somali - muslim cop shoots pajama wearing woman dead in Minnesota

[miketx]

Sounds bad. Muslim Somali trigger happy rookie cop. Totally sucks for the gal and her family, and almost to be husband.

Most bad cops are lily white.

Most cops are white, race baiter.

I merely stated a fact. MF. Most bad cops are lily white.

Prove it.

Why should I when white cops are doing such a great job of proving it on a near daily basis.

Done with your race baiting lib. Bye.

 

[pwjohn]

Most bad cops are lily white.

Most cops are white, race baiter.

I merely stated a fact. MF. Most bad cops are lily white.

Prove it.

Why should I when white cops are doing such a great job of proving it on a near daily basis.

Done with your race baiting lib. Bye.

Adios amigos.

 

[tinydancer]

This really is a case of cold blooded murder. I cannot even begin to guess his motive, and because of the politics of our times, he'll get away with it.

Did he shouted Allahu Akbar? I'm serious...

He might have....I mean .....you never can tell .....one second they seem like normal human beings ,and the next second the inner jihadist sociopath might jump out at you.

This is just flat out bizarre that he opens fire and shoots across his partner.

 

[jon_berzerk]

Dash cams show in front of the car. Body cams show in front of the officer. I am speculating but even if they were on, what would they show? Probably nothing!

They would show something, what the person did, how they acted, maybe not everything depending where they were pointed or if they were covered by something.

the cams should be running all the time

that was the idea behind them

Most of them do not have the battery life or storage capability to do that without being so expensive that they are not affordable. Several local police and sheriffs departments jumped on the body cam bandwagon and quietly discontinued their use shortly afterwards because they became more of a a problem than a solution.

Most of them do not have the battery life or storage capability to do that without being so expensive that they are not affordable.

simply not true

Police Body Cameras


The Big Picture: How Do Police Body Cameras Work?

public transparency is never a problem and always the solution

How much do those cameras cost?

All I know is what the police departments here have stated. The cameras they bought proved to be more problems than they were worth. That is why they stopped using them.

Most police departments cannot afford the expenditure of funds to replace the crappy ones they already bought that did not meet up with the manufacturers hype.

in this instance the cost of the camera was not a factor

the shooter violated his departments body cam rules

Mohamed Noor was in breach of his own police department’s strict bodycam rules when he opened fire and killed bride-to-be Justine Damond.

He now faces severe punishment, even if exonerated over the shooting, and could lose his job for not following the guidelines.

The 31-year-old officer knew he was compelled to switch on his body camera and record his interactions when answering a 911 call to reports of a sexual assault.

Department policy says it should be switched on for ‘any search’, and crucially, ‘prior to any use of force’.


Mohamed Noor who shot Justine Damond broke bodycam rules | Daily Mail Online

personally it should not be up to the officer to switch it on or (off) should need arise

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

They would show something, what the person did, how they acted, maybe not everything depending where they were pointed or if they were covered by something.

the cams should be running all the time

that was the idea behind them

Most of them do not have the battery life or storage capability to do that without being so expensive that they are not affordable. Several local police and sheriffs departments jumped on the body cam bandwagon and quietly discontinued their use shortly afterwards because they became more of a a problem than a solution.

Most of them do not have the battery life or storage capability to do that without being so expensive that they are not affordable.

simply not true

Police Body Cameras


The Big Picture: How Do Police Body Cameras Work?

public transparency is never a problem and always the solution

How much do those cameras cost?

All I know is what the police departments here have stated. The cameras they bought proved to be more problems than they were worth. That is why they stopped using them.

Most police departments cannot afford the expenditure of funds to replace the crappy ones they already bought that did not meet up with the manufacturers hype.

in this instance the cost of the camera was not a factor

the shooter violated his departments body cam rules

Mohamed Noor was in breach of his own police department’s strict bodycam rules when he opened fire and killed bride-to-be Justine Damond.

He now faces severe punishment, even if exonerated over the shooting, and could lose his job for not following the guidelines.

The 31-year-old officer knew he was compelled to switch on his body camera and record his interactions when answering a 911 call to reports of a sexual assault.

Department policy says it should be switched on for ‘any search’, and crucially, ‘prior to any use of force’.


Mohamed Noor who shot Justine Damond broke bodycam rules | Daily Mail Online

personally it should not be up to the officer to switch it on or (off) should need arise

I hate to bring this up, but words have meanings you know. He was not conducting a search. He was in his patrol car, talking to the person who called 911. I am not trying to defend him on this, but I find bodycams to be a convenient excuse for people to presume guilt.

 

[jon_berzerk]

This really is a case of cold blooded murder. I cannot even begin to guess his motive, and because of the politics of our times, he'll get away with it.

Did he shouted Allahu Akbar? I'm serious...

He might have....I mean .....you never can tell .....one second they seem like normal human beings ,and the next second the inner jihadist sociopath might jump out at you.

This is just flat out bizarre that he opens fire and shoots across his partner.

maybe she was about to report that he was the sexual assault perp

just a guess

 

[jon_berzerk]

the cams should be running all the time

that was the idea behind them

Most of them do not have the battery life or storage capability to do that without being so expensive that they are not affordable. Several local police and sheriffs departments jumped on the body cam bandwagon and quietly discontinued their use shortly afterwards because they became more of a a problem than a solution.

Most of them do not have the battery life or storage capability to do that without being so expensive that they are not affordable.

simply not true

Police Body Cameras


The Big Picture: How Do Police Body Cameras Work?

public transparency is never a problem and always the solution

How much do those cameras cost?

All I know is what the police departments here have stated. The cameras they bought proved to be more problems than they were worth. That is why they stopped using them.

Most police departments cannot afford the expenditure of funds to replace the crappy ones they already bought that did not meet up with the manufacturers hype.

in this instance the cost of the camera was not a factor

the shooter violated his departments body cam rules

Mohamed Noor was in breach of his own police department’s strict bodycam rules when he opened fire and killed bride-to-be Justine Damond.

He now faces severe punishment, even if exonerated over the shooting, and could lose his job for not following the guidelines.

The 31-year-old officer knew he was compelled to switch on his body camera and record his interactions when answering a 911 call to reports of a sexual assault.

Department policy says it should be switched on for ‘any search’, and crucially, ‘prior to any use of force’.


Mohamed Noor who shot Justine Damond broke bodycam rules | Daily Mail Online

personally it should not be up to the officer to switch it on or (off) should need arise

I hate to bring this up, but words have meanings you know. He was not conducting a search. He was in his patrol car, talking to the person who called 911. I am not trying to defend him on this, but I find bodycams to be a convenient excuse for people to presume guilt.

but words have meanings you know. He was not conducting a search.

no but he used "force" which you conveniently left off

Department policy says it should be switched on for 'any search', and crucially, 'prior to any use of force'.

shooting someone in the gut several times is use of force which he had a obligation to switch his cam on

Mohamed Noor who shot Justine Damond broke bodycam rules | Daily Mail Online

I find bodycams to be a convenient excuse for people to presume guilt

or innocence

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Most of them do not have the battery life or storage capability to do that without being so expensive that they are not affordable. Several local police and sheriffs departments jumped on the body cam bandwagon and quietly discontinued their use shortly afterwards because they became more of a a problem than a solution.

Most of them do not have the battery life or storage capability to do that without being so expensive that they are not affordable.

simply not true

Police Body Cameras


The Big Picture: How Do Police Body Cameras Work?

public transparency is never a problem and always the solution

How much do those cameras cost?

All I know is what the police departments here have stated. The cameras they bought proved to be more problems than they were worth. That is why they stopped using them.

Most police departments cannot afford the expenditure of funds to replace the crappy ones they already bought that did not meet up with the manufacturers hype.

in this instance the cost of the camera was not a factor

the shooter violated his departments body cam rules

Mohamed Noor was in breach of his own police department’s strict bodycam rules when he opened fire and killed bride-to-be Justine Damond.

He now faces severe punishment, even if exonerated over the shooting, and could lose his job for not following the guidelines.

The 31-year-old officer knew he was compelled to switch on his body camera and record his interactions when answering a 911 call to reports of a sexual assault.

Department policy says it should be switched on for ‘any search’, and crucially, ‘prior to any use of force’.


Mohamed Noor who shot Justine Damond broke bodycam rules | Daily Mail Online

personally it should not be up to the officer to switch it on or (off) should need arise

I hate to bring this up, but words have meanings you know. He was not conducting a search. He was in his patrol car, talking to the person who called 911. I am not trying to defend him on this, but I find bodycams to be a convenient excuse for people to presume guilt.

but words have meanings you know. He was not conducting a search.

no but he used "force" which you conveniently left off

Department policy says it should be switched on for 'any search', and crucially, 'prior to any use of force'.

shooting someone in the gut several times is use of force which he had a obligation to switch his cam on

Mohamed Noor who shot Justine Damond broke bodycam rules | Daily Mail Online

I find bodycams to be a convenient excuse for people to presume guilt

or innocence

Just playing Devil's advocate here. What if the threat suddenly appeared and he did not have time to switch it on?

Also, what good would it have done if all it showed was through the front windshield of the patrol car?

 

[skye]

Most of them do not have the battery life or storage capability to do that without being so expensive that they are not affordable.

simply not true

Police Body Cameras


The Big Picture: How Do Police Body Cameras Work?

public transparency is never a problem and always the solution

How much do those cameras cost?

All I know is what the police departments here have stated. The cameras they bought proved to be more problems than they were worth. That is why they stopped using them.

Most police departments cannot afford the expenditure of funds to replace the crappy ones they already bought that did not meet up with the manufacturers hype.

in this instance the cost of the camera was not a factor

the shooter violated his departments body cam rules

Mohamed Noor was in breach of his own police department’s strict bodycam rules when he opened fire and killed bride-to-be Justine Damond.

He now faces severe punishment, even if exonerated over the shooting, and could lose his job for not following the guidelines.

The 31-year-old officer knew he was compelled to switch on his body camera and record his interactions when answering a 911 call to reports of a sexual assault.

Department policy says it should be switched on for ‘any search’, and crucially, ‘prior to any use of force’.


Mohamed Noor who shot Justine Damond broke bodycam rules | Daily Mail Online

personally it should not be up to the officer to switch it on or (off) should need arise

I hate to bring this up, but words have meanings you know. He was not conducting a search. He was in his patrol car, talking to the person who called 911. I am not trying to defend him on this, but I find bodycams to be a convenient excuse for people to presume guilt.

but words have meanings you know. He was not conducting a search.

no but he used "force" which you conveniently left off

Department policy says it should be switched on for 'any search', and crucially, 'prior to any use of force'.

shooting someone in the gut several times is use of force which he had a obligation to switch his cam on

Mohamed Noor who shot Justine Damond broke bodycam rules | Daily Mail Online

I find bodycams to be a convenient excuse for people to presume guilt

or innocence

Just playing Devil's advocate here. What if the threat suddenly appeared and he did not have time to switch it on?

Also, what good would it have done if all it showed was through the front windshield of the patrol car?

Never mind that.


Mohamed Noor only got his job as a policeman because he was a "diversity hire".

Shame on the Mayor of the city of Minneapolis ....SHAME ON HIM! he has blood on his hands!

 

[Moonglow]

Eh, he acts no worse than none diversity hires..

 

[skye]

Eh, he acts no worse than none diversity hires..

I profoundly disagree with you.

 

[Moonglow]

Eh, he acts no worse than none diversity hires..

I profoundly disagree with you.

I do, I've seen that humans, no matter the color do bad things...

 

[Manonthestreet]

I'm stroking out here learning this. His partner must be completely losing it. He opened fire right in the freaking car!

Partner of cop who fatally shot bride-to-be 'was STUNNED when his colleague opened fire from inside their squad car' as autopsy reveals she was killed by one bullet to the stomach after she called 911

• Bride-to-be Justine Damond, 40, was fatally shot by officer Mohamed Noor
• His partner Matthew Harrity was 'left stunned' by the shooting, sources say

Read more: Cop who shot dead Justine Damond offers condolences | Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

• Harrity was speaking to Damond when Noor opened fire through the patrol car's driver side door, fatally wounding her in the abdomen

Why he cant win if this goes to trial.....

 

[skye]

Eh, he acts no worse than none diversity hires..

I profoundly disagree with you.

I do, I've seen that humans, no matter the color do bad things...

what are you talking about.

please shut up.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

How much do those cameras cost?

All I know is what the police departments here have stated. The cameras they bought proved to be more problems than they were worth. That is why they stopped using them.

Most police departments cannot afford the expenditure of funds to replace the crappy ones they already bought that did not meet up with the manufacturers hype.

in this instance the cost of the camera was not a factor

the shooter violated his departments body cam rules

Mohamed Noor was in breach of his own police department’s strict bodycam rules when he opened fire and killed bride-to-be Justine Damond.

He now faces severe punishment, even if exonerated over the shooting, and could lose his job for not following the guidelines.

The 31-year-old officer knew he was compelled to switch on his body camera and record his interactions when answering a 911 call to reports of a sexual assault.

Department policy says it should be switched on for ‘any search’, and crucially, ‘prior to any use of force’.


Mohamed Noor who shot Justine Damond broke bodycam rules | Daily Mail Online

personally it should not be up to the officer to switch it on or (off) should need arise

I hate to bring this up, but words have meanings you know. He was not conducting a search. He was in his patrol car, talking to the person who called 911. I am not trying to defend him on this, but I find bodycams to be a convenient excuse for people to presume guilt.

but words have meanings you know. He was not conducting a search.

no but he used "force" which you conveniently left off

Department policy says it should be switched on for 'any search', and crucially, 'prior to any use of force'.

shooting someone in the gut several times is use of force which he had a obligation to switch his cam on

Mohamed Noor who shot Justine Damond broke bodycam rules | Daily Mail Online

I find bodycams to be a convenient excuse for people to presume guilt

or innocence

Just playing Devil's advocate here. What if the threat suddenly appeared and he did not have time to switch it on?

Also, what good would it have done if all it showed was through the front windshield of the patrol car?

Never mind that.


Mohamed Noor only got his job as a policeman because he was a "diversity hire".

Shame on the Mayor of the city of Minneapolis ....SHAME ON HIM! he has blood on his hands!

You obviously have not researched this or you would have a link proving he was a diversity hire. Oh, BTW, the mayor is a woman! Her name is Betsy Hodges.

 

[Moonglow]

Eh, he acts no worse than none diversity hires..

I profoundly disagree with you.

I do, I've seen that humans, no matter the color do bad things...

what are you talking about.

please shut up.

Too many syllables?

 

[skye]

in this instance the cost of the camera was not a factor

the shooter violated his departments body cam rules

Mohamed Noor was in breach of his own police department’s strict bodycam rules when he opened fire and killed bride-to-be Justine Damond.

He now faces severe punishment, even if exonerated over the shooting, and could lose his job for not following the guidelines.

The 31-year-old officer knew he was compelled to switch on his body camera and record his interactions when answering a 911 call to reports of a sexual assault.

Department policy says it should be switched on for ‘any search’, and crucially, ‘prior to any use of force’.


Mohamed Noor who shot Justine Damond broke bodycam rules | Daily Mail Online

personally it should not be up to the officer to switch it on or (off) should need arise

I hate to bring this up, but words have meanings you know. He was not conducting a search. He was in his patrol car, talking to the person who called 911. I am not trying to defend him on this, but I find bodycams to be a convenient excuse for people to presume guilt.

but words have meanings you know. He was not conducting a search.

no but he used "force" which you conveniently left off

Department policy says it should be switched on for 'any search', and crucially, 'prior to any use of force'.

shooting someone in the gut several times is use of force which he had a obligation to switch his cam on

Mohamed Noor who shot Justine Damond broke bodycam rules | Daily Mail Online

I find bodycams to be a convenient excuse for people to presume guilt

or innocence

Just playing Devil's advocate here. What if the threat suddenly appeared and he did not have time to switch it on?

Also, what good would it have done if all it showed was through the front windshield of the patrol car?

Never mind that.


Mohamed Noor only got his job as a policeman because he was a "diversity hire".

Shame on the Mayor of the city of Minneapolis ....SHAME ON HIM! he has blood on his hands!

You obviously have not researched this or you would have a link proving he was a diversity hire. Oh, BTW, the mayor is a woman!

omigod you don't say A WOMAN????????????????????

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Eh, he acts no worse than none diversity hires..

I profoundly disagree with you.

I do, I've seen that humans, no matter the color do bad things...

what are you talking about.

please shut up.

To many syllables?

How about "Too many syllables?"

"to - too - two": There are differences!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I hate to bring this up, but words have meanings you know. He was not conducting a search. He was in his patrol car, talking to the person who called 911. I am not trying to defend him on this, but I find bodycams to be a convenient excuse for people to presume guilt.

but words have meanings you know. He was not conducting a search.

no but he used "force" which you conveniently left off

Department policy says it should be switched on for 'any search', and crucially, 'prior to any use of force'.

shooting someone in the gut several times is use of force which he had a obligation to switch his cam on

Mohamed Noor who shot Justine Damond broke bodycam rules | Daily Mail Online

I find bodycams to be a convenient excuse for people to presume guilt

or innocence

Just playing Devil's advocate here. What if the threat suddenly appeared and he did not have time to switch it on?

Also, what good would it have done if all it showed was through the front windshield of the patrol car?

Never mind that.


Mohamed Noor only got his job as a policeman because he was a "diversity hire".

Shame on the Mayor of the city of Minneapolis ....SHAME ON HIM! he has blood on his hands!

You obviously have not researched this or you would have a link proving he was a diversity hire. Oh, BTW, the mayor is a woman!

omigod you don't say A WOMAN????????????????????

You said it was a man. I merely corrected you. Did you find that link saying he was a diversity hire yet?

 

[Moonglow]

Eh, he acts no worse than none diversity hires..

I profoundly disagree with you.

I do, I've seen that humans, no matter the color do bad things...

what are you talking about.

please shut up.

To many syllables?

How about "Too many syllables?"

"to - too - two": There are differences!

Can't I pull a leg without you tripping in on the action?