You copied what you didn't understand.I didn't cut anything. Again, I copied.
Damn, you're ineducable.
That's buffoonish. But then. You did you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You copied what you didn't understand.I didn't cut anything. Again, I copied.
Damn, you're ineducable.
So. Obviously, no charges for "insurrection" means no such thing took place. Don't make up garbage claims when you cut and paste from web pages. It makes you appear to be a complete buffoon. Definitions for words have meaning. That's why words are spelled differently. You were obviously absent from grammer school in its entirety.
You copied what you didn't understand.
That's buffoonish. But then. You did you.
Thanks for being a buffoon and not understanding that "insurrection" was not a crime anyone was charged with. That your cutting and pasting leaves you befuddled about the terms you use is not surprising. When you mindlessly cut and paste, it leaves you unable to explain what you cut and pasted.LOL
You're so funny. Thanks for admitting yet again that you're incapable of understanding the dictionary's definition of sedition being equivalent to insurrection, just on a smaller scale.
Thanks for being a buffoon and not understanding that "insurrection" was not a crime anyone was charged with. That your cutting and pasting leaves you befuddled about the terms you use is not surprising. When you mindlessly cut and paste, it leaves you unable to explain what you cut and pasted.
What is the "scale factor" that differentiates one from the other?I copied the dictionary definition you're incapable of understanding. Sedition is the equivalent of insurrection, just on a smaller scale.
LoL it's comical to see you don't understand what you cut and paste.LOL
Cracks me up how you still can't understand a dictionary.
What is it with you? Is it like? “seditious conspiracy“ is like jaywalking but “insurrection“ is like. Gang raping an 80-year-old grandmother in front of her six grandchildren and then beheading and mutilating the body, and then setting her house on fire while Her grandkids watched the whole thing.So you acknowledge people were charged with seditious conspiracy and not "insurrection".
That was quite the meaningless attempt at analogy.What is it with you? Is it like? “seditious conspiracy“ is like jaywalking but “insurrection“ is like. Gang raping an 80-year-old grandmother in front of her six grandchildren and then beheading and mutilating the body, and then setting her house on fire while Her grandkids watched the whole thing.
What’s the ******* difference?
But I noticed you didn’t Answer the question.That was quite the meaningless attempt at analogy.
So, I noticed you didn't address your really outrageous attempt at comparison.But I noticed you didn’t Answer the question.
What’s the ******* difference?
So it serves purpose
Why don’t you just tell me what you think the difference is between “seditious conspiracy” and “ insurrection” as an attempt by the sitting president of the United States and his ******* cult of personality followers and white Christian election denying fascists who stormed the US Capitol threatening to execute the vice president and the Speaker of the House in order to stop the peaceful transfer of power to the duly elected president and vice president incoming administration?So, I noticed you didn't address your really outrageous attempt at comparison.
I'm under no obligation to address your nonsense claim about "an attempt by the sitting president of the United States and his ******* cult of personality followers and white Christian election denying fascists who storm the US Capitol."Why don’t you just tell me what you think the difference is insurrection” as an attempt by the sitting president of the United States and his ******* cult of personality followers and white Christian election denying fascists who storm the US Capitol stormed the US Capitol threatening to execute the vice president and the Speaker of the House heard stop the peaceful transfer power to the duly elected president and vice president incoming administration?
What is the "scale factor" that differentiates one from the other?
Odd that for all the screeching people like you whine about with your "insurrection," tirades, you admit that no such charge was ever made against any individual.
You just cut and paste something that claims one is more "crime'ier" than another.
Was the above a part of your Bar exam to get your message board lawyer license?
LoL it's comical to see you don't understand what you cut and paste.

Your cut and paste Gee-had was funny.Fourth time... the correct term is copy, not cut.![]()
18 can constitute a small scale. That is a factor. Also that their insurrection plans failed is a factor.
And I still didn't cut anything. For the 3rd time, I copied. It's quite revealing you're incapable of comprehending such a simple nuance. Does not reflect well for you.
It’s funny you can’t understand what you cut and paste.LOL
Cracks me up how you still can't understand a dictionary.
Where did you cut and paste the number 18 from? Is there a formula that allows you to “factor” your consiracy theory? Who were the planners of the insurrection™ that you insist happened with no one being charged for such a crime?18 can constitute a small scale. That is a factor. Also that their insurrection plans failed is a factor.
And I still didn't cut anything. For the 3rd time, I copied. It's quite revealing you're incapable of comprehending such a simple nuance. Does not reflect well for you.
Your cut and paste Gee-had was funny.