Talking to GPT/Chat GPT

[luiza]

No one’s scared of it.

Sheeple love it .
Saves them time and they cannot think anyhow .

They cannot conceive that it is used for Mind Control .
Just another way of influencing and creating misinformation.

80-90% of all people will believe anything told to them .
And compliance reduces stress and hysteria .

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

So it’s basically a fancy search engine

Actually it's much more than that.

When you Google information generally you have to provide context. With ChatGPT, it can and will remember context if so instructed, so that you don't have to provide it each time you ask it a question.

Providing lists of information isn't helpful unless you can retain everything that's listed. If you want to see how the app really shines, pick a topic you either know nothing about or one that you're moderately familiar with and ask it to thoroughly explain any aspect of it that you could use further clarification on. And include in your instructions, something like "explain it to me as if I know nothing/a little bit/a moderate amount/am well versed on the topic".

 

[Carl in Michigan]

===


Q: How tall would the tsunami be if all the water in the Pacific became a wave no more then 10 miles wide at the base.

A: It's impossible for all the water in the Pacific to become a single tsunami wave, but for the sake of calculation, we can make some assumptions and estimate the theoretical height of such a wave.

The Pacific Ocean has an estimated volume of approximately 714 million cubic kilometers (171 million cubic miles), which is equivalent to 1.5 billion trillion gallons of water. If all of this water were to be concentrated into a single wave that was 10 miles (16 kilometers) wide at the base, the wave would have a cross-sectional area of about 160 square miles (414 square kilometers).

Using the equation for the volume of a cylinder (V = A x h), we can solve for the height (h) of the wave, given the cross-sectional area (A) and the total volume (V) of the water:

V = A x h
h = V / A

Plugging in the numbers, we get:

h = (1.5 x 10^18 gallons) / (160 sq mi)
h = 9.4 x 10^13 feet

This height is obviously unrealistic, as it is much greater than the diameter of the Earth. In reality, a tsunami is typically generated by a much smaller amount of water displacement, such as from an earthquake or underwater landslide.


Q: Lets increase the base of the wave to 500 miles wide.

A: If we increase the width of the theoretical wave to 500 miles (804 kilometers) at the base, the cross-sectional area of the wave would increase to about 50,000 square miles (129,500 square kilometers).

Using the same equation as before, we can solve for the height of the wave:

h = V / A

where V is the total volume of the Pacific Ocean and A is the cross-sectional area of the wave.

Plugging in the numbers, we get:

h = (1.5 x 10^18 gallons) / (50,000 sq mi)
h = 3.0 x 10^10 feet

This height is still an unrealistic estimate, as it is much taller than Mount Everest, the highest peak on Earth. It's important to remember that this is a purely hypothetical scenario and not something that could ever happen in reality. Tsunamis are typically generated by more localized events such as earthquakes, and their height is typically determined by the amount of water displacement that occurs.
===

===

Q: Lets increase the base of the wave to 1,500 miles wide.

If we increase the width of the theoretical wave to 1,500 miles (2,414 kilometers) at the base, the cross-sectional area of the wave would increase to about 225,000 square miles (582,749 square kilometers).

Using the same equation as before, we can solve for the height of the wave:

h = V / A

where V is the total volume of the Pacific Ocean and A is the cross-sectional area of the wave.

Plugging in the numbers, we get:

h = (1.5 x 10^18 gallons) / (225,000 sq mi)
h = 6.7 x 10^9 feet

This height is still a very unrealistic estimate, as it is much taller than any mountain on Earth. It's important to note that such a wave could never form in reality, as the energy required to move all the water in the Pacific Ocean in this way would be many times greater than the energy of any known natural event or human activity. Tsunamis are typically generated by underwater earthquakes, landslides, or volcanic eruptions, and their height is limited by the amount of energy that can be released by these events.
===

Lets increase the base of the wave to 3,000 miles wide.

A: If we increase the width of the theoretical wave to 3,000 miles (4,828 kilometers) at the base, the cross-sectional area of the wave would increase to about 675,000 square miles (1,748,624 square kilometers).

Using the same equation as before, we can solve for the height of the wave:

h = V / A

where V is the total volume of the Pacific Ocean and A is the cross-sectional area of the wave.

Plugging in the numbers, we get:

h = (1.5 x 10^18 gallons) / (675,000 sq mi)
h = 2.2 x 10^9 feet

This height is still an unrealistic estimate, as it is much taller than any mountain on Earth. It's important to note that such a wave could never

form in reality, as the energy required to move all the water in the Pacific Ocean in this way would be many times greater than the energy of any known natural event or human activity. Tsunamis are typically generated by underwater earthquakes, landslides, or volcanic eruptions, and their height is limited by the amount of energy that can be released by these events.

Chatgpt sure is patient

 

[scruffy]

Chat GPT will give an obtuse answer to questions that might not show trump in a good light. It might take asking 3 or 4 pointed questions to get a straight answer.

Yeah, they had to magically fix that after the election.

 

[Jim H - VA USA]

Chat-GPT was programmed with publicly available misinformation.

If you type this exact question into Google (which is powered by its Gemini AI) it will tell you the same thing.

Guess where Google gets its misinformation from? The internet! And the MSM! Like here for instance:

https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/us-b-2-bombers-bunker-busters-alternatives-2025-06-18/

Google actually tells you that it's information comes from this specific source. It says:

"A B-2 Spirit stealth bomber can carry two GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) bombs, also known as bunker busters, according to Reuters and Al Jazeera. The GBU-57 is a 30,000-pound precision-guided bomb designed to penetrate deep underground. "
Click the Reuters link and this is exactly where it takes you.
Wikipedia however gives you a slightly straighter story:

GBU-57A/B MOP - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The takeaway is that the MSM is given higher priority in the chatbots that are spreading this misinformation.

But we knew that already, didn't we?

What really ticks me off is that these AI bots are called large learning models, but when you correct them, they don't learn a darn thing.

If you ask them the same question later, they will give you a wrong answer again.

Like you said, at this point it's no more reliable than a google search.