Something must be done to make amends.

berg80

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2017
Messages
33,263
Reaction score
27,121
Points
2,820
The Never-Ending Abrego Garcia Saga

The Trump administration spent another day in court stonewalling U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis of Maryland, defying her explicit order to put on a government witness who could testify with direct knowledge of its efforts to deport the much-abused Kilmar Abrego Garcia to a third country. I was at the courthouse and wrote a full report on that aspect of the hearing.

Separately, on the merits of the case, the Trump administration seems increasingly hobbled by its inability to produce any evidence that a final order of removal was ever issued for Abrego Garcia. Xinis has all but concluded that a final order of removal simply never existed, and her pending decision may well turn on that omission, as Politico’s Josh Gerstein reports.

The bitter irony is that the absence of a final order of removal means Abrego Garcia’s wrongful deportation to El Salvador in March was doubly unlawful. We already knew that it was in violation of an immigration judge order that he not be removed to El Salvador specifically, but it now appears likely there was no legal basis to remove him anywhere at all.


Sadly, this is only one example of the regime's lawless behavior.

Even though I understand Obama's rationale for not pursuing charges against members of Shrub's admin for the torture of detainees, I thought it was a mistake not to. This time around the country can't afford to turn a blind eye to what Pam Bondi has facilitated. Some kind of reckoning is called for even if it is only to make provisions so abuses of law by the DoJ have a more immediate method of recourse.

This was written after trump 1.0. trump 2.0 is much worse.

Repairing the Rule of Law: An Agenda for Post-Trump Reform​

As the U.S. begins to see the light at the end of the Trumpian tunnel, it is time to begin thinking about the issue of repair. One should not assume the result of the election, but it is nonetheless worth asking the question: What should be done in a post-Trump world to restore the rule of law?

Of Trump’s many excesses, his assault on legal norms has to rank high in terms of damage to fundamental values that form the fabric of America. His attacks on the free press, the independent judiciary and the independence of the Department of Justice have all created significant damage. His abuse of executive discretionary authority has made a mockery of the concept of checks and balances. His gaming of the judicial system has revealed weaknesses in our legal process. His attempts to place himself (and his family and his business interests) above the law have called into question foundational national conceptions of equal justice. In short, President Trump has led a wrecking crew (aided and abetted by William Barr and Mitch McConnell) that has severely damaged American legal norms of behavior.

Trump’s attacks on foundational norms and principles leave policymakers with two choices. Lawmakers and voters can accept that damage and admit the inevitability of American decline, or they can fight to restore and strengthen the country’s legal guardrails. This post is an effort to begin that fight—to identify practical steps that the country can take to reinvigorate the rule of law and the concept of checks and balances.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am laughing at his predicament like lefties laugh at Kirk’s murder.

If the Biden Admin did not violate border security to import illegal Dem voters, DEPORTATION WOULD NOT BE NECESSARY.

MISTAKES HAPPEN.

Had there ever been a mistake arrest by LE?

Lefties love this shit. Admit it, you guys spank it to mistakes like this so you can use it to stop all deportations.

I notice you brotherfuckers are not bringing illegals into your homes.

GFY.
 
This has always been Trump. If he can't take shortcuts he simply can't be bothered.
In this example "shortcuts" being violations of law and or court orders. The SC may have given him immunity for his crimes but that doesn't preclude enacting reforms to prevent routine abuses of power and lawlessness by the prez from happening again.

Here is one ripe for reform.

Redefining “emergency” authority to limit such declarations generally. Discretionary emergency authority, generally, is (as we’ve noted already) at the heart of the current structure of national security law. But that discretion seems now to be subject to abuse.

President Trump has repeatedly invoked federal emergency powers to pursue his more controversial political priorities. He declared a national emergency at the southern border, which allowed him to secure funds for constructing a border wall—a policy priority that Congress had refused to fund. More recently, he used emergency powers to criminalize cooperation with the International Criminal Court’s investigation of U.S. activity in Afghanistan, effectively stonewalling the investigation. Notably, under the cover of declared emergencies, President Trump has used the expanded powers to pursue economic objectives such as imposing tariffs on Mexico and China.

The rules for invoking emergency powers were established by the 1976 National Emergencies Act (NEA), which requires presidents to formally declare an emergency and specify which of the 123 statutory powers unlocked by the IEEPA that they intend to use. The emergency declaration lasts for one year unless renewed by the president. Congress has the power to terminate emergencies and is required to “consider a vote” on a joint resolution terminating the emergency declaration every six months. However, it has almost never met this mandate.
 
Why are the libs so devoted to this wife-beating , human-trafficking MS-13 thuggarino that they are spending so much political capital to keep him in America?
Even if any of the accusations you made are true there is a larger principle at stake here. Being a heinous criminal (so far there is no evidence Garcia is one) does not excuse the regime's lawless approach to dealing with one. Surely you understand that.
 
I am laughing at his predicament like lefties laugh at Kirk’s murder.

If the Biden Admin did not violate border security to import illegal Dem voters, DEPORTATION WOULD NOT BE NECESSARY.

MISTAKES HAPPEN.

Had there ever been a mistake arrest by LE?

Lefties love this shit. Admit it, you guys spank it to mistakes like this so you can use it to stop all deportations.

I notice you brotherfuckers are not bringing illegals into your homes.

GFY.
It was legal under Biden's E/Os, NOT ILLEGAL.

WHEN Trump became President, Trump new E/Os.... made legal immigration policy under Biden, illegal under him....

and made it retroactive...so people legally let in under the Biden admin that were seeking asylum, or paroled, are now being told ....sorry Charlie, and are being deported before their immigration court date as promised.
 
The Never-Ending Abrego Garcia Saga

The Trump administration spent another day in court stonewalling U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis of Maryland, defying her explicit order to put on a government witness who could testify with direct knowledge of its efforts to deport the much-abused Kilmar Abrego Garcia to a third country. I was at the courthouse and wrote a full report on that aspect of the hearing.

Separately, on the merits of the case, the Trump administration seems increasingly hobbled by its inability to produce any evidence that a final order of removal was ever issued for Abrego Garcia. Xinis has all but concluded that a final order of removal simply never existed, and her pending decision may well turn on that omission, as Politico’s Josh Gerstein reports.

The bitter irony is that the absence of a final order of removal means Abrego Garcia’s wrongful deportation to El Salvador in March was doubly unlawful. We already knew that it was in violation of an immigration judge order that he not be removed to El Salvador specifically, but it now appears likely there was no legal basis to remove him anywhere at all.


Sadly, this is only one example of the regime's lawless behavior.

Even though I understand Obama's rationale for not pursuing charges against members of Shrub's admin for the torture of detainees, I thought it was a mistake not to. This time around the country can't afford to turn a blind eye to what Pam Bondi has facilitated. Some kind of reckoning is called for even if it is only to make provisions so abuses of law by the DoJ have a more immediate method of recourse.

This was written after trump 1.0. trump 2.0 is much worse.

Repairing the Rule of Law: An Agenda for Post-Trump Reform​

As the U.S. begins to see the light at the end of the Trumpian tunnel, it is time to begin thinking about the issue of repair. One should not assume the result of the election, but it is nonetheless worth asking the question: What should be done in a post-Trump world to restore the rule of law?

Of Trump’s many excesses, his assault on legal norms has to rank high in terms of damage to fundamental values that form the fabric of America. His attacks on the free press, the independent judiciary and the independence of the Department of Justice have all created significant damage. His abuse of executive discretionary authority has made a mockery of the concept of checks and balances. His gaming of the judicial system has revealed weaknesses in our legal process. His attempts to place himself (and his family and his business interests) above the law have called into question foundational national conceptions of equal justice. In short, President Trump has led a wrecking crew (aided and abetted by William Barr and Mitch McConnell) that has severely damaged American legal norms of behavior.

Trump’s attacks on foundational norms and principles leave policymakers with two choices. Lawmakers and voters can accept that damage and admit the inevitability of American decline, or they can fight to restore and strengthen the country’s legal guardrails. This post is an effort to begin that fight—to identify practical steps that the country can take to reinvigorate the rule of law and the concept of checks and balances.


I agree!

Best thing would be for democrats to run Mr Garcia for Congress in the midterms, then as VP in '28
 
Can we all at least agree to reforms of a prez's authority to invoke emergency powers?

President Trump has repeatedly invoked federal emergency powers to pursue his more controversial political priorities. He declared a national emergency at the southern border, which allowed him to secure funds for constructing a border wall—a policy priority that Congress had refused to fund. More recently, he used emergency powers to criminalize cooperation with the International Criminal Court’s investigation of U.S. activity in Afghanistan, effectively stonewalling the investigation. Notably, under the cover of declared emergencies, President Trump has used the expanded powers to pursue economic objectives such as imposing tariffs on Mexico and China.

Like the use of tariffs during 2.0.
 
Why are the libs so devoted to this wife-beating , human-trafficking MS-13 thuggarino that they are spending so much political capital to keep him in America?
seriously...... one would have thought Garcia's tenure as 'poster boy for the left' would have ended when El Salvador officials agreed to send him back for prosecution.... :rolleyes:
~S~
 
The Never-Ending Abrego Garcia Saga

The Trump administration spent another day in court stonewalling U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis of Maryland, defying her explicit order to put on a government witness who could testify with direct knowledge of its efforts to deport the much-abused Kilmar Abrego Garcia to a third country. I was at the courthouse and wrote a full report on that aspect of the hearing.

Separately, on the merits of the case, the Trump administration seems increasingly hobbled by its inability to produce any evidence that a final order of removal was ever issued for Abrego Garcia. Xinis has all but concluded that a final order of removal simply never existed, and her pending decision may well turn on that omission, as Politico’s Josh Gerstein reports.

The bitter irony is that the absence of a final order of removal means Abrego Garcia’s wrongful deportation to El Salvador in March was doubly unlawful. We already knew that it was in violation of an immigration judge order that he not be removed to El Salvador specifically, but it now appears likely there was no legal basis to remove him anywhere at all.


Sadly, this is only one example of the regime's lawless behavior.

Even though I understand Obama's rationale for not pursuing charges against members of Shrub's admin for the torture of detainees, I thought it was a mistake not to. This time around the country can't afford to turn a blind eye to what Pam Bondi has facilitated. Some kind of reckoning is called for even if it is only to make provisions so abuses of law by the DoJ have a more immediate method of recourse.

This was written after trump 1.0. trump 2.0 is much worse.

Repairing the Rule of Law: An Agenda for Post-Trump Reform​

As the U.S. begins to see the light at the end of the Trumpian tunnel, it is time to begin thinking about the issue of repair. One should not assume the result of the election, but it is nonetheless worth asking the question: What should be done in a post-Trump world to restore the rule of law?

Of Trump’s many excesses, his assault on legal norms has to rank high in terms of damage to fundamental values that form the fabric of America. His attacks on the free press, the independent judiciary and the independence of the Department of Justice have all created significant damage. His abuse of executive discretionary authority has made a mockery of the concept of checks and balances. His gaming of the judicial system has revealed weaknesses in our legal process. His attempts to place himself (and his family and his business interests) above the law have called into question foundational national conceptions of equal justice. In short, President Trump has led a wrecking crew (aided and abetted by William Barr and Mitch McConnell) that has severely damaged American legal norms of behavior.

Trump’s attacks on foundational norms and principles leave policymakers with two choices. Lawmakers and voters can accept that damage and admit the inevitability of American decline, or they can fight to restore and strengthen the country’s legal guardrails. This post is an effort to begin that fight—to identify practical steps that the country can take to reinvigorate the rule of law and the concept of checks and balances.

No President needs a final order of approval to kick an illegal out, Simp.
 
seriously...... one would have thought Garcia's tenure as 'poster boy for the left' would have ended when El Salvador officials agreed to send him back for prosecution.... :rolleyes:
~S~
He was never the poster boy for the left. Rather, his case is an example of the regime carrying out an agenda in violation of court orders and the law.
 
15th post
seriously...... one would have thought Garcia's tenure as 'poster boy for the left' would have ended when El Salvador officials agreed to send him back for prosecution.... :rolleyes:
~S~

The thread is about the Trump administrations inability to carry out a prosecution.
 
Why are the libs so devoted to this wife-beating , human-trafficking MS-13 thuggarino that they are spending so much political capital to keep him in America?
There 2028 bench is lacking.
 
Even if any of the accusations you made are true there is a larger principle at stake here. Being a heinous criminal (so far there is no evidence Garcia is one) does not excuse the regime's lawless approach to dealing with one. Surely you understand that.
He doesn’t need to be a heinous criminal to be deported. He is, but it doesn’t matter.

He is here illegally, Shirt Bus.
 
Back
Top Bottom