Manonthestreet
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2014
- 35,723
- 24,269
- 1,945
- Thread starter
- #21
I've seen plenty of pics of US airbases with many planes in the open. Your Mr know it all act is tiring as hell. btw Rand did a study on this very thing 1999. ....Having nukes is basically insurance against getting nuked, that's it. Using nukes to take out just an airbase is a wasteAll kind of cruise missiles that'll render you planes garbage before you can move em especially when they are parked in the openNuke......Why would you need nukes to take out an airbase...…..wtfRiiighhhttttt…..….. funny how many has US pulled off, no warning ……
You really have no idea just how hard it is to start a full blown Nuclear Exchange. It's designed today so that there can be no sneak attacks by either side. We have monitors and they have monitors. And then there are the spies up the ying yang by both sides. The Generals can't take a crap without the other side knowing how many squares he used of toilet paper. You have been watching way too many movies.
And just how are you going to take out major Air Force Operational Bases? And how are you going to take out the stateside bases with the fighters, bombers and supplies to resupply lost inventory as a war goes on in Europe? There is only one sure fired way. You drop a nice nuke package and it's done.
I spent some time at Bitburg AB and not one single F-15 was parked out in the open. All of them were parked in Revetments. So you take out the Runway. A F-15 will use the taxiways to take off just as well. And it's tough enough to land in the cut grass almost anywhere on the base including the Golf Course. The F-16 does as well.
Your lack of operational knowledge shows big time.