So....how many posters do we have who have heard of this INCEL Movement?

[danielpalos]

nothing but a fabricated story. you know nothing about economics, story teller.

Blah blah blah More meaningless drivel to dodge the conversation.

No rational person is going to vote to revamp the unemployment compensation system to make it a welfare system.

they will if it is more cost effective and lowers our tax burden.

But it isn't more cost effective. Having 2 programs duplicating their efforts is never cost effective. And there will be determinations of need in both programs.

Compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment actually solves for that economic phenomena.

Fewer people would choose more expensive means tested welfare if they could apply for unemployment compensation instead.

When you apply for unemployment, you have to provide info on your last employer, your salary, and the reason for your unemployment. And the unemployment is for a set period of time.

If you were successful and had unemployment compensation made available for anyone who would claim it, and for an unrestricted period of time, there would be the same means tests added to it.

And as for it being more expensive, do you have any evidence of that? Welfare makes you fill out some forms stating your income, assets ect. YOu may have to review them annually and state any changes. They do not necessarily verify it all. In fact, I would think they verify 10% or so. Unemployment compensation contacts every single employer and checks that you are not lying.

No, it is not cheaper. No, it is not more efficient.

It is about equality. Equal protection of the law means labor should be able to quit and collect unemployment compensation.

There would be no need for litigation. That could save a lot of money.

 

[WinterBorn]

Blah blah blah More meaningless drivel to dodge the conversation.

No rational person is going to vote to revamp the unemployment compensation system to make it a welfare system.

they will if it is more cost effective and lowers our tax burden.

But it isn't more cost effective. Having 2 programs duplicating their efforts is never cost effective. And there will be determinations of need in both programs.

Compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment actually solves for that economic phenomena.

Fewer people would choose more expensive means tested welfare if they could apply for unemployment compensation instead.

When you apply for unemployment, you have to provide info on your last employer, your salary, and the reason for your unemployment. And the unemployment is for a set period of time.

If you were successful and had unemployment compensation made available for anyone who would claim it, and for an unrestricted period of time, there would be the same means tests added to it.

And as for it being more expensive, do you have any evidence of that? Welfare makes you fill out some forms stating your income, assets ect. YOu may have to review them annually and state any changes. They do not necessarily verify it all. In fact, I would think they verify 10% or so. Unemployment compensation contacts every single employer and checks that you are not lying.

No, it is not cheaper. No, it is not more efficient.

It is about equality. Equal protection of the law means labor should be able to quit and collect unemployment compensation.

There would be no need for litigation. That could save a lot of money.

Save money? Some of the higher paying states pay $500 a week or more. That is $26,000 per year per person. The litigation is almost always fairly simply. And labor litigation for a single case will not cost $26k.

Do you actually expect the federal and state governments to hand out checks, for thousands of people, without due diligence to make sure they are not being defrauded?

No Daniel, your pipedream will never become a reality. Unemployment compensation is designed to help people bridge the gap from one job to another, when they lost their job through no fault of their own. It is not to fund people who choose not to work and will survive without a paycheck.

 

[danielpalos]

they will if it is more cost effective and lowers our tax burden.

But it isn't more cost effective. Having 2 programs duplicating their efforts is never cost effective. And there will be determinations of need in both programs.

Compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment actually solves for that economic phenomena.

Fewer people would choose more expensive means tested welfare if they could apply for unemployment compensation instead.

When you apply for unemployment, you have to provide info on your last employer, your salary, and the reason for your unemployment. And the unemployment is for a set period of time.

If you were successful and had unemployment compensation made available for anyone who would claim it, and for an unrestricted period of time, there would be the same means tests added to it.

And as for it being more expensive, do you have any evidence of that? Welfare makes you fill out some forms stating your income, assets ect. YOu may have to review them annually and state any changes. They do not necessarily verify it all. In fact, I would think they verify 10% or so. Unemployment compensation contacts every single employer and checks that you are not lying.

No, it is not cheaper. No, it is not more efficient.

It is about equality. Equal protection of the law means labor should be able to quit and collect unemployment compensation.

There would be no need for litigation. That could save a lot of money.

Save money? Some of the higher paying states pay $500 a week or more. That is $26,000 per year per person. The litigation is almost always fairly simply. And labor litigation for a single case will not cost $26k.

Do you actually expect the federal and state governments to hand out checks, for thousands of people, without due diligence to make sure they are not being defrauded?

No Daniel, your pipedream will never become a reality. Unemployment compensation is designed to help people bridge the gap from one job to another, when they lost their job through no fault of their own. It is not to fund people who choose not to work and will survive without a paycheck.

the minimum wage will be going up to fifteen an hour. a fourteen dollar equivalent for unemployment compensation is rational in any capital based economy.

 

[WinterBorn]

But it isn't more cost effective. Having 2 programs duplicating their efforts is never cost effective. And there will be determinations of need in both programs.

Compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment actually solves for that economic phenomena.

Fewer people would choose more expensive means tested welfare if they could apply for unemployment compensation instead.

When you apply for unemployment, you have to provide info on your last employer, your salary, and the reason for your unemployment. And the unemployment is for a set period of time.

If you were successful and had unemployment compensation made available for anyone who would claim it, and for an unrestricted period of time, there would be the same means tests added to it.

And as for it being more expensive, do you have any evidence of that? Welfare makes you fill out some forms stating your income, assets ect. YOu may have to review them annually and state any changes. They do not necessarily verify it all. In fact, I would think they verify 10% or so. Unemployment compensation contacts every single employer and checks that you are not lying.

No, it is not cheaper. No, it is not more efficient.

It is about equality. Equal protection of the law means labor should be able to quit and collect unemployment compensation.

There would be no need for litigation. That could save a lot of money.

Save money? Some of the higher paying states pay $500 a week or more. That is $26,000 per year per person. The litigation is almost always fairly simply. And labor litigation for a single case will not cost $26k.

Do you actually expect the federal and state governments to hand out checks, for thousands of people, without due diligence to make sure they are not being defrauded?

No Daniel, your pipedream will never become a reality. Unemployment compensation is designed to help people bridge the gap from one job to another, when they lost their job through no fault of their own. It is not to fund people who choose not to work and will survive without a paycheck.

the minimum wage will be going up to fifteen an hour. a fourteen dollar equivalent for unemployment compensation is rational in any capital based economy.

Only for those who qualify. Those who do not will either have to submits means testing or get a job making $15 an hour. Or do without any lucre.

 

[danielpalos]

Compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment actually solves for that economic phenomena.

Fewer people would choose more expensive means tested welfare if they could apply for unemployment compensation instead.

When you apply for unemployment, you have to provide info on your last employer, your salary, and the reason for your unemployment. And the unemployment is for a set period of time.

If you were successful and had unemployment compensation made available for anyone who would claim it, and for an unrestricted period of time, there would be the same means tests added to it.

And as for it being more expensive, do you have any evidence of that? Welfare makes you fill out some forms stating your income, assets ect. YOu may have to review them annually and state any changes. They do not necessarily verify it all. In fact, I would think they verify 10% or so. Unemployment compensation contacts every single employer and checks that you are not lying.

No, it is not cheaper. No, it is not more efficient.

It is about equality. Equal protection of the law means labor should be able to quit and collect unemployment compensation.

There would be no need for litigation. That could save a lot of money.

Save money? Some of the higher paying states pay $500 a week or more. That is $26,000 per year per person. The litigation is almost always fairly simply. And labor litigation for a single case will not cost $26k.

Do you actually expect the federal and state governments to hand out checks, for thousands of people, without due diligence to make sure they are not being defrauded?

No Daniel, your pipedream will never become a reality. Unemployment compensation is designed to help people bridge the gap from one job to another, when they lost their job through no fault of their own. It is not to fund people who choose not to work and will survive without a paycheck.

the minimum wage will be going up to fifteen an hour. a fourteen dollar equivalent for unemployment compensation is rational in any capital based economy.

Only for those who qualify. Those who do not will either have to submits means testing or get a job making $15 an hour. Or do without any lucre.

There is a difference between unemployment compensation and means tested welfare.

 

[WinterBorn]

When you apply for unemployment, you have to provide info on your last employer, your salary, and the reason for your unemployment. And the unemployment is for a set period of time.

If you were successful and had unemployment compensation made available for anyone who would claim it, and for an unrestricted period of time, there would be the same means tests added to it.

And as for it being more expensive, do you have any evidence of that? Welfare makes you fill out some forms stating your income, assets ect. YOu may have to review them annually and state any changes. They do not necessarily verify it all. In fact, I would think they verify 10% or so. Unemployment compensation contacts every single employer and checks that you are not lying.

No, it is not cheaper. No, it is not more efficient.

It is about equality. Equal protection of the law means labor should be able to quit and collect unemployment compensation.

There would be no need for litigation. That could save a lot of money.

Save money? Some of the higher paying states pay $500 a week or more. That is $26,000 per year per person. The litigation is almost always fairly simply. And labor litigation for a single case will not cost $26k.

Do you actually expect the federal and state governments to hand out checks, for thousands of people, without due diligence to make sure they are not being defrauded?

No Daniel, your pipedream will never become a reality. Unemployment compensation is designed to help people bridge the gap from one job to another, when they lost their job through no fault of their own. It is not to fund people who choose not to work and will survive without a paycheck.

the minimum wage will be going up to fifteen an hour. a fourteen dollar equivalent for unemployment compensation is rational in any capital based economy.

Only for those who qualify. Those who do not will either have to submits means testing or get a job making $15 an hour. Or do without any lucre.

There is a difference between unemployment compensation and means tested welfare.

Yes there is.

One is a temporary compensation for a worker who lost their job through no fault of their own, and are actively looking for work.

The other is for people who need help to survive.


Actually, you don't qualify for either, do you? Not unless you lie.

 

[danielpalos]

It is about equality. Equal protection of the law means labor should be able to quit and collect unemployment compensation.

There would be no need for litigation. That could save a lot of money.

Save money? Some of the higher paying states pay $500 a week or more. That is $26,000 per year per person. The litigation is almost always fairly simply. And labor litigation for a single case will not cost $26k.

Do you actually expect the federal and state governments to hand out checks, for thousands of people, without due diligence to make sure they are not being defrauded?

No Daniel, your pipedream will never become a reality. Unemployment compensation is designed to help people bridge the gap from one job to another, when they lost their job through no fault of their own. It is not to fund people who choose not to work and will survive without a paycheck.

the minimum wage will be going up to fifteen an hour. a fourteen dollar equivalent for unemployment compensation is rational in any capital based economy.

Only for those who qualify. Those who do not will either have to submits means testing or get a job making $15 an hour. Or do without any lucre.

There is a difference between unemployment compensation and means tested welfare.

Yes there is.

One is a temporary compensation for a worker who lost their job through no fault of their own, and are actively looking for work.

The other is for people who need help to survive.


Actually, you don't qualify for either, do you? Not unless you lie.

Unemployment compensation is supposed to be, compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment. The right wing loves "shorting the Poor".

I should not have to lie for Government services.

 

[WinterBorn]

Save money? Some of the higher paying states pay $500 a week or more. That is $26,000 per year per person. The litigation is almost always fairly simply. And labor litigation for a single case will not cost $26k.

Do you actually expect the federal and state governments to hand out checks, for thousands of people, without due diligence to make sure they are not being defrauded?

No Daniel, your pipedream will never become a reality. Unemployment compensation is designed to help people bridge the gap from one job to another, when they lost their job through no fault of their own. It is not to fund people who choose not to work and will survive without a paycheck.

the minimum wage will be going up to fifteen an hour. a fourteen dollar equivalent for unemployment compensation is rational in any capital based economy.

Only for those who qualify. Those who do not will either have to submits means testing or get a job making $15 an hour. Or do without any lucre.

There is a difference between unemployment compensation and means tested welfare.

Yes there is.

One is a temporary compensation for a worker who lost their job through no fault of their own, and are actively looking for work.

The other is for people who need help to survive.


Actually, you don't qualify for either, do you? Not unless you lie.

Unemployment compensation is supposed to be, compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment. The right wing loves "shorting the Poor".

I should not have to lie for Government services.

The government should not have to provide you services which you are capable of providing yourself.

Unemployment compensation is meant to be a temporary assist until you find a new job. That is it. It is not, and never was, intended to be full time support for someone unwilling to help themselves.

Unemployment compensation is, in most states, only 26 weeks in duration. As I have said over and over, it is meant to be a temporary bridge between jobs.


What you want is money sent to you, at tax payer expense, just because you do not have a job and refuse to get one. That is what welfare is for. The means testing you keep talking about is simply a way of determining whether you need it for your survival. You obviously do not.

You want to change the entire system, for your benefit, so that you do not have to get a job and work for a living. Unemployment compensation was never meant to provide you with a way of avoiding work and still having money for things beyond subsistence. You want tax payers to pay for you to have things you do not need.

One of the key signs of maturity is differentiating between a want and a need. You don't get to suckle at the public teat for your wants.

 

[WinterBorn]

I have a simple question for you, Daniel.

Why don't you do what most people do and get a job to pay for what you want? Answer this simple question and we can continue.

 

[danielpalos]

the minimum wage will be going up to fifteen an hour. a fourteen dollar equivalent for unemployment compensation is rational in any capital based economy.

Only for those who qualify. Those who do not will either have to submits means testing or get a job making $15 an hour. Or do without any lucre.

There is a difference between unemployment compensation and means tested welfare.

Yes there is.

One is a temporary compensation for a worker who lost their job through no fault of their own, and are actively looking for work.

The other is for people who need help to survive.


Actually, you don't qualify for either, do you? Not unless you lie.

Unemployment compensation is supposed to be, compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment. The right wing loves "shorting the Poor".

I should not have to lie for Government services.

The government should not have to provide you services which you are capable of providing yourself.

Unemployment compensation is meant to be a temporary assist until you find a new job. That is it. It is not, and never was, intended to be full time support for someone unwilling to help themselves.

Unemployment compensation is, in most states, only 26 weeks in duration. As I have said over and over, it is meant to be a temporary bridge between jobs.


What you want is money sent to you, at tax payer expense, just because you do not have a job and refuse to get one. That is what welfare is for. The means testing you keep talking about is simply a way of determining whether you need it for your survival. You obviously do not.

You want to change the entire system, for your benefit, so that you do not have to get a job and work for a living. Unemployment compensation was never meant to provide you with a way of avoiding work and still having money for things beyond subsistence. You want tax payers to pay for you to have things you do not need.

One of the key signs of maturity is differentiating between a want and a need. You don't get to suckle at the public teat for your wants.

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment. Solving for that Institutional problem is a Government function and a provision of the general welfare.

 

[danielpalos]

I have a simple question for you, Daniel.

Why don't you do what most people do and get a job to pay for what you want? Answer this simple question and we can continue.

i am looking for work as well. i am looking for virtual positions online.

I am advocating for equal protection of the law not simply being a lemming.

 

[WinterBorn]

Only for those who qualify. Those who do not will either have to submits means testing or get a job making $15 an hour. Or do without any lucre.

There is a difference between unemployment compensation and means tested welfare.

Yes there is.

One is a temporary compensation for a worker who lost their job through no fault of their own, and are actively looking for work.

The other is for people who need help to survive.


Actually, you don't qualify for either, do you? Not unless you lie.

Unemployment compensation is supposed to be, compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment. The right wing loves "shorting the Poor".

I should not have to lie for Government services.

The government should not have to provide you services which you are capable of providing yourself.

Unemployment compensation is meant to be a temporary assist until you find a new job. That is it. It is not, and never was, intended to be full time support for someone unwilling to help themselves.

Unemployment compensation is, in most states, only 26 weeks in duration. As I have said over and over, it is meant to be a temporary bridge between jobs.


What you want is money sent to you, at tax payer expense, just because you do not have a job and refuse to get one. That is what welfare is for. The means testing you keep talking about is simply a way of determining whether you need it for your survival. You obviously do not.

You want to change the entire system, for your benefit, so that you do not have to get a job and work for a living. Unemployment compensation was never meant to provide you with a way of avoiding work and still having money for things beyond subsistence. You want tax payers to pay for you to have things you do not need.

One of the key signs of maturity is differentiating between a want and a need. You don't get to suckle at the public teat for your wants.

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment. Solving for that Institutional problem is a Government function and a provision of the general welfare.

That is solved by the welfare programs. They provide an income, food stamps and health insurance for those who need it.

The means tests weed out those who do not need it.

 

[WinterBorn]

I have a simple question for you, Daniel.

Why don't you do what most people do and get a job to pay for what you want? Answer this simple question and we can continue.

i am looking for work as well. i am looking for virtual positions online.

I am advocating for equal protection of the law not simply being a lemming.

Virtual positions are out there. But there are also jobs that you could take that are not virtual.

And providing for your own wants and needs is not being a lemming. It is being a productive adult.

 

[danielpalos]

There is a difference between unemployment compensation and means tested welfare.

Yes there is.

One is a temporary compensation for a worker who lost their job through no fault of their own, and are actively looking for work.

The other is for people who need help to survive.


Actually, you don't qualify for either, do you? Not unless you lie.

Unemployment compensation is supposed to be, compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment. The right wing loves "shorting the Poor".

I should not have to lie for Government services.

The government should not have to provide you services which you are capable of providing yourself.

Unemployment compensation is meant to be a temporary assist until you find a new job. That is it. It is not, and never was, intended to be full time support for someone unwilling to help themselves.

Unemployment compensation is, in most states, only 26 weeks in duration. As I have said over and over, it is meant to be a temporary bridge between jobs.


What you want is money sent to you, at tax payer expense, just because you do not have a job and refuse to get one. That is what welfare is for. The means testing you keep talking about is simply a way of determining whether you need it for your survival. You obviously do not.

You want to change the entire system, for your benefit, so that you do not have to get a job and work for a living. Unemployment compensation was never meant to provide you with a way of avoiding work and still having money for things beyond subsistence. You want tax payers to pay for you to have things you do not need.

One of the key signs of maturity is differentiating between a want and a need. You don't get to suckle at the public teat for your wants.

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment. Solving for that Institutional problem is a Government function and a provision of the general welfare.

That is solved by the welfare programs. They provide an income, food stamps and health insurance for those who need it.

The means tests weed out those who do not need it.

You have no economic clue or economic Cause, doing it that way.

Capitalism has a natural and institution, rate of unemployment. Correcting for that simple problem can solve simple poverty. We should have no homeless on the street.

 

[danielpalos]

I have a simple question for you, Daniel.

Why don't you do what most people do and get a job to pay for what you want? Answer this simple question and we can continue.

i am looking for work as well. i am looking for virtual positions online.

I am advocating for equal protection of the law not simply being a lemming.

Virtual positions are out there. But there are also jobs that you could take that are not virtual.

And providing for your own wants and needs is not being a lemming. It is being a productive adult.

yes, it is, if i fail in my civil duty.

 

[WinterBorn]

Yes there is.

One is a temporary compensation for a worker who lost their job through no fault of their own, and are actively looking for work.

The other is for people who need help to survive.


Actually, you don't qualify for either, do you? Not unless you lie.

Unemployment compensation is supposed to be, compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment. The right wing loves "shorting the Poor".

I should not have to lie for Government services.

The government should not have to provide you services which you are capable of providing yourself.

Unemployment compensation is meant to be a temporary assist until you find a new job. That is it. It is not, and never was, intended to be full time support for someone unwilling to help themselves.

Unemployment compensation is, in most states, only 26 weeks in duration. As I have said over and over, it is meant to be a temporary bridge between jobs.


What you want is money sent to you, at tax payer expense, just because you do not have a job and refuse to get one. That is what welfare is for. The means testing you keep talking about is simply a way of determining whether you need it for your survival. You obviously do not.

You want to change the entire system, for your benefit, so that you do not have to get a job and work for a living. Unemployment compensation was never meant to provide you with a way of avoiding work and still having money for things beyond subsistence. You want tax payers to pay for you to have things you do not need.

One of the key signs of maturity is differentiating between a want and a need. You don't get to suckle at the public teat for your wants.

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment. Solving for that Institutional problem is a Government function and a provision of the general welfare.

That is solved by the welfare programs. They provide an income, food stamps and health insurance for those who need it.

The means tests weed out those who do not need it.

You have no economic clue or economic Cause, doing it that way.

Capitalism has a natural and institution, rate of unemployment. Correcting for that simple problem can solve simple poverty. We should have no homeless on the street.

There is already a solution in the form of welfare programs. However, that will not solve the homeless problem. Not having a physical address means they cannot have their checks and other benefits sent to them. Most do not have any ID, which is required to get any sort of gov't assistance. And they don't have bank accounts they can put their checks into, which would mean they would have their entire month's assistance on their person on the streets.

And most homeless people, living on the streets, have some sort of history of mental problems or substance abuse. Handing them money without addressing those problems would do more harm than good.

 

[WinterBorn]

I have a simple question for you, Daniel.

Why don't you do what most people do and get a job to pay for what you want? Answer this simple question and we can continue.

i am looking for work as well. i am looking for virtual positions online.

I am advocating for equal protection of the law not simply being a lemming.

Virtual positions are out there. But there are also jobs that you could take that are not virtual.

And providing for your own wants and needs is not being a lemming. It is being a productive adult.

yes, it is, if i fail in my civil duty.

Your civic duty is not to try to leech off other citizens who support themselves. Being able to take care of yourself is one of the most basic civic duties.

 

[WinterBorn]

Yes there is.

One is a temporary compensation for a worker who lost their job through no fault of their own, and are actively looking for work.

The other is for people who need help to survive.


Actually, you don't qualify for either, do you? Not unless you lie.

Unemployment compensation is supposed to be, compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment. The right wing loves "shorting the Poor".

I should not have to lie for Government services.

The government should not have to provide you services which you are capable of providing yourself.

Unemployment compensation is meant to be a temporary assist until you find a new job. That is it. It is not, and never was, intended to be full time support for someone unwilling to help themselves.

Unemployment compensation is, in most states, only 26 weeks in duration. As I have said over and over, it is meant to be a temporary bridge between jobs.


What you want is money sent to you, at tax payer expense, just because you do not have a job and refuse to get one. That is what welfare is for. The means testing you keep talking about is simply a way of determining whether you need it for your survival. You obviously do not.

You want to change the entire system, for your benefit, so that you do not have to get a job and work for a living. Unemployment compensation was never meant to provide you with a way of avoiding work and still having money for things beyond subsistence. You want tax payers to pay for you to have things you do not need.

One of the key signs of maturity is differentiating between a want and a need. You don't get to suckle at the public teat for your wants.

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment. Solving for that Institutional problem is a Government function and a provision of the general welfare.

That is solved by the welfare programs. They provide an income, food stamps and health insurance for those who need it.

The means tests weed out those who do not need it.

You have no economic clue or economic Cause, doing it that way.

Capitalism has a natural and institution, rate of unemployment. Correcting for that simple problem can solve simple poverty. We should have no homeless on the street.

Also, the resources available for taking care of the poor is not unlimited. The fact that you choose to be poor means you want to take resources that could be used to help people who cannot help themselves. You take food and money away from them when you obviously do not need it.

 

[danielpalos]

Unemployment compensation is supposed to be, compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment. The right wing loves "shorting the Poor".

I should not have to lie for Government services.

The government should not have to provide you services which you are capable of providing yourself.

Unemployment compensation is meant to be a temporary assist until you find a new job. That is it. It is not, and never was, intended to be full time support for someone unwilling to help themselves.

Unemployment compensation is, in most states, only 26 weeks in duration. As I have said over and over, it is meant to be a temporary bridge between jobs.


What you want is money sent to you, at tax payer expense, just because you do not have a job and refuse to get one. That is what welfare is for. The means testing you keep talking about is simply a way of determining whether you need it for your survival. You obviously do not.

You want to change the entire system, for your benefit, so that you do not have to get a job and work for a living. Unemployment compensation was never meant to provide you with a way of avoiding work and still having money for things beyond subsistence. You want tax payers to pay for you to have things you do not need.

One of the key signs of maturity is differentiating between a want and a need. You don't get to suckle at the public teat for your wants.

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment. Solving for that Institutional problem is a Government function and a provision of the general welfare.

That is solved by the welfare programs. They provide an income, food stamps and health insurance for those who need it.

The means tests weed out those who do not need it.

You have no economic clue or economic Cause, doing it that way.

Capitalism has a natural and institution, rate of unemployment. Correcting for that simple problem can solve simple poverty. We should have no homeless on the street.

There is already a solution in the form of welfare programs. However, that will not solve the homeless problem. Not having a physical address means they cannot have their checks and other benefits sent to them. Most do not have any ID, which is required to get any sort of gov't assistance. And they don't have bank accounts they can put their checks into, which would mean they would have their entire month's assistance on their person on the streets.

And most homeless people, living on the streets, have some sort of history of mental problems or substance abuse. Handing them money without addressing those problems would do more harm than good.

A solution for simple poverty on an at-will basis?

All you do is tell stories.

 

[danielpalos]

I have a simple question for you, Daniel.

Why don't you do what most people do and get a job to pay for what you want? Answer this simple question and we can continue.

i am looking for work as well. i am looking for virtual positions online.

I am advocating for equal protection of the law not simply being a lemming.

Virtual positions are out there. But there are also jobs that you could take that are not virtual.

And providing for your own wants and needs is not being a lemming. It is being a productive adult.

yes, it is, if i fail in my civil duty.

Your civic duty is not to try to leech off other citizens who support themselves. Being able to take care of yourself is one of the most basic civic duties.

we have a first amendment. your morals mean Nothing.

equal protection of the law is express not implied in any way or any form of mere, story.