Small Business Tax Relief

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Pity poor Mr. Businessman and his tax deductible business expenses.

too stupid!! the beauty of capitalism is that its competitive so that if one business deducts too much a competitor can deduct less and drive you into bankruptcy.

What the hell are you taking about?

Do you even know what a tax deduction is?

the three martini lunch is the quintessential deduction. In short, a personal expense that is treated as business expense for tax purposes. Does the little boy understand now?

That's the exact opposite of what you said earlier, asshole.

if it was opposite you would not be so afriad to show both. What does your fear teach you, liberal?

 

[Care4all]

Pity poor Mr. Businessman and his tax deductible business expenses.

So let me get this straight... if I generate $100,000 in revenues within my business, and it costs me $30,000 to generate those revenues (labor, materials, inventory, insurance, utilities, overhead, etc.) you would expect me to pay income tax on the full $100,000?

Fuckin' Brotch.

Isn't that whAt a FLAT TAX does....tax us all on our gross earnings??? So those pushing for a flat tax are pushing for every one be taxed on their gross income??

 

[danielpalos]

Our economy sucks – in spite of what all the Lefties claim. So, this could be a boon for it, giving relief to the vast majority of those who hire people. H.R. 636 appears to be a sound approach. The summary of the bill is @ Summaries for H.R. 636 America s Small Business Tax Relief Act of 2015 version - GovTrack.us

I believe more, in less government for free; and call it supply side economics supplying us with better governance at lower cost. In this case, i believe micromanaging our tax codes codes merely engenders "loyalty" to the subjective value of morals of a rule-of-State law, State than to a truer, rule-of-law State, which is one basis for our republican form of Government and the "moral absolutism" of fealty to our supreme law of the land.

Would small business be better or worse off without the regulatory (non-Tax) burden of our current regime of employment at will, if only general taxes are levied on Firms to fund unemployment compensation on an at-will basis; and, labor can also quit on an at-will basis and have recourse to unemployment compensation that meets or beats our poverty guidelines?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Our economy sucks – in spite of what all the Lefties claim. So, this could be a boon for it, giving relief to the vast majority of those who hire people. H.R. 636 appears to be a sound approach. The summary of the bill is @ Summaries for H.R. 636 America s Small Business Tax Relief Act of 2015 version - GovTrack.us

I believe more, in less government for free; and call it supply side economics supplying us with better governance at lower cost. In this case, i believe micromanaging our tax codes codes merely engenders "loyalty" to the subjective value of morals of a rule-of-State law, State than to a truer, rule-of-law State, which is one basis for our republican form of Government and the "moral absolutism" of fealty to our supreme law of the land.

Would small business be better or worse off without the regulatory (non-Tax) burden of our current regime of employment at will, if only general taxes are levied on Firms to fund unemployment compensation on an at-will basis; and, labor can also quit on an at-will basis and have recourse to unemployment compensation that meets or beats our poverty guidelines?

yes, small businesses are very innovative and create most of the new jobs so getting liberal govt off their backs is a very very good thing to which liberals, of course, object given that liberalism is based in pure ignorance.

 

[Mr. H.]

Pity poor Mr. Businessman and his tax deductible business expenses.

So let me get this straight... if I generate $100,000 in revenues within my business, and it costs me $30,000 to generate those revenues (labor, materials, inventory, insurance, utilities, overhead, etc.) you would expect me to pay income tax on the full $100,000?

Fuckin' Brotch.

Isn't that whAt a FLAT TAX does....tax us all on our gross earnings??? So those pushing for a flat tax are pushing for every one be taxed on their gross income??

And what would that do to my incentive to invest in my business? To increase revenues?
The "flat tax" is the same as a severance tax with respect to income generation.

 

[danielpalos]

Our economy sucks – in spite of what all the Lefties claim. So, this could be a boon for it, giving relief to the vast majority of those who hire people. H.R. 636 appears to be a sound approach. The summary of the bill is @ Summaries for H.R. 636 America s Small Business Tax Relief Act of 2015 version - GovTrack.us

I believe more, in less government for free; and call it supply side economics supplying us with better governance at lower cost. In this case, i believe micromanaging our tax codes codes merely engenders "loyalty" to the subjective value of morals of a rule-of-State law, State than to a truer, rule-of-law State, which is one basis for our republican form of Government and the "moral absolutism" of fealty to our supreme law of the land.

Would small business be better or worse off without the regulatory (non-Tax) burden of our current regime of employment at will, if only general taxes are levied on Firms to fund unemployment compensation on an at-will basis; and, labor can also quit on an at-will basis and have recourse to unemployment compensation that meets or beats our poverty guidelines?

yes, small businesses are very innovative and create most of the new jobs so getting liberal govt off their backs is a very very good thing to which liberals, of course, object given that liberalism is based in pure ignorance.

Not at all; the left just isn't as cognitively dissonant as the right in believing we can wage global wars on abstractions such as crime, drugs, poverty, and terror; while lowering taxes.

The liberal part is that general taxes are much less restrictive than micromanaging our Tax codes, without any alleged and Perfect Knowledge (of Good and Evil) of such micromanagement, which the right appeals to in public venues.

 

[Freemason9]

If this discussion is actually about small business and taxation, I would say NO, they DO NOT need even more favorable tax treatment. They already show only a small portion of their profits as taxable income due to many, many deductions; there are a fair share of "small businesses" that only exist as tax dodges.

Mosts small businesses are like farmers--undertaxed, underworked, and overpitied.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Our economy sucks – in spite of what all the Lefties claim. So, this could be a boon for it, giving relief to the vast majority of those who hire people. H.R. 636 appears to be a sound approach. The summary of the bill is @ Summaries for H.R. 636 America s Small Business Tax Relief Act of 2015 version - GovTrack.us

I believe more, in less government for free; and call it supply side economics supplying us with better governance at lower cost. In this case, i believe micromanaging our tax codes codes merely engenders "loyalty" to the subjective value of morals of a rule-of-State law, State than to a truer, rule-of-law State, which is one basis for our republican form of Government and the "moral absolutism" of fealty to our supreme law of the land.

Would small business be better or worse off without the regulatory (non-Tax) burden of our current regime of employment at will, if only general taxes are levied on Firms to fund unemployment compensation on an at-will basis; and, labor can also quit on an at-will basis and have recourse to unemployment compensation that meets or beats our poverty guidelines?

yes, small businesses are very innovative and create most of the new jobs so getting liberal govt off their backs is a very very good thing to which liberals, of course, object given that liberalism is based in pure ignorance.

Not at all; the left just isn't as cognitively dissonant as the right in believing we can wage global wars on abstractions such as crime, drugs, poverty, and terror; while lowering taxes.

The liberal part is that general taxes are much less restrictive than micromanaging our Tax codes, without any alleged and Perfect Knowledge (of Good and Evil) of such micromanagement, which the right appeals to in public venues.

dear, your english is so bad it makes no sense. Care to try aain?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

If this discussion is actually about small business and taxation, I would say NO, they DO NOT need even more favorable tax treatment.

of course thats completely stupid and liberal. if true they would not respond to programs like Cumo's "start up NY" that gives them tax breaks to move to NYS.

 

[danielpalos]

Our economy sucks – in spite of what all the Lefties claim. So, this could be a boon for it, giving relief to the vast majority of those who hire people. H.R. 636 appears to be a sound approach. The summary of the bill is @ Summaries for H.R. 636 America s Small Business Tax Relief Act of 2015 version - GovTrack.us

I believe more, in less government for free; and call it supply side economics supplying us with better governance at lower cost. In this case, i believe micromanaging our tax codes codes merely engenders "loyalty" to the subjective value of morals of a rule-of-State law, State than to a truer, rule-of-law State, which is one basis for our republican form of Government and the "moral absolutism" of fealty to our supreme law of the land.

Would small business be better or worse off without the regulatory (non-Tax) burden of our current regime of employment at will, if only general taxes are levied on Firms to fund unemployment compensation on an at-will basis; and, labor can also quit on an at-will basis and have recourse to unemployment compensation that meets or beats our poverty guidelines?

yes, small businesses are very innovative and create most of the new jobs so getting liberal govt off their backs is a very very good thing to which liberals, of course, object given that liberalism is based in pure ignorance.

Not at all; the left just isn't as cognitively dissonant as the right in believing we can wage global wars on abstractions such as crime, drugs, poverty, and terror; while lowering taxes.

The liberal part is that general taxes are much less restrictive than micromanaging our Tax codes, without any alleged and Perfect Knowledge (of Good and Evil) of such micromanagement, which the right appeals to in public venues.

dear, your english is so bad it makes no sense. Care to try aain?

sorry dear; it is your reading comprehension that is bad. care to try again with something other than diversion, which is usually considered a fallacy or error in reasoning.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Our economy sucks – in spite of what all the Lefties claim. So, this could be a boon for it, giving relief to the vast majority of those who hire people. H.R. 636 appears to be a sound approach. The summary of the bill is @ Summaries for H.R. 636 America s Small Business Tax Relief Act of 2015 version - GovTrack.us

I believe more, in less government for free; and call it supply side economics supplying us with better governance at lower cost. In this case, i believe micromanaging our tax codes codes merely engenders "loyalty" to the subjective value of morals of a rule-of-State law, State than to a truer, rule-of-law State, which is one basis for our republican form of Government and the "moral absolutism" of fealty to our supreme law of the land.

Would small business be better or worse off without the regulatory (non-Tax) burden of our current regime of employment at will, if only general taxes are levied on Firms to fund unemployment compensation on an at-will basis; and, labor can also quit on an at-will basis and have recourse to unemployment compensation that meets or beats our poverty guidelines?

yes, small businesses are very innovative and create most of the new jobs so getting liberal govt off their backs is a very very good thing to which liberals, of course, object given that liberalism is based in pure ignorance.

Not at all; the left just isn't as cognitively dissonant as the right in believing we can wage global wars on abstractions such as crime, drugs, poverty, and terror; while lowering taxes.

The liberal part is that general taxes are much less restrictive than micromanaging our Tax codes, without any alleged and Perfect Knowledge (of Good and Evil) of such micromanagement, which the right appeals to in public venues.

dear, your english is so bad it makes no sense. Care to try aain?

sorry dear; it is your reading comprehension that is bad. care to try again with something other than diversion, which is usually considered a fallacy or error in reasoning.

dear, your english is so bad it makes no sense. Care to try aain?

 

[danielpalos]

I believe more, in less government for free; and call it supply side economics supplying us with better governance at lower cost. In this case, i believe micromanaging our tax codes codes merely engenders "loyalty" to the subjective value of morals of a rule-of-State law, State than to a truer, rule-of-law State, which is one basis for our republican form of Government and the "moral absolutism" of fealty to our supreme law of the land.

Would small business be better or worse off without the regulatory (non-Tax) burden of our current regime of employment at will, if only general taxes are levied on Firms to fund unemployment compensation on an at-will basis; and, labor can also quit on an at-will basis and have recourse to unemployment compensation that meets or beats our poverty guidelines?

yes, small businesses are very innovative and create most of the new jobs so getting liberal govt off their backs is a very very good thing to which liberals, of course, object given that liberalism is based in pure ignorance.

Not at all; the left just isn't as cognitively dissonant as the right in believing we can wage global wars on abstractions such as crime, drugs, poverty, and terror; while lowering taxes.

The liberal part is that general taxes are much less restrictive than micromanaging our Tax codes, without any alleged and Perfect Knowledge (of Good and Evil) of such micromanagement, which the right appeals to in public venues.

dear, your english is so bad it makes no sense. Care to try aain?

sorry dear; it is your reading comprehension that is bad. care to try again with something other than diversion, which is usually considered a fallacy or error in reasoning.

dear, your english is so bad it makes no sense. Care to try aain?

sorry dear, you have nothing but fallacy to work with; it must be a (reading) comprehension issue.

 

[Care4all]

If this discussion is actually about small business and taxation, I would say NO, they DO NOT need even more favorable tax treatment.

of course thats completely stupid and liberal. if true they would not respond to programs like Cumo's "start up NY" that gives them tax breaks to move to NYS.

giving them a tax break to move there to NY has NOT created a new business or new additional jobs, it only leaves the one area unemployed and the new area with replacement jobs....

so your example does not fit with this situation, it does not employ more people in the Nation.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

If this discussion is actually about small business and taxation, I would say NO, they DO NOT need even more favorable tax treatment.

of course thats completely stupid and liberal. if true they would not respond to programs like Cumo's "start up NY" that gives them tax breaks to move to NYS.

giving them a tax break to move there to NY has NOT created a new business or new additional jobs, it only leaves the one area unemployed and the new area with replacement jobs....

so your example does not fit with this situation, it does not employ more people in the Nation.

40 million new jobs tomorrow:
eliminate liberal corporate taxes, eliminate liberal unions, and eliminate liberal deficits.
then eliminate 20 million illegals, then end the liberal war on the family and schools.

 

[danielpalos]

If this discussion is actually about small business and taxation, I would say NO, they DO NOT need even more favorable tax treatment.

of course thats completely stupid and liberal. if true they would not respond to programs like Cumo's "start up NY" that gives them tax breaks to move to NYS.

giving them a tax break to move there to NY has NOT created a new business or new additional jobs, it only leaves the one area unemployed and the new area with replacement jobs....

so your example does not fit with this situation, it does not employ more people in the Nation.

40 million new jobs tomorrow:
eliminate liberal corporate taxes, eliminate liberal unions, and eliminate liberal deficits.
then eliminate 20 million illegals, then end the liberal war on the family and schools.

You cannot eliminate capitalism's laissez-fare capitalism's laziness in regard to a couch potato inducing, Natural Rate of Unemployment with more capitalism; it requires socialism to bailout capitalism through recourse to the socialism of the law.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

If this discussion is actually about small business and taxation, I would say NO, they DO NOT need even more favorable tax treatment.

of course thats completely stupid and liberal. if true they would not respond to programs like Cumo's "start up NY" that gives them tax breaks to move to NYS.

giving them a tax break to move there to NY has NOT created a new business or new additional jobs, it only leaves the one area unemployed and the new area with replacement jobs....

so your example does not fit with this situation, it does not employ more people in the Nation.

40 million new jobs tomorrow:
eliminate liberal corporate taxes, eliminate liberal unions, and eliminate liberal deficits.
then eliminate 20 million illegals, then end the liberal war on the family and schools.

You cannot eliminate capitalism's laissez-fare capitalism's laziness in regard to a couch potato inducing, Natural Rate of Unemployment with more capitalism; it requires socialism to bailout capitalism through recourse to the socialism of the law.

dear, your english is so bad we have no idea what you are trying to say. Care to try again. When you are learning English you should use very short sentences with a subject and verb.

 

[danielpalos]

dear, since I am not the one resorting to fallacies, it must be your (reading) comprehension.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

dear, since I am not the one resorting to fallacies, it must be your (reading) comprehension.

40 million new jobs tomorrow:
eliminate liberal corporate taxes, eliminate liberal unions, and eliminate liberal deficits.
then eliminate 20 million illegals, then end the liberal war on the family and schools.

 

[danielpalos]

dear, since I am not the one resorting to fallacies, it must be your (reading) comprehension.

40 million new jobs tomorrow:
eliminate liberal corporate taxes, eliminate liberal unions, and eliminate liberal deficits.
then eliminate 20 million illegals, then end the liberal war on the family and schools.

at what cost, dear? just more government programs while trying to lower taxes doesn't seem to be working very well. a general tax instead of a direct tax for unemployment insurance would be much simpler and reduce red tape in that manner. It would correct for capitalism's laissez-faire laziness regarding its Natural Rate of Unemployment and that form of social inefficiency, by using socialism to bailout capitalism, like usual.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

just more government programs.

dear, Republicans oppose more taxes and more programs. Do you understand? 1+1=2