Stomping Rand Paul Supporter Wants Victim To Apologize To Him

Like the woman in the miniskirt, the woman in the hot outfit, who gets raped? Not completely innocent? eh?

Your a hopeless left wingnut. :cuckoo:
It seems the leftwing whacko's have and echo chamber and they told these buffoons to use the old "A woman got raped because she wore a miniskirt" Mantra.


Completely different scenario. The woman had no business sticking the sign through the window. Deny it all you want...ignore it all you want, but it's a Epic Fail for not taking in account the facts, instead using a spin of the facts to reach your objective.

I asked you why her sign waving was relevant to what happened to her.

I don't think you gave me a straight answer yet.
he never said it was relevant to what happened to her
he said she wasn't innocent
 

The foot started on the shoulder..then slipped to the head.

But really..what the heck does that matter? The fact she was tackled is crime enough.
no, it did NOT
stop with the pathetic ******* lies
what happened to her was bad enough

and, if she wasnt trying to create an incident(that IS why she was there) she never would have been tackled
 
Your a hopeless left wingnut. :cuckoo:
It seems the leftwing whacko's have and echo chamber and they told these buffoons to use the old "A woman got raped because she wore a miniskirt" Mantra.


Completely different scenario. The woman had no business sticking the sign through the window. Deny it all you want...ignore it all you want, but it's a Epic Fail for not taking in account the facts, instead using a spin of the facts to reach your objective.

I asked you why her sign waving was relevant to what happened to her.

I don't think you gave me a straight answer yet.
he never said it was relevant to what happened to her
he said she wasn't innocent

So why interject something irrelevant into the topic? To troll? To deflect? To hijack?
 
how can you liberals be this ******* stupid?
she went there to create and incident, not what she got, but an incident anyway
 

The foot started on the shoulder..then slipped to the head.

But really..what the heck does that matter? The fact she was tackled is crime enough.

It's hilarious, in a sort of sad way, that these defenders of this Brownshirt think they win some sort of big moral victory if they establish that he stomped on the woman's shoulder instead of her head.

Let's compromise between the head and the shoulder...

...he stomped on her neck.
 
A tidbit of irony:

Rand Paul, a while back, on the BP spill issue:

"What I don't like from the president's administration is this sort of, 'I'll put my boot heel on the throat of BP,'" Paul said in an interview with ABC's "Good Morning America." "I think that sounds really un-American...'

So the FIGURATIVE boot on the neck is Un-American.

I guess the REAL boot on the neck is Tea Partian.

Oh, and as bonus, remember the conservative clown who apologized to BP? Amid widespread conservative cheers? I guess this bizarre sense of who should apologize to whom is rather consistent throughout Conservatopia.
 
Last edited:
he never said it was relevant to what happened to her
he said she wasn't innocent

So why interject something irrelevant into the topic? To troll? To deflect? To hijack?
because you assholes keep trying to saint her

Their Protesters seem very unorganized, unpredictable, that is not only dangerous for the people involved, but by-standers. I know one thing worse than Someone losing control, and that man truly did. The one thing worse are the Puppet Masters orchestrating and setting scenarios like this up with the promise of Headlines and Smear Campaigns.

NYCarbiner is just a lowly foot soldier parroting the talking points. That's not what I'm referring to.

I knew of a guy way back in the 80's that chained himself to a railroad track during a protest, as a part of. Each side thought the other side would give in, so neither did. The train could not stop in time. It cost him 4 limbs. Did sound reasoning even show up that day? Safety first. Nobody is paying attention to that. The cost will be injury , death, and burned out structures when civility is lost. This position is not coming from a partisan perspective. When things get excited, in a bad way, people lose it. You will not be able to control outcome. Don't go there. You will regret it. Stop feeding the Bullshit. Make your point, without the false accusations. What are your concerns?
 
the foot was ON HER SHOULDER
so stop lying

The foot started on the shoulder..then slipped to the head.

But really..what the heck does that matter? The fact she was tackled is crime enough.

It's hilarious, in a sort of sad way, that these defenders of this Brownshirt think they win some sort of big moral victory if they establish that he stomped on the woman's shoulder instead of her head.

Let's compromise between the head and the shoulder...

...he stomped on her neck.
no, liar
he didnt "stomp on her neck"
the asshole stepped on her SHOULDER
that doesnt excuse him at all
but YOU want to LIE about it and make it worse than what he actually did

why is that, asshole?
 
I propose a simple way to end this whole thing:

This woman will drop any charges and render an apology on one condition:

This ******* doucher has to stand there with his hands on his hips, let her take a running start, and kick him in the nuts with steel toed boots.

She will then apologize for kicking him in the nuts and he will agree not to press charges.

Problem solved.
 
Last edited:
So why interject something irrelevant into the topic? To troll? To deflect? To hijack?
because you assholes keep trying to saint her

She's not a saint....but she's the victim here...unless this guy's foot is the real victim.

Thank You, Bo. Finally someone stepped up and acknowleged what I was trying to get across. Your also right that she was the victim. The guys foot is the weapon.
 
I propose a simple way to end this whole thing:

This woman will drop any charges and render an apology on one condition:

This ******* doucher has to stand there with his hands on his hips, let her take a running start, and kick him in the nuts with steel toed boots.

She will then apologize for kicking him in the nuts and he will agree not to press charges.

Problem solved.

So you advocate violence, it's good that the mask is off. What you suggest would be premeditated, and that's worse. He lost control. You have none to begin with. Real impressive. Have you been violent your whole life?
 
I propose a simple way to end this whole thing:

This woman will drop any charges and render an apology on one condition:

This ******* doucher has to stand there with his hands on his hips, let her take a running start, and kick him in the nuts with steel toed boots.

She will then apologize for kicking him in the nuts and he will agree not to press charges.

Problem solved.

So you advocate violence, it's good that the mask is off. What you suggest would be premeditated, and that's worse. He lost control. You have none to begin with. Real impressive. Have you been violent your whole life?

:lol:

Weak.
 
15th post
I propose a simple way to end this whole thing:

This woman will drop any charges and render an apology on one condition:

This ******* doucher has to stand there with his hands on his hips, let her take a running start, and kick him in the nuts with steel toed boots.

She will then apologize for kicking him in the nuts and he will agree not to press charges.

Problem solved.

So you advocate violence, it's good that the mask is off. What you suggest would be premeditated, and that's worse. He lost control. You have none to begin with. Real impressive. Have you been violent your whole life?

:lol:

Weak.

You are to Peace Advocacy like what Hitler was to Girl Scout Cookies. Stand Proud, fraud.
 
Didn't the Obama administration brag about having its "boot on the neck" of BP?

Brutally Honest: Obama administration to "keep our boot on the neck" of BP

One more Retarded Grandstanding Statement meant to increase approval, but in reality destabilizing the Country further. Did you catch the car accident analogy? The only thing more pathetic than those words said by him, was Al Franken's expansion of the Fantasy. When Horse Shit is combined with Bullshit it really should have it's own special word to describe it. That's about all I got out of it. Who's writing this shit. Dr. Seuss could do better. I'm thinking either Green Eggs and Ham or The Grinch that Stole Christmas.

Dr. Seuss | Seussville.com
 
Back
Top Bottom