So Who You Liberals Got For 2020?

[miketx]

there are a lot of options

Wacky Cory Booker
Uncle Joe Biden
Crazy Kamala Harris
Low Energy John Hickenlooper
Crooked Luis Gutierrez
Pocahontas

even Creepy Al Frankenstein might run

Running against a Republican under indictment

You're just a blatant bald faced liar aren't you? Trump is not under indictment.

 

[rightwinger]

I would love to see Liz Warren debate Trump

As Warren regales him with facts, figures and economic projections......Trump will respond with an Indian dance

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Anthony Weiner.for president
Al Franken for vice president.

The Liberal Jew dream team...

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

So Hillary to run a 3rd time? You need drug tested!

If you think I just said that Hillary should run again then you are the one needing to be tested. The point is that nobody being talked about now will end up being the nominee if history holds true. I brought up Hillary only to show she was the one exception to the rule, not because she would run again. And she was only the exception to the rule because the DNC did everything they could to make sure she won. Had they started on level playing fields she would likely not have won. Which in and of itself supports my point that the early names never win because the other side has had 3 years to attack them at every turn.

So you sneak someone in at the last minute(like barry)in hopes that there wont be enough time to uncover how crooked they are?

And what does that say about dem voters? They'll vote dem even if they know nothing about their candidate.

It is not just the Dems, the same thing has held true for the GOP. How many people were talking about Trump in 2013? Nobody? In 2013 it was not even sure if Trump ran what party he would be a part of.

How many people were talking about Bush II in 1997, just about nobody. It was not till late 1998 that Bush II started to get any real traction and became one of the front runners.

Do you know nothing about political history?

I stopped reading when you brought Trump up as an unknown.

So, you think that in 2013 Trump was being talked about as the favorite to win the GOP nomination? Really? Would you mind sharing some of those drugs with the rest of us? What world do you people even live in?

So nobody had heard of Trump until he decided to run for office?

 

[rightwinger]

there are a lot of options

Wacky Cory Booker
Uncle Joe Biden
Crazy Kamala Harris
Low Energy John Hickenlooper
Crooked Luis Gutierrez
Pocahontas

even Creepy Al Frankenstein might run

Running against a Republican under indictment

you mean a Republican incumbent who is more popular than Saint Reagan

Yea......approval numbers in the 20s will ensure reelection

 

[basquebromance]

Anthony Weiner....

he would get more votes than you think

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

there are a lot of options

Wacky Cory Booker
Uncle Joe Biden
Crazy Kamala Harris
Low Energy John Hickenlooper
Crooked Luis Gutierrez
Pocahontas

even Creepy Al Frankenstein might run

Running against a Republican under indictment

you mean a Republican incumbent who is more popular than Saint Reagan

Yea......approval numbers in the 20s will ensure reelection

Yeah...and hillary had a 98 percent chance to win the presidency.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

If you think I just said that Hillary should run again then you are the one needing to be tested. The point is that nobody being talked about now will end up being the nominee if history holds true. I brought up Hillary only to show she was the one exception to the rule, not because she would run again. And she was only the exception to the rule because the DNC did everything they could to make sure she won. Had they started on level playing fields she would likely not have won. Which in and of itself supports my point that the early names never win because the other side has had 3 years to attack them at every turn.

So you sneak someone in at the last minute(like barry)in hopes that there wont be enough time to uncover how crooked they are?

And what does that say about dem voters? They'll vote dem even if they know nothing about their candidate.

It is not just the Dems, the same thing has held true for the GOP. How many people were talking about Trump in 2013? Nobody? In 2013 it was not even sure if Trump ran what party he would be a part of.

How many people were talking about Bush II in 1997, just about nobody. It was not till late 1998 that Bush II started to get any real traction and became one of the front runners.

Do you know nothing about political history?

I stopped reading when you brought Trump up as an unknown.

So, you think that in 2013 Trump was being talked about as the favorite to win the GOP nomination? Really? Would you mind sharing some of those drugs with the rest of us? What world do you people even live in?

So nobody had heard of Trump until he decided to run for office?

I never said nobody heard of him. Dude, it is way too early to be this drunk, even on a Saturday.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

The problem is that

Anyone at all would be better for working class Americans and American values. Consider that working class families with children helped by CHIP are passed over for taxes for the rich. This tax BS will cause short term improvement as it did in the thirties, then under Reagan and finally Bush Jr, but soon the economy will once again slump, that is history for anyone awake. The rich take they do not create. For us it doesn't matter but I do want to make sure when the next crash comes our investments are safe. Republicans play you conservatives and you perform the ball balance like a trained seal. Fooled again you'd think you'd learn? Donnie will laugh all the way to the bank and you fools will still miss the point. LOL

"There is no historical evidence that tax cuts spur economic growth. The highest period of growth in U.S. history (1933-1973) also saw its highest tax rates on the rich: 70 to 91 percent. During this period, the general tax rate climbed as well, but it reached a plateau in 1969, and growth slowed down five years later. Almost all rich nations have higher general taxes than the U.S., and they are growing faster as well."

Tax cuts spur economic growth

"For his part, Mr. Trump has repeatedly asserted with a straight face that the tax bill would hurt him. In fact, it will give him and his family a windfall. That’s because the Senate bill will provide a generous tax break for income that people earn through limited liability corporations, partnerships and other so-called pass-through businesses that do not pay taxes before passing on profits to owners. Under the Senate bill, the president will be able to claim a 23 percent deduction on profits he earns through his more than 500 pass-through businesses."

Opinion | A Historic Tax Heist

Judging By This New York Times Story, Steve Mnuchin Is a Liar

House tax bill made kinda simple - Analysis | The House just passed its big tax bill. Here’s what is in it.

"I have to wonder how many know wealthy people who use their wealth to create jobs? In truth it is the struggling that create jobs as they want a bit of the wealth. The truly rich could give a crap, well maybe they care a bit about their portfolio. But wealth for corporations is another issue, they do sometimes create jobs here and abroad but they are privileged as Baker writes."

Dean Baker: The Conservative Nanny State

The problem is Democrats don't give a shit about working class Americans and American values just identity politics. The average American is concerned about jobs, the economy and illegal immigration The left is more concerned with labeling everyone who disagrees with them racist, misogynistic, bigoted, Nazi's.

 

[DarkFury]

there are a lot of options

Wacky Cory Booker
Uncle Joe Biden
Crazy Kamala Harris
Low Energy John Hickenlooper
Crooked Luis Gutierrez
Pocahontas

even Creepy Al Frankenstein might run

Running against a Republican under indictment

you mean a Republican incumbent who is more popular than Saint Reagan

Yea......approval numbers in the 20s will ensure reelection

Trump's poll numbers are HIGHER than REAGAN'S at this same point! Full speed ahead!

 

[miketx]

So Hillary to run a 3rd time? You need drug tested!

If you think I just said that Hillary should run again then you are the one needing to be tested. The point is that nobody being talked about now will end up being the nominee if history holds true. I brought up Hillary only to show she was the one exception to the rule, not because she would run again. And she was only the exception to the rule because the DNC did everything they could to make sure she won. Had they started on level playing fields she would likely not have won. Which in and of itself supports my point that the early names never win because the other side has had 3 years to attack them at every turn.

So you sneak someone in at the last minute(like barry)in hopes that there wont be enough time to uncover how crooked they are?

And what does that say about dem voters? They'll vote dem even if they know nothing about their candidate.

It is not just the Dems, the same thing has held true for the GOP. How many people were talking about Trump in 2013? Nobody? In 2013 it was not even sure if Trump ran what party he would be a part of.

How many people were talking about Bush II in 1997, just about nobody. It was not till late 1998 that Bush II started to get any real traction and became one of the front runners.

Do you know nothing about political history?

I stopped reading when you brought Trump up as an unknown.

So, you think that in 2013 Trump was being talked about as the favorite to win the GOP nomination? Really? Would you mind sharing some of those drugs with the rest of us? What world do you people even live in?

Here you go failure boy.

 

[rightwinger]

 

[rightwinger]

there are a lot of options

Wacky Cory Booker
Uncle Joe Biden
Crazy Kamala Harris
Low Energy John Hickenlooper
Crooked Luis Gutierrez
Pocahontas

even Creepy Al Frankenstein might run

Running against a Republican under indictment

you mean a Republican incumbent who is more popular than Saint Reagan

Yea......approval numbers in the 20s will ensure reelection

Trump's poll numbers are HIGHER than REAGAN'S at this same point! Full speed ahead!

But Trumps have never broken 50 percent
Reagan had a short term drop. Trump struggles to break 40percent

 

[Disir]

I'm a liberal. I don't see any liberals on the horizon.

It looks a might thin and you need one now. Whose the party leader at this point anyway?

I'm not a Democrat. I'm a liberal.

I will try and remember that. Your kind is a dying breed. A classical liberal I assume?

No. War is the last choice not defending and promoting US corporations or (now) multinational corporations. Public education not charter schools and real estate scams created by high stakes testing scams (faux privatization). No offshoring and outsourcing. Bring back R&D. Affordable housing. Medical care for vets, mentally ill, intellectually disabled, and elderly including state run facilities where profit is not the motive.

You know, crap that can be solved and not some wingding shit with no resolution in sight.

 

[Seawytch]

When Nancy Pelosi takes back over as speaker next year, Trump and Pence will get impeached, Nancy will be President and will name Hillary her VP then she'll step down and the rightfully elected person will finally be seated.

Oh please,please run the ding bat!!!!

You didn't read it at all, what I typed. You only saw the name, Hillary. No need to "run" anyone. The rightfully elected President would finally be in office.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

So you sneak someone in at the last minute(like barry)in hopes that there wont be enough time to uncover how crooked they are?

And what does that say about dem voters? They'll vote dem even if they know nothing about their candidate.

It is not just the Dems, the same thing has held true for the GOP. How many people were talking about Trump in 2013? Nobody? In 2013 it was not even sure if Trump ran what party he would be a part of.

How many people were talking about Bush II in 1997, just about nobody. It was not till late 1998 that Bush II started to get any real traction and became one of the front runners.

Do you know nothing about political history?

I stopped reading when you brought Trump up as an unknown.

So, you think that in 2013 Trump was being talked about as the favorite to win the GOP nomination? Really? Would you mind sharing some of those drugs with the rest of us? What world do you people even live in?

So nobody had heard of Trump until he decided to run for office?

I never said nobody heard of him. Dude, it is way too early to be this drunk, even on a Saturday.

Who had heard of Barry before he ran?
And stop trying to deflect.

 

[Seawytch]

When Nancy Pelosi takes back over as speaker next year, Trump and Pence will get impeached, Nancy will be President and will name Hillary her VP then she'll step down and the rightfully elected person will finally be seated.

There will be civil war before that happens!

Half of the 30% that support Drumph couldn't get off the couch to revolt.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

When Nancy Pelosi takes back over as speaker next year, Trump and Pence will get impeached, Nancy will be President and will name Hillary her VP then she'll step down and the rightfully elected person will finally be seated.

Oh please,please run the ding bat!!!!

You didn't read it at all, what I typed. You only saw the name, Hillary. No need to "run" anyone. The rightfully elected President would finally be in office.

Well you have to admit your plan is kinda nutty and about as likely as a million monkeys pounding on typewriters producing the works of Shakespeare.

 

[BuckToothMoron]

Joe "Paws" Biden?
AL "The freak" Franken?
"Mad" Maxine Watters?
Kamala " invisible planes"Harris?
Hillary "crime wave" Clinton?
Bernie "socialist" Sanders?

Honest to god you ignorant if you just remove the names using four little rules...
1, They cannot be in or on their way to prison.
2, They cannot be in or on their way to a mental asylum
3, They cannot be in or on their way to a nursing home.
4, They cannot be a pervert.

That wipes out your ENTIRE leadership. Hell if those rules applied to your voters you would have no base. So who is going to lift up that torn tatterd nasty ratty flag of the DNC and lead you forward?

Fury

You didn’t mention Elizabeth “Pocahontas” Warren. But let’s be honest, if Flynn or something else takes Trump down before 2020, other than the sitting Veep, the GOP doesn’t have a lot of leadership either.

got cruz got Ryan got rubio

If that is what the GOP has, then they got nuttin’ IMO. Cruz and Rubio have already been rejected by the GOP base, and Ryan himself didn’t think he would fair any better. That is why he refused to jump in the race.

 

[Disir]

When Nancy Pelosi takes back over as speaker next year, Trump and Pence will get impeached, Nancy will be President and will name Hillary her VP then she'll step down and the rightfully elected person will finally be seated.

There will be civil war before that happens!

Half of the 30% that support Drumph couldn't get off the couch to revolt.

Why do you support Nancy Pelosi?