Sucking up to the Israelis.

And here was me expecting this thread to be analysing the recent AIPAC/Republican rim-job gala.
 
Last edited:
katzeundratze00 said:
Caroljo said:
Why isn't this in Conspiracy?? Lol!
Where's your PROOF of this? And not from some left-wing blog.....
Click to expand...

Und der Katze sagt:

I refer you to the "dancing Israelis," who were apprehended on 9-11, and sent back to Israel, where they appeared on Israeli TV. One of them said that they were there to document the event. He didn't say they were there in case some unusual event occurred. He didn't say they just happended to be there. He said, "We were there to document the event." This makes them accessories before the fact, and guilty to the same extent as the people who hijacked the planes.
Click to expand...
jesus-1.jpg
 
daws101 said:
eots said:
daws101 said:
when you actually post some you may be onto something! till then.....
Click to expand...

you can not debate the facts so you resort to denial instead....weak
Click to expand...
wrong again the crap you post is NOT fact...so any denial is yours
Click to expand...

you are clearly not capable of having any rational discourse on the subject of Israels influence on U.S foreign policy and so resort to complete denial,emocons and inane little pictures
 
eots said:
daws101 said:
eots said:
you can not debate the facts so you resort to denial instead....weak
Click to expand...
wrong again the crap you post is NOT fact...so any denial is yours
Click to expand...

you are clearly not capable of having any rational discourse on the subject of Israels influence on U.S foreign policy and so resort to complete denial,emocons and inane little pictures
Click to expand...
only in you twisted empty skull..
The setting up of the cameras “prior to the attacks” is an inference from the phrase “they photographed the attacks” in this report. It’s a reasonable literal interpretation, but that doesn’t necessarily make it true: a New York resident who took photos of what happened on 9/11 may well describe those images as “my pictures of the 9/11 attacks”, for instance, even if they didn’t include any shots of the initial plane impacts.

Even if the unnamed officials were saying the cameras were set up before the attack, these may be reports of the allegations they are investigating. The report does talk of the men “apparently” setting up cameras near the Hudson River, for instance, and that they said “said” to have congratulated each other afterwards. The report itself is very early, published on the 13th, perhaps written less than 24 hours after they were arrested, so it would be surprising if these officials had reached definitive conclusions.

Of course it’s difficult to form meaningful conclusions by simply analysing one or two words. That is demonstrated more than adequately here:

Several of the detainees discussed their experience in America on an Israeli talk show after their return home. Said one of the men, denying that they were laughing or happy on the morning of Sept. 11, "The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event."

How did they know there would be an event to document on 9/11?
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/fiveisraelis.html

Here it’s suggested that saying “our purpose was to document the event” is in itself somehow suspicious, that it indicates foreknowledge. Why? We’ve no idea. Every single person who pointed a camera at the WTC on 9/11 did so because they wanted to “document the event”. The phrase indicates precisely nothing at all.

Dancing Israelis


talked to witnesses who saw the 5 Israelis and the NJ police officer who stopped their van. They were taken into custody, questioned and held for 10 weeks. They were eventually cleared by the FBI of any involvement in 9/11 and deported back to Israeli on immigration violations. On Israeli TV, they claimed they were merely taking pictures of a historic event. I included this sequence in the movie because I wanted to show how a real incident that raised legitimate questions could quickly mutate into so called “evidence” that the Israelis were behind the attack and not Al Qaeda. There were even some claiming the 5 Israelis were controlling the planes by remote control from New Jersey.
http://thinkfilm.blogs.com/protocols_of_zion
 
Last edited:
daws101 said:
eots said:
daws101 said:
wrong again the crap you post is NOT fact...so any denial is yours
Click to expand...

you are clearly not capable of having any rational discourse on the subject of Israels influence on U.S foreign policy and so resort to complete denial,emocons and inane little pictures
Click to expand...
only in you twisted empty skull..
The setting up of the cameras “prior to the attacks” is an inference from the phrase “they photographed the attacks” in this report. It’s a reasonable literal interpretation, but that doesn’t necessarily make it true: a New York resident who took photos of what happened on 9/11 may well describe those images as “my pictures of the 9/11 attacks”, for instance, even if they didn’t include any shots of the initial plane impacts.

Even if the unnamed officials were saying the cameras were set up before the attack, these may be reports of the allegations they are investigating. The report does talk of the men “apparently” setting up cameras near the Hudson River, for instance, and that they said “said” to have congratulated each other afterwards. The report itself is very early, published on the 13th, perhaps written less than 24 hours after they were arrested, so it would be surprising if these officials had reached definitive conclusions.

Of course itÂ’s difficult to form meaningful conclusions by simply analysing one or two words. That is demonstrated more than adequately here:

Several of the detainees discussed their experience in America on an Israeli talk show after their return home. Said one of the men, denying that they were laughing or happy on the morning of Sept. 11, "The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event."

How did they know there would be an event to document on 9/11?
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/fiveisraelis.html

Here it’s suggested that saying “our purpose was to document the event” is in itself somehow suspicious, that it indicates foreknowledge. Why? We’ve no idea. Every single person who pointed a camera at the WTC on 9/11 did so because they wanted to “document the event”. The phrase indicates precisely nothing at all.

Dancing Israelis
Click to expand...

but the others point cameras where in the not country illegally ,not former mossad agents or explosive experts and already know to the CIA or reported by concerned citizens as they where seen celebrating and none of this addresses the unwarranted influence of Israel on U.S foreign policy
 
eots said:
daws101 said:
eots said:
you are clearly not capable of having any rational discourse on the subject of Israels influence on U.S foreign policy and so resort to complete denial,emocons and inane little pictures
Click to expand...
only in you twisted empty skull..
The setting up of the cameras “prior to the attacks” is an inference from the phrase “they photographed the attacks” in this report. It’s a reasonable literal interpretation, but that doesn’t necessarily make it true: a New York resident who took photos of what happened on 9/11 may well describe those images as “my pictures of the 9/11 attacks”, for instance, even if they didn’t include any shots of the initial plane impacts.

Even if the unnamed officials were saying the cameras were set up before the attack, these may be reports of the allegations they are investigating. The report does talk of the men “apparently” setting up cameras near the Hudson River, for instance, and that they said “said” to have congratulated each other afterwards. The report itself is very early, published on the 13th, perhaps written less than 24 hours after they were arrested, so it would be surprising if these officials had reached definitive conclusions.

Of course itÂ’s difficult to form meaningful conclusions by simply analysing one or two words. That is demonstrated more than adequately here:

Several of the detainees discussed their experience in America on an Israeli talk show after their return home. Said one of the men, denying that they were laughing or happy on the morning of Sept. 11, "The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event."

How did they know there would be an event to document on 9/11?
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/fiveisraelis.html

Here it’s suggested that saying “our purpose was to document the event” is in itself somehow suspicious, that it indicates foreknowledge. Why? We’ve no idea. Every single person who pointed a camera at the WTC on 9/11 did so because they wanted to “document the event”. The phrase indicates precisely nothing at all.

Dancing Israelis
Click to expand...

but the others point cameras where in the not country illegally ,not former mossad agents or explosive experts and already know to the CIA or reported by concerned citizens as they where seen celebrating and none of this addresses the unwarranted influence of Israel on U.S foreign policy
Click to expand...
more bullshit prove it !
 
East Festering Pustule NJ------MARCH 07 2012

POLICE ARREST 5 DANCING TWOOFERS On the Wang overpass while the twoofers were dancing and celebrating while video taping and photographing the Broken Arms high rise hotel fire..
the police were alerted to the scene by Ms. Molly Bendam "This van stopped on the overpass and these scary young men jumped out and started filming,the fire had just started to burn really big!"
"At first I though it was a news crew ,then they started dancing and clapping."
then it hit me, they did it...otherwise why would they be filming ,you know with all the terrorists around these days!"
when questioned, the group's leader, a young man who calls himself EOT'S had this to say,"We wanted to document the event"."since we've never been right about steel framed buildings collapsing from fire...We thought maybe this time!"
the group is being held in the Festering Pustule jail on undisclosed charges until bail is set.
It has been rumored that Gloria Allred volunteered her services ...UPI
 
Last edited:
daws101 said:
East Festering Pustule NJ------MARCH 07 2012

POLICE ARREST 5 DANCING TWOOFERS On the Wang overpass while the twoofers were dancing and celebrating while video taping and photographing the Broken Arms high rise hotel fire..
the police were alerted to the scene by Ms. Molly Bendam "This van stopped on the overpass and these scary young men jumped out and started filming,the fire had just started to burn really big!"
"At first I though it was a news crew ,then they started dancing and clapping."
then it hit me, they did it...otherwise why would they be filming ,you know with all the terrorists around these days!"
when questioned, the group's leader, a young man who calls himself EOT'S had this to say,"We wanted to document the event"."since we've never been right about steel framed buildings collapsing from fire...We thought maybe this time!"
the group is being held in the Festering Pustule jail on undisclosed charges until bail is set.
It has been rumored that Gloria Allred volunteered her services ...UPI
Click to expand...

so now you regress to deluded ramblings instead of adressing the actual events or concerns of thhe arresting officer...how sad to be you
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

WIKILEAKED: Bin Laden Body Not Buried At Sea...

< Previous Thread

The War on Moonz !

Next Thread >

Similar threads

J
Trump Wants To Rename Gaza The Riviera Try Srebrenica!
Replies
3
Views
78
luiza
L
T
Almost half of Gazans willing to leave, survey finds
Replies
16
Views
244
Deadstick
Deadstick
Andrew_Jackson_FTW
Ashamed of nothing offended by everything- Israel protesters assault New York City Jewish woman
Replies
11
Views
148
irosie91
I
Sayaras
What we all knew: sex criminal Islamist ICC's Karim Khan's fake news "arrest warrant" of PallyWeid rushing to Amanpour
Replies
1
Views
111
Sayaras
Sayaras
shockedcanadian
Retired UK police officer suing after being arrested over 'thought crime' post on social media
Replies
7
Views
160
Ringo
Ringo

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom