So, what does the Left expect in a Republican Candidate?

[Lesh]

That's what you get when you have a Democrat party supporting illegal invaders and all sorts of sexual deviants, including pedophiles over Mr. and Mrs. John Q. Taxpayer.

That’s what you get when you elect Republicans

 

[BluesLegend]

OK, how about FUCKING BACKSTABBING BOLSHEVIK COMMUNIST BASTARDS THAT NEED A MAJOR ENEMA FOR THE NEXT 10 YEARS!!!!!

That's more like it

 

[pknopp]

Apparently you know nothing about Gabbard's position on firearms. She was a socialist gun-grabber at one time. But between the idiot Democrats and leftists she turned her back on, and her realization of what a great leader Trump is, she switched her views.

"Gabbard's views on gun control and gun owners' rights have varied through the course of her political career.

During her time in Congress and throughout her presidential campaign, Gabbard supported a common rifle weapons ban and universal background checks.[222] She received an F-rating from the NRA, a 0% rating by the Hawaii Rifle Association and a 100% rating by the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence for her time in Congress.[223]

Following her retirement from Congress, Gabbard's positions on gun control and gun owners' rights have slightly shifted to the right.

Gabbard has stated that she is a supporter of the Second Amendment. Gabbard says she believes the Second Amendment is necessary so citizens can "defend themselves and our loved ones, and to serve as a check on a tyrannical government seeking to take away our God-given freedoms."[11][12]

Gabbard expressed approval with the Supreme Court's ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, which held that an individual's right to carry a handgun for self-defense outside the home is protected by the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution.[11][12]"

Political positions of Tulsi Gabbard - Wikipedia

So she sadly has no principles.

 

[JGalt]

So she sadly has no principles.

No. Unlike yourself, people can and do change their views.

But you just go on being you, bro.

 

[pknopp]

No. Unlike yourself, people can and do change their views.

But you just go on being you, bro.

Whichever way the wind blows......

 

[Marener]

Translation into Liberalspeak: A Republican In Name Only that campaigns as a Conservative, but governs like a Democrat.

More like being able to listen to them speak without wondering WTF is going on in their head.

 

[Doc7505]

1. To not be a traitor who is out to end American democracy.

2. To not be a sexual pervert and molester and sick rapey woman-hater.

3. To not be a felon and fraudster.

4. To not be a white-supremacist antisemite.

5. To not be a pathological liar and sociopath.

6. To not be the whiniest little bitch to ever walk the planet.

7. To not be suffering from extreme dementia.

We don't demand much, but the GOP couldn't hit even one of those targets with Trump.

~~~~~~
The only thing you left out was pedophilia, then your defintion paints Joe Biden exactly....

 

[Yarddog]

I remember when I supported Gabbard in 2020 and was told she was a Socialist gun grabber. Now the right likes her.

Both sides are nothing else if not hypocrites.

I never thought of her as a gun grabber. She seems to be able to string together coherent rational thoughts without a teleprompter, whats not to like about that? She's moderate which is fine, but then you have Hillary Clinton going out and calling her a Russian asset.. people are so sick of that after Dems did the same thing with Trump.. so damn tiresome, so YES, the fact that she is in the crosshairs of radical Democrats, probably means shes doing something right, and as an added + she also served in the military and was actually deployed in Iraq, which is much more than Walzzz can say. He spent more time in China then overseas is service for his country.
So yeah, I have no problem liking Gabbard. + she likes to surf and so do I so there is that. I doubt very much she is a Russian asset.

 

[GMCGeneral]

That’s what you get when you elect Republicans

Nope. Which party supports the murder of the unborn child for selfish convenience? Which party supports Sodomites, sexually confused and kiddie diddlers? Yep. DemocRATs.

 

[GMCGeneral]

More like being able to listen to them speak without wondering WTF is going on in their head.

And yet you still mercilessly pillory any and all Republicans who DARE to oppose the Leftist agenda.

 

[pknopp]

I never thought of her as a gun grabber. She seems to be able to string together coherent rational thoughts without a teleprompter, whats not to like about that? She's moderate which is fine, but then you have Hillary Clinton going out and calling her a Russian asset.. people are so sick of that after Dems did the same thing with Trump.. so damn tiresome, so YES, the fact that she is in the crosshairs of radical Democrats, probably means shes doing something right, and as an added + she also served in the military and was actually deployed in Iraq, which is much more than Walzzz can say. He spent more time in China then overseas is service for his country.
So yeah, I have no problem liking Gabbard. + she likes to surf and so do I so there is that. I doubt very much she is a Russian asset.

Democrats always condemned her. Just as Republicans did.

 

[cnm]

We want someone who will fight Democrats tooth and nail for the sake of the country.

You want a cult.

 

[Lesh]

Nope. Which party supports the murder of the unborn child for selfish convenience? Which party supports Sodomites, sexually confused and kiddie diddlers? Yep. DemocRATs.

Oh bullshit

 

[GMCGeneral]

You want a cult.

No, I want a fighter, not some limp dick who "takes the high road" and lays down in front of Democrats like John McShitstain and Mittens did

 

[GMCGeneral]

That's more like it

A couple cases in point, I don't know if you remember GHW's "Read My Lips, No New Taxes" campaign pledge? OK. This happened with both Bush 41 and Reagan. They tried to get this "grand deal" in both 1988 and 1990. Raise taxes and we will cut spending (wink, wink), well, taxes went up but guess what?

 

[BluesLegend]

A couple cases in point, I don't know if you remember GHW's "Read My Lips, No New Taxes" campaign pledge? OK. This happened with both Bush 41 and Reagan. They tried to get this "grand deal" in both 1988 and 1990. Raise taxes and we will cut spending (wink, wink), well, taxes went up but guess what?

Not only did taxes AND spending go up, Democrats also raided the social security trust fund repeatedly. They 'borrowed' and spent OUR money, that Reagan asked us to contribute and set aside to cover the baby boomers retirement. Trillions of it. How will congress pay us back OUR money, hold a f'ing bake sale? This is the brilliant part, they will tax us a second time and we'll have to pay the money twice. Either directly or in the form of benefit cuts.

 

[Mortis]

Not only did taxes AND spending go up, Democrats also raided the social security trust fund repeatedly. They 'borrowed' and spent OUR money, that Reagan asked us to contribute and set aside to cover the baby boomers retirement. Trillions of it. How will congress pay us back OUR money, hold a f'ing bake sale? This is the brilliant part, they will tax us a second time and we'll have to pay the money twice. Either directly or in the form of benefit cuts.

Lets not forget the Student Loan Forgiveness courtesy of the Biden/Harris Administration.

 

[Lesh]

No, I want a fighter, not some limp dick who "takes the high road" and lays down in front of Democrats like John McShitstain and Mittens did

Sounds pretty cultish

 

[BluesLegend]

Lets not forget the Student Loan Forgiveness courtesy of the Biden/Harris Administration.

Right, because working class blue collar workers should pay off doctors and lawyers student loans. Nothing but BLATANT bribes for votes.

 

[GMCGeneral]

Sounds pretty cultish

What is cultish is worshipping the Mulatto Menace.