So much for the mantra of LESS federal government intrusion....

nat4900

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2015
Messages
42,021
Reaction score
5,975
Points
1,870
One of Trump's proposed action will eliminate "sanctuary cities" -- cities that do not deport undocumented immigrant.....Sounds good, but does it not smack just a bit of MORE federal government intrusion on local control?

Just asking.....LOL
 
It is enforcement of laws which those cities are ignoring. Government intrusion on criminals, pretty funny stuff there.
 
...when the funny button is your best defense...weak.
 
It is enforcement of laws which those cities are ignoring. Government intrusion on criminals, pretty funny stuff there.


name.....specifically.....the LAW that states that "sanctuary cities" are illegal.....Go on, look it up, learn something.
 
One of Trump's proposed action will eliminate "sanctuary cities" -- cities that do not deport undocumented immigrant.....Sounds good, but does it not smack just a bit of MORE federal government intrusion on local control?

Just asking.....LOL

Sounds like enforcing federal law.
 
So, it's intrusion to expect the enforcement of immigration laws? Laws explicitly granted to the feds in the U.S. Constitution?
 
It is enforcement of laws which those cities are ignoring. Government intrusion on criminals, pretty funny stuff there.


name.....specifically.....the LAW that states that "sanctuary cities" are illegal.....Go on, look it up, learn something.

What part of harboring illegals gives you the must trouble intellectually?

Title 1324 of the 8 U.S. code makes it a crime to transporting or smuggling aliens into the U.S. or harboring them there. The provision includes harboring an alien who entered the U.S. legally but has since lost his or her legal status.

Class is in session.
 
Enforcing federal law? Deer geebus, you loons are loony.
 
One of Trump's proposed action will eliminate "sanctuary cities" -- cities that do not deport undocumented immigrant.....Sounds good, but does it not smack just a bit of MORE federal government intrusion on local control?

Just asking.....LOL


Uh I love liberals that read an article but don't understand how things work.
Like drain the swamp, you don't get immigration.
Immigration IS a federal duty, not a local one
Therefore the feds can enact those laws. Abortion and education are NOT federal duties, therfore states and local govt are better to handle those.
 
Does the radical left really think that enforcing the law is an intrusion?
 
It is enforcement of laws which those cities are ignoring. Government intrusion on criminals, pretty funny stuff there.


name.....specifically.....the LAW that states that "sanctuary cities" are illegal.....Go on, look it up, learn something.

Name.. specifically.. the law that states not enforcing housing discrimination laws is illegal.
 
You'd think that when someone lives on a msg board, Google wouldn't be so hard...


8 U.S. Code § 1325 - Improper entry by alien



16105950_10154960294531952_1201366507718807915_n.jpg
 
One of Trump's proposed action will eliminate "sanctuary cities" -- cities that do not deport undocumented immigrant.....Sounds good, but does it not smack just a bit of MORE federal government intrusion on local control?

Just asking.....LOL
So you're FOR cities violating Federal Law and being subsidized with tax dollars to help them continue to break the law? Got it...thanks.

There is no 'local control'. The local authorities are breaking the law, thus the necessity to step in.

Like Barry, tough, you believe Liberals should have the authority to decide for themselves where and when they will adhere to the law and when not to.
 
15th post
Funny boy is pretty quiet since two of us mention the exact federal laws...
 
It is enforcement of laws which those cities are ignoring. Government intrusion on criminals, pretty funny stuff there.


name.....specifically.....the LAW that states that "sanctuary cities" are illegal.....Go on, look it up, learn something.

Control of immigration has always been seen as a federal mandate, as once inside the borders, States cannot restrict their movements. Thus the Feds control the outer barrier.

If States were allowed to dictate immigration policy, each ones individual preferences would impact other States that may not want the same level of immigration, due to States not being able to control their own internal borders.
 
Just holding up a mirror to your hypocrisy, right wingers..........When a county does not want a pipeline through their land, what should the government do then???
 
If States were allowed to dictate immigration policy, each ones individual preferences would impact other States that may not want the same level of immigration, due to States not being able to control their own internal borders.


true, like restriction of gun sales and open-carry laws?
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom