So These Are Left Wingers, Eh?

[g5000]

The sign in the background says USA WHITE HOMELAND.

What sort of left wing rhetoric do you think this man is shouting?

 

[Siete]

fucking RW's wont take responsibility for a damn thing, not even being RW's ..

cracks me up.

 

[gipper]

I am curious to know how many times you have to hit yourself in the head with a hammer in order to be profoundly stupid enough to say "Nazis are lefties".

they voted for the orange sociopath. you can't expect them to be sane or truthful.

Left wingers. Carrying Confederate flags. Wearing Nazi shields. Shouting "N*GGER!" at black counter-protesters and "K*KE!" at Jews.

Left wingers, eh?

BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA!

Man, you just can't find people any more stupid than the ones who say Nazis are lefties. You really can't.

This thread is yet another perfect example of how easy the elite DNC media can dupe some Americans.

The left has been committing heinous and murderous actions for decades. Hell...our prior president announced his run for the office in the home of two domestic terrorists...to say nothing of his rhetoric leading to the shooting so many police officers...to say nothing of his meeting the terror group BLM, in the White House...to say nothing of his refusal to condemn Radical Islam...and on and on....

So the reason you think Nazis are left wing is "because Obama"?

Does that work for everything?

"I drank some Drano because Obama."

Did I post Nazis are LWNJs like you? Please tell me were that post is.

 

[gipper]

fucking RW's wont take responsibility for a damn thing, not even being RW's ..

cracks me up.

I guess they learned that from LWNJs.

The left has a long history of violence and I have yet to hear one of their leaders take responsibility for it.

HELL...the NY Slimes still proudly displays Walter Duranty's Pulitzer Prize for promoting Stalin's murdering of the Ukraine. But...I would guess you don't know anything about that.

My guess is you don't even think left wingers commit any violence. Am I right or wrong?

 

[Siete]

I am curious to know how many times you have to hit yourself in the head with a hammer in order to be profoundly stupid enough to say "Nazis are lefties".

they voted for the orange sociopath. you can't expect them to be sane or truthful.

Left wingers. Carrying Confederate flags. Wearing Nazi shields. Shouting "N*GGER!" at black counter-protesters and "K*KE!" at Jews.

Left wingers, eh?

BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA!

Man, you just can't find people any more stupid than the ones who say Nazis are lefties. You really can't.

This thread is yet another perfect example of how easy the elite DNC media can dupe some Americans.

The left has been committing heinous and murderous actions for decades. Hell...our prior president announced his run for the office in the home of two domestic terrorists...to say nothing of his rhetoric leading to the shooting so many police officers...to say nothing of his meeting the terror group BLM, in the White House...to say nothing of his refusal to condemn Radical Islam...and on and on....

So the reason you think Nazis are left wing is "because Obama"?

Does that work for everything?

"I drank some Drano because Obama."

Did I post Nazis are LWNJs like you? Please tell me were that post is.

ok, you're a leftwinger ...happy now ?

 

[2aguy]

I am curious to know how many times you have to hit yourself in the head with a hammer in order to be profoundly stupid enough to say "Nazis are lefties".

nazis are left wing......they are socialists, they believe in government control of the economy, that is socialism, ding bat.....socialism is a left wing economic model.

Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian

My purpose today is to make just two main points: (1) To show why Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And (2) to show why socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.

The identification of Nazi Germany as a socialist state was one of the many great contributions of Ludwig von Mises.

When one remembers that the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party — Mises's identification might not appear all that noteworthy. For what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?

------

De facto government ownership of the means of production, as Mises termed it, was logically implied by such fundamental collectivist principles embraced by the Nazis as that the common good comes before the private good and the individual exists as a means to the ends of the State. If the individual is a means to the ends of the State, so too, of course, is his property. Just as he is owned by the State, his property is also owned by the State.

Nope...NAZIS are Right Wing fascist totalitarians. Communists are Left Wing totalitarians.

Oh...and if you believe having the word "Socialists" in their title means they really are...then you also believe that the People's Republic of China is really a republic.

Nope......national socialism is in fact socialism....socialism is on the left of the political spectrum....you can lie about this all day long, but the truth is the truth.

 

[Timmy]

The sign in the background says USA WHITE HOMELAND.

What sort of left wing rhetoric do you think this man is shouting?

"Free healthcare for all!...... well, except for Jews !"

Lol!!

 

[Timmy]

I am curious to know how many times you have to hit yourself in the head with a hammer in order to be profoundly stupid enough to say "Nazis are lefties".

nazis are left wing......they are socialists, they believe in government control of the economy, that is socialism, ding bat.....socialism is a left wing economic model.

Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian

My purpose today is to make just two main points: (1) To show why Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And (2) to show why socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.

The identification of Nazi Germany as a socialist state was one of the many great contributions of Ludwig von Mises.

When one remembers that the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party — Mises's identification might not appear all that noteworthy. For what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?

------

De facto government ownership of the means of production, as Mises termed it, was logically implied by such fundamental collectivist principles embraced by the Nazis as that the common good comes before the private good and the individual exists as a means to the ends of the State. If the individual is a means to the ends of the State, so too, of course, is his property. Just as he is owned by the State, his property is also owned by the State.

Nope...NAZIS are Right Wing fascist totalitarians. Communists are Left Wing totalitarians.

Oh...and if you believe having the word "Socialists" in their title means they really are...then you also believe that the People's Republic of China is really a republic.

Nope......national socialism is in fact socialism....socialism is on the left of the political spectrum....you can lie about this all day long, but the truth is the truth.

All those nazi freaks are voting republican . Fact!

 

[g5000]

I am curious to know how many times you have to hit yourself in the head with a hammer in order to be profoundly stupid enough to say "Nazis are lefties".

nazis are left wing......they are socialists, they believe in government control of the economy, that is socialism, ding bat.....socialism is a left wing economic model.

Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian

My purpose today is to make just two main points: (1) To show why Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And (2) to show why socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.

The identification of Nazi Germany as a socialist state was one of the many great contributions of Ludwig von Mises.

When one remembers that the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party — Mises's identification might not appear all that noteworthy. For what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?

------

De facto government ownership of the means of production, as Mises termed it, was logically implied by such fundamental collectivist principles embraced by the Nazis as that the common good comes before the private good and the individual exists as a means to the ends of the State. If the individual is a means to the ends of the State, so too, of course, is his property. Just as he is owned by the State, his property is also owned by the State.

Nope...NAZIS are Right Wing fascist totalitarians. Communists are Left Wing totalitarians.

Oh...and if you believe having the word "Socialists" in their title means they really are...then you also believe that the People's Republic of China is really a republic.

Nope......national socialism is in fact socialism....socialism is on the left of the political spectrum....you can lie about this all day long, but the truth is the truth.

So tell us how you got this stupid. I really want to know. It's why I started this topic. I want to know what makes you tards tick.

 

[2aguy]

I am curious to know how many times you have to hit yourself in the head with a hammer in order to be profoundly stupid enough to say "Nazis are lefties".

nazis are left wing......they are socialists, they believe in government control of the economy, that is socialism, ding bat.....socialism is a left wing economic model.

Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian

My purpose today is to make just two main points: (1) To show why Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And (2) to show why socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.

The identification of Nazi Germany as a socialist state was one of the many great contributions of Ludwig von Mises.

When one remembers that the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party — Mises's identification might not appear all that noteworthy. For what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?

------

De facto government ownership of the means of production, as Mises termed it, was logically implied by such fundamental collectivist principles embraced by the Nazis as that the common good comes before the private good and the individual exists as a means to the ends of the State. If the individual is a means to the ends of the State, so too, of course, is his property. Just as he is owned by the State, his property is also owned by the State.

Nope...NAZIS are Right Wing fascist totalitarians. Communists are Left Wing totalitarians.

Oh...and if you believe having the word "Socialists" in their title means they really are...then you also believe that the People's Republic of China is really a republic.

Nope......national socialism is in fact socialism....socialism is on the left of the political spectrum....you can lie about this all day long, but the truth is the truth.

All those nazi freaks are voting republican . Fact!

And all the other racists are voting democrat......

la raza, black lives matter, all vote democrat, both are racist to their core.....

The big difference...the Republicans do not accpet tne national socialists into our party...la raza, and black lives matter are welcomed to the White House when the democrats are in control.....

 

[g5000]

Nope......national socialism is in fact socialism....socialism is on the left of the political spectrum....you can lie about this all day long, but the truth is the truth.

I want you to tell us how you got so profoundly stupid that you can look at these guys and think "Yep, those guys are left wingers".

 

[hunarcy]

I am curious to know how many times you have to hit yourself in the head with a hammer in order to be profoundly stupid enough to say "Nazis are lefties".

nazis are left wing......they are socialists, they believe in government control of the economy, that is socialism, ding bat.....socialism is a left wing economic model.

Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian

My purpose today is to make just two main points: (1) To show why Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And (2) to show why socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.

The identification of Nazi Germany as a socialist state was one of the many great contributions of Ludwig von Mises.

When one remembers that the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party — Mises's identification might not appear all that noteworthy. For what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?

------

De facto government ownership of the means of production, as Mises termed it, was logically implied by such fundamental collectivist principles embraced by the Nazis as that the common good comes before the private good and the individual exists as a means to the ends of the State. If the individual is a means to the ends of the State, so too, of course, is his property. Just as he is owned by the State, his property is also owned by the State.

Actually, Hitler claimed that Nazism was not exclusively for any class, and he also indicated that it favored neither the left nor the right.

 

[2aguy]

Nope......national socialism is in fact socialism....socialism is on the left of the political spectrum....you can lie about this all day long, but the truth is the truth.

I want you to tell us how you got so profoundly stupid that you can look at these guys and think "Yep, those guys are left wingers".

Moron.....it is their believes, not their costumes....you stupid twit. antifa play dress up too......

 

[2aguy]

I am curious to know how many times you have to hit yourself in the head with a hammer in order to be profoundly stupid enough to say "Nazis are lefties".

nazis are left wing......they are socialists, they believe in government control of the economy, that is socialism, ding bat.....socialism is a left wing economic model.

Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian

My purpose today is to make just two main points: (1) To show why Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And (2) to show why socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.

The identification of Nazi Germany as a socialist state was one of the many great contributions of Ludwig von Mises.

When one remembers that the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party — Mises's identification might not appear all that noteworthy. For what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?

------

De facto government ownership of the means of production, as Mises termed it, was logically implied by such fundamental collectivist principles embraced by the Nazis as that the common good comes before the private good and the individual exists as a means to the ends of the State. If the individual is a means to the ends of the State, so too, of course, is his property. Just as he is owned by the State, his property is also owned by the State.

Actually, Hitler claimed that Nazism was not exclusively for any class, and he also indicated that it favored neither the left nor the right.

Yeah......believing anything hitler said is not a good starting point....

 

[g5000]

The big difference...the Republicans do not accpet tne national socialists into our party......la raza, and black lives matter are welcomed to the White House when the democrats are in control.....

Here's Republican Congressman Tom Garrett meeting with the Nazis who organized the Charlottesville protest.

 

[2aguy]

Here.....the marxists were anti jew and racist too....socialism is an economic system from the left......white nationalists and antifa are socialists......antifa supports black lives matter which makes them racists as well...

HITLER WAS A SOCIALIST

The context of Nazism

"True, it is a fixed idea with the French that the Rhine is their property, but to this arrogant demand the only reply worthy of the German nation is Arndt's: "Give back Alsace and Lorraine". For I am of the opinion, perhaps in contrast to many whose standpoint I share in other respects, that the reconquest of the German-speaking left bank of the Rhine is a matter of national honour, and that the Germanisation of a disloyal Holland and of Belgium is a political necessity for us. Shall we let the German nationality be completely suppressed in these countries, while the Slavs are rising ever more powerfully in the East?"


Have a look at the quote immediately above and say who wrote it. It is a typical Hitler rant, is it not? Give it to 100 people who know Hitler's speeches and 100 would identify it as something said by Adolf. The fierce German nationalism and territorial ambition is unmistakeable. And if there is any doubt, have a look at another quote from the same author:

This is our calling, that we shall become the templars of this Grail, gird the sword round our loins for its sake and stake our lives joyfully in the last, holy war which will be followed by the thousand-year reign of freedom.

That settles it, doesn't it? Who does not know of Hitler's glorification of military sacrifice and his aim to establish a "thousand-year Reich"?

But neither quote is in fact from Hitler. Both quotes were written by Friedrich Engels, Karl Marx's co-author (See here and here). So let that be an introduction to the idea that Hitler not only called himself a socialist but that he WAS in fact a socialist by the standards of his day. Ideas that are now condemned as Rightist were in Hitler's day perfectly normal ideas among Leftists. And if Friedrich Engels was not a Leftist, I do not know who would be.

 

[g5000]

I am curious to know how many times you have to hit yourself in the head with a hammer in order to be profoundly stupid enough to say "Nazis are lefties".

nazis are left wing......they are socialists, they believe in government control of the economy, that is socialism, ding bat.....socialism is a left wing economic model.

Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian

My purpose today is to make just two main points: (1) To show why Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And (2) to show why socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.

The identification of Nazi Germany as a socialist state was one of the many great contributions of Ludwig von Mises.

When one remembers that the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party — Mises's identification might not appear all that noteworthy. For what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?

------

De facto government ownership of the means of production, as Mises termed it, was logically implied by such fundamental collectivist principles embraced by the Nazis as that the common good comes before the private good and the individual exists as a means to the ends of the State. If the individual is a means to the ends of the State, so too, of course, is his property. Just as he is owned by the State, his property is also owned by the State.

Actually, Hitler claimed that Nazism was not exclusively for any class, and he also indicated that it favored neither the left nor the right.

Hitler made it very clear in Mein Kampf his party was right wing. He laughed at the tards who mistook his deliberate attempts to mislead them into thinking he was left wing.

 

[hunarcy]

I am curious to know how many times you have to hit yourself in the head with a hammer in order to be profoundly stupid enough to say "Nazis are lefties".

nazis are left wing......they are socialists, they believe in government control of the economy, that is socialism, ding bat.....socialism is a left wing economic model.

Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian

My purpose today is to make just two main points: (1) To show why Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And (2) to show why socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.

The identification of Nazi Germany as a socialist state was one of the many great contributions of Ludwig von Mises.

When one remembers that the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party — Mises's identification might not appear all that noteworthy. For what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?

------

De facto government ownership of the means of production, as Mises termed it, was logically implied by such fundamental collectivist principles embraced by the Nazis as that the common good comes before the private good and the individual exists as a means to the ends of the State. If the individual is a means to the ends of the State, so too, of course, is his property. Just as he is owned by the State, his property is also owned by the State.

Actually, Hitler claimed that Nazism was not exclusively for any class, and he also indicated that it favored neither the left nor the right.

Yeah......believing anything hitler said is not a good starting point....

Point is that he adopted any belief that he felt would further his cause. He didn't really believe in anything but hate and his own "genius".

 

[g5000]

Man, this is the best entertainment you can get for free.

A dipshit who looks at these Nazis and bleevs they are left wingers.

Wow. Who would believe someone could actually be this retarded?

I mean, literally retarded?

 

[2aguy]

I am curious to know how many times you have to hit yourself in the head with a hammer in order to be profoundly stupid enough to say "Nazis are lefties".

nazis are left wing......they are socialists, they believe in government control of the economy, that is socialism, ding bat.....socialism is a left wing economic model.

Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian

My purpose today is to make just two main points: (1) To show why Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And (2) to show why socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.

The identification of Nazi Germany as a socialist state was one of the many great contributions of Ludwig von Mises.

When one remembers that the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the National Socialist German Workers' Party — Mises's identification might not appear all that noteworthy. For what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?

------

De facto government ownership of the means of production, as Mises termed it, was logically implied by such fundamental collectivist principles embraced by the Nazis as that the common good comes before the private good and the individual exists as a means to the ends of the State. If the individual is a means to the ends of the State, so too, of course, is his property. Just as he is owned by the State, his property is also owned by the State.

Actually, Hitler claimed that Nazism was not exclusively for any class, and he also indicated that it favored neither the left nor the right.

Hitler made it very clear in Mein Kampf his party was right wing. He laughed at the tards who mistook his deliberate attempts to mislead them into thinking he was left wing.

Moron......

Nazism is Socialism -- F A Hayek, et al

By Friedrich August von Hayek Spring 1933

Hoover Institution, F. A. Hayek Papers, Box/Folder 105 : 10.

Incomprehensible as the recent events in Germany must seem to anyone who has known that country chiefly in the democratic post-war years, any attempt fully to understand these developments must treat them as the culmination of tendencies which date back to a period long before the Great War. Nothing could be more superficial than to consider the forces which dominate the Germany of today as reactionary – in the sense that they want a return to the social and economic order of 1914. The persecution of the Marxists, and of democrats in general, tends to obscure the fundamental fact that National “Socialism” is a genuine socialist movement, whose leading ideas are the final fruit of the anti-liberal tendencies which have been steadily gaining ground in Germany since the later part of the Bismarckian era, and which led the majority of the German intelligentsia first to “socialism of the chair” and later to Marxism in its social-democratic or communist form.

One of the main reasons why the socialist character of National Socialism has been quite generally unrecognized, is, no doubt, its alliance with the nationalist groups which represent the great industries and the great landowners. But this merely proves that these groups too -as they have since learnt to their bitter disappointment -have, at least partly, been mistaken as to the nature of the movement. But only partly because -and this is the most characteristic feature of modern Germany – many capitalists are themselves strongly influenced by socialistic ideas, and have not sufficient belief in capitalism to defend it with a clear conscience. But, in spite of this, the German entrepreneur class have manifested almost incredible short-sightedness in allying themselves with a move movement of whose strong anti-capitalistic tendencies there should never have been any doubt.

A careful observer must always have been aware that the opposition of the Nazis to the established socialist parties, which gained them the sympathy of the entrepreneur, was only to a very small extend directed against their economic policy. What the Nazis mainly objected to was their internationalism and all the aspects of their cultural programme which were still influenced by liberal ideas. But the accusations against the social-democrats and the communists which were most effective in their propaganda were not so much directed against their programme as against their supposed practice -their corruption and nepotism, and even their alleged alliance with “the golden International of Jewish Capitalism.”

It would, indeed, hardly have been possible for the Nationalists to advance fundamental objections to the economic policy of the other socialist parties when their own published programme differed from these only in that its socialism was much cruder and less rational.

The famous 25 points drawn up by Herr Feder,[2] one of Hitler’s early allies, repeatedly endorsed by Hitler and recognized by the by-laws of the National-Socialist party as the immutable basis of all its actions, which together with an extensive commentary is circulating throughout Germany in many hundreds of thousands of copies, is full of ideas resembling those of the early socialists.


But the dominant feature is a fierce hatred of anything capitalistic -individualistic profit seeking, large scale enterprise, banks, joint-stock companies, department stores, “international finance and loan capital,” the system of “interest slavery” in general; the abolition of these is described as the “[indecipherable] of the programme, around which everything else turns.” It was to this programme that the masses of the German people, who were already completely under the influence of collectivist ideas, responded so enthusiastically.

That this violent anti-capitalistic attack is genuine – and not a mere piece of propaganda – becomes as clear from the personal history of the intellectual leaders of the movement as from the general milieu from which it springs. It is not even denied that man of the young men who today play a prominent part in it have previously been communists or socialists. And to any observer of the literary tendencies which made the Germans intelligentsia ready to join the ranks of the new party, it must be clear that the common characteristic of all the politically influential writers – in many cases free from definite party affiliations – was their anti-liberal and anti-capitalist trend. Groups like that formed around the review “Die Tat” have made the phrase “the end of capitalism” an accepted dogma to most young Germans.[3]