton of improperly handling classified information."

The former president was facing a charge under the Espionage Act, Trump attorney Jim Trusty told CNN, in addition to charges of obstruction of justice, destruction or falsification of records, conspiracy, and false statements.
 
.

Left cultists

MUST

HAVE

SOMEONE

TO


HATE

If Trump was dead, they'd continue hating him just because without hate, they have nothing.


.
We hated Bush just as much. And you hated Bill, Obama and Biden just as much as you did Hillary. Pelosi. AOC.

Stop being a hypocrite.
 
.

Left cultists

MUST

HAVE

SOMEONE

TO


HATE

If Trump was dead, they'd continue hating him just because without hate, they have nothing.


.
TRUMP! could die tomorrow and 30 years from now they would still be blaming him for sunspots, dogs and cats living together, and people wearing white after Labor Day.
 
A crime? How serious of a crime? Because before Trump made it a felony, it wasn't a felony. And when Trump broke the law, it was. Because he made it a felony.
Enough of one she had to get the cover of being too dumb to know better. Come to think of it, they trotted that one out to give Quid Pro Joe cover from investigation as well.
What is Trump's excuse? I'm not talking about the chat.
I am because it's the latest iteration of TDS caused Orange Man Bad.
Trump's entire team used private emails and phones in his first term to do official business. That's what's crazy about how they treated Hillary. And you don't even care or realize it.
And he even dared to point out how her rich donors used the same tax breaks he did, the cad.
Trump broke this law when he was hording classified documents in Mara Lago.
You mean the same hoarding most all presidents do? You know, in a box in the garage where their cokehead son could easily get to them when looking for something to sell.
Remember this:

Trump is expected to be charged over his handling of classified documents

In what might be a particularly ironic outcome, if Trump is charged for mishandling classified documents, it would be under felony legislation that he signed while president.

"The law HE SIGNED upgrades the crime of wrongly handling classified material from a misdemeanor to a felony.

"Trump signed the bill after spending the 2016 presidential campaign accusing Hillary Clinton of improperly handling classified information."

The former president was facing a charge under the Espionage Act, Trump attorney Jim Trusty told CNN, in addition to charges of obstruction of justice, destruction or falsification of records, conspiracy, and false statements.
Nah, he just needs to issue a blanket pre-emptive pardon covering any crimes anyone even thinks he may have committed. The door is open.
 
Enough of one she had to get the cover of being too dumb to know better. Come to think of it, they trotted that one out to give Quid Pro Joe cover from investigation as well.

I am because it's the latest iteration of TDS caused Orange Man Bad.

And he even dared to point out how her rich donors used the same tax breaks he did, the cad.

You mean the same hoarding most all presidents do? You know, in a box in the garage where their cokehead son could easily get to them when looking for something to sell.

Nah, he just needs to issue a blanket pre-emptive pardon covering any crimes anyone even thinks he may have committed. The door is open.
But Trump did it too. Didn't he know better?
 
Enough of one she had to get the cover of being too dumb to know better. Come to think of it, they trotted that one out to give Quid Pro Joe cover from investigation as well.

I am because it's the latest iteration of TDS caused Orange Man Bad.

And he even dared to point out how her rich donors used the same tax breaks he did, the cad.

You mean the same hoarding most all presidents do? You know, in a box in the garage where their cokehead son could easily get to them when looking for something to sell.

Nah, he just needs to issue a blanket pre-emptive pardon covering any crimes anyone even thinks he may have committed. The door is open.
Trump got in trouble for the classified documents because he lied to FBI and didn't turn over the documents they told him to turn over. Biden did turn them over.

You guys love to point out the differences that benefit you. This one benefits us. For one, doesn't seem like Biden was doing anything shady with those classified documents. He taught a class in between being VP and POTUS. What was Trump doing with those classified documents?

I bet he was selling them to the highest bidder. We know he was showing them off to guests. Biden doesn't have a Mara Lago where hundreds of people have access to his toilet where he's storing top secret shit.

And we know Trump told an Australian billionaire our nuclear sub secrets and he told 100 other people. Remember that?

Trump shared sensitive information about US nuclear subs with Australian billionaire​

This article is more than 1 year old

THEN Anthony Pratt, a member of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort, shared submarine details with former Australian PMs and journalists
 
But Trump did it too. Didn't he know better?
You'll have to ask him in the next meeting, right after you prove he made the decision to have an unauthorized person on the chat. You know, that thing I've already said you need to prove.
 
Trump got in trouble for the classified documents because he lied to FBI and didn't turn over the documents they told him to turn over. Biden did turn them over.

You guys love to point out the differences that benefit you. This one benefits us. For one, doesn't seem like Biden was doing anything shady with those classified documents. He taught a class in between being VP and POTUS. What was Trump doing with those classified documents?

I bet he was selling them to the highest bidder. We know he was showing them off to guests. Biden doesn't have a Mara Lago where hundreds of people have access to his toilet where he's storing top secret shit.

And we know Trump told an Australian billionaire our nuclear sub secrets and he told 100 other people. Remember that?

Trump shared sensitive information about US nuclear subs with Australian billionaire​

This article is more than 1 year old

THEN Anthony Pratt, a member of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort, shared submarine details with former Australian PMs and journalists
Wait, your quote states that Anthony Pratt did something while your panting headline says TRUMP! did something. Can you pick a horse and stay on it?
 
200w.gif


I'd say...........120,000 volts at about half a hour should do the trick.
 
THe buck stops where?
False from the start. If you want to go down that road, no underling would ever get fired, only the CEO, who would never hold a job more than a few minutes.

Let's put it this way, if you are the boss of a multi-trillion-dollar enterprise and a manager hires someone who makes a simple mistake that ultimately costs nothing, do you submit your resignation and walk out in disgrace? Be honest.
 
False from the start. If you want to go down that road, no underling would ever get fired, only the CEO, who would never hold a job more than a few minutes.

Let's put it this way, if you are the boss of a multi-trillion-dollar enterprise and a manager hires someone who makes a simple mistake that ultimately costs nothing, do you submit your resignation and walk out in disgrace? Be honest.
Do you know what Sarbanes Oxley is?

The Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 is a United States federal law that mandates certain practices in financial record keeping and reporting for corporations.

The law was enacted as a reaction to a number of major corporate and accounting scandals, including Enron and WorldCom. The sections of the bill cover responsibilities of a public corporation's board of directors, add criminal penalties for certain misconduct, and require the Securities and Exchange Commission to create regulations to define how public corporations are to comply with the law.
 
15th post
Do you know what Sarbanes Oxley is?

The Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 is a United States federal law that mandates certain practices in financial record keeping and reporting for corporations.

The law was enacted as a reaction to a number of major corporate and accounting scandals, including Enron and WorldCom. The sections of the bill cover responsibilities of a public corporation's board of directors, add criminal penalties for certain misconduct, and require the Securities and Exchange Commission to create regulations to define how public corporations are to comply with the law.
That doesn't address the question I posed. Would you, as the CEO of a mega-corporation, resign in disgrace if a manager hired a worker who made a dumb mistake? You want the buck to stop at the top, answer the question.
 
That doesn't address the question I posed. Would you, as the CEO of a mega-corporation, resign in disgrace if a manager hired a worker who made a dumb mistake? You want the buck to stop at the top, answer the question.
No. Not in that scenario.

We warned Trump those guys are over their heads and they're proving it. So much for Trump surrounding himself with the best or being a good judge of character. But we already knew that. He thinks Kim Jung and Putin are good guys.
 
No. Not in that scenario.

We warned Trump those guys are over their heads and they're proving it. So much for Trump surrounding himself with the best or being a good judge of character. But we already knew that. He thinks Kim Jung and Putin are good guys.
And you're still trying to spin a mistake by a low-level flunky as being TRUMP!'s fault, even after admitting the buck would not get anywhere near your desk if you were in charge.
 
And you're still trying to spin a mistake by a low-level flunky as being TRUMP!'s fault, even after admitting the buck would not get anywhere near your desk if you were in charge.

The guy who introduced the TDS bill was arrested for being a pedo the next day.

And imagine if Biden or Hillary or Kamala fucked up as bad as Pete Hegseth did. What would you be saying?
 
Back
Top Bottom