So you love socialism ?????

[Rustic]

Socialism is the dream of the delusional...
Lol

The Swedes, Danes, British, etc. are delusional? You need a better mirror.

Of course they are, the euro zone is all but dead...
Anyway,this "it takes a village' bullshit is as cowardly as it gets...

What a shame that you used our roads, parks, schools, courts, etc. Only a island of one fits your needs apparently.

The federal government should not be involved in personal life decisions whatsoever...

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Socialism is the dream of the delusional...
Lol

The Swedes, Danes, British, etc. are delusional? You need a better mirror.

Of course they are, the euro zone is all but dead...
Anyway,this "it takes a village' bullshit is as cowardly as it gets...

What a shame that you used our roads, parks, schools, courts, etc. Only a island of one fits your needs apparently.

The federal government should not be involved in personal life decisions whatsoever...

Dogmatic nonsense. To you paying taxes should be optional.

 

[peach174]

Socialism is the dream of the delusional...
Lol

The Swedes, Danes, British, etc. are delusional? You need a better mirror.

Have you noticed how many new British are moving here and abroad lately?
They say the reason is cost.
London has been determined as the second most expensive city in the world to inhabit.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Socialism is the dream of the delusional...
Lol

The Swedes, Danes, British, etc. are delusional? You need a better mirror.

Have you noticed how many new British are moving here and abroad lately?
They say the reason is cost.
London has been determined as the second most expensive city in the world to inhabit.

And that matters how? Oh right, it doesn't.

 

[nat4900]

Liberals now are all communists.

Now that you finally got THAT out of your system, don't forget to flush and wash your hands thoroughly.

 

[Rustic]

Socialism is the dream of the delusional...
Lol

The Swedes, Danes, British, etc. are delusional? You need a better mirror.

Of course they are, the euro zone is all but dead...
Anyway,this "it takes a village' bullshit is as cowardly as it gets...

What a shame that you used our roads, parks, schools, courts, etc. Only a island of one fits your needs apparently.

The federal government should not be involved in personal life decisions whatsoever...

Dogmatic nonsense. To you paying taxes should be optional.

An income tax is unconstitutional, a luxury tax makes more sense...

 

[Camp]

Socialism is the dream of the delusional...
Lol

The Swedes, Danes, British, etc. are delusional? You need a better mirror.

Of course they are, the euro zone is all but dead...
Anyway,this "it takes a village' bullshit is as cowardly as it gets...

What a shame that you used our roads, parks, schools, courts, etc. Only a island of one fits your needs apparently.

The federal government should not be involved in personal life decisions whatsoever...

When personal life decisions have effects and interference with others, a referee and moderators are needed to rectify the disagreements and disturbances. That is a government's role. You can argue that seat belts should be a personal life decision and not the concern of government, but by not wearing a seatbelt, we know beyond any doubt that others will be paying for the cost of you not wearing that belt if you are injured to a certain extent in an accident. Your personal life decision will cost others and that makes it the government's decision.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

The Swedes, Danes, British, etc. are delusional? You need a better mirror.

Of course they are, the euro zone is all but dead...
Anyway,this "it takes a village' bullshit is as cowardly as it gets...

What a shame that you used our roads, parks, schools, courts, etc. Only a island of one fits your needs apparently.

The federal government should not be involved in personal life decisions whatsoever...

Dogmatic nonsense. To you paying taxes should be optional.

An income tax is unconstitutional, a luxury tax makes more sense...

Where do you guys get the nonsense from? And a luxury tax, very Adam Smith. He opposed taxes on wages.

 

[nat4900]

The federal government should not be involved in personal life decisions whatsoever...

Well, good for you......Women will approve of your new-found advocacy for a woman's RIGHT TO CHOOSE......Now tell that to your conservative ilk.

 

[bripat9643]

The reasons are all bad. The worst one being that it violates the Constitution. All you're saying is that you don't give a crap about what the Constitution says.

The Constitution allows for regulated capitalism, as does common sense, as does capitalism itself which doesn't exist without government.

And yes, unlike you, I deal with the real world. We don't live in 1789 so what actually worked for them then doesn't matter a damn today. Since they expected us to recreate the government to fit our needs, exactly what they did, they wouldn't be dumb enough to say you shouldn't have an FAA just because we didn't have one. They would have said, dummies, we didn't have ******* planes you morons...

Wrong, shit for brains, I just proved the Constitution does not allow the federal government to regulate farmers or manufacturers. It only regulates sales across state lines.

Why do you think, even if true, that such a thing matters?

ROFL! You just proved you don't give a crap about what the Constitution says.

I care to the point where it still makes sense, for a people living 230 years after it was written. It was only supposed to last for a generation, at least that's what they expected. It's on paper, not carved in stone, for a reason.

In other words you think you are free to ignore any parts of the Constitution you don't like. You're fascist to the bone.

 

[nat4900]

That is a government's role. You can argue that seat belts should be a personal life decision and not the concern of government, but by not wearing a seatbelt, we know beyond any doubt that others will be paying for the cost of you not wearing that belt if you are injured to a certain extent in an accident.

.....and please make sure you repeat the above to any of those right wing idiots who ***** and moan that the ACA HC insurance "mandates" that everyone should purchase HC insurance.

 

[bripat9643]

Puhleeze, our income tax code interferes with trade in 80,000 ways.

I'm not talking about the tax code, I'm talking about a tax on income affecting trade, which it does not.

So the tax code isn't a feature of the income tax?

Nope. An income tax is an income tax, and income taxes do not affect trade.

If the entire code for that is, "All income is taxed at 10%.", how does that or the tax affect trade? Oh right, it doesn't.

Are you actually claiming our income tax does not affect trade?

You asked for a tax that does not affect trade, and I gave you one. Stop trying to put words in the mouths of others, you suck at it.

You failed. The income tax obviously affects trade. There are no taxes that have no affect on trade.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

The Constitution allows for regulated capitalism, as does common sense, as does capitalism itself which doesn't exist without government.

And yes, unlike you, I deal with the real world. We don't live in 1789 so what actually worked for them then doesn't matter a damn today. Since they expected us to recreate the government to fit our needs, exactly what they did, they wouldn't be dumb enough to say you shouldn't have an FAA just because we didn't have one. They would have said, dummies, we didn't have ******* planes you morons...

Wrong, shit for brains, I just proved the Constitution does not allow the federal government to regulate farmers or manufacturers. It only regulates sales across state lines.

Why do you think, even if true, that such a thing matters?

ROFL! You just proved you don't give a crap about what the Constitution says.

I care to the point where it still makes sense, for a people living 230 years after it was written. It was only supposed to last for a generation, at least that's what they expected. It's on paper, not carved in stone, for a reason.

In other words you think you are free to ignore any parts of the Constitution you don't like. You're fascist to the bone.

I live in the real world while you think we can't do what the Founders did, create a government that works for the citizens.

In your world (not the real one) there is no FAA, it's not in the Constitution, even though in 1789 there were no ******* airplanes.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

You failed. The income tax obviously affects trade. There are no taxes that have no affect on trade.

Prove it? Oh right, you can't.

 

[nat4900]

The income tax obviously affects trade. There are no taxes that have no affect on trade.

"Brilliant"....just great......so, let traders haul their goods on their backs to market and skip the ports, the roads, the internet system, the banking, the trade agreements, etc. and be "free" of taxation......right, moron?

 

[elektra]

That is a government's role. You can argue that seat belts should be a personal life decision and not the concern of government, but by not wearing a seatbelt, we know beyond any doubt that others will be paying for the cost of you not wearing that belt if you are injured to a certain extent in an accident.

,,,,,and please make sure you repeat the above to any of those right wing idiots who ***** and moan that the ACA HC insurance.

another post that is a bit incoherent, at least you are good at something nat4900,

 

[bripat9643]

Wrong, shit for brains, I just proved the Constitution does not allow the federal government to regulate farmers or manufacturers. It only regulates sales across state lines.

Why do you think, even if true, that such a thing matters?

ROFL! You just proved you don't give a crap about what the Constitution says.

I care to the point where it still makes sense, for a people living 230 years after it was written. It was only supposed to last for a generation, at least that's what they expected. It's on paper, not carved in stone, for a reason.

In other words you think you are free to ignore any parts of the Constitution you don't like. You're fascist to the bone.

I live in the real world while you think we can't do what the Founders did, create a government that works for the citizens.

In your world (not the real one) there is no FAA, it's not in the Constitution, even though in 1789 there were no ******* airplanes.

The Founders fought a revolution so they could "create a government that works for the citizens." Is that what you're proposing? You certainly aren't advocating the rule of law. If we are free to flout the Constitution, then we are also free to flout FAA regulations, aren't we?

Your' government doesn't work for me.

 

[bripat9643]

You failed. The income tax obviously affects trade. There are no taxes that have no affect on trade.

Prove it? Oh right, you can't.

I just did, numskull.

 

[bripat9643]

The income tax obviously affects trade. There are no taxes that have no affect on trade.

"Brilliant"....just great......so, let traders haul their goods on their backs to market and skip the ports, the roads, the internet system, the banking, the trade agreements, etc. and be "free" of taxation......right, moron?

Where did I say anything that even remotely suggests that?

 

[elektra]

The income tax obviously affects trade. There are no taxes that have no affect on trade.

"Brilliant"....just great......so, let traders haul their goods on their backs to market and skip the ports, the roads, the internet system, the banking, the trade agreements, etc. and be "free" of taxation......right, moron?

Brilliant is how you got that rant from so little. you forget rail, moron.