Statistically reliable sample of registered voters?

jwoodie

Platinum Member
Aug 15, 2012
19,344
8,105
940
Why not contact a random sample of registered voters in each disputed state and ask them (1) if they voted; (2) how they voted; and (3) who did they vote for? This would provide corroborating evidence regarding the validity of the recorded vote totals and would provide an audit trail to verify the handling of their ballots.

Who could possibly be against such an effort to insure the integrity of our voting process?
 
Why not contact a random sample of registered voters in each disputed state and ask them (1) if they voted; (2) how they voted; and (3) who did they vote for? This would provide corroborating evidence regarding the validity of the recorded vote totals and would provide an audit trail to verify the handling of their ballots.

Who could possibly be against such an effort to insure the integrity of our voting process?

Because the election is over. The only people crowing about election integrity are the people who support the side that lost. Election officials from both federal and state organizations have said that there was no evidence of voter fraud. Judges (some of them Trump appointees) are showing lawsuits the door almost as quick as they are filed. Something like 32 filed across 8 states and all of them dismissed. You and other sheep like you are questioning the integrity of the process because that's all the guy who lost and his right wing and alt-right media whores have been bleating for the past three weeks.

Trump lost. Move on. This is beyond embarrassing and quite frankly, un-American.
 
Now it is just a stalling ploy so that people can't get the chinese vaccine
 
Why not contact a random sample of registered voters in each disputed state and ask them (1) if they voted; (2) how they voted; and (3) who did they vote for? This would provide corroborating evidence regarding the validity of the recorded vote totals and would provide an audit trail to verify the handling of their ballots.

Who could possibly be against such an effort to insure the integrity of our voting process?


It's far far easier to commit fraud with statistical sampling than it is to commit fraud with voting ...

The first restriction of our sample pool is we're limited to only people who will state who they voted for ... or do we imprison those who refuse to answer? ... people won't like admitting they voted for a loser, how many The Donald voters will say they voted for Quid Pro Joe? ... and we're still within the realm of good-faith efforts ...

If we have Republicans conduct this survey, they'll focus on Republican precincts ... Democrats on Democrat precincts ... who's in charge of the randomization? ... remember that all college professors are co-conspirators in this election fraud ... all mathematicians and software engineers are fighting for Democrats ... we're left with some uneducated coal minor rolling 1d6,000,000 ...

I'm a regular casino gambler ... this proposal is no better than casino gambling ... rolling craps ten times in a row happens ...
 
Why not contact a random sample of registered voters in each disputed state and ask them (1) if they voted; (2) how they voted; and (3) who did they vote for? This would provide corroborating evidence regarding the validity of the recorded vote totals and would provide an audit trail to verify the handling of their ballots.

Who could possibly be against such an effort to insure the integrity of our voting process?

Because the election is over. The only people crowing about election integrity are the people who support the side that lost. Election officials from both federal and state organizations have said that there was no evidence of voter fraud. Judges (some of them Trump appointees) are showing lawsuits the door almost as quick as they are filed. Something like 32 filed across 8 states and all of them dismissed. You and other sheep like you are questioning the integrity of the process because that's all the guy who lost and his right wing and alt-right media whores have been bleating for the past three weeks.

Trump lost. Move on. This is beyond embarrassing and quite frankly, un-American.

I don't think I saw there was this much whining by the left a few weeks after the election in 2016. Goddamn bunch of crying trumpturds. He lost, move on. Biden is the 14th President I've lived through and I have survived and prospered with each one since I turned 18. Life goes on crybabies.
 
Obviously. If you knew anything about statistics, you wouldn't be a "regular."

It's a negative expectation ... do we spend an evening in a bar and expect to walk out with more money? ... the more we gamble at casinos, the closer our total losses will be to 2% ... the only question is whether one can drink that much free booze ... if one can't then stay out ... if one can, then it's a cheap drunk ...
 
Back to the OP: Why not query a statistically reliable sample of registered voters? At the very least, it would indicate the number of fraudulent ballots counted for people who claim they didn't vote.

Who could possibly be against such an effort to insure the integrity of our voting process?
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top