Stocks do 9 times better when Democrats are in the White House

The Dow just reached a 4 year high. The Nasdaq just reached an 11 year high.

Obama is the Democrats Reagan.
 
The Dow just reached a 4 year high. The Nasdaq just reached an 11 year high.

Obama is the Democrats Reagan.

So Bush was right about partial privatization of Social Security


Chris hates Reagan.

So what's up with that ?

Of course, Bush was right about it. He just was a pathetic leader who could not message his way out of a paper bag.

And we elected four more years of the same.
 
We have just had the fastest 6 month drop in unemployment since 1984.

Obama is the Democrats Reagan.

Yes and as we get closer to election day the obama labor department will report lower unemployment, as more people exhaust their unemployment benefits

Part of the plan...and in the interim? More jobs will go away and not be counted any longer...
 
gdp_recov.png
 
We have just had the fastest 6 month drop in unemployment since 1984.

Obama is the Democrats Reagan.
 
GDP has been growing since 2009.
The stock market has doubled since 2009.
Americans net worth is up $9 trillion dollars since 2009.
3.7 million private sector jobs have been created since 2009.
Auto sales are up.
Retail sales are up.
Home sales are up.
Unemployment is down.
GM was saved, and is now the number one automaker in the world.
Obama has done a good job.
 

There they are folks.

Chris has officially "inked off".

Now, let's see if he can explain the casual relationship he seems to imply exists here.

I am not holding my breath.

An earlier post said it all.
 
GDP has been growing since 2009.
The stock market has doubled since 2009.
Americans net worth is up $9 trillion dollars since 2009.
3.7 million private sector jobs have been created since 2009.
Auto sales are up.
Retail sales are up.
Home sales are up.
Unemployment is down.
GM was saved, and is now the number one automaker in the world.
Obama has done a good job.

It happens without him and if he does not meddle, these numbers are better.

Get a clue Chris, you got sold a bill of goods.
 
While Republicans promote themselves as the friendliest party for Wall Street, stock investors do better when Democrats occupy the White House. From a dollars- and-cents standpoint, it’s not even close.

The BGOV Barometer shows that, over the five decades since John F. Kennedy was inaugurated, $1,000 invested in a hypothetical fund that tracks the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (SPX) only when Democrats are in the White House would have been worth $10,920 at the close of trading yesterday.

That’s more than nine times the dollar return an investor would have realized from following a similar strategy during Republican administrations. A $1,000 stake invested in a fund that followed the S&P 500 under Republican presidents, starting with Richard Nixon, would have grown to $2,087 on the day George W. Bush left office.

Stocks Return More With Democrat in White House: BGOV Barometer - Bloomberg

Until they get caught. ;)
 
The number of Americans filing first-time claims for jobless benefits fell to a level matching a four-year low, more evidence the labor market is healing.

Applications for unemployment insurance decreased 2,000 in the week ended Feb. 25 to 351,000, Labor Department figures showed today. Economists forecast 355,000 claims, according to the median estimate in a Bloomberg News survey. The number of people on unemployment benefit rolls fell, while those getting extended payments also declined.

Initial Jobless Claims in U.S. Lowest Since March
 
This thread is was posted by a moron who somehow claims that stock market performance is tied to who is in the WH. The argument takes nothing into account except a simple scatter graph of time and stock market performance.

It fails an 8th grade logic course because it makes no real argument.

It just hides behind a spurious conclusion that cannot be upheld.

The stock maret feel apart under Obama and came back to life when the GOP took back the house.

Related...somewhat.

What is so sad is that some so called adults have very little ability to actually relate things.
 
This thread is was posted by a moron who somehow claims that stock market performance is tied to who is in the WH. The argument takes nothing into account except a simple scatter graph of time and stock market performance.

It fails an 8th grade logic course because it makes no real argument.

It just hides behind a spurious conclusion that cannot be upheld.

The stock maret feel apart under Obama and came back to life when the GOP took back the house.

Related...somewhat.

What is so sad is that some so called adults have very little ability to actually relate things.
and proof to this statement in the way of a link?
 
This thread is was posted by a moron who somehow claims that stock market performance is tied to who is in the WH. The argument takes nothing into account except a simple scatter graph of time and stock market performance.

It fails an 8th grade logic course because it makes no real argument.

It just hides behind a spurious conclusion that cannot be upheld.

The stock maret feel apart under Obama and came back to life when the GOP took back the house.

Related...somewhat.

What is so sad is that some so called adults have very little ability to actually relate things.
and proof to this statement in the way of a link?

The proof of what statement ?

That it somewhat came back under the GOP ? I said it was somewhat related.

What exactly are you looking for ?

Proof that you can't make the claim of the OP ?
 

Forum List

Back
Top