Speaker Rips Obama on Libya...

did President bush have an objective in Iraq, yep, oil

Huh?
In case you haven't filled up your Prius lately - gas is right almost $4 / gallon. And we're still in Iraq, A-Stan and now Obama's latest illegal war- Libya.
Pull yer mouth of Michael Moore's crank and come up for some fresh air.
 
The hypocrite in chief exposes himself more each day. He's done almost everything he criticized the former admin for.

Though it could be argued that the UN mandate is more supportive in this case.
 
As he should. What's the objective over there? Anyone know?
As soon as Barry gets back from vacation, perhaps he'll tell us.

John Boehner rips President Obama on Libya - Jake Sherman - POLITICO.com

Boils down to....

"To protect civilians and civilian populated areas under threat of attack in the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, including Benghazi."

Unless of course you think it's something else.

Shouldn't it boil down to KILL Gaddafi?

I think it should be.

But, I don't think Barry Hussein has the stones to kill him.
 
15th post
The hypocrite in chief exposes himself more each day. He's done almost everything he criticized the former admin for.

then you shouid be thrilled and stop whining.

Why "shouid " I be thrilled? I've never contended that Bush was anything less than a fuckin' idiot too, but he was a much better choice than either Kerry or Gore.
 
As he should. What's the objective over there? Anyone know?
As soon as Barry gets back from vacation, perhaps he'll tell us.

John Boehner rips President Obama on Libya - Jake Sherman - POLITICO.com

Boils down to....

"To protect civilians and civilian populated areas under threat of attack in the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, including Benghazi."

Unless of course you think it's something else.

Shouldn't it boil down to KILL Gaddafi?

I think it should be.

But, I don't think Barry Hussein has the stones to kill him.

I quoted from the UN resolution, so whether it should or shouldn't, it doesn't. Exceeding the mandate (which some argue is already happening) would leave him very open to the same charges Bush faced about doing it for oil (that's already happening too), something I'm sure he's keen to avoid.
 
Back
Top Bottom