Turley's words , taken from Zero Hedge this morning, provide the full summary/ conclusions and echo OP's outline .
I speculate Dorsey effectively fronted himself via the plausible deniability route and is banking on zero prosecution given the known bias in his favour from King Rat Garland the present AG .
" The question is then whether this was a case of willful blindness or an attempt by other executives like Gadde or Roth to give him plausible deniability by keeping him in the dark. He then became the public face in unequivocally and confidently denying practices like shadow-banning.
The greatest defense for Dorsey may be found in the
Justice Department itself. Any prosecution of Twitter executives could prove a hard sell for Attorney General Merrick Garland, whose department has been repeatedly accused of pronounced political bias.
While Garland has aggressively pursued contempt sanctions against Trump associates, it is not clear if he would prove as aggressive with Democratic allies like Dorsey or
other Twitter executives. He could face that question if the House under the GOP pursues perjury or contempt sanction"
www.zerohedge.com
