Super Salesman He Ain’t

Flanders

ARCHCONSERVATIVE
Joined
Sep 23, 2010
Messages
7,628
Reaction score
748
Points
205
Everybody points out that Barack Taqiyya never stops campaigning. Critics are correct in identifying all of his endless speeches as campaign speeches.

I have not found anyone in the media talking about what drives him beyond saying he campaigns because it’s easier than governing. As true as that observation is there is more than “campaigning” to it. Question: Why does he continue to engage in behavior that only draws scorn? Even the parasites who will benefit the most from his policies squirm whenever he makes a speech. Let me preface my answer to the question.

In theology, Satan is considered the first liar. Who was the first known human liar? No one can say, but I suspect it was the first person trying to sell something. Salesmen have been lying ever since.

Why is Barack Taqiyya getting away with so many lies? That’s an easy one. It’s because he is the salesman the liberal MSM was waiting for.

Look at the evolution of product sales to better understand why Barack Taqiyya was built up as a savior; the messiah who brings hope to the world. When asked how he was going to save us all he answered with a platitude.

Look at product advertising from the beginning and you’ll arrive at selling the salesman not the product. First it was using Hollywood’s stars in radio advertising, then came famous athletes in TV ads. Products sold simply because the salesman was famous. That’s what “selling the salesman’ means.

It was always known that the same sales technique used to sell products would work for political causes if the right salesman could be found. Up until now there was no politician who was trusted enough for the public to buy socialism because of the salesman. Then came Barack Taqiyya who campaigned on platitudes. If you remember his 2008 campaign the MSM sold him to the public. He won the election before most Americans knew what he was selling.

Few Americans would buy a used car from Barack Taqiyya, while a substantial number appear close to buying the destructive agenda he is selling because of his fame which is much different than the fame of previous presidents.

To answer my question: Barack Taqiyya is not campaigning. He is hung up on the idea that he is a super salesman, yet his record shows that his greatest failures are seen in the crap he cannot sell. His self-promoting remark about selling Hillarycare II, reported by then-Representative Marion Barry, is the best insight you’ll find to his exaggerated view of his own sales prowess:


Berry recounted meetings with White House officials, reminiscent of some during the Clinton days, where he and others urged them not to force Blue Dogs “off into that swamp” of supporting bills that would be unpopular with voters back home.

“I’ve been doing that with this White House, and they just don’t seem to give it any credibility at all,” Berry said. “They just kept telling us how good it was going to be. The president himself, when that was brought up in one group, said, ‘Well, the big difference here and in ’94 was you’ve got me.’ We’re going to see how much difference that makes now.”

Berry: Obama said "big difference" between '10 and '94 is "me" - On Congress - POLITICO.com

The difference he made turned out to be Congress ramming the ACA down the public’s throat with lies and bribes followed by the Supreme Court putting its stamp of approval on an unconstitutional law. That amounts to a testament to Barack Taqiyya’s super salesmanship in some quarters. Today, the super salesman is failing to sell the ACA’s implementation to an overwhelming majority of Americans.

Barack Taqiyya cannot govern a free people. So he makes no pretense of governing. Since he can’t govern he imposes his agenda through federal bureaucracies like the IRS, the Department of Justice, the Department of Homeland Security, the EPA, and so on. The law means nothing to him. Saving the ACA at any cost proves it. The US Constitution and the Bill of Rights means less than the law. The IRS proves it.

The scary part

Barack Taqiyya is commander in chief without a clue as Benghazi proves. The military is what the military is. The super salesman can’t sell the military to the American people who already have the highest regard for the men and women serving in the armed forces; so he is left with selling lies to cover his blunders in disasters like Benghazi, and he’s failing at that, too.

NOTE: High regard for America’s military men and women does not always include high-ranking officers who play politics for any Administration. With the exception of Lt. Col. Gibson, the high ranking officers connected to the Benghazi attack did not cover themselves with honor:


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOoGL3eTvZI&feature=player_embedded]Hicks: General Told Me - YouTube[/ame]​

If the order to stand down while Americans were fighting for their lives did not come from the president, I doubt if super salesman knows who did issue the order. If the order did come from him as I suspect it shows how inept he really is. In short: Super salesman couldn’t give away water bottled from the fountain of youth. It gets worse for super salesman.

Ripley’s Believe It or Not!

Barack Taqiyya slept throughout the entire attack in Benghazi.

Believe it if you believe sleeping protects him from facing the music for the deaths of Americans killed in the second attack when there was every chance they might have been saved.

This part is the lie too much.

The reason given for not sending help was that help could not get there in time. That B.S. does not hold up because nobody knew how long our guys could hold out. As it turned out they held out for more than enough time for help to arrive. In theory they could have held out for a day or more. Nobody in the Administration knew how long they could keep fighting, yet the decision was made to stand down while they were still fighting off the attackers.

I firmly believe that the Administration is covering up one thing more than anything else.

Ambassador Stevens and Sean Smith were killed in the first attack on the consulate.


images

images

Sean Smith​

Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods were killed hours later in the second attack on the CIA annex.

images

Glen Doherty​

images

Tyrone Woods​

Based on this Administration’s track record in Muslim countries there is good reason to believe that Barack Taqiyya & Company made a conscious decision to abandon the CIA annex after it was learned that Stevens was dead. With Stevens dead there was no incentive to risk escalating the fighting in Benghazi just to save a few civilians.

Exactly when the White House learned that Stevens and Smith were killed is more than a little hazy. Time lines say that the president was NOT told Ambassador Stevens was dead until AFTER the attack on the CIA annex ended. I don’t believe it. Admitting that Barack Taqiyya knew Stevens was dead before the second attack began is political suicide. They have to lie just as Suzy Five Shows lied when she called a well-coordinated military attack a “demonstration.”

Finally, Suzy Five Shows was rewarded with a promotion because she kept the focus on the video nobody saw. That gave the White House breathing room to fix the time line regarding what the president knew and when he knew it. Who gave the order to stand down was lost in Suzy’s smokescreen. To this day, learning who gave the order to stand down is not a priority in Congress, and certainly not in media boardrooms.
 
Last edited:
First off, who the hell is Barack Taqiyya and Susy Five Shows? Do you mean President Barack Obama and Ambassador Susan Rice?

Secondly, most of the bribes, cover-ups, etc. are unsubstantiated. You provide me some proof that any of these things actually occured, then maybe I'll believe you.

Thirdly, Obama gives WAY too many speeches, and on this point I agree with you. I can't stand to watch him either.

Fourthly, what is your fear of socialism? Much of Europe is socialist and they have free healthcare, free college, etc. Sounds like a sweet deal to me. Socialism and Communism is NOT the same thing, nor is Communism and Soviet Russia "Communism" the same thing. There has never existed a true Communist country.

Fifth, Obama does not receive any more special treatment due to his "fame"(?) than his predecessors. How about Reagan? He was an actor AND governor of California. Did he not receive praise because of his fame?

Sixthly, I would have a hard time believing that Christopher Stevens would have wanted people to kill in his protection. He was an ambassador; he didn't have a gun on his hip. My mother went to school with him and he just wasn't that type of guy. Some would rather die than kill.

Lastly, I think both Democrats and Republicans can be blamed for many things. Both get singled out way too much. Barack Obama may be more-or-less an empty suit, but he's far less nefarious than you give him credit for.
 
Too long, too crazy........didn't read
 
First off, who the hell is Barack Taqiyya and Susy Five Shows? Do you mean President Barack Obama and Ambassador Susan Rice?

To sambino510:You figured that out for yourself; so I guess you’re not a complete imbecile.

Secondly, most of the bribes, cover-ups, etc. are unsubstantiated. You provide me some proof that any of these things actually occured, then maybe I'll believe you.

To sambino510: I’m not providing you with anything.

And why is that people like you think your beliefs are important to others? Frankly, I don’t give a rat’s what you believe.

Friendly advice: Don’t read my messages. You’ll only get more of the same.


Fourthly, what is your fear of socialism? Much of Europe is socialist and they have free healthcare, free college, etc.

To sambino510: Europe is a basket case. I fear parasites because throughout history they always found a way to bring down great nations from within. American parasites discovered socialism more than a century ago and they used it to destroy this country. Their task is almost completed.

Sounds like a sweet deal to me.

To sambino510: Only parasites think living off of others is a sweet deal.

Socialism and Communism is NOT the same thing, nor is Communism and Soviet Russia "Communism" the same thing. There has never existed a true Communist country.

To sambino510: Socialism/Communism is one religion. Research my messages if you want details. I don’t have the time or the patience to explain to everybody who pops up in my threads.

Fifth, Obama does not receive any more special treatment due to his "fame"(?) than his predecessors.

To sambino510: No president received more special treatment than Barack Taqiyya gets from the media, the courts, and everywhere else.

How about Reagan? He was an actor AND governor of California. Did he not receive praise because of his fame?

To sambino510: The media hated Ronald Reagan and treated him like he was an idiot. Most Americans admired him; if not for his policies then for the kind of man he was.
 
The former community agitator has no other skills so he counts on the media to prop up his failed administration with puff pieces and propaganda.
 
First off, who the hell is Barack Taqiyya and Susy Five Shows? Do you mean President Barack Obama and Ambassador Susan Rice?

To sambino510:You figured that out for yourself; so I guess you’re not a complete imbecile.

Secondly, most of the bribes, cover-ups, etc. are unsubstantiated. You provide me some proof that any of these things actually occured, then maybe I'll believe you.

To sambino510: I’m not providing you with anything.

And why is that people like you think your beliefs are important to others? Frankly, I don’t give a rat’s what you believe.

Friendly advice: Don’t read my messages. You’ll only get more of the same.




To sambino510: Europe is a basket case. I fear parasites because throughout history they always found a way to bring down great nations from within. American parasites discovered socialism more than a century ago and they used it to destroy this country. Their task is almost completed.



To sambino510: Only parasites think living off of others is a sweet deal.



To sambino510: Socialism/Communism is one religion. Research my messages if you want details. I don’t have the time or the patience to explain to everybody who pops up in my threads.

Fifth, Obama does not receive any more special treatment due to his "fame"(?) than his predecessors.

To sambino510: No president received more special treatment than Barack Taqiyya gets from the media, the courts, and everywhere else.

How about Reagan? He was an actor AND governor of California. Did he not receive praise because of his fame?

To sambino510: The media hated Ronald Reagan and treated him like he was an idiot. Most Americans admired him; if not for his policies then for the kind of man he was.

So let me get this straight. You post a message, obviously thinking that your beliefs are important. Someone replies, and they don't have a right to think what they're saying is important. I don't think my opinion is MORE important than yours; I was just trying to have a friendly debate. If I don't reply to your message then you're talking to a computer screen. I cared enough about what you posted to reply. Try to care enough about what I post to do the same.

Everyone who has ever said Barack Obama is guilty of murder or bribery or whatever tells others to "go find the evidence for themselves". Is it so hard to post one article for us lowly, inferior beings? I know I couldn't possibly ever match your gargantuan intelligence, but please, have pity on me.

Which American socialists, when, and how did they destroy this country? Or is answering me that not worth your precious time either? Educate me, if I'm such a worthless pile of garbage.

My question of who Barack Taqiyya and Susie Five Shows is was rhetorical. I just thought it was a childish and disrespectful way of referring to people you disagree with.
 
So let me get this straight. You post a message, obviously thinking that your beliefs are important.

To sambino510: No I don’t. I post my opinions and interpretations for conservatives who might get something from them just as I get something from the conservative articles I elaborate on. My beliefs are incidental.

Someone replies, and they don't have a right to think what they're saying is important.

To sambino510: Nothing said by anyone who thinks socialism/communism is a sweet deal is important to me.

I don't think my opinion is MORE important than yours;

To sambino510: You started with “believe” now your switching to opinion. Either way I still don’t give a rat’s ass.

I was just trying to have a friendly debate.

To sambino510: No you weren’t. You wanted to spout your beliefs/opinions in a conservative’s thread.

If I don't reply to your message then you're talking to a computer screen.

To sambino510: Let me worry about it.

I cared enough about what you posted to reply.

To sambino510: No you didn’t. You replied because you did not like what I said.

Try to care enough about what I post to do the same.

To sambino510: You got two replies —— not because I care about what you said, but in the hope you will learn where you stand in my opinion.

My question of who Barack Taqiyya and Susie Five Shows is was rhetorical. I just thought it was a childish and disrespectful way of referring to people you disagree with.

To sambino510: Now you have it straight. I have no respect for government officials who cannot open their mouths without lying. And please don’t reply with this B.S. “Respect the office if not the officeholder.”

The two people we are discussing, along with many others, would sellout this country to the UNIC (United Nations/International Community) in a heartbeat. I do not respect them or the offices they hold —— offices that provide them with the authority to betray their own country without fear of punishment. Just so you understand what I’m talking about let me repeat something I’ve said many times.

In addition to the United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945, the sneaks who got this country into the UN knew what they were doing when they designed a foundation that was a masterpiece of betrayal. A foundation that would withstand every challenge when their descendants carried on. Treason became legal the minute the US became a member of an underhanded organization that was, and is, determined to tear down America. Membership in the UN meant that no American official betraying this country on the UN’s behalf could be prosecuted for treason. Only lawyers could design something like that.
 
Hey Flanders.............you might benefit from a surgery that would install a glass bellybutton because your head is so far up your ass.
 
So let me get this straight. You post a message, obviously thinking that your beliefs are important.

To sambino510: No I don’t. I post my opinions and interpretations for conservatives who might get something from them just as I get something from the conservative articles I elaborate on. My beliefs are incidental.

Someone replies, and they don't have a right to think what they're saying is important.

To sambino510: Nothing said by anyone who thinks socialism/communism is a sweet deal is important to me.



To sambino510: You started with “believe” now your switching to opinion. Either way I still don’t give a rat’s ass.



To sambino510: No you weren’t. You wanted to spout your beliefs/opinions in a conservative’s thread.



To sambino510: Let me worry about it.



To sambino510: No you didn’t. You replied because you did not like what I said.

Try to care enough about what I post to do the same.

To sambino510: You got two replies —— not because I care about what you said, but in the hope you will learn where you stand in my opinion.

My question of who Barack Taqiyya and Susie Five Shows is was rhetorical. I just thought it was a childish and disrespectful way of referring to people you disagree with.

To sambino510: Now you have it straight. I have no respect for government officials who cannot open their mouths without lying. And please don’t reply with this B.S. “Respect the office if not the officeholder.”

The two people we are discussing, along with many others, would sellout this country to the UNIC (United Nations/International Community) in a heartbeat. I do not respect them or the offices they hold —— offices that provide them with the authority to betray their own country without fear of punishment. Just so you understand what I’m talking about let me repeat something I’ve said many times.

In addition to the United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945, the sneaks who got this country into the UN knew what they were doing when they designed a foundation that was a masterpiece of betrayal. A foundation that would withstand every challenge when their descendants carried on. Treason became legal the minute the US became a member of an underhanded organization that was, and is, determined to tear down America. Membership in the UN meant that no American official betraying this country on the UN’s behalf could be prosecuted for treason. Only lawyers could design something like that.

I promise you, I replied because I just wanted to have a discussion and clarify your opinions. It was not out of frustration about what you said. I reply to people I agree with or disagree with; doesn't matter.

Anyways, I know you don't "give a rat's ass" about what I'm writing so I'll just leave it at thanks for the two replies and good luck with your theoretical perspectives. I agree with a lot of them.
 
BTW Flanders..............if you'd ever bother to read the Bible (because you sound like one of those Bible thumping fundamentalists who hate Obama and clutch their guns), you'd know that the first liar was Cain, after he slew Able and God asked him where his brother was.

But then again....................I guess it's easier to point fingers at the black man in the White House because you don't have to think much to attract the racists.
 
BTW Flanders..............if you'd ever bother to read the Bible (because you sound like one of those Bible thumping fundamentalists who hate Obama and clutch their guns), you'd know that the first liar was Cain, after he slew Able and God asked him where his brother was.

To ABikerSailor: You’re the one who cites the Bible, yet you call me a Bible-thumper!

And I clutch the Second Amendment because it is the best and only defense against government tyranny. If nothing else gun owners willing to defend themselves from the government don’t die victims.

BTW, I assume you believe Cain was the first liar based on your Bible. However, different versions of the Devil appear in theologies that preceded the first Christian Bible. Is it possible one of the earlier religions identified a liar before Cain showed up?

For future reference. Instead of guessing see this thread if you want my views on organized religion in general:



But then again....................I guess it's easier to point fingers at the black man in the White House because you don't have to think much to attract the racists.

To ABikerSailor: There’s a Communist America-hater in the White House who happens to be black. You and your kind play the race card in order to give Barack Taqiyya blanket absolution. In short: A black president can do no wrong because he’s black. I hold a different view. The more people who hate a Communist for whatever reason the better off the country is.

I suspect that you are too dense to see where the real danger is coming from so make an effort to wrap your limited intellect around this: Racists are preferred over Communists.
 
BTW Flanders..............if you'd ever bother to read the Bible (because you sound like one of those Bible thumping fundamentalists who hate Obama and clutch their guns), you'd know that the first liar was Cain, after he slew Able and God asked him where his brother was.

To ABikerSailor: You’re the one who cites the Bible, yet you call me a Bible-thumper!

And I clutch the Second Amendment because it is the best and only defense against government tyranny. If nothing else gun owners willing to defend themselves from the government don’t die victims.

BTW, I assume you believe Cain was the first liar based on your Bible. However, different versions of the Devil appear in theologies that preceded the first Christian Bible. Is it possible one of the earlier religions identified a liar before Cain showed up?

For future reference. Instead of guessing see this thread if you want my views on organized religion in general:



But then again....................I guess it's easier to point fingers at the black man in the White House because you don't have to think much to attract the racists.

To ABikerSailor: There’s a Communist America-hater in the White House who happens to be black. You and your kind play the race card in order to give Barack Taqiyya blanket absolution. In short: A black president can do no wrong because he’s black. I hold a different view. The more people who hate a Communist for whatever reason the better off the country is.

I suspect that you are too dense to see where the real danger is coming from so make an effort to wrap your limited intellect around this: Racists are preferred over Communists.

Interesting..............you call Obama a Communist, when in reality, he's not only helped the stock market double since Jr. left office, but he's also helped the wealthy get richer.

Doesn't sound really Communist to me, because according to their view, it's "from each according to their ability, to each according to their need".

Oh...................BTW.............................nice way of supporting your fellow tea baggers by calling him Barack Taqiyya (Taquiyya which is a reference to the Islamic practice which states that it is allowed to lie to those who don't follow Islam, meaning you're still to stupid to see that Obama has never been a Muslim).

I wish you well with your bigotry. Remember, Karma can occasionally be a real *****.
 
Interesting..............you call Obama a Communist, when in reality, he's not only helped the stock market double since Jr. left office, but he's also helped the wealthy get richer.

To ABikerSailor: You’re making the mistake of thinking the wealthy are not Communists. In truth, it doesn’t matter what they are called. Wealthy individuals and families are, and always were, totalitarians; hence, communism gives the wealthy the same control they enjoyed in monarchies, in dictatorships, in theocracies, and so on.

The rich made two mistakes in the last century. A few of America’s wealthiest families funded the Russian revolutions. Ultimately, wealthy Russians lost everything to hardcore Communists. Many wealthy Germans supported Hitler. They lost everything in the war.

America’s wealthy made a better deal. They support communism because tax dollars end up in their pockets increasing their fortunes. To be precise, wealthy Americans get to protect their wealth, while Communists get to enslave the American people without interference from their partners. American Communists in government are now part of the wealthy class, yet Barack Taqiyya never preaches class warfare against his kind. Indeed, he truly hates anyone who acquires wealth without getting it from tax dollars.
 
Interesting..............you call Obama a Communist, when in reality, he's not only helped the stock market double since Jr. left office, but he's also helped the wealthy get richer.

To ABikerSailor: You’re making the mistake of thinking the wealthy are not Communists. In truth, it doesn’t matter what they are called. Wealthy individuals and families are, and always were, totalitarians; hence, communism gives the wealthy the same control they enjoyed in monarchies, in dictatorships, in theocracies, and so on.

The rich made two mistakes in the last century. A few of America’s wealthiest families funded the Russian revolutions. Ultimately, wealthy Russians lost everything to hardcore Communists. Many wealthy Germans supported Hitler. They lost everything in the war.

America’s wealthy made a better deal. They support communism because tax dollars end up in their pockets increasing their fortunes. To be precise, wealthy Americans get to protect their wealth, while Communists get to enslave the American people without interference from their partners. American Communists in government are now part of the wealthy class, yet Barack Taqiyya never preaches class warfare against his kind. Indeed, he truly hates anyone who acquires wealth without getting it from tax dollars.

So...................do all those millionaires in the GOP (including Romney) support communism?

You said that the wealthy support communism.
 
America’s wealthy made a better deal. They support communism because tax dollars end up in their pockets increasing their fortunes. To be precise, wealthy Americans get to protect their wealth, while Communists get to enslave the American people without interference from their partners.

So...................do all those millionaires in the GOP (including Romney) support communism?

You said that the wealthy support communism.

To ABikerSailor: They support communism so long as it is NOT the kind Lenin and Mao handed out.
 
15th post
America’s wealthy made a better deal. They support communism because tax dollars end up in their pockets increasing their fortunes. To be precise, wealthy Americans get to protect their wealth, while Communists get to enslave the American people without interference from their partners.

So...................do all those millionaires in the GOP (including Romney) support communism?

You said that the wealthy support communism.

To ABikerSailor: They support communism so long as it is NOT the kind Lenin and Mao handed out.

I get it.....................it's all communal property, as long as they get a cut of over 56 percent.

However...............you might want to re-check your history, because the wealthy getting richer, and the powerful getting more power is exactly what is happening right now with the rich.
 
the wealthy getting richer, and the powerful getting more power is exactly what is happening right now with the rich.

To ABikerSailor: None more than Democrats who are implementing communism. Note that there are far more millionaires among congressional Democrats than Republicans. Is it any wonder Democrats want communism?

Bottom line: NOBODY should get a penny of tax dollars if they are not necessary in the operation of running the limited government the Founders intended.
 
the wealthy getting richer, and the powerful getting more power is exactly what is happening right now with the rich.

To ABikerSailor: None more than Democrats who are implementing communism. Note that there are far more millionaires among congressional Democrats than Republicans. Is it any wonder Democrats want communism?

Bottom line: NOBODY should get a penny of tax dollars if they are not necessary in the operation of running the limited government the Founders intended.

Really? Wanna talk about Mittens RobMe (Mitt Romney)?
 
Back
Top Bottom