Supreme Court Denies Trumps Delay In Sentencing On Friday

It's funny to watch your evolution around here since your joining date. You've gone from at least, a 'bearable' poster, to someone who is just filled with venom and hate for those whose votes do not meet your approval.
Sounds like you meant to send that reply to Trump.

Now fix the grammar errors in your signature you retarded trumpanzee it should be one of these:

The civil war has started, the only thing that is missing is are the bullets.
The civil war has started, the only things that are is missing are the bullets.
 
It's funny to watch your evolution around here since your joining date. You've gone from at least, a 'bearable' poster, to someone who is just filled with venom and hate for those whose votes do not meet your approval.

DigitalDrifterlighting
 
Sounds like you meant to send that reply to Trump.

Now fix the grammar errors in your signature you retarded trumpanzee it should be one of these:

The civil war has started, the only thing that is missing is are the bullets.
The civil war has started, the only things that are is missing are the bullets.

Did you teach fifth, or sixth grade English?
 
You really are naive sometimes.
Why shouldn’t he?
Because he's a tax evading fraudster with billions of dollars in assets who enriched himself by charging extortionate hotel rates to the secret service etc.
The bogus case was brought as the deliberate attempt to interfere with the election.
It did interfere yes, it helped him:

1736533154169.png

He might have LOST the election but for the "witch hunt" :auiqs.jpg:

Turn about is now fair play.
Life isn't fair someone needs to explain that to the orange privileged elitist bastard.
 
It’s all good. It was quite predictable that SCOTUS wouldn’t prevent the sentence from being imposed. In fact, I predicted it.

They most often decline to take a case where the litigation isn’t finished. They usually prefer to weigh in only after there is a “complete” record. The sentencing allowed entry of judgment to be made and with that there is now a complete record.

So, Trump be required to go through the motions of the State’s appellate process. That’s probably pointless, since it’s NY.

But, then, the appeal (now on a complete appellate record) can go to SCOTUS.

THIS CASE is — and has been — a miscarriage of justice and a deliberate mockery of laws, rules and procedures. It will get reversed and dismissed.
This is all true, but Trump was not asking for a ruling in the case- he was asking for a stay so that the interlocutory appeal could be heard before sentencing.

Merchan delayed ruling on that motion for 5 months, and then denied it at the last minute and set sentencing for 5 days later.

He effectively denied Trump the interlocutory appeal, and the SCOTUS could have prevented that- 4 Justices saw it that way.

Roberts was afraid of looking political, and he chose to let the sentencing go ahead since Merchan had already said it would be an unconditional discharge. That might be convenient, but it does not enforce due process.
 
15th post
You really are naive sometimes.

Nah. I just like to get to the point. And in exposing your endless fraudulence, sometimes a simple question suffices.
Because he's a tax evading fraudster with billions of dollars in assets who enriched himself by charging extortionate hotel rates to the secret service etc.
You’re a fraud. You make Indic claims and don’t bother to support them.

By the way, charging the government for lodging the secret service wasn’t a new thing from Trump. I doubt you ever bothered to look. You hack.
It did interfere yes, it helped him:

View attachment 1063874
He might have LOST the election but for the "witch hunt"
Maybe you libturds will learn a lesson from that. But I doubt it. You tend to be a slow lot.
 
This is all true, but Trump was not asking for a ruling in the case-

I know. As I said, what he sought was to deny the persecution and the judge the ability to sentence him. I was clear about my prediction. And I was right. 🙂
 
Nah. I just like to get to the point. And in exposing your endless fraudulence, sometimes a simple question suffices.

You’re a fraud. You make Indic claims and don’t bother to support them.

By the way, charging the government for lodging the secret service wasn’t a new thing from Trump. I doubt you ever bothered to look. You hack.

Maybe you libturds will learn a lesson from that. But I doubt it. You tend to be a slow lot.
Would you have preferred he had no trials at all but ended up losing the election?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom