DonGlock26
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2024
- 19,298
- 28,295
- 2,288
Mr. Chow did not act in self-defense or in defense of his son at the moment of the supposed "threat" with a loaded pistol,
What is your evidence of this?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mr. Chow did not act in self-defense or in defense of his son at the moment of the supposed "threat" with a loaded pistol,
His ass would have gotten life in prison if he was White.
Or simply weren't sure who to believe, causing reasonable doubt.
What crime did he commit JB Stoner
Right, that's the verdict, when there is reasonable doubt. But... thanks?The jury verdict was unanimous, “Not Guilty,”.
Right, but white ass kisser you didn't have a problem with Kyle Rittenhouse carrying one.
Which is a matter for the police.Hold on, Kyle Rittenhouse was 18 and legally allowed to carry that weapon. This kid was 14 and you have to be 21 to carry the weapon that he was carrying.
Right, that's the verdict, when there is reasonable doubt. But... thanks?
Which is a matter for the police.
I was seven years old and walking to the store.A14yr old needs his parents to walk to the corner store.
Every kid in this world has done something they had no business doing.Pretty much. I had a strict upbringing and a father in my household.
I was not running the streets with a loaded pistol. Were you?
You didn't have a problem with Rittenhouse carrying one.What crime? Well, one thing for sure, he was illegally carrying an illegal gun.
Actually, he was 17yrs old, the Law was murky at best on if Rittenhouse could lawfully carry.Hold on, Kyle Rittenhouse was 18 and legally allowed to carry that weapon. This kid was 14 and you have to be 21 to carry the weapon that he was carrying.
Tell that to numbnuts.I was seven years old and walking to the store.
You didn't have a problem with Rittenhouse carrying one.
Every kid in this world has done something they had no business doing.
The teenager did in fact, illegally have a gun? That appears to very much support the verdict. What is the OP arguing?Who stole something from it?
You didn't have a problem with Rittenhouse carrying one.
That this 14yr old didn't steal anything and why the hell were they chasing this kid.The teenager did in fact, illegally have a gun? That appears to very much support the verdict. What is the OP arguing?
Actually, he was 17yrs old, the Law was murky at best on if Rittenhouse could lawfully carry.
Wisconsin law says that "any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor."
The exception is aimed at letting children ages 16 and 17 hunt, but it is also clear, Rittenhouse wasn’t in Kenosha to hunt