So the FBI knew January 6th was coming and allowed it to happen ?

[Osiris-ODS]

I hope the OP understands that by condemning the fbi about failing to act on intelligence that said an attack was coming on 1/6, he is also admitting that the attack was a pre-planned terrorist attack by the Trump supporters.

"The" Trump supporters? No. There were tens of thousands of Trump supporters at Trump's rally a couple miles away who had no part in this, and thousands more who peacefully protested outside the Capitol building without breaking any laws.

There were certainly some individuals who planned in advance to cause a ruckus, and those individuals consist of much more than "Trump supporters"... No doubt there were some misguided Trump supporters among them. But also among those identified as having entered the Capitol building and playing key roles during the escalation period include individuals associated with previous left-wing, anarchist, Antifa and BLM riots, as well as FBI agents and informants. But it's clear that those people who planned in advance were most interested in stirring up the masses and hoping for total melee to break out, as opposed to planning an organized "attack" as you put it. There were no firearms or explosives, it was not an attack in that sense. Those who planned in advance planned to cause an agitated riot and chaos to break out.

 

[MinTrut]

I hope the OP understands that by condemning the fbi about failing to act on intelligence that said an attack was coming on 1/6, he is also admitting that the attack was a pre-planned terrorist attack by the Trump supporters.

I hope you know how ridiculous this is, but I won't hold my breath waiting to find out.

 

[2aguy]

I hope the OP understands that by condemning the fbi about failing to act on intelligence that said an attack was coming on 1/6, he is also admitting that the attack was a pre-planned terrorist attack by the Trump supporters.

No.....no such thing.....they knew there was a planned riot.....they also likely knew it was blm and antifa.......you moron.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Oh there's a big surprise.​

FBI monitoring of social media posts before Jan 6 raises more questions of how much it REALLY knew prior to Capitol Hill riot​

Publicly, US authorities have rigidly stuck to the story that no one saw the January 6 Capitol ruckus coming. But the publication of internal documents is casting further doubt on the established version of events.

On June 21, NBC News reported on a recent court filing that raises further questions about whether the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) foresaw what happened in Washington DC on January 6 and, if so, why the agency failed to sound the alarm in good time.

The document in question is an FBI investigative report on social media activity prior to that fateful day, produced in February, showing that enraged Donald Trump supporters were openly talking about bringing firearms to the Capitol in order to instigate a “revolution.” The offending posts were used as justification to launch a probe into protest attendee Thomas Webster, a former New York Police Department officer, who was indicted the following month for attacking a Capitol Police officer.

“A review of open source and social media posts leading up to and during the event indicates that individuals participating on the ‘Stop the Steal’ rally were angered about the results of the 2020 presidential election and felt that Joseph Biden had unlawfully been declared President-Elect,” the report stated. “Users in multiple online groups and platforms discussed traveling to the Capitol armed or making plans to start a ‘revolution’ on that day.”

Oddly, Webster himself didn’t feature in those incendiary discussions, and it’s unknown if any other individuals arrested for their role in the riot did. In all, 521 people have been charged as of June 11.

FBI monitoring of social media posts before Jan 6 raises more questions of how much it REALLY knew prior to Capitol Hill riot

Publicly, US authorities have rigidly stuck to the story that no one saw the January 6 Capitol ruckus coming. But the publication of internal documents is casting further doubt on the established version of events.

www.rt.com

I think you give the FBI way too much credit. They're fucking idiots. Don't know shit.

 

[MinTrut]

Oh there's a big surprise.​

FBI monitoring of social media posts before Jan 6 raises more questions of how much it REALLY knew prior to Capitol Hill riot​

Publicly, US authorities have rigidly stuck to the story that no one saw the January 6 Capitol ruckus coming. But the publication of internal documents is casting further doubt on the established version of events.

On June 21, NBC News reported on a recent court filing that raises further questions about whether the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) foresaw what happened in Washington DC on January 6 and, if so, why the agency failed to sound the alarm in good time.

The document in question is an FBI investigative report on social media activity prior to that fateful day, produced in February, showing that enraged Donald Trump supporters were openly talking about bringing firearms to the Capitol in order to instigate a “revolution.” The offending posts were used as justification to launch a probe into protest attendee Thomas Webster, a former New York Police Department officer, who was indicted the following month for attacking a Capitol Police officer.

“A review of open source and social media posts leading up to and during the event indicates that individuals participating on the ‘Stop the Steal’ rally were angered about the results of the 2020 presidential election and felt that Joseph Biden had unlawfully been declared President-Elect,” the report stated. “Users in multiple online groups and platforms discussed traveling to the Capitol armed or making plans to start a ‘revolution’ on that day.”

Oddly, Webster himself didn’t feature in those incendiary discussions, and it’s unknown if any other individuals arrested for their role in the riot did. In all, 521 people have been charged as of June 11.

FBI monitoring of social media posts before Jan 6 raises more questions of how much it REALLY knew prior to Capitol Hill riot

Publicly, US authorities have rigidly stuck to the story that no one saw the January 6 Capitol ruckus coming. But the publication of internal documents is casting further doubt on the established version of events.

www.rt.com

Still trying to blame anyone but Trump and his mob.

Orange Man: Still bad!

 

[gipper]

FBI Informants More Likely Than Agents at Jan 6, Former Undercover Agent Says

www.theepochtimes.com

Recent inquiries about whether FBI operatives were mixed in among the protesters and intruders who broke into the United States Capitol on Jan. 6 will more likely uncover the presence of FBI informants rather than undercover agents, according to Marc Ruskin, a 27-year FBI veteran and former undercover agent who is also an Epoch Times contributor.

Before he left the bureau in 2012, there were only about 100 undercover FBI agents in the whole country, Ruskin told the Epoch Times. Deployment of each requires a lengthy, “very resource-intensive” operation that needs to be approved on several levels. Even if there was a top-down operation run by the headquarters underway on Jan. 6, it would have been unlikely that any significant number of undercover agents were present, he said.

Informants, on the other hand, would have been much more convenient, needing only some vetting and an assigned handling agent. The bureau uses them regularly and they’re not necessarily aware of each other even if they collect information on the same target, Ruskin said.

Our crazy government use to commit false flags on other countries. Now they do it on their own country.

As history reveals, what a warlike empire does aboard ultimately they do at home.

 

[Muhammed]

Whenever you have a crowd of a half a million people there is going to be a few drunken misfits in the crowd looking for a fight. The FBI knows that.

 

[WTF19]

Oh there's a big surprise.​

FBI monitoring of social media posts before Jan 6 raises more questions of how much it REALLY knew prior to Capitol Hill riot​

Publicly, US authorities have rigidly stuck to the story that no one saw the January 6 Capitol ruckus coming. But the publication of internal documents is casting further doubt on the established version of events.

On June 21, NBC News reported on a recent court filing that raises further questions about whether the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) foresaw what happened in Washington DC on January 6 and, if so, why the agency failed to sound the alarm in good time.

The document in question is an FBI investigative report on social media activity prior to that fateful day, produced in February, showing that enraged Donald Trump supporters were openly talking about bringing firearms to the Capitol in order to instigate a “revolution.” The offending posts were used as justification to launch a probe into protest attendee Thomas Webster, a former New York Police Department officer, who was indicted the following month for attacking a Capitol Police officer.

“A review of open source and social media posts leading up to and during the event indicates that individuals participating on the ‘Stop the Steal’ rally were angered about the results of the 2020 presidential election and felt that Joseph Biden had unlawfully been declared President-Elect,” the report stated. “Users in multiple online groups and platforms discussed traveling to the Capitol armed or making plans to start a ‘revolution’ on that day.”

Oddly, Webster himself didn’t feature in those incendiary discussions, and it’s unknown if any other individuals arrested for their role in the riot did. In all, 521 people have been charged as of June 11.

FBI monitoring of social media posts before Jan 6 raises more questions of how much it REALLY knew prior to Capitol Hill riot

Publicly, US authorities have rigidly stuck to the story that no one saw the January 6 Capitol ruckus coming. But the publication of internal documents is casting further doubt on the established version of events.

www.rt.com

Hmmmm...the FBI did nothing....pelosi refused to allow National Guard to be used, and capitol police allowed protestors into the building......

blm and antifa....we will find out they were all over the place too...

Pelosi was in the Capitol when the mob attacked.

what a shame some1 didn't pop the twat...botoxed, ugly shit stain-PIG-lousi is
this twat had the criminals bussed in...that is on film....hard to convince sheep about TRUTH

 

[candycorn]

wrong

 

[candycorn]

"The" Trump supporters? No. There were tens of thousands of Trump supporters at Trump's rally a couple miles away who had no part in this, and thousands more who peacefully protested outside the Capitol building without breaking any laws.

There were certainly some individuals who planned in advance to cause a ruckus, and those individuals consist of much more than "Trump supporters"... No doubt there were some misguided Trump supporters among them. But also among those identified as having entered the Capitol building and playing key roles during the escalation period include individuals associated with previous left-wing, anarchist, Antifa and BLM riots, as well as FBI agents and informants. But it's clear that those people who planned in advance were most interested in stirring up the masses and hoping for total melee to break out, as opposed to planning an organized "attack" as you put it. There were no firearms or explosives, it was not an attack in that sense. Those who planned in advance planned to cause an agitated riot and chaos to break out.

And they forced a guy to come in to the capitol with zip-ties! Pretty persuasive people

You're as delusional as you are dishonest.

 

[the other mike]

"The" Trump supporters? No. There were tens of thousands of Trump supporters at Trump's rally a couple miles away who had no part in this, and thousands more who peacefully protested outside the Capitol building without breaking any laws.

There were certainly some individuals who planned in advance to cause a ruckus, and those individuals consist of much more than "Trump supporters"... No doubt there were some misguided Trump supporters among them. But also among those identified as having entered the Capitol building and playing key roles during the escalation period include individuals associated with previous left-wing, anarchist, Antifa and BLM riots, as well as FBI agents and informants. But it's clear that those people who planned in advance were most interested in stirring up the masses and hoping for total melee to break out, as opposed to planning an organized "attack" as you put it. There were no firearms or explosives, it was not an attack in that sense. Those who planned in advance planned to cause an agitated riot and chaos to break out.

Well said.

 

[talksalot]

Oh there's a big surprise.​

FBI monitoring of social media posts before Jan 6 raises more questions of how much it REALLY knew prior to Capitol Hill riot​

Publicly, US authorities have rigidly stuck to the story that no one saw the January 6 Capitol ruckus coming. But the publication of internal documents is casting further doubt on the established version of events.

On June 21, NBC News reported on a recent court filing that raises further questions about whether the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) foresaw what happened in Washington DC on January 6 and, if so, why the agency failed to sound the alarm in good time.

The document in question is an FBI investigative report on social media activity prior to that fateful day, produced in February, showing that enraged Donald Trump supporters were openly talking about bringing firearms to the Capitol in order to instigate a “revolution.” The offending posts were used as justification to launch a probe into protest attendee Thomas Webster, a former New York Police Department officer, who was indicted the following month for attacking a Capitol Police officer.

“A review of open source and social media posts leading up to and during the event indicates that individuals participating on the ‘Stop the Steal’ rally were angered about the results of the 2020 presidential election and felt that Joseph Biden had unlawfully been declared President-Elect,” the report stated. “Users in multiple online groups and platforms discussed traveling to the Capitol armed or making plans to start a ‘revolution’ on that day.”

Oddly, Webster himself didn’t feature in those incendiary discussions, and it’s unknown if any other individuals arrested for their role in the riot did. In all, 521 people have been charged as of June 11.

FBI monitoring of social media posts before Jan 6 raises more questions of how much it REALLY knew prior to Capitol Hill riot

Publicly, US authorities have rigidly stuck to the story that no one saw the January 6 Capitol ruckus coming. But the publication of internal documents is casting further doubt on the established version of events.

www.rt.com

The FBI is corrupt and works for Democrats.