State Department finds no 'deliberate mishandling of classified information' related to Clinton

[AzogtheDefiler]

But once you corrected when the election was, you still attributed it to his front runner status. You told us that companies hired just on the mere possibility of Trump winning the election.

Why does that not show up in the data?

Even worse for that nut, no matter how you shake it, the numbers on employed blacks has not kept up with the trend.

If we go by July, 2015, when Trump became the GOP frontrunner and compare the number of jobs added in the 18 months before then with the 18 months after, we find

Before ... 1,220,000
After ...... 894,000

So Trump becoming the GOP frontrunner certainly didn't help.

If we go by January, 2017, when Trump became the president and compare the number of jobs added in the 32 months before then with the 32 months after, we find

Before ... 1,846,000
After .... 1,094,000

So Trump becoming president certainly didn't help.

Even if we go by November, 2016, when Trump won the presidential election and compare the number of jobs added in the 34 months before then with the 34 months after, we find

Before ... 1,960,000
After .... 1,248,000

So Trump winning the presidential election certainly didn't help.


... which thoroughly demonstrates what an abject imbecile AzogtheDefiler is. And then he questions me as to whether or not it's believable that he doesn't know that Trump won the election in 2016.

So you don’t think I know when elections take place? You’re an idiot. You truly didn’t know what QE was. Again. You’re an idiot.

LOL

Like that matters coming from an abject imbecile who not only b'lieves Trump was elected in 2015 -- he actually said it...

To illustrate that when Trump won it was 9.4% and now it is 6%.

Still avoiding the answer. Point is I know when elections take place. You had zero clue what QE was.

Still avoiding what answer?

You answer me first. Little man.

 

[Faun]

Even worse for that nut, no matter how you shake it, the numbers on employed blacks has not kept up with the trend.

If we go by July, 2015, when Trump became the GOP frontrunner and compare the number of jobs added in the 18 months before then with the 18 months after, we find

Before ... 1,220,000
After ...... 894,000

So Trump becoming the GOP frontrunner certainly didn't help.

If we go by January, 2017, when Trump became the president and compare the number of jobs added in the 32 months before then with the 32 months after, we find

Before ... 1,846,000
After .... 1,094,000

So Trump becoming president certainly didn't help.

Even if we go by November, 2016, when Trump won the presidential election and compare the number of jobs added in the 34 months before then with the 34 months after, we find

Before ... 1,960,000
After .... 1,248,000

So Trump winning the presidential election certainly didn't help.


... which thoroughly demonstrates what an abject imbecile AzogtheDefiler is. And then he questions me as to whether or not it's believable that he doesn't know that Trump won the election in 2016.

So you don’t think I know when elections take place? You’re an idiot. You truly didn’t know what QE was. Again. You’re an idiot.

LOL

Like that matters coming from an abject imbecile who not only b'lieves Trump was elected in 2015 -- he actually said it...

To illustrate that when Trump won it was 9.4% and now it is 6%.

Still avoiding the answer. Point is I know when elections take place. You had zero clue what QE was.

Still avoiding what answer?

You answer me first. Little man.

You're truly fucked in the head. You claim I didn't answer something... not knowing what you think I didn't answer, I ask you what you think I didn't answer ... to which you idiotically insist I answer you.



Oh well, I can only take that to mean you're crazy and there is nothing I didn't answer.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I ask Again if you had to bet your life do you think I dont know when elections and presidential changes take place. Yes or no? Give me a one word answer.

I am sure you do, but that is now just a diversion so you do not have to explain why you gave Trump credit for a hiring boom in 2015 that does not exist.

According to you companies starting hiring on the mere chance that Trump might win, yet there is ZERO data to support that...why is that?

OK so I do. Fawn had no idea what QE was. I do give Trump credit as it began in 2015 as he was making his run. But I cannot prove it with stats because they are shadowy so **** me.

Stats are shadowy????

And you claim to know about finance and business?

Sometimes yes. Sometimes you don’t see true results until 12 mos. post investment. Sometimes it takes as many as 60 mos. Are you familiar with net present value?

Well, it has been 4 years since Trump became the front runner, so that excuse is out the window.

Next excuse...

Do you tell your clients to ignore the data and just take you word for it?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

So you don’t think I know when elections take place? You’re an idiot. You truly didn’t know what QE was. Again. You’re an idiot.

LOL

Like that matters coming from an abject imbecile who not only b'lieves Trump was elected in 2015 -- he actually said it...

To illustrate that when Trump won it was 9.4% and now it is 6%.

Still avoiding the answer. Point is I know when elections take place. You had zero clue what QE was.

Still avoiding what answer?

You answer me first. Little man.

You're truly fucked in the head. You claim I didn't answer something... not knowing what you think I didn't answer, I ask you what you think I didn't answer ... to which you idiotically insist I answer you.



Oh well, I can only take that to mean you're crazy and there is nothing I didn't answer.

Again. Simple yes or no. Do you or don’t you think that I know when elections take place?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

I ask Again if you had to bet your life do you think I dont know when elections and presidential changes take place. Yes or no? Give me a one word answer.

I am sure you do, but that is now just a diversion so you do not have to explain why you gave Trump credit for a hiring boom in 2015 that does not exist.

According to you companies starting hiring on the mere chance that Trump might win, yet there is ZERO data to support that...why is that?

OK so I do. Fawn had no idea what QE was. I do give Trump credit as it began in 2015 as he was making his run. But I cannot prove it with stats because they are shadowy so **** me.

Stats are shadowy????

And you claim to know about finance and business?

Sometimes yes. Sometimes you don’t see true results until 12 mos. post investment. Sometimes it takes as many as 60 mos. Are you familiar with net present value?

Well, it has been 4 years since Trump became the front runner, so that excuse is out the window.

Next excuse...

Do you tell your clients to ignore the data and just take you word for it?

4 years and unemployment is at an all time low? The hiring began in 2015. Duh.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I am sure you do, but that is now just a diversion so you do not have to explain why you gave Trump credit for a hiring boom in 2015 that does not exist.

According to you companies starting hiring on the mere chance that Trump might win, yet there is ZERO data to support that...why is that?

OK so I do. Fawn had no idea what QE was. I do give Trump credit as it began in 2015 as he was making his run. But I cannot prove it with stats because they are shadowy so **** me.

Stats are shadowy????

And you claim to know about finance and business?

Sometimes yes. Sometimes you don’t see true results until 12 mos. post investment. Sometimes it takes as many as 60 mos. Are you familiar with net present value?

Well, it has been 4 years since Trump became the front runner, so that excuse is out the window.

Next excuse...

Do you tell your clients to ignore the data and just take you word for it?

4 years and unemployment is at an all time low? The hiring began in 2015. Duh.

As the stats I gave you already have shown, hiring slowed in 2015, it did not begin then. Why do you keep telling this lie?

There was no surge in hiring after the Trump announcement. In fact job creation for 2015 was slower after he took over “front runner” status and that continued in 2016, which was 18% slower than 2015...which was 10% slower than 2014.

So, again I have to ask you...Do you tell your clients to ignore the data and just take you word for it?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

OK so I do. Fawn had no idea what QE was. I do give Trump credit as it began in 2015 as he was making his run. But I cannot prove it with stats because they are shadowy so **** me.

Stats are shadowy????

And you claim to know about finance and business?

Sometimes yes. Sometimes you don’t see true results until 12 mos. post investment. Sometimes it takes as many as 60 mos. Are you familiar with net present value?

Well, it has been 4 years since Trump became the front runner, so that excuse is out the window.

Next excuse...

Do you tell your clients to ignore the data and just take you word for it?

4 years and unemployment is at an all time low? The hiring began in 2015. Duh.

As the stats I gave you already have shown, hiring slowed in 2015, it did not begin then. Why do you keep telling this lie?

There was no surge in hiring after the Trump announcement. In fact job creation for 2015 was slower after he took over “front runner” status and that continued in 2016, which was 18% slower than 2015...which was 10% slower than 2014.

So, again I have to ask you...Do you tell your clients to ignore the data and just take you word for it?

I am looking at corporate high priced roles not blue collar ones. Hence now people are scrambling because they cannot find welders and plumbers. But you don’t hear law firms and banks crying for talent, correct? That’s because they proactively hired. You will also notice as Trump gained traction and ultimately won, the hiring went up like a rocket. It began way before November 2016. Regardless we can debate this all day but we agree that I do know when elections take place. Faun had no idea what QE was. Therein lies the difference.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I am looking at corporate high priced roles not blue collar ones. Hence now people are scrambling because they cannot find welders and plumbers. But you don’t hear law firms and banks crying for talent, correct? That’s because they proactively hired.

Show me the data little buddy...."because I said so" is not good enough.

 

[Faun]

LOL

Like that matters coming from an abject imbecile who not only b'lieves Trump was elected in 2015 -- he actually said it...

​

Still avoiding the answer. Point is I know when elections take place. You had zero clue what QE was.

Still avoiding what answer?

You answer me first. Little man.

You're truly fucked in the head. You claim I didn't answer something... not knowing what you think I didn't answer, I ask you what you think I didn't answer ... to which you idiotically insist I answer you.



Oh well, I can only take that to mean you're crazy and there is nothing I didn't answer.

Again. Simple yes or no. Do you or don’t you think that I know when elections take place?

LOL

I already answered that, you ******* retard.

AND you even replied, so you should know I already answered that. My answer didn't really need affirmation.

 

[Faun]

Stats are shadowy????

And you claim to know about finance and business?

Sometimes yes. Sometimes you don’t see true results until 12 mos. post investment. Sometimes it takes as many as 60 mos. Are you familiar with net present value?

Well, it has been 4 years since Trump became the front runner, so that excuse is out the window.

Next excuse...

Do you tell your clients to ignore the data and just take you word for it?

4 years and unemployment is at an all time low? The hiring began in 2015. Duh.

As the stats I gave you already have shown, hiring slowed in 2015, it did not begin then. Why do you keep telling this lie?

There was no surge in hiring after the Trump announcement. In fact job creation for 2015 was slower after he took over “front runner” status and that continued in 2016, which was 18% slower than 2015...which was 10% slower than 2014.

So, again I have to ask you...Do you tell your clients to ignore the data and just take you word for it?

I am looking at corporate high priced roles not blue collar ones. Hence now people are scrambling because they cannot find welders and plumbers. But you don’t hear law firms and banks crying for talent, correct? That’s because they proactively hired. You will also notice as Trump gained traction and ultimately won, the hiring went up like a rocket. It began way before November 2016. Regardless we can debate this all day but we agree that I do know when elections take place. Faun had no idea what QE was. Therein lies the difference.

And you thought Trump won the election in 2015 when black unemployment was 9.4%. You literally said so yourself.

To illustrate that when Trump won it was 9.4% and now it is 6%.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Sometimes yes. Sometimes you don’t see true results until 12 mos. post investment. Sometimes it takes as many as 60 mos. Are you familiar with net present value?

Well, it has been 4 years since Trump became the front runner, so that excuse is out the window.

Next excuse...

Do you tell your clients to ignore the data and just take you word for it?

4 years and unemployment is at an all time low? The hiring began in 2015. Duh.

As the stats I gave you already have shown, hiring slowed in 2015, it did not begin then. Why do you keep telling this lie?

There was no surge in hiring after the Trump announcement. In fact job creation for 2015 was slower after he took over “front runner” status and that continued in 2016, which was 18% slower than 2015...which was 10% slower than 2014.

So, again I have to ask you...Do you tell your clients to ignore the data and just take you word for it?

I am looking at corporate high priced roles not blue collar ones. Hence now people are scrambling because they cannot find welders and plumbers. But you don’t hear law firms and banks crying for talent, correct? That’s because they proactively hired. You will also notice as Trump gained traction and ultimately won, the hiring went up like a rocket. It began way before November 2016. Regardless we can debate this all day but we agree that I do know when elections take place. Faun had no idea what QE was. Therein lies the difference.

And you thought Trump won the election in 2015 when black unemployment was 9.4%. You literally said so yourself.

To illustrate that when Trump won it was 9.4% and now it is 6%.

You're going in circles. Obviously I know when elections take place. You have no idea what QE is. Bottom line. Loser. Leftist.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I am looking at corporate high priced roles not blue collar ones. Hence now people are scrambling because they cannot find welders and plumbers. But you don’t hear law firms and banks crying for talent, correct? That’s because they proactively hired.

Would you say there is a large portion of those hires that were black people? You gave Trump being the front runner credit for the drop in black UE.

You will also notice as Trump gained traction and ultimately won, the hiring went up like a rocket. It began way before November 2016.

This is false. 2015 was slower than 2014 and 2016 was even slower than 2015. 2017 was slower yet again. 2017 was the slowest year for job growth since 2011. 2017 was down more than 50,000 jobs per month as opposed to prior to Trump becoming the front runner.

We did not see and increase till the tax cut and that is now gone and 2019 is the slowest job growth per month since 2010.

you keep making claims that have no basis in fact and cannot be supported with data. you might know "finance" but I know data and the data says you are full of shit.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

I am looking at corporate high priced roles not blue collar ones. Hence now people are scrambling because they cannot find welders and plumbers. But you don’t hear law firms and banks crying for talent, correct? That’s because they proactively hired.

Would you say there is a large portion of those hires that were black people? You gave Trump being the front runner credit for the drop in black UE.

You will also notice as Trump gained traction and ultimately won, the hiring went up like a rocket. It began way before November 2016.

This is false. 2015 was slower than 2014 and 2016 was even slower than 2015. 2017 was slower yet again. 2017 was the slowest year for job growth since 2011. 2017 was down more than 50,000 jobs per month as opposed to prior to Trump becoming the front runner.

We did not see and increase till the tax cut and that is now gone and 2019 is the slowest job growth per month since 2010.

you keep making claims that have no basis in fact and cannot be supported with data. you might know "finance" but I know data and the data says you are full of shit.

How is unemployment and consumer spend?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I am looking at corporate high priced roles not blue collar ones. Hence now people are scrambling because they cannot find welders and plumbers. But you don’t hear law firms and banks crying for talent, correct? That’s because they proactively hired.

Would you say there is a large portion of those hires that were black people? You gave Trump being the front runner credit for the drop in black UE.

You will also notice as Trump gained traction and ultimately won, the hiring went up like a rocket. It began way before November 2016.

This is false. 2015 was slower than 2014 and 2016 was even slower than 2015. 2017 was slower yet again. 2017 was the slowest year for job growth since 2011. 2017 was down more than 50,000 jobs per month as opposed to prior to Trump becoming the front runner.

We did not see and increase till the tax cut and that is now gone and 2019 is the slowest job growth per month since 2010.

you keep making claims that have no basis in fact and cannot be supported with data. you might know "finance" but I know data and the data says you are full of shit.

How is unemployment and consumer spend?

following the same trend they have been following for more than 8 years.

 

[MAGAman]

Short version:

Trump is doing far better than Obama

 

[playtime]

emails

"There was no persuasive evidence of systemic, deliberate mishandling of classified information," the report states.

The report is yet another instance of federal investigators clearing Clinton and her aides of deliberately mishandling classified information, which was the focus of attacks on the former secretary of state throughout the 2016 presidential campaign. Clinton was also cleared of wrongdoing by the FBI twice over her private email server during the campaign.

After the FBI closed its investigation of Clinton's email server in 2016, State Department investigators, over the next three years, interviewed dozens of former and current State Department employees and reviewed thousands of pages of documents.

State Department finds no 'deliberate mishandling of classified information' related to Clinton email server - CNNPolitics
----------------------------------------------------

I didn't think so. Now what is tramp going to talk about at his rallies??

^ 'I didn't think so. Now what is tramp going to talk about at his rallies??'

i'm willing to bet it's benghaziiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii.

Benghazi Emails Confirm Clinton Email Cover-Up

how long did that take?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

emails

"There was no persuasive evidence of systemic, deliberate mishandling of classified information," the report states.

The report is yet another instance of federal investigators clearing Clinton and her aides of deliberately mishandling classified information, which was the focus of attacks on the former secretary of state throughout the 2016 presidential campaign. Clinton was also cleared of wrongdoing by the FBI twice over her private email server during the campaign.

After the FBI closed its investigation of Clinton's email server in 2016, State Department investigators, over the next three years, interviewed dozens of former and current State Department employees and reviewed thousands of pages of documents.

State Department finds no 'deliberate mishandling of classified information' related to Clinton email server - CNNPolitics
----------------------------------------------------

I didn't think so. Now what is tramp going to talk about at his rallies??

^ 'I didn't think so. Now what is tramp going to talk about at his rallies??'

i'm willing to bet it's benghaziiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii.

Benghazi Emails Confirm Clinton Email Cover-Up

how long did that take?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Short version:

Trump is doing far better than Obama

just barely....and Obama was the 2nd worst POTUS ever....

being just barely better than the 2nd worst POTUS ever is not a ringing endorsement.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Short version:

Trump is doing far better than Obama

just barely....and Obama was the 2nd worst POTUS ever....

being just barely better than the 2nd worst POTUS ever is not a ringing endorsement.

Trump is BY far the best POTUS of the last century.

Hands down,

 

[Aletheia4u]

There are plenty of Obama's leftovers that are still working for the DOJ. And Bill Barr has helped out the Clinton's in the past.