justoffal
Diamond Member
- Jun 29, 2013
- 31,419
- 23,696
- 2,905
- Thread starter
- #21
Today, we're 1ºC over the 20th Century average ... global warming ... so what? ... why should we care, this is a trivial amount and it's not expected to increase more than another ... single ... degree ... (c.f. IPCC AR5 1WC Fig 12-5 and associated text) ...
Hysteria for Hysteria's sake ...
The atmosphere is a fluid ... it behaves as a fluid ... we apply N/S at all times and in all places ... including the stratospheric polar vortex ... that's everybody's position ... why would you work with each individual molecule? ...
Maybe you have a link to this new theorem? ... sounds like the same mistake ... the amount of enthalpy is immaterial to weather ... we only care about changing enthalpy, which requires power ... no power produces powerless weather ... we tend to only care about powerful events, lots and lots of changing enthalpy ...
An expanded polar vortex means more moderate weather, and lower amplitude Rossby waves ... the opposite of what we're seeing ... sounds like this new theory is the opposite of established science ... but I'll read your link ...
Excellent ... I will endeavor to find the link It's something I read a few months back pertaining to the expansion of the vortex based on greater heat retention per unit volume.
But I'm satisfied with your explanation because it takes in more than just one narrow field of science which makes sense if you're dealing with anything on a global scale.
That's always been my problem with the warming alanists.... They ignore every other field of science and how it might interact with the data that they are presenting. Very specifically they ignore astronomy.
Now I have a Glacier for sale that would like to talk to you about.

Last edited: