Supreme Court Blocks Federal Judges Ruling In Favor Of Birthright Citizenship.

[Highlight]

I for one am in favor of doing away with birthright citizenship. I am more in favor of taking all the illegal invaders who spit out anchor babies in this country and dropping them off in the middle of the ocean. With no flotation devices.

But there is a right way and a wrong way of doing things. The supreme court basically said that a Federal Judge ruling to keep birthright citizenship couldn't impede what Trump is trying to do nationwide. But the core function of a Federal Judge is to see to it that the Constitution is followed. And like it or not, the 14th amendment exists as part of the Constitution. And its wording is clear. Unless that amendment can be repealed, it should be obeyed.

This is yet another reason to vote Democrat in the upcoming 2026 mid term elections. Because I was reading that with a large enough of a majority, Congress can impeach any sitting judge on the supreme court. What would give them the right to do so? Having a supreme court judge go against what the Constitution says is justification enough.

You probably noticed that the supreme court didn't take up this issue themselves. They just said what a Federal Judge could or couldn't do. I want the supreme court jesters to take up this issue themselves! Is the 14th Amendment in the Constitution? Yes. Will they uphold the Constitution? YES or NO!!!

 

[Dante]

I for one am in favor of doing away with birthright citizenship. I am more in favor of taking all the illegal invaders who spit out anchor babies in this country and dropping them off in the middle of the ocean. With no flotation devices.

But there is a right way and a wrong way of doing things. The supreme court basically said that a Federal Judge ruling to keep birthright citizenship couldn't impede what Trump is trying to do nationwide. But the core function of a Federal Judge is to see to it that the Constitution is followed. And like it or not, the 14th amendment exists as part of the Constitution. And its wording is clear. Unless that amendment can be repealed, it should be obeyed.

This is yet another reason to vote Democrat in the upcoming 2026 mid term elections. Because I was reading that with a large enough of a majority, Congress can impeach any sitting judge on the supreme court. What would give them the right to do so? Having a supreme court judge go against what the Constitution says is justification enough.

You probably noticed that the supreme court didn't take up this issue themselves. They just said what a Federal Judge could or couldn't do. I want the supreme court jesters to take up this issue themselves! Is the 14th Amendment in the Constitution? Yes. Will they uphold the Constitution? YES or NO!!!

Not exactly.

Try and keep up

try reading the opinions

 

[Dante]

I for one am in favor of doing away with birthright citizenship.

The Court did not rule on Birthright Citizenship

 

[Highlight]

Not exactly.

Try and keep up

try reading the opinions

"Exactly" enough. And the opinions don't matter. The ruling does.

 

[Darkwind]

I for one am in favor of doing away with birthright citizenship. I am more in favor of taking all the illegal invaders who spit out anchor babies in this country and dropping them off in the middle of the ocean. With no flotation devices.

But there is a right way and a wrong way of doing things. The supreme court basically said that a Federal Judge ruling to keep birthright citizenship couldn't impede what Trump is trying to do nationwide. But the core function of a Federal Judge is to see to it that the Constitution is followed. And like it or not, the 14th amendment exists as part of the Constitution. And its wording is clear. Unless that amendment can be repealed, it should be obeyed.

This is yet another reason to vote Democrat in the upcoming 2026 mid term elections. Because I was reading that with a large enough of a majority, Congress can impeach any sitting judge on the supreme court. What would give them the right to do so? Having a supreme court judge go against what the Constitution says is justification enough.

You probably noticed that the supreme court didn't take up this issue themselves. They just said what a Federal Judge could or couldn't do. I want the supreme court jesters to take up this issue themselves! Is the 14th Amendment in the Constitution? Yes. Will they uphold the Constitution? YES or NO!!!

Not entirely accurate.

A Federal Judge IS supposed to use the Constitution and all applicable laws in his or her rulings. However, that ruling applies ONLY to their jurisdiction.

That is a full stop right there.

Miller said it best. No President should have to get a green light from 700 judges in order to perform the duties he was elected to perform.

That too is a full stop.

As to the 14th Amendment, no President has the authority to alter or dismiss an Amendment to the Constitution. Not through EO, not through EA. In fact, the only authority a President has regarding the Constitution and the Amendments found in that Constitution is to sign legislation either removing it or adding an additional Amendment, or even altering an existing Amendment.

There is a fully outlined process for altering, making, or removing Amendments. None of them can be done unilaterally by ANY President, of ANY party.

Now, the SCOTUS Is going to rule on Birthright Citizenship in October, is the schedule that I heard. At that time, I fully expect a 9-0 ruling against Trump regarding the EA/EO on birthright Citizenship.

However, until they do, no lower court can stop Trump, nor should they be permitted to do so.

Stay in your lane.

 

[Highlight]

The Court did not rule on Birthright Citizenship

I never said they did. But they should have.

 

[Dante]

"Exactly" enough. And the opinions don't matter. The ruling does.

I favor a strong executive, but not a corrupt one.

 

[Darkwind]

I favor a strong executive, but not a corrupt one.

So, you're glad that Biden is gone. I am too.

 

[Dante]

I never said they did. But they should have.

They were not asked to.

See? That is what is wrong with people like you. You fail Civics:101 every time.

 

[Dante]

So, you're glad that Biden is gone. I am too.

djt was gone in 2020. He should have stayed gone. We need to 86 47 again

 

[Highlight]

Not entirely accurate.

A Federal Judge IS supposed to use the Constitution and all applicable laws in his or her rulings. However, that ruling applies ONLY to their jurisdiction.

That is a full stop right there.

Miller said it best. No President should have to get a green light from 700 judges in order to perform the duties he was elected to perform.

That too is a full stop.

As to the 14th Amendment, no President has the authority to alter or dismiss an Amendment to the Constitution. Not through EO, not through EA. In fact, the only authority a President has regarding the Constitution and the Amendments found in that Constitution is to sign legislation either removing it or adding an additional Amendment, or even altering an existing Amendment.

There is a fully outlined process for altering, making, or removing Amendments. None of them can be done unilaterally by ANY President, of ANY party.

Now, the SCOTUS Is going to rule on Birthright Citizenship in October, is the schedule that I heard. At that time, I fully expect a 9-0 ruling against Trump regarding the EA/EO on birthright Citizenship.

However, until they do, no lower court can stop Trump, nor should they be permitted to do so.

Stay in your lane.

A lower court, such as a federal Court, should have the authority to stop any presidential action if it goes against the Constitution. THAT'S THEIR JOB! Until the supreme court says otherwise, the judgement of a Federal Judge in any state should apply to ALL states. Because the Constitution is the law of the land in all states.

 

[Darkwind]

A lower court, such as a federal Court, should have the authority to stop any presidential action if it goes against the Constitution. THAT'S THEIR JOB! Until the supreme court says otherwise, the judgement of a Federal Judge in any state should apply to ALL states. Because the Constitution is the law of the land in all states.

It is NOT their job. That is the job of the SCOTUS, which is the ONLY equal part of the Judiciary with the other branches.

Lower courts are authorized by Congress and as such, are part of Congress.

ONLY the Supreme Court is considered a co-equal branch.

 

[Highlight]

They were not asked to.

See? That is what is wrong with people like you. You fail Civics:101 every time.

They shouldn't need to be asked to. It is a simple matter. Should the Constitution in this matter be followed or not.

 

[Darkwind]

djt was gone in 2020. He should have stayed gone. We need to 86 47 again

We need to 86 anyone who attempts it.

 

[mudwhistle]

The Court did not rule on Birthright Citizenship

They did in a way, but they punted on eliminating it completely.

 

[Dante]

They shouldn't need to be asked to. It is a simple matter. Should the Constitution in thos matter be followed or not

Civics: 101
Fail

again

 

[Dante]

We need to 86 anyone who attempts it.

You want to fire voters?

 

[Dante]

They did in a way, but they punted on eliminating it completely.

Wrong. Post a mention where the opinion supports eliminating it

 

[Darkwind]

You want to fire voters?

Voters won't be removing Trump from office.

You do know that, right?

 

[Dante]

Voters won't be removing Trump from office.

You do know that, right?

We shall see. Representatives in a representative democracy. The US House and Senate, both houses, chambers of the Congress can turn Dem. we shall see