Some liberals STILL think govt can have some say in who can own a gun

[Agit8r]

Yeah, domestic abusers have no right to own a firearm. They are more like animals than people. No impulse control.

Another Gun Control freak. Damn Nazi.

I don't have any problem with law-abiding citizens owning guns. Domestic abusers are not law abiding. They are more of a threat to other members of their household, than criminals outside their home are. Those are the facts of the matter.

 

[bripat9643]

Use a comma to separate the elements in a series (three or more things), including the last two. "He hit the ball, dropped the bat, and ran to first base."

Here's a better example:

Gasoline being necessary for the operation of motor cars, you shall not steal gas.

The dependent clause does not modify the meaning of the independent clause in any sense.

 

[bripat9643]

Use a comma to separate the elements in a series (three or more things), including the last two. "He hit the ball, dropped the bat, and ran to first base."

Save your breath. Learning and education is like kryptonite to the conservative base on this site.

Liberal Dictionary:
=============================================================
Learning - swallowing leftwing propaganda without question.

 

[bripat9643]

Because the liberals who come up with this horseshit need to be refuted. Which I have done.

BTW, I "like" guns for the same reason I "like" the hammer, saw, and screwdrivers in my tool box. They enable me to do things that need doing. Even though most of the time I leave them in the box and don't think about them for days or weeks on end. Until another situation comes up where I need to use them. And then I'm glad I have them.

Then just say I like my gun and it limits my freedom to take it away. I've done nothing wrong with it and preventative law is no law at all. The argument that we should all be able to hold the government to account with our firearms is a laughable anachranism.

What is that babble supposed to mean?

Guns in private hands are indeed a very effective constraint on government. You don't ever see people lined up for mass slaughter in countries where gun ownership is allowed. You don't see oppressive tyrannies.

not for a very long time they haven't

I have no idea what that means. Name one country where guns are legally own where the government has engaged in mass slaughter or imprisonment.

france ...

Guns were legally owned during the French revolution?

 

[daws101]

btw the 2nd amendment is one sentence .

With several separate clauses.

that's pauses .
no where does it state that individuals have the right to bear personal arms , then again it does not prohibit them either and there's the rub.

I'm afraid so. It says "the right of the people." In all other amendments in the Bill of Rights, that means every individual.

your point?
I just said in that post the 2nd amendment never explicitly mentions that individuals have the right bear (own) personal arms but neither does it explicitly state they cannot .....do you understand what the word ambiguous means ?

 

[daws101]

Then just say I like my gun and it limits my freedom to take it away. I've done nothing wrong with it and preventative law is no law at all. The argument that we should all be able to hold the government to account with our firearms is a laughable anachranism.

What is that babble supposed to mean?

Guns in private hands are indeed a very effective constraint on government. You don't ever see people lined up for mass slaughter in countries where gun ownership is allowed. You don't see oppressive tyrannies.

not for a very long time they haven't

I have no idea what that means. Name one country where guns are legally own where the government has engaged in mass slaughter or imprisonment.

france ...

Guns were legally owned during the French revolution?

not relevant .....chicken shit dodge.

 

[daws101]

You do know an "amendment" can be changed don't you? By sorta dictionary definition it already has been. And since the government already has nukes, drones and more aircraft carriers than the rest of the world's countries three times over then your 9mm in your locked box in the shed aint really the deterant to government that it used to be when soldiers and civilians both had muskets.

Why not just say I want my gun because I like it rather than come out with this horseshit. I don't want to take it off you and I don't want the federal government to do so either but at least admit to yourself that you want it because you like it and not some higher calling of holding government to account.

The soldiers that control those weapons of that military happen to be second amendment backers in the majority of them at least. You think our men and women of the military back a fucked up federal government when they threaten the Second Amendment.

yes, the military's job is to maintain order period .

 

[daws101]

Use a comma to separate the elements in a series (three or more things), including the last two. "He hit the ball, dropped the bat, and ran to first base."

Here's a better example:

Gasoline being necessary for the operation of motor cars, you shall not steal gas.

The dependent clause does not modify the meaning of the independent clause in any sense.

false comparison. that sentence has no ambiguity in it
the 2nd amendment does.
thanks for playing.

 

[Auld Phart]

All our rights have some limit .

Otherwise people could just buy guns out of vending machines .

They used to sell them mail order

 

[Rustic]

You do know an "amendment" can be changed don't you? By sorta dictionary definition it already has been. And since the government already has nukes, drones and more aircraft carriers than the rest of the world's countries three times over then your 9mm in your locked box in the shed aint really the deterant to government that it used to be when soldiers and civilians both had muskets.

Why not just say I want my gun because I like it rather than come out with this horseshit. I don't want to take it off you and I don't want the federal government to do so either but at least admit to yourself that you want it because you like it and not some higher calling of holding government to account.

The soldiers that control those weapons of that military happen to be second amendment backers in the majority of them at least. You think our men and women of the military back a fucked up federal government when they threaten the Second Amendment.

yes, the military's job is to maintain order period .

Order and the federal government are two opposing things

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Yeah, domestic abusers have no right to own a firearm. They are more like animals than people. No impulse control.

Another Gun Control freak. Damn Nazi.

I don't have any problem with law-abiding citizens owning guns. Domestic abusers are not law abiding. They are more of a threat to other members of their household, than criminals outside their home are. Those are the facts of the matter.

So, you believe in Gun Control. Got it.

Fuckin' Nazi...

 

[Rustic]

Yeah, domestic abusers have no right to own a firearm. They are more like animals than people. No impulse control.

Another Gun Control freak. Damn Nazi.

I don't have any problem with law-abiding citizens owning guns. Domestic abusers are not law abiding. They are more of a threat to other members of their household, than criminals outside their home are. Those are the facts of the matter.

So, you believe in Gun Control. Got it.

Fuckin' Nazi...

Criminal control is a better solution

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Yeah, domestic abusers have no right to own a firearm. They are more like animals than people. No impulse control.

Another Gun Control freak. Damn Nazi.

I don't have any problem with law-abiding citizens owning guns. Domestic abusers are not law abiding. They are more of a threat to other members of their household, than criminals outside their home are. Those are the facts of the matter.

So, you believe in Gun Control. Got it.

Fuckin' Nazi...

Criminal control is a better solution

That's not Criminal Control. He's walking the streets, he's just not allowed to legally own a gun. That, Sweetcheeks, is Gun Control.

 

[bripat9643]

All our rights have some limit .

Otherwise people could just buy guns out of vending machines .

The limit is we don't allow children to have guns. Children don't have all the rights that adults have.

 

[bripat9643]

Words have meaning. You don't get to change them just because it's convenient for your argument.

that's ironic you do it all the time ,

Really? Provide an example.

read any thing you've posted there are several in this thread.

I haven't changed the meaning of any words.

yes you have ...

You have failed to quote any examples.

 

[Agit8r]

Yeah, domestic abusers have no right to own a firearm. They are more like animals than people. No impulse control.

Another Gun Control freak. Damn Nazi.

I don't have any problem with law-abiding citizens owning guns. Domestic abusers are not law abiding. They are more of a threat to other members of their household, than criminals outside their home are. Those are the facts of the matter.

So, you believe in Gun Control. Got it.

Fuckin' Nazi...

Only a wife beater would defend domestic violence. Duly noted.

 

[Rustic]

Yeah, domestic abusers have no right to own a firearm. They are more like animals than people. No impulse control.

Another Gun Control freak. Damn Nazi.

I don't have any problem with law-abiding citizens owning guns. Domestic abusers are not law abiding. They are more of a threat to other members of their household, than criminals outside their home are. Those are the facts of the matter.

So, you believe in Gun Control. Got it.

Fuckin' Nazi...

Criminal control is a better solution

That's not Criminal Control. He's walking the streets, he's just not allowed to legally own a gun. That, Sweetcheeks, is Gun Control.

In your professional consultants view, how are you going to diss-arm millions of Americans of 300-400 million firearms??

 

[bripat9643]

in France where just under a quarter of all households have guns, often between three and four per house, with around 20 million registered firearms in circulation – that’s with a population of 66 million.

What does France have to do with anything. It has some of the strongest gun control laws in Europe.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Yeah, domestic abusers have no right to own a firearm. They are more like animals than people. No impulse control.

Another Gun Control freak. Damn Nazi.

I don't have any problem with law-abiding citizens owning guns. Domestic abusers are not law abiding. They are more of a threat to other members of their household, than criminals outside their home are. Those are the facts of the matter.

So, you believe in Gun Control. Got it.

Fuckin' Nazi...

Only a wife beater would defend domestic violence. Duly noted.

In this case I'm defending the rights of people to own guns. Did he shoot anyone, yet? No.

If the point is he might shoot someone, that is true of everyone who owns or can manage to get access to a gun, hence the problem...

 

[bripat9643]

btw the 2nd amendment is one sentence .

With several separate clauses.

that's pauses .
no where does it state that individuals have the right to bear personal arms , then again it does not prohibit them either and there's the rub.

I'm afraid so. It says "the right of the people." In all other amendments in the Bill of Rights, that means every individual.

your point?
I just said in that post the 2nd amendment never explicitly mentions that individuals have the right bear (own) personal arms but neither does it explicitly state they cannot .....do you understand what the word ambiguous means ?

"The people" means every individual, so you're just plain wrong. It's not the slightest big ambiguous.

Please try to keep up.