Snowflakes Demand john McEnroe Apologize To Serena Williams

[petro]

All I need to know is what exists and what does not.
An answer to my original question --- does not.
He hangs 'em, I bang 'em. Wanna see my bat flip?

Sorry Pogo. You denying that snowflakes don't exist is akin to the Imperial Wizard of the KKK denying racists exist.

In baseball at least, you can be taken seriously, snowflake or not.

Still no answer.
You just don't get it do ya. Reading is a lost art.

Love the double negative though.

I was at the US Open in NY a few years ago. Saw both women and men play. It was apparent the men hit the ball considerably harder than the ladies.

The women sure scream like in orgasm every stroke though. Local radio show has morning contest, is it porn or tennis? I can never tell by the audio.

I must admit I really enjoyed watching the ladies in their little outfits, running around.

Best part of any women's sports.

 

[Pogo]

Pogo, I can only take you seriously as regards the Phillies and baseball. In political matters, you've lost all credibility as a dedicated snowflake.

All I need to know is what exists and what does not.
An answer to my original question --- does not.
He hangs 'em, I bang 'em. Wanna see my bat flip?

Sorry Pogo. You denying that snowflakes don't exist is akin to the Imperial Wizard of the KKK denying racists exist.

In baseball at least, you can be taken seriously, snowflake or not.

Still no answer.
You just don't get it do ya. Reading is a lost art.

Love the double negative though.

I was at the US Open in NY a few years ago. Saw both women and men play. It was apparent the men hit the ball considerably harder than the ladies.

The women sure scream like in orgasm every stroke though. Local radio show has morning contest, is it porn or tennis? I can never tell by the audio.

Ah yes, that would be the aforementioned Monica Seles.

She was an OK tennis player but as a vocalist ----

I imagine you could take a Monica match and edit the audio so it syncs to a certain.... rhythm. Couldn't do much about the :: poing::: of the ball though.

 

[Pogo]

Still no answer.
You just don't get it do ya. Reading is a lost art.

Love the double negative though.

Pogo, you are way out of your league with me. There was no double-negative, except apparently, for snowflakes with little understanding of grammar.

Like it or not, you have dug yourself a deeper hole with your imbecilic comments on the existence of snowflakes, and now grammar.

Find and explain it, "You denying that snowflakes exist is akin to the Imperial Wizard of the KKK denying racists exist."

My initial impression of you was that of reasonable intelligence, despite your snowflake tenancies; alas no more.

Sorry, I don't suffer fools gladly.

And you're a dishonest hack, since the double negative is still nested in my quote, before you scrambled back to re-edit it after I pointed it out -- to wit:

Sorry Pogo. You denying that snowflakes don't exist is akin to the Imperial Wizard of the KKK denying racists exist.

---- which you also stripped out of your own post because it would demonstrate exactly that dishonesty.

Post 76. You can't edit it.

BUSTED.

Sorry, I don't suffer liars at all.

 

[deanrd]

Oh please. I'd like to see one of them have a baby.

Irrelevant. The comment was about playing tennis, and the mens' game is tougher. The men are stronger, hit the ball harder, and their matches last longer. It's simple biology, and pretending men are not generally bigger and stronger then women is ridiculous.

Who said men weren't stronger than women? On average.

But I bet this guy isn't as strong as this woman:

 

[hadit]

Oh please. I'd like to see one of them have a baby.

Irrelevant. The comment was about playing tennis, and the mens' game is tougher. The men are stronger, hit the ball harder, and their matches last longer. It's simple biology, and pretending men are not generally bigger and stronger then women is ridiculous.

Who said men weren't stronger than women? On average.

But I bet this guy isn't as strong as this woman:

The strongest woman is not as strong as the strongest man, and the best female tennis player would be defeated by the best male tennis player. That's pretty much a given.

 

[Meathead]

Still no answer.
You just don't get it do ya. Reading is a lost art.

Love the double negative though.

Pogo, you are way out of your league with me. There was no double-negative, except apparently, for snowflakes with little understanding of grammar.

Like it or not, you have dug yourself a deeper hole with your imbecilic comments on the existence of snowflakes, and now grammar.

Find and explain it, "You denying that snowflakes exist is akin to the Imperial Wizard of the KKK denying racists exist."

My initial impression of you was that of reasonable intelligence, despite your snowflake tenancies; alas no more.

Sorry, I don't suffer fools gladly.

And you're a dishonest hack, since the double negative is still nested in my quote, before you scrambled back to re-edit it after I pointed it out -- to wit:

Sorry Pogo. You denying that snowflakes don't exist is akin to the Imperial Wizard of the KKK denying racists exist.

---- which you also stripped out of your own post because it would demonstrate exactly that dishonesty.

Post 76. You can't edit it.

BUSTED.

Sorry, I don't suffer liars at all.

You can't form a double-negative without 2 grammatical negatives, which all start with an "n", as in you don't know nothing or there isn't no such thing as a snowflake. This applies to butt-hurt snowflakes, blacks, lesbians and so on as well.

 

[Iceweasel]

I don't think he said anything inflammatory but I just don't understand his reasoning for making his comment. It was an unnecessary comment out of the blue.

I want to know what was the purpose of it.

He was asked a specific question where the "reporter" was attempting to lead McEnroe into a false narrative. If you read it he was asked why he didn't consider Serena Williams the top player in the world so he answered the dumb question truthfully, nothing inflammatory about it unless honesty inflames someone.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

I think Serena Williams is pretty. She is a world class athlete, a titan in her sport, and, a philanthropist. Haters gonna hate, though.

"A" world class athlete?! She is 'THE' world class athlete!

MF*^%E*^YTFV&I#@!

You APOLOGIZE right now!

This is one of the Bedwetting Snowflakes.

Say, isn't that David Vitter?

Here's another one, quick get them some Play Doh.

Can do!

Who is David Vitter?

That shows how great The Donald is, taking gifts of Play Doh to people

He didn't. There was a there and he pretended to help unload and distribute the Ply Doh.

Meanwhile, since the election, he has ignored the victims of natural disasters.


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Pogo]

Still no answer.
You just don't get it do ya. Reading is a lost art.

Love the double negative though.

Pogo, you are way out of your league with me. There was no double-negative, except apparently, for snowflakes with little understanding of grammar.

Like it or not, you have dug yourself a deeper hole with your imbecilic comments on the existence of snowflakes, and now grammar.

Find and explain it, "You denying that snowflakes exist is akin to the Imperial Wizard of the KKK denying racists exist."

My initial impression of you was that of reasonable intelligence, despite your snowflake tenancies; alas no more.

Sorry, I don't suffer fools gladly.

And you're a dishonest hack, since the double negative is still nested in my quote, before you scrambled back to re-edit it after I pointed it out -- to wit:

Sorry Pogo. You denying that snowflakes don't exist is akin to the Imperial Wizard of the KKK denying racists exist.

---- which you also stripped out of your own post because it would demonstrate exactly that dishonesty.

Post 76. You can't edit it.

BUSTED.

Sorry, I don't suffer liars at all.

You can't form a double-negative without 2 grammatical negatives, which all start with an "n", as in you don't know nothing or there isn't no such thing as a snowflake. This applies to butt-hurt snowflakes, blacks, lesbians and so on as well.

Not only are you a lying hack, you're too stupid to not keep highlighting it.

My post 76: 5:24 pm. WITH your original post nested.

Your post: "Last edited: Yesterday at 5:50 PM". Twenty-six minutes later. At which point you pathetically sleazed in trying to claim it was always edited, despite the evidence right there on the page, and we have always been at war with Eastasia.

You'r a liar, plain and simple. Own it.

 

[Meathead]

Still no answer.
You just don't get it do ya. Reading is a lost art.

Love the double negative though.

Pogo, you are way out of your league with me. There was no double-negative, except apparently, for snowflakes with little understanding of grammar.

Like it or not, you have dug yourself a deeper hole with your imbecilic comments on the existence of snowflakes, and now grammar.

Find and explain it, "You denying that snowflakes exist is akin to the Imperial Wizard of the KKK denying racists exist."

My initial impression of you was that of reasonable intelligence, despite your snowflake tenancies; alas no more.

Sorry, I don't suffer fools gladly.

And you're a dishonest hack, since the double negative is still nested in my quote, before you scrambled back to re-edit it after I pointed it out -- to wit:

Sorry Pogo. You denying that snowflakes don't exist is akin to the Imperial Wizard of the KKK denying racists exist.

---- which you also stripped out of your own post because it would demonstrate exactly that dishonesty.

Post 76. You can't edit it.

BUSTED.

Sorry, I don't suffer liars at all.

You can't form a double-negative without 2 grammatical negatives, which all start with an "n", as in you don't know nothing or there isn't no such thing as a snowflake. This applies to butt-hurt snowflakes, blacks, lesbians and so on as well.

Not only are you a lying hack, you're too stupid to not keep highlighting it.

My post 76: 5:24 pm. WITH your original post nested.

Your post: "Last edited: Yesterday at 5:50 PM". Twenty-six minutes later. At which point you pathetically sleazed in trying to claim it was always edited, despite the evidence right there on the page, and we have always been at war with Eastasia.

You'r a liar, plain and simple. Own it.

Since you don't have a TV, here:

Breaking News, Latest News and Videos - CNN.com

A safe-space soothing for snowflakes, live!

 

[mudwhistle]

I think Serena Williams is pretty. She is a world class athlete, a titan in her sport, and, a philanthropist. Haters gonna hate, though.

"A" world class athlete?! She is 'THE' world class athlete!

MF*^%E*^YTFV&I#@!

You APOLOGIZE right now!

Yes he better apologise or they are going to all wet their little pants and stamp their little feet

He should apologize like Kathy Griffin.....blame all of his problems on old white men......"They broke me......my life is over"..*sob*