Supreme Court Broadens Hobby Lobby Ruling to All Forms of Birth Control

[Synthaholic]

Yet another far left blog site that the far left Taliban believes without question or hesitation.

Mother Jones is hack far left web site..

And you're a dumbass (as is everyone who 'thanked' you)


Hobby Lobby Ruling Applies to More Than Just Abortifacients | National Review Online

 

[Synthaholic]

A great and solid victory for freedom!!

And the conservative war on women continues.

 

[Synthaholic]

This ruling will be irrelevant. Insurance companies - even Hobby Lobby's - will still provide contraceptive coverage to women because it's cheaper than the alternatives, i.e. pregnancy.

 

[Zander]

"Mother Jones" is engaging in fear mongering. They're throwing the LWNJ's some blue meat......

 

[Zander]

This ruling will be irrelevant. Insurance companies - even Hobby Lobby's - will still provide contraceptive coverage to women because it's cheaper than the alternatives, i.e. pregnancy.

You're literally all over the board!!

"it's a war on women"

"it's irrelevant"

Pick a meme and stick with it will ya?

 

[daveman]

No clue and couldn't care less...

Then I'll just settle for calling you a proglodyte fucktard right here.

As You Wish...

Oh, I know it has no effect on you. I expect you hear it so often it's just noise.

 

[daveman]

The last part of that excerpt deserves an additional comment. The idea that not subsidizing something is equivalent to banning it, is as silly as the idea that not taxing something is equivalent to subsidizing it.

As soon as liberals can get over these egregiously irrational concepts, we will all be able to get along a bit better.

.

Don't hold yer breath. Liberals bitterly cling to their emotional illogic. It's all they have.

 

[DriftingSand]

Supreme Court Broadens Hobby Lobby Ruling to All Forms of Birth Control | Mother Jones


told you so.....

Less than a day after the United States Supreme Court issued its divisive ruling on Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, it has already begun to toss aside the supposedly narrow interpretation of the decision. On Tuesday, the Supremes ordered lower courts to rehear any cases where companies had sought to deny coverage for any type of contraception, not just the specific types Hobby Lobby was opposed to.

No matter what Alito and other justices may claim, court decisions set precedent and offer opportunities for lower courts to expand the logic of the initial case. (See Bush v. Gore.) The immediate turnaround to broaden the scope of Hobby Lobby won't do anything to dispel fears that the case has opened the way for a broad swath of businesses to object to any government regulation they dislike based on the religious whims of corporate owners.

told you so. this is what you get for a cheap partisan win. You get chaos.

And? Is there a problem? PB, you're a guy. Stop acting like you know what's good for women. They can handle themselves without the far left telling them that.

It's the left's "war on women." They're trying to force them to think like the left does. Fortunately, most women are smarter than that.

 

[billyerock1991]

Yet another far left blog site that the far left Taliban believes without question or hesitation.

Mother Jones is hack far left web site..

no thanks to right wing nazi they hate everything

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

Yet another far left blog site that the far left Taliban believes without question or hesitation.

Mother Jones is hack far left web site..

My Lord you're a moron.

 

[Synthaholic]

This ruling will be irrelevant. Insurance companies - even Hobby Lobby's - will still provide contraceptive coverage to women because it's cheaper than the alternatives, i.e. pregnancy.

You're literally all over the board!!

"it's a war on women"

Republican intent.

"it's irrelevant"

Reality.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Bummer---pregnant women----EVERYWHERE

White liberals may actually have to start having kids !

 

[TemplarKormac]

This ruling will be irrelevant. Insurance companies - even Hobby Lobby's - will still provide contraceptive coverage to women because it's cheaper than the alternatives, i.e. pregnancy.

Well of course it's irrelevant, anything that doesn't fit the liberal mold is irrelevant. What's new?

 

[Freewill]

This ruling will be irrelevant. Insurance companies - even Hobby Lobby's - will still provide contraceptive coverage to women because it's cheaper than the alternatives, i.e. pregnancy.

If so then why do you think the left is acting as spoiled brats?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Supreme Court Broadens Hobby Lobby Ruling to All Forms of Birth Control | Mother Jones


told you so.....

Less than a day after the United States Supreme Court issued its divisive ruling on Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, it has already begun to toss aside the supposedly narrow interpretation of the decision. On Tuesday, the Supremes ordered lower courts to rehear any cases where companies had sought to deny coverage for any type of contraception, not just the specific types Hobby Lobby was opposed to.

No matter what Alito and other justices may claim, court decisions set precedent and offer opportunities for lower courts to expand the logic of the initial case. (See Bush v. Gore.) The immediate turnaround to broaden the scope of Hobby Lobby won't do anything to dispel fears that the case has opened the way for a broad swath of businesses to object to any government regulation they dislike based on the religious whims of corporate owners.

told you so. this is what you get for a cheap partisan win. You get chaos.

So why when many of us pointed out the legitimate slippery slope aspect of this, the RWnuts around here pounded the table insisting that was bullshit?

Let's be clear. Most conservatives want birth control coverage out of the mandatory minimums of employer provided insurance. This has nothing to do with any trumped up arguments about abortion.

 

[Mr. H.]

How refreshing. Voice being given to Americans. Whoda thunkit?

Hobby Lobby covered abortifacients for their employees until it was mandated. Then they found religion.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

This only implies that lower courts will be allowed to hear these cases in order to verify whether or not the employer truly has a religious objection (in other words to make sure it's not abused).

 

[DriftingSand]

Bummer---pregnant women----EVERYWHERE

White liberals may actually have to start having kids !

Most are gay ... so no worries.

 

[jillian]

How refreshing. Voice being given to Americans. Whoda thunkit?

corporations are fictitious entities used by individuals to shield themselves from personal liability they exist to allow jurisdiction to be asserted over an entity or by an entity.

they are not humans. no one ever contemplated corporations having first amendment rights.

but the rabid right wouldn't be singing the same tune if islam was the majority religion.

i'm embarrassed by the decisions being issued by this court.

i do however think if you want to claim you have the right to impose your religion on your employees, then you shouldn't be able to shield yourself from liability for debt, or the torts and criminal actions of your corporation

good luck with that.

 

[Misty]

Why do women have to pollute their body with hormones to keep from getting pregnant? Why is there no birth control, besides a vasectomy, for men. That's the question you should be asking.

The answer is because men don't want to be responsible for birth control. They want to put it on the woman.

Women are more likely to get blood clots heart attacks strokes and cancer because of birth control.

Supreme Court Broadens Hobby Lobby Ruling to All Forms of Birth Control | Mother Jones


told you so.....

Less than a day after the United States Supreme Court issued its divisive ruling on Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, it has already begun to toss aside the supposedly narrow interpretation of the decision. On Tuesday, the Supremes ordered lower courts to rehear any cases where companies had sought to deny coverage for any type of contraception, not just the specific types Hobby Lobby was opposed to.

No matter what Alito and other justices may claim, court decisions set precedent and offer opportunities for lower courts to expand the logic of the initial case. (See Bush v. Gore.) The immediate turnaround to broaden the scope of Hobby Lobby won't do anything to dispel fears that the case has opened the way for a broad swath of businesses to object to any government regulation they dislike based on the religious whims of corporate owners.

told you so. this is what you get for a cheap partisan win. You get chaos.