Well, if you are looking for an answer such as " x = ?" that is not possible.
All you can do is rationalize the denominator.
Which means, you can't have a radical in the demoninator.
So, the simplified version of your question is:
"the cube root of x squared" divided by x.
Stuff that up your idiot ass.
Well, I'll give your arrogant, pompous ass credit for at least one small thing, at least you
tried to answer the question and sort of got it half right.
Most people think the question is asking to solve for the literal VALUE of X, which of course is impossible at this point.
In this case, it can only be asking for what other forms X may be EXPRESSED as.
Most people who struggle with math fail to realize or ever master that the
most important part of working any algebraic equation properly or easily is to not only get the order of operations right, but in also reworking all the terms so that they are all in the same FORM, and that is what we are really asking and doing here. For instance, you wouldn't want an equation with one term using a fractional radical and another term using a decimal radical (such as 1/2 and 0.5).
And even though your reworking of X would give the correct value for X if a literal value were to be substituted in,
, it is mathematically sloppy and disallowed in this case because you are unnecessarily using X to DEFINE ITSELF! You are unnecessarily adding complexity and terms where none are needed when the goal is to reduce X to and keep it in its simplest form. I mean, doesn't X GO INTO X to cancel out, dude?! And you end up with TWO radicals where only one was started with and needed!
The correct answer(s), would have been to rewrite the expression either simply as
or as
where X remains the only virtual term. These are the only two other mathematically clean expressions for X as was originally written.
So: A). You were WRONG that the denominator cannot have a radical in it. Why would you even think that? And
B). Though you reworked the expression in a different way that would get you to the right value for X if solving with a literal and basically says the same thing, you ADD a virtual term ending up with TWO where only one was started with and only one was needed!
So,
- You tripped over your own dick, asshole. It was 4:15AM in the morning when you replied, butthead, I WENT TO BED jerkoff and didn't "run away" from anything, much less my own problem.
- Don't pat yourself too hard cupcake, half your work and assumptions were wrong and was, after all, only a reworked basic high school problem!
You're not ready for JPL yet.
- NOWHERE did I ever suggest my problem was an equation. Get your head out of your ass for once and learn to READ what was actually SAID instead of what you THINK you saw.
- You can go FUCK YOURSELF and take your apology and SHOVE IT UP YOUR ASS where it belongs. Only a twat would think he needs congratulated for something ANY 9th grader should be able to do.
If this were an actual math class, I'd fail you for your answer but might give you partial credit if I was in a good mood for at least finding SOME way to rewrite the original X problem even if it was a butchered one, but considering your haughty arrogance and contemptible know-it-all disdain, no, I'd give you a C- or a D+. Ace pupil you are not.
Another dickless shithead leftist waving his "smarts" at others drives face-first into his own wall of stupid arrogance AGAIN.
