- Sep 16, 2012
- 57,690
- 51,212
- 3,605
As some of you may, or may not know, when you are in living in a big city, and are being the victim of a crime and call 911, the STATE is under no obligation to respond and save you.
This has been ruled by the SCOTUS.
www.barneslawllp.com
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
www.lawlink.com
nypost.com
And of course, we all remember Parkland School, right?
The police are there to protect the capital resources of the STATE and the elites that run society, not necessarily the citizenry. No where is this more apparent, than in the big liberal cities like LA, NY, those on the West Coast, Chicago, etc.
When the police resources are spread thin, and the citizenry is constantly under assault, this generally leads to vigilantism. It is an interesting topic, I follow off and on.
Joe Rogan did a podcast on it once, obviously.
en.wikipedia.org
This is one of the few topics I wish I had an account to YouTube, b/c all the vids are age restricted, and most alt platforms, the citizen journalist up-loaders don't usually put their stuff there, the money if you catch the action just isn't anywhere buy on YouTube. If you are interested, I recommend it though, it is probably some entertaining stuff.
So, how should society compensate local super heroes? Or should they just mind their own business and let the crime take over the city?
It is a shame about that hero Phoenix Jones when I found out about him recently.
How should he have supported his philanthropy?
This has been ruled by the SCOTUS.
The Police are Not Required to Protect You — Barnes Law
To Protect and to Serve” – the ubiquitous creed emblazoned across millions of police cars throughout Los Angeles and indeed the United States. This motto is consistent with the common belief that police officers as well as other law enforcement officers are here to protect us.
www.barneslawllp.com
Warren v. District of Columbia - Wikipedia
Town of Castle Rock v. Gonzales - Wikipedia
Hartzler v. City of San Jose
Hartzler v. City of San Jose (1975) [46 Cal.App.3d 6]Hartzler v. City of San Jose (1975) , 46 Cal.App.3d 6[Civ. No. 34650.Court of Appeals of California, First Appellate District,
"COURT RULINGS THAT SAY POLICE DO NOT HAVE OBLIGATION TO PROTECT CITIZENS FROM VIOLENT CRIME")
www.whatreallyhappened.com
City says cops had no duty to protect subway hero who subdued killer
He says he put his life on the line to stop a killer — and claims cops sat back and watched. But city lawyers are arguing that the police had no legal duty to protect Joseph Lozito, the Long Island…
nypost.com
And of course, we all remember Parkland School, right?
Police Not Required to Protect; Are They Required to Serve?
"At a recent hearing, former Broward County, Florida, Sheriff’s Deputy Scot Peterson claimed that he had no legal duty to protect the children inside the Parkland high school he was assigned to while Nikolas Cruz committed mass murder. . . . "The police are there to protect the capital resources of the STATE and the elites that run society, not necessarily the citizenry. No where is this more apparent, than in the big liberal cities like LA, NY, those on the West Coast, Chicago, etc.
When the police resources are spread thin, and the citizenry is constantly under assault, this generally leads to vigilantism. It is an interesting topic, I follow off and on.
Joe Rogan did a podcast on it once, obviously.
Mutual combat - Wikipedia
This is one of the few topics I wish I had an account to YouTube, b/c all the vids are age restricted, and most alt platforms, the citizen journalist up-loaders don't usually put their stuff there, the money if you catch the action just isn't anywhere buy on YouTube. If you are interested, I recommend it though, it is probably some entertaining stuff.
So, how should society compensate local super heroes? Or should they just mind their own business and let the crime take over the city?
It is a shame about that hero Phoenix Jones when I found out about him recently.
How should he have supported his philanthropy?
