Smoke signals from the super-massive black hole of the Galaxy

[Frannie]

The dark spot we see is not just the entire event horizon, but the entire event horizon nested and mapped a huge number of times (but a finite number nonetheless).

We are seeing the opposite side of the event horizon. Many times over.

We "see" the photons which reach our, instruments. So, we see a ring, as photons' paths are curved around the black hole and emerge, visible to us much later, from over the horizon of the event horizon. The ones that fall into the event horizon, we don't see. It's not complicated. But it's not intuitive, either.

Lol yesterday no photons escaped a black hole, you just babble whatever suits your needs at the moment

 

[Olde Europe]

False. Now you are just trolling for attention. Good for you.

Quite. That insight was overdue about 25 postings ago. Just why everyone obsessive-compulsively devotes attention to an attention-seeking troll with nothing of any worth to say, thereby helping to derail the thread, I will not understand, ever.

Have some discipline. Or crazy-glue your hands to the table, failing that.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Lol yesterday no photons escaped a black hole,

The photons i referenced are not escaping the black hole, as they never crossed the event horizon.

 

[Frannie]

Lol yesterday no photons escaped a black hole,

The photons i referenced are not escaping the black hole, as they never crossed the event horizon.

NASA says it's high energy plasma

But you know more

 

[Frannie]

False. Now you are just trolling for attention. Good for you.

Quite. That insight was overdue about 25 postings ago. Just why everyone obsessive-compulsively devotes attention to an attention-seeking troll with nothing of any worth to say, thereby helping to derail the thread, I will not understand, ever.

Have some discipline. Or crazy-glue your hands to the table, failing that.

What exactly did you just add to the conversation?

Squat

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

NASA says it's high energy plasma

Correct. And we can observe it because it emits photons. We are recording the photons with our instruments.

 

[Frannie]

NASA says it's high energy plasma

Correct. And we can observe it because it emits photons. We are recording the photons with our instruments.

Why is the plasma not sucked into the black hole.

God might know

You do not know

But that won't stop you from making up schizzo delusions

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Why is the plasma not sucked into the black hole.

Because it did not get close enough to the black hole to be sucked into the black hole.

And yes, we know precisely at what distance from the black hole at which all of its possible futures end up in the black hole, , given its velocity. In fact, some of the plasma which emitted the photons we observe may have indeed ended up in the black hole later.

 

[Frannie]

Why is the plasma not sucked into the black hole.

Because it did not get close enough to the black hole to be sucked into the black hole.

And yes, we know precisely at what distance from the black hole at which all of its possible futures end up in the black hole, , given its velocity. In fact, some of the plasma which emitted the photons we observe may have indeed ended up in the black hole later.

Nothing about black holes is known, but you pretend to know the velocity of something at the other end of the universe....

Again you like all schizzos just make up stuff as you go

Just think how rich you would be if you used your advanced mathematical skills to make your own stock buying and selling algorithms

Yawn

 

[G.T.]

Why is the plasma not sucked into the black hole.

Because it did not get close enough to the black hole to be sucked into the black hole.

And yes, we know precisely at what distance from the black hole at which all of its possible futures end up in the black hole, , given its velocity. In fact, some of the plasma which emitted the photons we observe may have indeed ended up in the black hole later.

Nothing about black holes is known, but you pretend to know the velocity of something at the other end of the universe....

Again you like all schizzos just make up stuff as you go

Just think how rich you would be if you used your advanced mathematical skills to make your own stock buying and selling algorithms

Yawn

you believe in a sky pixie invented by desert people, corky

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

Well there goes the entire black hole narrative where nothing even light escapes.

Light DOESN'T escape a black hole. But it does affect surrounding regions.

 

[Frannie]

Why is the plasma not sucked into the black hole.

Because it did not get close enough to the black hole to be sucked into the black hole.

And yes, we know precisely at what distance from the black hole at which all of its possible futures end up in the black hole, , given its velocity. In fact, some of the plasma which emitted the photons we observe may have indeed ended up in the black hole later.

Nothing about black holes is known, but you pretend to know the velocity of something at the other end of the universe....

Again you like all schizzos just make up stuff as you go

Just think how rich you would be if you used your advanced mathematical skills to make your own stock buying and selling algorithms

Yawn

you believe in a sky pixie invented by desert people, corky

Actually the only evidence I see for God is the complexity of DNA.

However morons like you certainly could have crawled out of a pond

 

[Frannie]

Well there goes the entire black hole narrative where nothing even light escapes.

Light DOESN'T escape a black hole. But it does affect surrounding regions.

Why would anything not fall into the hole?

Answer, the gravity is not nearly as much as is babbled, if there is any gravity at all to nothingness

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Nothing about black holes is known,

False, obviously.

but you pretend to know the velocity of something at the other end of the universe....

No, you're mistaken again. We dont have to know the precise velocity of, say, a plasma cloud to know at what velocities it would eventually cross the event horizon of a black hole, given ithe black hole's mass. And we know the photons in the image did not cross the event horizon, because they reached our instruments.

Everything you are saying is ass backwards wrong. You're welcome for the attention.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Why would anything not fall into the hole?

Because a black hole affects objects the exact same way as any massive object. Objects can orbit a black hole, just as an object can orbit any other type of star. The special case of a black hole is the small amount of space in which its mass resides, meaning mass with certain velocities will always end up in the black hole. But mass with other velocities will not.

Yes, your "answer" was 100% wrong.

 

[G.T.]

Why is the plasma not sucked into the black hole.

Because it did not get close enough to the black hole to be sucked into the black hole.

And yes, we know precisely at what distance from the black hole at which all of its possible futures end up in the black hole, , given its velocity. In fact, some of the plasma which emitted the photons we observe may have indeed ended up in the black hole later.

Nothing about black holes is known, but you pretend to know the velocity of something at the other end of the universe....

Again you like all schizzos just make up stuff as you go

Just think how rich you would be if you used your advanced mathematical skills to make your own stock buying and selling algorithms

Yawn

you believe in a sky pixie invented by desert people, corky

Actually the only evidence I see for God is the complexity of DNA.

However morons like you certainly could have crawled out of a pond

The watchmaker argument is debunked, corky.

I wouldnt go around calling people morin when even the least of the least debaters here are outclassing you, with your stupidity.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Actually the only evidence I see for God is the complexity of DNA.

Which is not good evidence at all.

 

[Frannie]

Nothing about black holes is known,

False, obviously.

but you pretend to know the velocity of something at the other end of the universe....

No, you're mistaken again. We dont have to know the precise velocity of, say, a plasma cloud to know at what velocities it would eventually cross the event horizon of a black hole, given ithe black hole's mass. And we know the photons in the image did not cross the event horizon, because they reached our instruments.

Everything you are saying is ass backwards wrong. You're welcome for the attention.

Dude no one knows anything about the mass or velocity of any black hole.

You are sick if you believe your babbles

You are not a great scientist, you are delusional

Seek medical help

 

[Frannie]

Actually the only evidence I see for God is the complexity of DNA.

Which is not good evidence at all.

Can you explain the evidence that life spontaneously generated by pond water writing code?

Yawn good luck with that

How is that stock algorithm coming along

 

[Frannie]

Why is the plasma not sucked into the black hole.

Because it did not get close enough to the black hole to be sucked into the black hole.

And yes, we know precisely at what distance from the black hole at which all of its possible futures end up in the black hole, , given its velocity. In fact, some of the plasma which emitted the photons we observe may have indeed ended up in the black hole later.

Nothing about black holes is known, but you pretend to know the velocity of something at the other end of the universe....

Again you like all schizzos just make up stuff as you go

Just think how rich you would be if you used your advanced mathematical skills to make your own stock buying and selling algorithms

Yawn

you believe in a sky pixie invented by desert people, corky

Actually the only evidence I see for God is the complexity of DNA.

However morons like you certainly could have crawled out of a pond

The watchmaker argument is debunked, corky.

I wouldnt go around calling people morin when even the least of the least debaters here are outclassing you, with your stupidity.

How did your portfolio do to day boy?

GOOG and AAPL up or down