What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

“Surprise Surprise – Fauci Lied Again”: Rand Paul Reacts To Wuhan Bombshell

OP
Doc7505

Doc7505

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2016
Messages
9,181
Reaction score
14,901
Points
2,430
Location
North Carolina
Yes at one time he admitted that he was interested in GOF but Obama was the president and makes the decision. Now you are saying Fauci overruled his boss and took American policy matters in his own hand. Just because someone believes something does not mean that he will not follow orders from his boss.

Obama in 2014 said no to GOF and Fauci is not going to do an end around and for what reason. I told you so?

Just because some guy goes on FOX and gives his opinion that it is not proof.

The grant was terminated in 2020 and they got another grant a few months later. Yes there was no oversight in the past 4 years under Trump and under Obama

oversight - well in hindsight it sounds good

but in this article it dated in 2011 , it was a problem known but no one did anything.

In hindsight it nice to say that congress expects this but



So if it was a problem 10 years ago and no one did anything about it. Well to claim that this oversight caused funds for GOF is a stretch.

Wulan lab is a scientific organization and to get grants they need to show that they can be trusted. EcoHealth's bat research in China got 3.7 mil NIH grant but only a small amount went to Wulan — about $76,000 per year — was used to pay the Wuhan lab for its on-the-ground work.


~~~~~~
Molecular biologist Richard H. Ebright on Wednesday posted a letter from the National Institute of Health (NIH) showing that an NIH grant did fund gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, contrary to what Dr. Anthony Fauci had testified to the Senate.


Will Dr. Fauci be prosecuted for perjuring his testimony before Congress? I'm sure that Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commies in Congress will ignore his perjury and allow him to retire keeping his pension.
Just another example of PM/DSA Democrat Just-Us
 

Kilroy2

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2018
Messages
3,730
Reaction score
966
Points
140
~~~~~~
Molecular biologist Richard H. Ebright on Wednesday posted a letter from the National Institute of Health (NIH) showing that an NIH grant did fund gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, contrary to what Dr. Anthony Fauci had testified to the Senate.


Will Dr. Fauci be prosecuted for perjuring his testimony before Congress? I'm sure that Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commies in Congress will ignore his perjury and allow him to retire keeping his pension.
Just another example of PM/DSA Democrat Just-Us

EcoHealth Alliance, the U.S. non-profit that funneled NIH money to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, was not transparent about the work it was doing.

So sub contractors who did the deed did not report it to NIH and that was a violation of their agreement.

Ebright noted that the NIH’s letter appeared to show that EcoHealth Alliance violated the Terms and Conditions of the NIH grant.

The letter pointed out that the coronaviruses studied under the grant were unlikely to have become SARS-CoV-2, now commonly referred to as the “coronavirus” or “COVID-19.”

to say he lied implies that he deliberately knew something and lied about it.

The agreement was clear and there is no indication that Fauci knew that the contractor's violated the agreement. Also since what Wulan lab did has not shown that it contributed to COVID-19

So for Fauci to have lied he would have had to known that they violated the agreement.

at this point that is not the case it just a matter of Fauci unaware of what the contractors did and violated the agreement.

Still gain of function is a general term as it describes any research that results in the gain of a certain function.

So GOF with the mice thing can be considered GOF.

Yet the problem with GOF is if the research causes a pathogen to be more infections.

Thus it can be tied into the covid 19 but the paper also reports that it does not tie into COVID 19 and it was unlikely to have cause COVID 19. So basically no harm no foul.

Yet he lied to congress is the right wing mantra

Yet Trump continues to lie that the election was stolen.
 
Last edited:

beagle9

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2011
Messages
30,589
Reaction score
8,171
Points
1,330
this is just a rehash of the SARS - CoV -2 COVID 19 being man made instead of naturally occurring.

Obama admin announced that they would not fund gain of function research back in 2014. EIH reviewed the project and determine that it was not gain of function research.

A biologist appears on FOX and claims that he reviewed the papers and concluded that this was gain of function. Well he actually says it seems to be gain of function.

Multiple studies done and they all agree that there was no alteration and that it jump from an animal to humans and evolved naturally

They did fund research at the Chinese lab but unless there is proof that the virus is man made it is a false story based on hate of Fauci and a fondness for conspiracies.
Not man-made, but manipulated with the GOF, so what's with this "unless the virus is man-made" talk you used ?
 

beagle9

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2011
Messages
30,589
Reaction score
8,171
Points
1,330
EcoHealth Alliance, the U.S. non-profit that funneled NIH money to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, was not transparent about the work it was doing.

So sub contractors who did the deed did not report it to NIH and that was a violation of their agreement.

Ebright noted that the NIH’s letter appeared to show that EcoHealth Alliance violated the Terms and Conditions of the NIH grant.

The letter pointed out that the coronaviruses studied under the grant were unlikely to have become SARS-CoV-2, now commonly referred to as the “coronavirus” or “COVID-19.”

to say he lied implies that he deliberately knew something and lied about it.

The agreement was clear and there is no indication that Fauci knew that the contractor's violated the agreement. Also since what Wulan lab did has not shown that it contributed to COVID-19

So for Fauci to have lied he would have had to known that they violated the agreement.

at this point that is not the case it just a matter of Fauci unaware of what the contractors did and violated the agreement.

Still gain of function is a general term as it describes any research that results in the gain of a certain function.

So GOF with the mice thing can be considered GOF.

Yet the problem with GOF is if the research causes a pathogen to be more infections.

Thus it can be tied into the covid 19 but the paper also reports that it does not tie into COVID 19 and it was unlikely to have cause COVID 19. So basically no harm no foul.

Yet he lied to congress is the right wing mantra

Yet Trump continues to lie that the election was stolen.
Wow, here's the thing though -Fauci has already perjured himself right (?), and so the thing is that when you tell a lie in such ways, and then have to tell many more in order to keep ahead of it, then it becomes easy for the puzzle to be put together by the investigator's who are expert's in their fields on such things, especially on studying the human condition when it acts in these ways.

Fauci has become his own worst enemy it seems. He's caught in his own fly trap.
 

beagle9

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2011
Messages
30,589
Reaction score
8,171
Points
1,330
Sometimes you have to look at the source. Now politicians on both sides have there conspiracies and Rand is one of them

the idea that the Bilderbergers are trying to erase American sovereignty — with the cooperation of traitors in our own government — is a favorite of his.
When he became a senator he toned it down a little.

Paul’s 2010 Senate campaign, his campaign spokesman was a truther (as well as a death-metal musician with racist and satanic tendencies). When asked by a reporter, Paul agreed with this view, his campaign quickly clarified this that it was a “complicated situation” with “truth on both sides.” Yes rand the Truth hurts.

Paul’s also jumped on Bush saying that the leader of his party sacrificed American lives not for a misguided view of national security, but for naked greed.

I would guess that for Rand it show time and any conspiracy has its believers. .
Making it about Rand Paul is a deflection. Everyone see's it.
 

Kilroy2

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2018
Messages
3,730
Reaction score
966
Points
140
Not man-made, but manipulated with the GOF, so what's with this "unless the virus is man-made" talk you used ?
well since GOF has a research team that uses a virus that is passaged in a host until a virus with different properties is obtained thus it is manmade as it is not naturally occurring. Thus it is man made.

Republicans have claim that what happen with COVID 19.

Two United States experts have said on June 6 that “damning” science strongly indicates that COVID-19 causing novel coronavirus, is man-made and optimized in a lab for maximum infectivity before leading to a pandemic last year.

of course this is just a theory that is being bounced around.
 

Kilroy2

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2018
Messages
3,730
Reaction score
966
Points
140
Making it about Rand Paul is a deflection. Everyone see's it.

A few see it and that because they like how he rolls as a conspiracist. He has supported and repeat numerous conspiracies.
in 2015

Rand Paul Conspiracy Theories No. 1 - Dick Cheney pushed for the Iraq War to benefit from Halliburton.

Rand Paul Conspiracy Theories No. 2 - The Bilderberg Group is trying to turn America into a communist nation.

Rand Paul Conspiracy Theories No. 3 - Beware of the NAFTA superhighway

Rand Paul Conspiracy Theories No. 4 - The "audit-the-Fed" bill
 
Last edited:

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$120.00
Goal
$350.00

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top