Quantum Windbag
Gold Member
- May 9, 2010
- 58,308
- 5,099
- 245
The "libertarian/tea party" movement he says.
It's really not a laughing matter, Kevin. "Definition first!" were the first words out of the mouth of my professor in the first meeting of Intro to Logic (not formal logic, a course in the philosophy of language - linguistics, semantics, connotation, etc.).
It's quite funny, actually. To state that the Tea Party was libertarian is completely absurd. The Tea Party was more Palin than Paul, and Palin is in no way shape or form a libertarian. Making such a ridiculous claim makes me think that the OP probably doesn't know anything about libertarianism.
The OP doesn't know anything about anything, despite his claims to be an astrophysicist. I still can't believe he lost a debate about science to an autodidact when he claims to have an advanced degree in physics.