Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 110,236
- 99,369
- 3,645
Dude likes my posts.Anyone ever notice how bdtex follows fortfun around like a puppy dog?

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dude likes my posts.Anyone ever notice how bdtex follows fortfun around like a puppy dog?
It's funny.Dude likes my posts.![]()
Since you asked, I'm a Environmental Resources Engineer retired from a U.S. gov't meteorology branch, but that changes nothing. Our focus is the this climate question and decided who's a bad guy is a side issue.Well of course you're at a loss. Are you a physicist? A climate scientist? A computer model programmer?
You would have to go read up on that. Same here.
...you might see that my interest is finding out what we're measuring and understanding what gets mapped. This may be because of my scientific background that I sense you do not share.OK, I can say we "map patterns that match our models and the physics" as much as the next guy, but I'm a bit at a loss to imagine exactly what gets measured and what gets mapped.
Sorry but there is no one, in any field, I never question.Those are organizations, not scientists.
NAME the "scientists" you religiously parrot and never question,
Don't know why or why it matters.and then explain why there is ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska...
Very hard to believe and that is why I never suggested it.Are you saying that we'd just take on the heat problem w/ ice-cubes & air-conditioners? Somehow that's a bit hard to believe.
The earth is warming.What do you claim they say about climate?
Just like it has in every interglacial period before it. CO2 is 0.22C to 0.5C of it.The earth is warming.
Sorry but there is no one, in any field, I never question.
Don't know why or why it matters.
And some species will go extinct like in previous periods. I don't want humans to be in that number.Just like it has in every interglacial period before it. CO2 is 0.22C to 0.5C of it.
CO2 has nothing to do or is just one of the many factors that contribute to ice ages? If you know the answer to that you are the most knowledgeable climate scientist on the planet. Are you?LOL!!!!
Your "cause" is Co2. Co2 is constant over Alaska and Greenland. Hence, Co2 has NOTHING TO DO with ICE AGES.... since Alaska and Greenland have completely stumped the Co2 FRAUD here since the question was first asked more than a year ago...
I really struggle with that logic. What kind of temperatures swings does life endure today from daylight to darkness, from summer to winter?And some species will go extinct like in previous periods. I don't want humans to be in that number.
Weather is not climate. Why don't you ask Mammoths their opinion? Oh yeah, they (and many others) went extinct when the earth warmed.I really struggle with that logic. What kind of temperatures swings does life endure today from daylight to darkness, from summer to winter?
Right, but it demonstrates the tolerance range of life. Please do make that leap in logic of a 1C increase and woolly mammoths. I'd love to see your mental masturbation.Weather is not climate. Why don't you ask Mammoths their opinion? Oh yeah, they (and many others) went extinct when the earth warmed.
Exactly, you did not suggest any possible way of removing the heat. Mean while I'm assuming you have no idea.Very hard to believe and that is why I never suggested it.
Heat is always escaping to outer space. The atmosphere acts like a choke. Evaporative cooling, cloud reflectivity, albedo, convective currents, heat transfer from the Atlantic to the Arctic, solar variability, etc. are variables which can affect the climate. It only takes a 0.7 W/m^2 of change to go from net warming to net cooling.Exactly, you did not suggest any possible way of removing the heat. Mean while I'm assuming you have no idea.
You know what happens when you assume. I didn't list the ways since there are so many options.Exactly, you did not suggest any possible way of removing the heat. Mean while I'm assuming you have no idea.
It wasn't heat that killed of the mammoths, it was its effects on vegetation. Mammoths didn't live in forests and that is what spread after the ice age ended.Right, but it demonstrates the tolerance range of life. Please do make that leap in logic of a 1C increase and woolly mammoths. I'd love to see your mental masturbation.
That's right it changes nothing. You are not a climate scientist or climate modeler.Since you asked, I'm a Environmental Resources Engineer retired from a U.S. gov't meteorology branch, but that changes nothing
Plants can't tolerate a 1C warmer planet? Have you tried killing off weeds?It wasn't heat that killed of the mammoths, it was its effects on vegetation. Mammoths didn't live in forests and that is what spread after the ice age ended.