Talk About Delusional: Obama Says Democrats Would Have Won If They Ran On His Great Record

[mudwhistle]

A poster running bogus quotes in his sigline wants to talk "delusional".

This is like the Turkish coffee of irony.

Must be really strong irony.......

 

[hadit]

The non-natural born citizen unConstitutional president needs to be intutionalized. His so-called 'great record' is what doomed the democrats.


Obama Frustrated Dems Didn t Run on His Great Record in Midterms - Breitbart

Which staunch defenders of Obamacare, for example, which Democrats who did NOT try to distance themselves from Obama,

lost in 2014?

Can't name any?

Alison Lundergan Grimes lost badly in KY while doing everything she could to distance herself from Obama. It's not like she had anything to lose by doing the opposite.

That's because she did it in a stupid way.

 

[BlindBoo]

The so called liberal media profits off of conflict. Their non stop coverage of Ebola laden child refugees from ISIS invading us from the open southern border helped motivate the GOP victim class to get out and vote.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Did any of you bother to note that what Obama actually said bears no resemblance to what the OP claims he said?

...or did you just assume that considering the sources, i.e., the poster + Breitbart, that it was bound to be a lie, and you didn't need to confirm it.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The non-natural born citizen unConstitutional president needs to be intutionalized. His so-called 'great record' is what doomed the democrats.


Obama Frustrated Dems Didn t Run on His Great Record in Midterms - Breitbart

Which staunch defenders of Obamacare, for example, which Democrats who did NOT try to distance themselves from Obama,

lost in 2014?

Can't name any?

Alison Lundergan Grimes lost badly in KY while doing everything she could to distance herself from Obama. It's not like she had anything to lose by doing the opposite.

That's because she did it in a stupid way.

Were there Democrats who won by distancing themselves from Obama?

 

[hadit]

The non-natural born citizen unConstitutional president needs to be intutionalized. His so-called 'great record' is what doomed the democrats.


Obama Frustrated Dems Didn t Run on His Great Record in Midterms - Breitbart

Which staunch defenders of Obamacare, for example, which Democrats who did NOT try to distance themselves from Obama,

lost in 2014?

Can't name any?

Alison Lundergan Grimes lost badly in KY while doing everything she could to distance herself from Obama. It's not like she had anything to lose by doing the opposite.

That's because she did it in a stupid way.

Were there Democrats who won by distancing themselves from Obama?

There were some who tried to distance themselves from him, but were unsuccessful because their voting record tied them irrevocably to him. Democrats in general didn't do very well last year. Understandably so, because they had nothing positive to offer.

 

[BlindBoo]

Did any of you bother to note that what Obama actually said bears no resemblance to what the OP claims he said?

...or did you just assume that considering the sources, i.e., the poster + Breitbart, that it was bound to be a lie, and you didn't need to confirm it.

The latter.

 

[Meathead]

FFS, Grimes, the great Kentucky Dem hope, couldn't bring herself to admit she voted for Obama. How toxic is he?

 

[NYcarbineer]

FFS, Grimes, the great Kentucky Dem hope, couldn't bring herself to admit she voted for Obama. How toxic is he?

The more she ran away from Obama, the lower she went in the polls.

 

[Meathead]

FFS, Grimes, the great Kentucky Dem hope, couldn't bring herself to admit she voted for Obama. How toxic is he?

The more she ran away from Obama, the lower she went in the polls.

LOL. In Kentucky she couldn't run away fast enough. She couldn't even take advantage of no voting record in federal government, something that haunted the most of the rest of the Dem losers.

 

[Pogo]

Did any of you bother to note that what Obama actually said bears no resemblance to what the OP claims he said?

...or did you just assume that considering the sources, i.e., the poster + Breitbart, that it was bound to be a lie, and you didn't need to confirm it.

The latter.

Viva la Revisionistas! Put speech bubbles on anyone you want with nothing more than a thread title!

It's life in the echo chamber of Duh Bubble Duh Bubble Duh Bubble Duh Bubble

 

[mudwhistle]

Obama's record was terrible ... although he always received great coverage from the MSM ... so he claims they didn't make a good enough case to win. Fact is ... too many voters felt the sting of Obama's screw ups personally. That is what sunk Democrats ... and he will remain an Albatross around their necks for years to come. A perfect example is his failure to solve issues rather than create one crisis after another. ... the latest is his support of nationwide protests ... which resulted in the deaths of cops in NYC.

 

[lutraphile]

I have no idea why the Democrats did not run on the economic recovery, which moved forward hugely in 2014. Instead, someone told them that the "war on women" was the right tactic to base their campaigns on, and as a result they won less of the male vote than ever before.

 

[Pogo]

Obama's record was terrible ... although he always received great coverage from the MSM ... so he claims they didn't make a good enough case to win. Fact is ... too many voters felt the sting of Obama's screw ups personally. That is what sunk Democrats ... and he will remain an Albatross around their necks for years to come. A perfect example is his failure to solve issues rather than create one crisis after another. ... the latest is his support of nationwide protests ... which resulted in the deaths of cops in NYC.

Wish I had that creative an imagination. I'd do book tours. Screenplays.

The reality is it's a mid-term, and the party in the WH always loses ground in a mid-term. Happened four years ago and, four years from now it will happen again. Doesn't really matter who has the WH or who runs on what.

 

[Meathead]

I have no idea why the Democrats did not run on the economic recovery, which moved forward hugely in 2014. Instead, someone told them that the "war on women" was the right tactic to base their campaigns on, and as a result they won less of the male vote than ever before.

The Democrats had nothing to run on. That's why the got their butts kicked.

 

[mudwhistle]

Obama's record was terrible ... although he always received great coverage from the MSM ... so he claims they didn't make a good enough case to win. Fact is ... too many voters felt the sting of Obama's screw ups personally. That is what sunk Democrats ... and he will remain an Albatross around their necks for years to come. A perfect example is his failure to solve issues rather than create one crisis after another. ... the latest is his support of nationwide protests ... which resulted in the deaths of cops in NYC.

Wish I had that creative an imagination. I'd do book tours. Screenplays.

The reality is it's a mid-term, and the party in the WH always loses ground in a mid-term. Happened four years ago and, four years from now it will happen again. Doesn't really matter who has the WH or who runs on what.

Keep telling yourself that.

We all have to admit that the only reason it wasn't worse was because the GOP took the House and minimised some of the damage before the 2012 election but couldn't prevent Obama from going around them ... thus letting him show everyone their worst fears could still be realised.

 

[Pogo]

Obama's record was terrible ... although he always received great coverage from the MSM ... so he claims they didn't make a good enough case to win. Fact is ... too many voters felt the sting of Obama's screw ups personally. That is what sunk Democrats ... and he will remain an Albatross around their necks for years to come. A perfect example is his failure to solve issues rather than create one crisis after another. ... the latest is his support of nationwide protests ... which resulted in the deaths of cops in NYC.

Wish I had that creative an imagination. I'd do book tours. Screenplays.

The reality is it's a mid-term, and the party in the WH always loses ground in a mid-term. Happened four years ago and, four years from now it will happen again. Doesn't really matter who has the WH or who runs on what.

Keep telling yourself that.

We all have to admit that the only reason it wasn't worse was because the GOP took the House and minimised some of the damage before the 2012 election but couldn't prevent Obama from going around them ... thus letting him show everyone their worst fears could still be realised.

It's American history dood. You could look it up. It's been that way as long as we've had these two parties. There have been exactly three exceptions in that entire time span. First time it ever didn't happen was 1934, which was two years into FDR's handling of the Depression.

 

[mudwhistle]

Obama's record was terrible ... although he always received great coverage from the MSM ... so he claims they didn't make a good enough case to win. Fact is ... too many voters felt the sting of Obama's screw ups personally. That is what sunk Democrats ... and he will remain an Albatross around their necks for years to come. A perfect example is his failure to solve issues rather than create one crisis after another. ... the latest is his support of nationwide protests ... which resulted in the deaths of cops in NYC.

Wish I had that creative an imagination. I'd do book tours. Screenplays.

The reality is it's a mid-term, and the party in the WH always loses ground in a mid-term. Happened four years ago and, four years from now it will happen again. Doesn't really matter who has the WH or who runs on what.

Keep telling yourself that.

We all have to admit that the only reason it wasn't worse was because the GOP took the House and minimised some of the damage before the 2012 election but couldn't prevent Obama from going around them ... thus letting him show everyone their worst fears could still be realised.

It's American history dood. You could look it up. It's been that way as long as we've had these two parties. There have been exactly three exceptions in that entire time span. First time it ever didn't happen was 1934, which was two years into FDR's handling of the Depression.

Regardless ... Obama is the worst thing that could have happened to the Democratic Party. He has exposed them and they will pay a heavy price. The GOP appears complacent but in fact they're just letting his ideological flaws become a reality. The media has lost credibility because of their avid support for Obama and the only way their lies have been exposed is by allowing his policies to go into effect.

 

[Pogo]

Obama's record was terrible ... although he always received great coverage from the MSM ... so he claims they didn't make a good enough case to win. Fact is ... too many voters felt the sting of Obama's screw ups personally. That is what sunk Democrats ... and he will remain an Albatross around their necks for years to come. A perfect example is his failure to solve issues rather than create one crisis after another. ... the latest is his support of nationwide protests ... which resulted in the deaths of cops in NYC.

Wish I had that creative an imagination. I'd do book tours. Screenplays.

The reality is it's a mid-term, and the party in the WH always loses ground in a mid-term. Happened four years ago and, four years from now it will happen again. Doesn't really matter who has the WH or who runs on what.

Keep telling yourself that.

We all have to admit that the only reason it wasn't worse was because the GOP took the House and minimised some of the damage before the 2012 election but couldn't prevent Obama from going around them ... thus letting him show everyone their worst fears could still be realised.

It's American history dood. You could look it up. It's been that way as long as we've had these two parties. There have been exactly three exceptions in that entire time span. First time it ever didn't happen was 1934, which was two years into FDR's handling of the Depression.

Regardless ... Obama is the worst thing that could have happened to the Democratic Party. He has exposed them and they will pay a heavy price. The GOP appears complacent but in fact they're just letting his ideological flaws become a reality. The media has lost credibility because of their avid support for Obama and the only way their lies have been exposed is by allowing his policies to go into effect.

Yawn. Change the year and the name of the POTUS and it's all been said before. Perspective.

 

[mudwhistle]

Obama's record was terrible ... although he always received great coverage from the MSM ... so he claims they didn't make a good enough case to win. Fact is ... too many voters felt the sting of Obama's screw ups personally. That is what sunk Democrats ... and he will remain an Albatross around their necks for years to come. A perfect example is his failure to solve issues rather than create one crisis after another. ... the latest is his support of nationwide protests ... which resulted in the deaths of cops in NYC.

Wish I had that creative an imagination. I'd do book tours. Screenplays.

The reality is it's a mid-term, and the party in the WH always loses ground in a mid-term. Happened four years ago and, four years from now it will happen again. Doesn't really matter who has the WH or who runs on what.

Keep telling yourself that.

We all have to admit that the only reason it wasn't worse was because the GOP took the House and minimised some of the damage before the 2012 election but couldn't prevent Obama from going around them ... thus letting him show everyone their worst fears could still be realised.

It's American history dood. You could look it up. It's been that way as long as we've had these two parties. There have been exactly three exceptions in that entire time span. First time it ever didn't happen was 1934, which was two years into FDR's handling of the Depression.

Regardless ... Obama is the worst thing that could have happened to the Democratic Party. He has exposed them and they will pay a heavy price. The GOP appears complacent but in fact they're just letting his ideological flaws become a reality. The media has lost credibility because of their avid support for Obama and the only way their lies have been exposed is by allowing his policies to go into effect.

Yawn. Change the year and the name of the POTUS and it's all been said before. Perspective.

Well perhaps the transformation Obama set into motion will scare enough people into reversing that trend. I'm sure history is some consolation to you ... but things have changed. This anti-cop nonsense is just the tip of the iceberg. It's only going to snowball from here on out. Obama still hasn't shown his true colors yet. Once he thinks nothing can harm his presidency any more than it already is he'll make his amnesty EO look tame in comparison. After all ... He is a very vindictive motherfucker.