Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 91,172
- 52,326
- 2,645
Yes, she was convicted of harassment.Thats harrassment
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yes, she was convicted of harassment.Thats harrassment
I am sure it depends on the misdemeanor. And they no doubt take more into accountthan just the crimes of which they were convicted
Yep! She was convicted of harassment, and he was convicted of assault.did they point their firearms at them?
Why…because they were such dumbasses they aren’t aware of the fundamental rules of safe gun handling? They are idiots.And you're so excited you just can't hide it, huh? Don't bother trying to cover that Chinese flag tattoo with long sleeves; we can smell it on you from miles away. This couple ought to be awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom.
I am sure that was brought before the court. Didn't work.yep. you have to take into account that people came over their wall and up to their house during a riot season that saw a billion $$$ worth of property burned or damaged and people injured
I am sure that was brought before the court. Didn't work.
Or maybe you are just wrong. Nah, cant be that.to bad. in a sane world it would have.
No they won’t. Stop lying you idiot. You are disgusting. Protecting their home and property from thugs who were ILLEGALLY on their property spouting threats. I see where that bothers a moron like you.Missouri's chief disciplinary counsel knows the honest facts of this case. Which is why they are asking for the license of those lawyers to be suspended.
The counsel doesn't care about politics. It doesn't even enter the situation so they acted without any prejudice.
The counsel doesn't care about lies either. All the care about is the facts.
If the state Supreme Court does the same, those lawyers licenses will be suspended.
neither of those crimes are crimes of moral turpitude.The governor may have pardoned them but the legal community of Missouri have not.
Missouri's chief disciplinary counsel has asked the state Supreme Court to suspend the law licenses of the couple.
It will be interesting to see what the court does.
St. Louis Couple Who Waved Guns At BLM Protesters Face Suspension Of Their Law Licenses
Mark and Patricia McCloskey made national headlines in June 2020 when they confronted a group of mostly Black protesters who entered their gated community en route to demonstrate in front of the nearby home of a former St. Louis mayor.www.kcur.org
Good…they are Liberals.The governor may have pardoned them but the legal community of Missouri have not.
Missouri's chief disciplinary counsel has asked the state Supreme Court to suspend the law licenses of the couple.
It will be interesting to see what the court does.
St. Louis Couple Who Waved Guns At BLM Protesters Face Suspension Of Their Law Licenses
Mark and Patricia McCloskey made national headlines in June 2020 when they confronted a group of mostly Black protesters who entered their gated community en route to demonstrate in front of the nearby home of a former St. Louis mayor.www.kcur.org
And you can believe that this is becoming rarer all the time. There is another site I'd spent 10 years on that would not allow anything close to the level of freedom of expression on political issues FOR CONSERVATIVES, that exists here. I had many friends there and felt like part of a family, actually, but my political opinions were forever being used to paint me as some kind of extremist and I finally got banned from that Forum, though not from the site.You can't use your Second Amendment rights to block someone's First Amendment rights.
All rights are equal. Most would say the First Amendment is the most important right of all. It's what we practice on usmessageboard
No dumbfuck, they were protecting themselves after one of your beloved savages threatened the woman. News flash: breaking down the gate at the entrance means they were trespassing Maybe you should stop lying. But that means you need to never speak again.....Oops, no. They were menacing people that were no threat to them. Or maybe you haven't read the news in about a year
They were standing outside the house
View attachment 541922
Is there a wall between the protestors and the couple?
I was merely answering the question as asked.They had to point them to get them out of their yard. Why do you think 9 of them were cited for trespassing? Since when do you have a "protest" on someones front lawn, inside their boundary walls.
Bullshit. They saw what looked like a nice house.. probably owned by some' Rich white people' and wanted to go in and see what up. If you were a homeowner there, you would have every right to expect once someone breaches you first level of security you could expect them to go further unless you make a strong statement.
They did. They were walking past the house. they kept walking. Eventually Jimmy and Tammy Faye took their penis extensions and went back insideOne has to wonder why the "frightened" protestors simply didn't leave at this point?
Those are your words not the state’sYes, she was convicted of harassment.
Yeah dummy, they kept walking after their bullshit got called. They shot their mouths off while trespassing and didn’t think this couple would defend themselves. And you, of course, defend the criminals. And calling firearms penis extensions. Classic projection there.They did. They were walking past the house. they kept walking. Eventually Jimmy and Tammy Faye took their penis extensions and went back inside
Indeed. They didn't climb walls to get into the McCloskeys' property.They did. They were walking past the house. they kept walking. Eventually Jimmy and Tammy Faye took their penis extensions and went back inside