aplcr0331
ConvenientHeuristic
What is it with you Morons?I wouldn't use SJG as a rebuttal for anything. He's been proven wrong, for the most part, by science in the intervening years between his publishing.
Don't you feel obligated to post ANY Content/backing for your statement?
Post any logical or sourced refutation of the OP?
Yet Another 60 IQ Simpleton just chirps in with "no".
Post some Meat or get lost A-hole.
`
Well, since you asked so nicely.
Read this one carefully - Remembering Stephen Jay Gould | Natural History Magazine
Proof that the very thing SJG accused actual scientists of, he was in fact doing himself - PLOS Biology: The Mismeasure of Science: Stephen Jay Gould versus Samuel George Morton on Skulls and Bias
Contrary to SJG - http://search.vcu.edu/search?q=cach...t=default_frontend&ie=UTF-8&access=p&oe=UTF-8
SJG fame is already lessening. His dressing up his political lectures to appear as essays on scientific history isn't a very effective mechanism for lasting regard, no matter how well done. He is nowadays remembered for only two things: punctuated equilibrium and the mustard seed bias in cranial measurements.
Gould was wrong about a lot of things, however I too am an evolution believer not sure where your vitriol is coming from.
Last edited: