So strzok lied before congress

[OODA_Loop]

READ: All the declassified FISA documents on Carter Page

Where is Strzok's name mentioned?

Its not.

 

[Lakhota]

READ: All the declassified FISA documents on Carter Page

Where is Strzok's name mentioned?

Its not.

I agree that Strzok's name is not mentioned - so how does the OP know that he lied to Congress?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Misrepresented nothing burger presented by people desperate to derail the investigation.

 

[OODA_Loop]

I agree that Strzok's name is not mentioned - so how does the OP know that he lied to Congress?

It contradicts Stzck's sworn testimony.

 

[Lakhota]

I agree that Strzok's name is not mentioned - so how does the OP know that he lied to Congress?

It contradicts Stzck's sworn testimony.

How does it "contradict" Strzok's "sworn testimony"? Please be specific.

 

[OODA_Loop]

What we know and its highly redacted is the Steele dossier was what the FISA warrant was relied on contradictory to prior testimony

 

[Slade3200]

What we know and its highly redacted is the Steele dossier was what the FISA warrant was relied on contradictory to prior testimony

How do you know that the warrant relied on the dossier?

 

[Lakhota]

What we know and its highly redacted is the Steele dossier was what the FISA warrant was relied on contradictory to prior testimony

Where does the 412-page document say that?

 

[JakeStarkey]

iow, the far and alt right cannot prove that Strzok lied.

 

[OODA_Loop]

What we know and its highly redacted is the Steele dossier was what the FISA warrant was relied on contradictory to prior testimony

Where does the 412-page document say that?

Did you search > Do you really want to find the truth for yourself ?

If I go back and find it would you believe it ?

 

[OODA_Loop]

What we know and its highly redacted is the Steele dossier was what the FISA warrant was relied on contradictory to prior testimony

Where does the 412-page document say that?

Did you search > Do you really want to find the truth for yourself ?

If I go back and find it would you believe it ?

Page 15 and 16

 

[danielpalos]

What we know and its highly redacted is the Steele dossier was what the FISA warrant was relied on contradictory to prior testimony

Where does the 412-page document say that?

Did you search > Do you really want to find the truth for yourself ?

If I go back and find it would you believe it ?

Page 15 and 16

was nothing "productive" found the first time?

 

[OODA_Loop]

was nothing "productive" found the first time?

Please help me understand ?

 

[Mike473]

Irrefutable proof this nut bag lied before congress.
So what?
Criminal referral? probably not
Firing? probably not

Probably get a promotion if the dems get back in power.

Newly Released FISA Docs Contradict Strzok's Sworn Claims He Had Nothing to Do With Carter Page FISA Warrant

Could we see 2020 run from Strzok?

 

[danielpalos]

was nothing "productive" found the first time?

Please help me understand ?

from a previous video; they don't keep giving out warrants like candy, if they don't show anything for it. They had to have gotten some Information, to keep getting warrants.

 

[OODA_Loop]

was nothing "productive" found the first time?

Please help me understand ?

from a previous video; they don't keep giving out warrants like candy, if they don't show anything for it. They had to have gotten some Information, to keep getting warrants.

They wont release that (yet), I have nothing. Do you ?

 

[danielpalos]

was nothing "productive" found the first time?

Please help me understand ?

from a previous video; they don't keep giving out warrants like candy, if they don't show anything for it. They had to have gotten some Information, to keep getting warrants.

They wont release that (yet), I have nothing. Do you ?

how did they get more than One authorization?

 

[OODA_Loop]

how did they get more than One authorization?

I don't know - do you ?

 

[danielpalos]

how did they get more than One authorization?

I don't know - do you ?

standard procedure is to only give out more authorizations if the previous authorization was productive and not, "merely a witch hunt".

 

[OODA_Loop]

standard procedure is to only give out more authorizations if the previous authorization was productive and not, "merely a witch hunt".

I believe Page was and this refers to the first authorization ? If the first was bogus the others are useless.