So apparently don jr bribed homeless folks to pretend to be Trump supporters during his visit to Greenland

mexico paid indirectly by having to spend money to put troops on the border,
Trump never said that they would mail us a check. There are many ways to pay. try to keep up.
No, that's not how it went.

US companies foremost those of the heavy, machining&automotive industry had invested US$ billions into Mexico since the 90'ies - as such avoiding to employ costly American labor and additionally obtaining considerable tax-benefits from Mexico - the same industries and foremost sub-supplier industries from the US and Oversees countries followed this strategy.

Mexico by 2015 had already become a major manufacturing hub for the US industry and those from Oversees servicing and relying onto the US market. My partner companies major investment (outpacing ALL investments of the other globally located 8 manufacturing plants, incl. China, combined) went from 2015 to 2019 into the Mexican plant. - around U$$ 180 million. US$ 4 million into the USA, instead of the initially budgeted 28 million for the USA.

During Trumps stint - this "investment strategy" towards Mexico was additionally extremely intensified due to his tariff policy in regards to China, when US, European, and Asian companies, incl. Chinese companies then shifted partially their manufacturing capacities, but foremost their future manufacturing investments, from China towards localizing them in Mexico. This indeed impacted the Chinese and the global economy negatively.

Trump however couldn't "create" any significant number of "new-qualified" jobs in the USA with his China & EU tariff-war - since they factually were all, foremost created in Mexico, heavily subsidized with tax-and investment benefits from Mexico - thus Trumps tariffs only increasing the prices for US consumers and in parallel negatively impacted the US manufacturing industry.

In view of this situation - caused solely by Trump, he then threatened Mexico with tariffs - factually endangering foremost the US manufacturing industry and naturally also Mexico's ambition towards becoming THE major manufacturing hub for the US and Canadian market. In order to avoid economic repercussions - Mexico then agreed to "combat" migrant streams. As for how much the US and the Global industry then "subsidized" this Mexican border commitment - I wouldn't know.

But the total costs of this tariff policy - had to be and still are footed in majority by the US industry and the US consumer. Aka the US economy. Dumb Biden in order to promote the US propagated democracy contra authoritarian rule, then whacked another 100% onto those Trump tariffs, and Trumps propagated solution from 2025 onward is, to place another 20-50% on top. :cuckoo:
 
Last edited:
If you read the stories they wrote when they got access, you’d realize that they did do a fair job. Giuliani didn’t want a fair job. He wanted a hit job. That’s why he gave it to the NY Post, who we should both agree is pretty biased.

You can’t report based on what was reported by another agency, especially when that other agency is highly biased. That’s totally illogical.

Meanwhile, the biased conservative media published many lies about the laptop but you don’t care because you expect them to lie. It’s okay. Your double standards are glaring.

Just posting the photos found on the laptop would have been damaging enough. Guiluani knew the MSM would spin. The NY Post is no more biased than the Washington Post. The NY Times is very biased. Guiliani knew the NY Post, which does lean right, would publish the material without trying to sugar coat it. The same could not have been said about the traditional media. They still have a lot of power and influence to quickly change a narrative, true or not.
 
Just posting the photos found on the laptop would have been damaging enough. Guiluani knew the MSM would spin. The NY Post is no more biased than the Washington Post. The NY Times is very biased. Guiliani knew the NY Post, which does lean right, would publish the material without trying to sugar coat it. The same could not have been said about the traditional media. They still have a lot of power and influence to quickly change a narrative, true or not.
Please tell me why respectable news media would resort to the gutter politics of posting the photos of Hunter Biden?

Giuliani knew the NY Post would try to distort the content of the laptop, and leave out any exculpatory context.

At the end of the day, after extensive review of the laptop, the claimed corruption (let alone the child pornography) never materialized. The story of the laptop is a right wing narrative, not truth.
 
As is yours and other liberals. Stalemate.
And so you see how your paradigm of ignoring anything you consider “biased” results in futility.

That’s what I’m trying to show you.

If we accept this nonsense, nothing anyone says means anything ever. It’s nihilistic.
 
Please tell me why respectable news media would resort to the gutter politics of posting the photos of Hunter Biden?

Giuliani knew the NY Post would try to distort the content of the laptop, and leave out any exculpatory context.

At the end of the day, after extensive review of the laptop, the claimed corruption (let alone the child pornography) never materialized. The story of the laptop is a right wing narrative, not truth.
"Respectable news media"???
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
:rofl:
 
No, that's not how it went.

US companies foremost those of the heavy, machining&automotive industry had invested US$ billions into Mexico since the 90'ies - as such avoiding to employ costly American labor and additionally obtaining considerable tax-benefits from Mexico - the same industries and foremost sub-supplier industries from the US and Oversees countries followed this strategy.

Mexico by 2015 had already become a major manufacturing hub for the US industry and those from Oversees servicing and relying onto the US market. My partner companies major investment (outpacing ALL investments of the other globally located 8 manufacturing plants, incl. China, combined) went from 2015 to 2019 into the Mexican plant. - around U$$ 180 million. US$ 4 million into the USA, instead of the initially budgeted 28 million for the USA.

During Trumps stint - this "investment strategy" towards Mexico was additionally extremely intensified due to his tariff policy in regards to China, when US, European, and Asian companies, incl. Chinese companies then shifted partially their manufacturing capacities, but foremost their future manufacturing investments, from China towards localizing them in Mexico. This indeed impacted the Chinese and the global economy negatively.

Trump however couldn't "create" any significant number of "new-qualified" jobs in the USA with his China & EU tariff-war - since they factually were all, foremost created in Mexico, heavily subsidized with tax-and investment benefits from Mexico - thus Trumps tariffs only increasing the prices for US consumers and in parallel negatively impacted the US manufacturing industry.

In view of this situation - caused solely by Trump, he then threatened Mexico with tariffs - factually endangering foremost the US manufacturing industry and naturally also Mexico's ambition towards becoming THE major manufacturing hub for the US and Canadian market. In order to avoid economic repercussions - Mexico then agreed to "combat" migrant streams. As for how much the US and the Global industry then "subsidized" this Mexican border commitment - I wouldn't know.

But the total costs of this tariff policy - had to be and still are footed in majority by the US industry and the US consumer. Aka the US economy. Dumb Biden in order to promote the US propagated democracy contra authoritarian rule, then whacked another 100% onto those Trump tariffs, and Trumps propagated solution from 2025 onward is, to place another 20-50% on top. :cuckoo:
your understanding of tariffs is marginal at best, but rant on, it just confirms your lack of knowledge.
 
15th post
Back
Top Bottom