Skeptics Win, Endangerment Finding Axed – Truth Finally Prevails in The Climate Wars

I think most climatologists concede that climate change does not contribute to hurricane frequency

No to strength either while the 1990's remains the most active and strongest hurricanes decade in the satellite era.

It was posted right in front of you...... lol.
 
Meanwhile still waiting for a cogent rebuttal to post one.

Waiting,
waiting,
waiting.......
 
LOL, you have NOTHING but propaganda to offer, what ever happen to the idea of comprehensive cogent rebuttals, you haven't posted a single just one stupid propaganda pieces.

Already show a NASA published research that increasing CO2 levels in the atmosphere is great for life on the planet,

Carbon Dioxide Fertilization Greening Earth, Study Finds​

The headshot image of Karl B. Hille

Karl B. Hille​

Apr 26, 2016

Excerpt:

From a quarter to half of Earth’s vegetated lands has shown significant greening over the last 35 years largely due to rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, according to a new study published in the journal Nature Climate Change on April 25.

An international team of 32 authors from 24 institutions in eight countries led the effort, which involved using satellite data from NASA’s Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer instruments to help determine the leaf area index, or amount of leaf cover, over the planet’s vegetated regions. The greening represents an increase in leaves on plants and trees equivalent in area to two times the continental United States.

LINK
Liberal NASA
 
LOL, you have NOTHING but propaganda to offer, what ever happen to the idea of comprehensive cogent rebuttals, you haven't posted a single just one stupid propaganda pieces.

Already show a NASA published research that increasing CO2 levels in the atmosphere is great for life on the planet,

Carbon Dioxide Fertilization Greening Earth, Study Finds​

The headshot image of Karl B. Hille

Karl B. Hille​

Apr 26, 2016

Excerpt:

From a quarter to half of Earth’s vegetated lands has shown significant greening over the last 35 years largely due to rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, according to a new study published in the journal Nature Climate Change on April 25.

An international team of 32 authors from 24 institutions in eight countries led the effort, which involved using satellite data from NASA’s Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer instruments to help determine the leaf area index, or amount of leaf cover, over the planet’s vegetated regions. The greening represents an increase in leaves on plants and trees equivalent in area to two times the continental United States.

LINK
While rising carbon dioxide concentrations in the air can be beneficial for plants, it is also the chief culprit of climate change. The gas, which traps heat in Earth’s atmosphere, has been increasing since the industrial age due to the burning of oil, gas, coal and wood for energy and is continuing to reach concentrations not seen in at least 500,000 years. The impacts of climate change include global warming, rising sea levels, melting glaciers and sea ice as well as more severe weather events
 
While rising carbon dioxide concentrations in the air can be beneficial for plants, it is also the chief culprit of climate change. The gas, which traps heat in Earth’s atmosphere, has been increasing since the industrial age due to the burning of oil, gas, coal and wood for energy and is continuing to reach concentrations not seen in at least 500,000 years. The impacts of climate change include global warming, rising sea levels, melting glaciers and sea ice as well as more severe weather events

Where is climate changing.......,

Meanwhile where is that rebuttal to post one...........

Take your time.
 
While rising carbon dioxide concentrations in the air can be beneficial for plants, it is also the chief culprit of climate change. The gas, which traps heat in Earth’s atmosphere, has been increasing since the industrial age due to the burning of oil, gas, coal and wood for energy and is continuing to reach concentrations not seen in at least 500,000 years. The impacts of climate change include global warming, rising sea levels, melting glaciers and sea ice as well as more severe weather events
Show your math, birdbrain.
 

LOL, another modeling construct link you didn't read and it is still in conflict with official data at The National Hurricane Center (NOAA) which you continually ignore because you are highly allergic to OFFICIAL data.

Although the question of whether we can ascribe a change in tropical cyclone intensity to anthropogenic climate change (attribution) is still open, it was argued based on data models for extreme winds that the difference in hurricane intensity for storms near the U.S. coast between globally warm and cool years is consistent in sign and magnitude with theory and simulations. In this regard it was noted that the apparent discrepancy between numerical model results and observations is likely due to a reliance on data analysis rather than data models.

They hope you don't know that the Atlantic Ocean waters has for many many many thousands of years been plenty warm enough for strong Hurricane development, heck the warmest waters on the planets are in the Indonesian/Philippines waters but they don't spawn any stronger tropical storms than the Atlantic does.

Your ignorance is hurting you here.
 
15th post
We're all doing our part to 'kill the planet'. Maybe we can kill a little less of it, or kill it a little more slowly.

No it is getting GREENER which is a visible sign of increase in life even Stuart is now posting it.
 
No to strength either while the 1990's remains the most active and strongest hurricanes decade in the satellite era.

It was posted right in front of you...... lol.
Tom Knutson, senior scientist at NOAA’s Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, is a leading scientist on hurricanes and climate change. He notes that “even if hurricanes themselves don’t change [due to climate change], the flooding from storm surge events will be made worse by sea level rise.” In addition, he says models show increases in a hurricane’s rainfall rate by 2100. This means that hurricanes are likely to cause more intense rain when they come ashore.

Scientists have long predicted that climate change would increase extreme rainfall events. In a warmer world, there is simply more moisture in the air in the form of gaseous water vapor. Think of heating up a pot of water on the stove. Once the liquid water becomes hot enough, it boils and creates steam (or hot water vapor). This process is called “evaporation,” or when a liquid changes to a gas.

A similar process happens at Earth’s surface. As surface temperatures rise, more liquid water evaporates from the land and ocean. Evaporation adds moisture to the air. How much water vapor the air can hold is based on its temperature. Warmer air temperatures can hold more water vapor. The increased moisture in the air leads to more intense rainfall, especially during extreme events.

In a hurricane, spiraling winds draw moist air toward the center, fueling the towering thunderstorms that surround it. As the air continues to warm due to climate change, hurricanes can hold more water vapor, producing more intense rainfall rates in a storm.

Moreover, according to Knutson, most models show that climate change brings a slight increase in hurricane wind intensity. This change is likely related to warming ocean temperatures and more moisture in the air, both of which fuel hurricanes. While most models show either no change or a decrease in hurricane frequency in a warmer climate, a greater proportion of the storms that form will reach very intense (Category 4 or 5) levels. In other words, while there may be fewer storms, the ones that form have a greater chance of becoming stronger
 
It appears post one will never be challenged because warmest/alarmists can't address it factually thus ignore it which is why they are losing the debate badly.

All they do now is trot out the same few replies over and over as the following attests,

Consensus bromides

Propaganda articles

Cut and paste
 
Back
Top Bottom