Both the RNC and the DNC featured families who had lost loved ones in the defense of our country, but the difference in style and substance couldn't have been greater.
The RNC featured the families of those killed in Benghazi, who also recounted their meeting with Hillary Clinton, who knowingly lied to them and the American people about the circumstances that killed their loved ones.
The DNC featured the family of a soldier who also died heroically in the defense of our country. However, this family took this opportunity to publicly criticize Donald Trump for his policies (which had nothing to do with their son's death). In addition, they personally attacked him for not having made the same sacrifice (never mind that neither did Hillary).
Which presentation was more appropriate for these families: Recounting their personal experiences or pontificating about an opposition candidate's policy positions? If the latter, do you think it would have been appropriate for the RNC to feature the families of the Fort Hood massacre? Should they have criticized the policies of President Obama, who also didn't serve in the military?
Other than in the DNC/MSM world of political correctness, why should individuals like Mr. Khan be given a public platform for expressing his political views while at the same time be protected from public scrutiny of those views?
WAKE UP, AMERICA!!!
The RNC featured the families of those killed in Benghazi, who also recounted their meeting with Hillary Clinton, who knowingly lied to them and the American people about the circumstances that killed their loved ones.
The DNC featured the family of a soldier who also died heroically in the defense of our country. However, this family took this opportunity to publicly criticize Donald Trump for his policies (which had nothing to do with their son's death). In addition, they personally attacked him for not having made the same sacrifice (never mind that neither did Hillary).
Which presentation was more appropriate for these families: Recounting their personal experiences or pontificating about an opposition candidate's policy positions? If the latter, do you think it would have been appropriate for the RNC to feature the families of the Fort Hood massacre? Should they have criticized the policies of President Obama, who also didn't serve in the military?
Other than in the DNC/MSM world of political correctness, why should individuals like Mr. Khan be given a public platform for expressing his political views while at the same time be protected from public scrutiny of those views?
WAKE UP, AMERICA!!!