Support for removing Trump from office among Independents, Republicans and Democrats.

[CWayne]

Support for removing Trump from office among Democrats, Independents, and Republicans:

DEMOCRATS: 74%

INDEPENDENTS: 46%

REPUBLICANS: 14%

WHAT'S HOLDING YOU UP? IMPEACH HIM! IMPEACH HIM! You have the full support of the party that has wanted to nullify an election for three years now! Now all you need are the grounds!

And the beauty is that you want to impeach him for trying to expose a crime so you can replace him with the guy who committed the crime.

There is no evidence that BIDEN did anything wrong. NONE! He was one of several messengers calling for the Ukrainian prosecutor to be fired. The fired Ukrainian prosecutor was not prosecuting anyone. He was not doing his job. So if Hunter Biden was involved in anything illicit, he was safer with the prosecutor that was fired.

As for Trump he did the following:

01. Only agreed to talk to the Ukrainian President if he was willing to "play ball on Biden".

02. Temporarily blocked the sale of Javelin Anti-Tank Missiles to Ukraine on July 18, 2019

03. July 25, 2019 phone call happens between Trump and Ukrainian President. Ukrainian President asked about getting the Anti-Tank Missiles and Trump mentions he needs a favor first. Help investigating Joe Biden, his political opponent in the United States.

Easy path to impeachment right there. Only thing preventing Trump from being removed from office are a few Republican Senators who will probably pick PARTY over COUNTRY.

You have to be intentionally stupid to believe that. If trump's kids were with him on air force one and two weeks after leaving China his kids inked a 1.5 billion dollar deal, with the Chinese government, that targeted defense businesses that required trump to sign off on the deal because the Chinese government company had been proven to have stolen defense secrets, you would be screaming for his head.

Rightfully so.

But when it's bidens kid, along with Kerry's nephew , and Kerry had to approve the deal you are silent.

Well guess what silly person, that is ******* criminal!

Not a peep. They're down with it.

Repeat a lie....and for Trump ass kissers it has to be "true"..........


The Post's fact-check traced the origins of the $1.5 billion figure to a 2018 book published by conservative author Peter Schweizer.

A book that is fact-checked and loaded with footnotes. Do you know what footnotes are?

 

[kyzr]

There is no evidence that BIDEN did anything wrong.

Now you're just being stupid.

As for Trump he did the following:
01. Only agreed to talk to the Ukrainian President if he was willing to "play ball on Biden".
02. Temporarily blocked the sale of Javelin Anti-Tank Missiles to Ukraine on July 18, 2019
03. July 25, 2019 phone call happens between Trump and Ukrainian President. Ukrainian President asked about getting the Anti-Tank Missiles and Trump mentions he needs a favor first. Help investigating Joe Biden, his political opponent in the United States.

1 & 2, presidents have asked and done like 10,000 times before! Nothing new here.
3, Trump never asked to investigate a political opponent. There were all kinds of other people in on the call as it was made. Trump was investigating a possible crime, did nothing more than Hillary did in 2016, so if Trump is guilty, so is she. You would have put her in the WH without question. But if you still think it impeachable to remove a president for this only to replace him with the actual person committing the crime, be my guest: IMPEACH HIM.

PLEASE.


View attachment 283242

Please, name the last time a U.S. President would only talk to a leader of another country if they were willing to either discuss or dig up dirt on a domestic political opponent. Just name one and site the source and what was said! I'm waiting.

According to FEC, it is illegal for candidates running for the office of President to solicit the aid of a foreign government to dig up dirt on a political opponent in that election. Trump is guilty of this. Whistleblower #1 is a CIA officer working in the White House and has confirmed this. Whistleblower #2 has the firsthand knowledge that Trump claims Whistleblower #1 lacks. Whistleblower #2 will soon be adding what they know to the investigation. These are people that work at the White House. More people are likely to come forward in the weeks ahead.

As of right now, there is not proof, or solid evidence that Joe or Hunter Biden committed any crime with regard to Ukraine. So as of right now, no crime exists when it comes to the Biden's and Ukraine. Over the past 3 years, the F.B.I./Justice Department have not found anything on the Biden's with regard to Ukraine. There is an allegation, which seems to be primarily the result of someone searching for dirt and hoping to find something. Its basically someone looking at activities and relationships and trying to create a crime where none exist.

1. Trump did NOT ask for the Ukraine to "dig up dirt" on Biden, like Hillary paid Russians for in 2016, Trump asked Z to investigate what happened in 2016, where the Ukraine helped Hillary and hurt Trump.
2. The "whistleblowers" are irrelevant, Trump has every right to investigate potential crimes, as per existing treaties.
3. Joe Biden's video is proof that he fired the prosecutor investigating his son's company, where Hunter got $50,000 a month, to ensure that the Soros criminals were not investigated. Joe's protection racket.
4. China is the biggest crime, $1.5b worth. Nice work if you can get it.

 

[Claudette]

Have they got him yet???

LMFAO

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Support for removing Trump from office among Democrats, Independents, and Republicans:

DEMOCRATS: 74%

INDEPENDENTS: 46%

REPUBLICANS: 14%

WHAT'S HOLDING YOU UP? IMPEACH HIM! IMPEACH HIM! You have the full support of the party that has wanted to nullify an election for three years now! Now all you need are the grounds!

And the beauty is that you want to impeach him for trying to expose a crime so you can replace him with the guy who committed the crime.

There is no evidence that BIDEN did anything wrong. NONE! He was one of several messengers calling for the Ukrainian prosecutor to be fired. The fired Ukrainian prosecutor was not prosecuting anyone. He was not doing his job. So if Hunter Biden was involved in anything illicit, he was safer with the prosecutor that was fired.

As for Trump he did the following:

01. Only agreed to talk to the Ukrainian President if he was willing to "play ball on Biden".

02. Temporarily blocked the sale of Javelin Anti-Tank Missiles to Ukraine on July 18, 2019

03. July 25, 2019 phone call happens between Trump and Ukrainian President. Ukrainian President asked about getting the Anti-Tank Missiles and Trump mentions he needs a favor first. Help investigating Joe Biden, his political opponent in the United States.

Easy path to impeachment right there. Only thing preventing Trump from being removed from office are a few Republican Senators who will probably pick PARTY over COUNTRY.

And none of this is true.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

And the beauty is that you want to impeach him for trying to expose a crime so you can replace him with the guy who committed the crime.

Yes, yes....for you Trump ass kissers, Trump is a pure as fallen snow......The poor orange victim.....LMAO

Don't eat the orange snow.

 

[toobfreak]

Please, name the last time a U.S. President would only talk to a leader of another country if they were willing to either discuss or dig up dirt on a domestic political opponent.

Why do you perpetually act obtuse and stupid, or is it that you just are not acting? Virtually every deal, treaty and transaction between countries has wishes, desires and conditions set between them --- you scratch my back, I scratch yours. Thanks to Trump, we now know a whole lot more about Biden that we SHOULD know going into an election, such as the fact that his son was named a director of Ukraine's largest gas producer right after daddy Biden visited there, then when their investigator started looking into it, Pappy Biden threatened to withhold a billion in US aid unless the guy was fired.

Worse, a similar thing happened in China. THAT's an actual crime, not looking into it. Get your head right.

 

[U2Edge]

Support for removing Trump from office among Democrats, Independents, and Republicans:

DEMOCRATS: 74%

INDEPENDENTS: 46%

REPUBLICANS: 14%

WHAT'S HOLDING YOU UP? IMPEACH HIM! IMPEACH HIM! You have the full support of the party that has wanted to nullify an election for three years now! Now all you need are the grounds!

And the beauty is that you want to impeach him for trying to expose a crime so you can replace him with the guy who committed the crime.

There is no evidence that BIDEN did anything wrong. NONE! He was one of several messengers calling for the Ukrainian prosecutor to be fired. The fired Ukrainian prosecutor was not prosecuting anyone. He was not doing his job. So if Hunter Biden was involved in anything illicit, he was safer with the prosecutor that was fired.

As for Trump he did the following:

01. Only agreed to talk to the Ukrainian President if he was willing to "play ball on Biden".

02. Temporarily blocked the sale of Javelin Anti-Tank Missiles to Ukraine on July 18, 2019

03. July 25, 2019 phone call happens between Trump and Ukrainian President. Ukrainian President asked about getting the Anti-Tank Missiles and Trump mentions he needs a favor first. Help investigating Joe Biden, his political opponent in the United States.

Easy path to impeachment right there. Only thing preventing Trump from being removed from office are a few Republican Senators who will probably pick PARTY over COUNTRY.

Do you mean besides his own confession?

So, of those 'several messengers' calling for the Ukrainian prosecutor to be fired, how many offered to pay 1 billion dollars to do so? By my count, that would be one.

European contributions to Ukraine for development and military aid total 16 Billion dollars. They wanted the prosecutor fired as well.

Did any of them threaten to withhold that aid?

They all demanded the prosecutor be fired before anymore aid was given. So the answer is YES!

 

[U2Edge]

Support for removing Trump from office among Democrats, Independents, and Republicans:

DEMOCRATS: 74%

INDEPENDENTS: 46%

REPUBLICANS: 14%

The poll is from polling done by SSRS and independent research company and released by CNN on September 30, 2019.

Interesting to see that support among Republicans for removing Trump from office is already at 14%. The highest it ever got among Republicans with Richard Nixon was 31%


http://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2019/images/09/30/rel11a.-.impeachment.pdf

CNN Poll: Support for impeaching Trump rises among independents and Republicans - CNNPolitics

Poll asked kids who are brainless. CNN poll? Yeah they have no agenda!

Its not actually a CNN poll, and yes, the poll does ask adults of all ages. It wouldn't be an accurate poll if it didn't.

 

[U2Edge]

Please, name the last time a U.S. President would only talk to a leader of another country if they were willing to either discuss or dig up dirt on a domestic political opponent.

Why do you perpetually act obtuse and stupid, or is it that you just are not acting? Virtually every deal, treaty and transaction between countries has wishes, desires and conditions set between them --- you scratch my back, I scratch yours. Thanks to Trump, we now know a whole lot more about Biden that we SHOULD know going into an election, such as the fact that his son was named a director of Ukraine's largest gas producer right after daddy Biden visited there, then when their investigator started looking into it, Pappy Biden threatened to withhold a billion in US aid unless the guy was fired.

Worse, a similar thing happened in China. THAT's an actual crime, not looking into it. Get your head right.

Ahhh, so you FAIL to do the following:

Please, name the last time a U.S. President would only talk to a leader of another country if they were willing to either discuss or dig up dirt on a domestic political opponent.

Can't do it can you?

 

[sartre play]

Seems both party's are working in the twilight zone, yet see if I have this right. The news media is fake, journalists are fake, Democrats are fake, the FBI & CIA are fake public schools & colleges are fake, & the only one telling the truth is Trump, does this sound reasonable?

 

[U2Edge]

There is no evidence that BIDEN did anything wrong.

Now you're just being stupid.

As for Trump he did the following:
01. Only agreed to talk to the Ukrainian President if he was willing to "play ball on Biden".
02. Temporarily blocked the sale of Javelin Anti-Tank Missiles to Ukraine on July 18, 2019
03. July 25, 2019 phone call happens between Trump and Ukrainian President. Ukrainian President asked about getting the Anti-Tank Missiles and Trump mentions he needs a favor first. Help investigating Joe Biden, his political opponent in the United States.

1 & 2, presidents have asked and done like 10,000 times before! Nothing new here.
3, Trump never asked to investigate a political opponent. There were all kinds of other people in on the call as it was made. Trump was investigating a possible crime, did nothing more than Hillary did in 2016, so if Trump is guilty, so is she. You would have put her in the WH without question. But if you still think it impeachable to remove a president for this only to replace him with the actual person committing the crime, be my guest: IMPEACH HIM.

PLEASE.


View attachment 283242

Please, name the last time a U.S. President would only talk to a leader of another country if they were willing to either discuss or dig up dirt on a domestic political opponent. Just name one and site the source and what was said! I'm waiting.

According to FEC, it is illegal for candidates running for the office of President to solicit the aid of a foreign government to dig up dirt on a political opponent in that election. Trump is guilty of this. Whistleblower #1 is a CIA officer working in the White House and has confirmed this. Whistleblower #2 has the firsthand knowledge that Trump claims Whistleblower #1 lacks. Whistleblower #2 will soon be adding what they know to the investigation. These are people that work at the White House. More people are likely to come forward in the weeks ahead.

As of right now, there is not proof, or solid evidence that Joe or Hunter Biden committed any crime with regard to Ukraine. So as of right now, no crime exists when it comes to the Biden's and Ukraine. Over the past 3 years, the F.B.I./Justice Department have not found anything on the Biden's with regard to Ukraine. There is an allegation, which seems to be primarily the result of someone searching for dirt and hoping to find something. Its basically someone looking at activities and relationships and trying to create a crime where none exist.

1. Trump did NOT ask for the Ukraine to "dig up dirt" on Biden, like Hillary paid Russians for in 2016, Trump asked Z to investigate what happened in 2016, where the Ukraine helped Hillary and hurt Trump.
2. The "whistleblowers" are irrelevant, Trump has every right to investigate potential crimes, as per existing treaties.
3. Joe Biden's video is proof that he fired the prosecutor investigating his son's company, where Hunter got $50,000 a month, to ensure that the Soros criminals were not investigated. Joe's protection racket.
4. China is the biggest crime, $1.5b worth. Nice work if you can get it.

1. The phone call, texts and Presidents own admission says otherwise. So does the information from the Whistleblowers.

2. If the Whistleblowers were irrelevant, they would not be coming before Congress. Michael Atkinson, Trumps inspector general for national intelligence says the Whistleblowers statements are legit and congress will get to hear and see the information they have on Trump's criminal activity. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION LAW prevents soliciting the aid of a foreign government to dig up dirt on a political opponent. Any potential crimes or criminal investigations involving the United States and Ukraine are to be handled independently by the U.S. Justice Department!

3. Joe Biden's video shows he was one of many messengers trying to convince Ukraine to fire the prosecutor who was not doing his job, to include NOT PROSECUTING ANYONE. If Hunter Biden was guilty of anything, Joe Biden just made his sons legal situation worse by getting the sitting prosecutor fired.

4. The U.S. Justice Department does not seem to think so. Trump on the front lawn of the White House asking China to investigate his political opponent. ILLEGAL and criminal according to the laws of the United States Federal Election Commission!

 

[U2Edge]

Support for removing Trump from office among Democrats, Independents, and Republicans:

DEMOCRATS: 74%

INDEPENDENTS: 46%

REPUBLICANS: 14%

WHAT'S HOLDING YOU UP? IMPEACH HIM! IMPEACH HIM! You have the full support of the party that has wanted to nullify an election for three years now! Now all you need are the grounds!

And the beauty is that you want to impeach him for trying to expose a crime so you can replace him with the guy who committed the crime.

There is no evidence that BIDEN did anything wrong. NONE! He was one of several messengers calling for the Ukrainian prosecutor to be fired. The fired Ukrainian prosecutor was not prosecuting anyone. He was not doing his job. So if Hunter Biden was involved in anything illicit, he was safer with the prosecutor that was fired.

As for Trump he did the following:

01. Only agreed to talk to the Ukrainian President if he was willing to "play ball on Biden".

02. Temporarily blocked the sale of Javelin Anti-Tank Missiles to Ukraine on July 18, 2019

03. July 25, 2019 phone call happens between Trump and Ukrainian President. Ukrainian President asked about getting the Anti-Tank Missiles and Trump mentions he needs a favor first. Help investigating Joe Biden, his political opponent in the United States.

Easy path to impeachment right there. Only thing preventing Trump from being removed from office are a few Republican Senators who will probably pick PARTY over COUNTRY.

And none of this is true.

You wish it wasn't true, but it is. The question is what to do about it.

 

[U2Edge]

Seems both party's are working in the twilight zone, yet see if I have this right. The news media is fake, journalists are fake, Democrats are fake, the FBI & CIA are fake public schools & colleges are fake, & the only one telling the truth is Trump, does this sound reasonable?

It does to Trump. I think it will be apart of his speech when he resigns before impeachment. He will resign claiming he could no longer function as President because of the "criminal deep state". He will then be a private citizen and receive a Presidential Pardon from President Pence. In the next couple of years as a private citizen, he will launch his on TV station, TRUMP WORLD.

 

[kyzr]

There is no evidence that BIDEN did anything wrong.

Now you're just being stupid.

As for Trump he did the following:
01. Only agreed to talk to the Ukrainian President if he was willing to "play ball on Biden".
02. Temporarily blocked the sale of Javelin Anti-Tank Missiles to Ukraine on July 18, 2019
03. July 25, 2019 phone call happens between Trump and Ukrainian President. Ukrainian President asked about getting the Anti-Tank Missiles and Trump mentions he needs a favor first. Help investigating Joe Biden, his political opponent in the United States.

1 & 2, presidents have asked and done like 10,000 times before! Nothing new here.
3, Trump never asked to investigate a political opponent. There were all kinds of other people in on the call as it was made. Trump was investigating a possible crime, did nothing more than Hillary did in 2016, so if Trump is guilty, so is she. You would have put her in the WH without question. But if you still think it impeachable to remove a president for this only to replace him with the actual person committing the crime, be my guest: IMPEACH HIM.

PLEASE.


View attachment 283242

Please, name the last time a U.S. President would only talk to a leader of another country if they were willing to either discuss or dig up dirt on a domestic political opponent. Just name one and site the source and what was said! I'm waiting.

According to FEC, it is illegal for candidates running for the office of President to solicit the aid of a foreign government to dig up dirt on a political opponent in that election. Trump is guilty of this. Whistleblower #1 is a CIA officer working in the White House and has confirmed this. Whistleblower #2 has the firsthand knowledge that Trump claims Whistleblower #1 lacks. Whistleblower #2 will soon be adding what they know to the investigation. These are people that work at the White House. More people are likely to come forward in the weeks ahead.

As of right now, there is not proof, or solid evidence that Joe or Hunter Biden committed any crime with regard to Ukraine. So as of right now, no crime exists when it comes to the Biden's and Ukraine. Over the past 3 years, the F.B.I./Justice Department have not found anything on the Biden's with regard to Ukraine. There is an allegation, which seems to be primarily the result of someone searching for dirt and hoping to find something. Its basically someone looking at activities and relationships and trying to create a crime where none exist.

1. Trump did NOT ask for the Ukraine to "dig up dirt" on Biden, like Hillary paid Russians for in 2016, Trump asked Z to investigate what happened in 2016, where the Ukraine helped Hillary and hurt Trump.
2. The "whistleblowers" are irrelevant, Trump has every right to investigate potential crimes, as per existing treaties.
3. Joe Biden's video is proof that he fired the prosecutor investigating his son's company, where Hunter got $50,000 a month, to ensure that the Soros criminals were not investigated. Joe's protection racket.
4. China is the biggest crime, $1.5b worth. Nice work if you can get it.

1. The phone call, texts and Presidents own admission says otherwise. So does the information from the Whistleblowers.

2. If the Whistleblowers were irrelevant, they would not be coming before Congress. Michael Atkinson, Trumps inspector general for national intelligence says the Whistleblowers statements are legit and congress will get to hear and see the information they have on Trump's criminal activity. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION LAW prevents soliciting the aid of a foreign government to dig up dirt on a political opponent. Any potential crimes or criminal investigations involving the United States and Ukraine are to be handled independently by the U.S. Justice Department!

3. Joe Biden's video shows he was one of many messengers trying to convince Ukraine to fire the prosecutor who was not doing his job, to include NOT PROSECUTING ANYONE. If Hunter Biden was guilty of anything, Joe Biden just made his sons legal situation worse by getting the sitting prosecutor fired.

4. The U.S. Justice Department does not seem to think so. Trump on the front lawn of the White House asking China to investigate his political opponent. ILLEGAL and criminal according to the laws of the United States Federal Election Commission!

1. We're obviously reading the Trump-Z phone transcript differently. Let AG Barr and Durham sort thru the evidence and make a ruling. Then Giuliani and others seem to have evidence that the Ukraine was forced by Biden's threat to withhold $391m of US military aid if the prosecutor wasn't fired. Barr needs to set the record straight once and for all. Z needs to say whose version is right, a bad prosecutor was fired by Biden, or a good prosecutor was fired by Biden.

2. If digging up dirt was a crime, how about Hillary's paying Russians for the Steele Dossier, used by the FBI to spy on Trump? If that wasn't a crime, then Trump's off the cuff remark isn't a crime, so says Alan Dershowitz. The whistleblower law doesn't cover the president, it covers the intel agents under the DNI. Trump wants the Ukraine to investigate how much the Ukraine helped Hillary and hurt Trump in the 2016 election. That is not digging dirt, that is an investigation into potential election meddling. Just like Mueller did on Trump-Russia.

3. Everyone agrees that Hunter Biden's $50,000 a month salary from Burisma looks horrible, especially if Biden told Ukraine not to investigate the Soros organization. An obvious protection racket.

4. You are saying that when democrats break the law overseas the GOP can't investigate, but when the GOP doesn't break the law the democrats can investigate, like by Mueller. WTF?? That makes no sense. Trump did not collude/conspire. Biden and Hillary did collude/conspire.

 

[nat4900]

4. You are saying that when democrats break the law overseas the GOP can't investigate, but when the GOP doesn't break the law the democrats can investigate, like by Mueller. WTF?? That makes no sense. Trump did not collude/conspire. Biden and Hillary did collude/conspire

You're more fucked up than usual..........Time for your daily orange kool-aid????

 

[g5000]

Nat and U2edge just don't get it. What part of:
1. Nancy doesn't have a legitimate "impeachment inquiry", the whole House needs to vote on it for it to be legal

Nope. That's false. You have been lied to. A congressional committee does not need a full House vote to begin a hearing.

 

[g5000]

Trump is going to need a lot more than his "base" to be re-elected. If there is a crack in his base (14) percent, and growing dissent among Independents, that does not bode well for him.

They dissenters don't even need to vote Democratic next time. They can just stay home on Election Day, and that will hurt Trump's chances tremendously.

 

[nat4900]

Nat and U2edge just don't get it. What part of:
1. Nancy doesn't have a legitimate "impeachment inquiry", the whole House needs to vote on it for it to be legal

Nope. That's false. You have been lied to. A congressional committee does not need a full House vote to begin a hearing.

Its very easy to lie to morons, like KYZR.........this is why Trump stated that he LOVES the poorly educated.....They can be led over the cliff without a whimper.

 

[nat4900]

Trump is going to need a lot more than his "base" to be re-elected. If there is a crack in his base (14) percent, and growing dissent among Independents, that does not bode well for him.

They dissenters don't even need to vote Democratic next time. They can just stay home on Election Day, and that will hurt Trump's chances tremendously.

What are....realistically....the chances of Trump carrying WI, MI and PA again???
Hell Trump should be worried about GA, AZ and FL.

 

[kyzr]

Nat and U2edge just don't get it. What part of:
1. Nancy doesn't have a legitimate "impeachment inquiry", the whole House needs to vote on it for it to be legal

Nope. That's false. You have been lied to. A congressional committee does not need a full House vote to begin a hearing.

My point is that in order to begin an "impeachment inquiry" the whole House needs to vote, the same way it was done for Nixon and for Clinton. Then BOTH parties have subpoena power, otherwise its a one-sided kangaroo court. The kind Nancy and Schiff like.