State Dept: We Warned Clinton in 96 About Bin Laden

Weatherman2020

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2013
Messages
96,199
Reaction score
69,515
Points
3,605
Location
Right coast, classified
The failure to act in order to avoid conflict can many times lead to enormous loss of life later. We saw it in WW2, and now in what really is WW3.

“State Department analysts warned the Clinton administration in July 1996 that Osama bin Laden’s move to Afghanistan would give him an even more dangerous haven as he sought to expand radical Islam ‘well beyond the Middle East,’ but the government chose not to deter the move, newly declassified documents show.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/17/w...s-it-warned-about-bin-laden-in-1996.html?_r=0
 
Everyone knows BJ Clinton passed on Bin Laden. Liberal Presidents are always a foreign policy disaster. Carter, BJ, the Hussein. We can't even imagine what would happen if Cankles becomes President.
 
The failure to act in order to avoid conflict can many times lead to enormous loss of life later. We saw it in WW2, and now in what really is WW3.

“State Department analysts warned the Clinton administration in July 1996 that Osama bin Laden’s move to Afghanistan would give him an even more dangerous haven as he sought to expand radical Islam ‘well beyond the Middle East,’ but the government chose not to deter the move, newly declassified documents show.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/17/w...s-it-warned-about-bin-laden-in-1996.html?_r=0
Reagan and CIA's man bin Laden? Old news.
 
Everyone knows BJ Clinton passed on Bin Laden. Liberal Presidents are always a foreign policy disaster. Carter, BJ, the Hussein. We can't even imagine what would happen if Cankles becomes President.

Clinton was no liberal
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom