Signs of extremism.

A classic “sign of extremism” in politics today: Republican Representative Matt Gaetz, speaking before a crowd at the “family-friendly” Iowa fair, standing right next to President Trump, said:

"Mr. President, I cannot stand these people that are destroying our country. They are opening our borders. They are weaponizing our federal law enforcement against patriotic Americans who love this nation as we should," Gaetz said.

"We love standing with you. But we know that only through force do we make any change in a corrupt town like Washington, D.C.
The crowd reportedly applauded his comments and Trump, standing next to him, nodded but said nothing on the use of force.

Gaetz followed with a remark about everyone having to work hard to get Trump elected. Clearly his words were not in themselves a crime, but they clearly show a willingness to endorse & encourage more violent actions like we saw on Jan. 6th.
 
Last edited:
A classic “sign of extremism” in politics today: Republican Representative Matt Gaetz, speaking before a crowd at the “family-friendly” Iowa fair, standing right next to President Trump, said:




The crowd reportedly applauded his comments and Trump, standing next to him, nodded but said nothing on the use of force.

He followed with a. Remark about everyone having to work hard to get Trump elected. So his words were not a crime, just a typical remark from an important Trump fanatic and Florida politician.

He's calling to use force against elections, the rule of law and the constitution. He should be stopped as a traitor.
 
He's calling to use force against elections, the rule of law and the constitution. He should be stopped as a traitor.
He should be stopped. The best way to do that is for Florida voters to dump him, and for U.S. voters to overwhelmingly dump his leader Donald Trump in 2024.
 
One of the signs of Extremism is the believe that the laws do not apply. You are justified in breaking any law, and lying to anyone, to accomplish your goals. This is usually a warning to people that they are about to cross a line into a terrible thing.

Now, we know the Radical Nutjobs are out there demanding that books be banned from schools. We know these Nutjobs swear they are protecting the children. We know that is a lie. And here we have a radical extremist who lied to gain access to the School Library on the hunt for “smut” in the books. No, I am not making that up.


At 9:30 a.m. on Aug. 2, when Assistant Principal Danny Guidry walked past the high school library in Granbury, Texas, he saw two figures moving in the darkened interior.

“There were flashing lights from the phones looking at some books,” he later reported in an email to the district office made public by a parent’s open records request.

Guidry entered and asked if he could be of assistance. He informed the two they were in a restricted part of the building.

“It was dark and difficult to see,” he wrote. “One of the ladies identified herself as Karen Lowery, Board Trustee.”

Lowery is indeed a member of the Granbury Independent School District board. Security video would show that she and another woman, Carolyn Reeves, had entered the library an hour and a half earlier, around 8 a.m., repeatedly switching the lights off when a motion detector turned them on.


Now, what book could possibly have been missed by the State and District groups that went through the library and removed anything that might be offensive?

Well they just knew books remained. Everyone was lying, they knew. The laws didn’t apply to them, they were perfectly justified in lying to gain access, because they were on a mission to protect the children. There be smut in them there books.

Personally, one of the cornerstones of my actions is the basic truth. You pick the hill you are willing to die on carefully. Because once you stake that claim, you can’t take it back later. Some decisions, you’re stuck with, and you are stuck with the consequences.

I guess I have too much Libertarian in me. The idea of the people making choices regarding their own lives, and having as much information available as possible before they make those choices. I’ve never known any information so dangerous it couldn’t be discussed. Apparently the extreme right has. They’ve heard of a lot of information that is so dangerous it couldn’t even be discussed.

Thank you God for letting me grow up listening to George Carlin and Lenny Bruce. Thank you God for giving me an era where access to information was more important than banning that dangerous knowledge.
It seems that as we have "evolved" that taxes have grown exponentially with all of the social justice victories. This means that there is an issue of sustaining things perhaps by percentages for each agenda if the money trough is reduced of even stops. True libertarians do not believe in putting others on the hook to pay for what anyone does in their lives. However there must be some disciplines to degree to keep civilization moving along.
 
And this was covered in other threads.....this is a case of left wing school boards cutting Shakespeare as a distraction from the fact that they don't want parents to know about the actual kiddie porn...."Gender Queer," "Lawn Boy," and the other graphic depictions of minor children having sex with each other and grown men......

They think they can throw out Shakespeare and no one will pay attention to the kiddie porn they want on the shelves...
Sure Q-NUT.
Why didn't Trump shut down Comet pizza, when he had the chance?

Pizzagate, the fake news conspiracy theory that led a ... - Vox​

1692004934784.png
vox.com
https://www.vox.com › policy-and-politics › 2016/12

Dec 8, 2016 — The Sunday shooting was far from the beginning of threats that Comet Ping Pong has faced over the past few weeks. Cecilia Kang reported at the ...
 
One of the signs of Extremism is the believe that the laws do not apply. You are justified in breaking any law, and lying to anyone, to accomplish your goals. This is usually a warning to people that they are about to cross a line into a terrible thing.

Now, we know the Radical Nutjobs are out there demanding that books be banned from schools. We know these Nutjobs swear they are protecting the children. We know that is a lie. And here we have a radical extremist who lied to gain access to the School Library on the hunt for “smut” in the books. No, I am not making that up.


At 9:30 a.m. on Aug. 2, when Assistant Principal Danny Guidry walked past the high school library in Granbury, Texas, he saw two figures moving in the darkened interior.

“There were flashing lights from the phones looking at some books,” he later reported in an email to the district office made public by a parent’s open records request.

Guidry entered and asked if he could be of assistance. He informed the two they were in a restricted part of the building.

“It was dark and difficult to see,” he wrote. “One of the ladies identified herself as Karen Lowery, Board Trustee.”

Lowery is indeed a member of the Granbury Independent School District board. Security video would show that she and another woman, Carolyn Reeves, had entered the library an hour and a half earlier, around 8 a.m., repeatedly switching the lights off when a motion detector turned them on.


Now, what book could possibly have been missed by the State and District groups that went through the library and removed anything that might be offensive?

Well they just knew books remained. Everyone was lying, they knew. The laws didn’t apply to them, they were perfectly justified in lying to gain access, because they were on a mission to protect the children. There be smut in them there books.

Personally, one of the cornerstones of my actions is the basic truth. You pick the hill you are willing to die on carefully. Because once you stake that claim, you can’t take it back later. Some decisions, you’re stuck with, and you are stuck with the consequences.

I guess I have too much Libertarian in me. The idea of the people making choices regarding their own lives, and having as much information available as possible before they make those choices. I’ve never known any information so dangerous it couldn’t be discussed. Apparently the extreme right has. They’ve heard of a lot of information that is so dangerous it couldn’t even be discussed.

Thank you God for letting me grow up listening to George Carlin and Lenny Bruce. Thank you God for giving me an era where access to information was more important than banning that dangerous knowledge.
Amazing you folks didn't notice these signs when morons in black masks were burning down cities. The credibility of liberals is zero.
 
Amazing you folks didn't notice these signs when morons in black masks were burning down cities. The credibility of liberals is zero.

So it is acceptable for the RW to violate the Constitution and break any laws because Liberals were not sufficiently outraged by morons for your satisfaction.

That may be the thread winner. I mean how stupid can you get?
 
So it is acceptable for the RW to violate the Constitution and break any laws because Liberals were not sufficiently outraged by morons for your satisfaction.

That may be the thread winner. I mean how stupid can you get?
Where are these alleged Constitutional violations? You loons saying a thing doesn't make it so. When will you folks learn, the Constitution doesn't protect your feelings? Lucky for you, it does protect your endless ability to whine, those are two very different things. Nor is any intelligent being about to take you folks seriously while you are mired in hypocrisy and double standards. There is no Constitutional right to distribute filth to children. there is no Constitutional right to mutilate children, as by all of our laws they are incapable of consent to such procedures, people do have a right to disagree with your lunacy and express such disagreement, that in no way violates your rights, it does however hurt your fragile egos, which again, is not protected.
 
Where are these alleged Constitutional violations? You loons saying a thing doesn't make it so. When will you folks learn, the Constitution doesn't protect your feelings? Lucky for you, it does protect your endless ability to whine, those are two very different things. Nor is any intelligent being about to take you folks seriously while you are mired in hypocrisy and double standards. There is no Constitutional right to distribute filth to children. there is no Constitutional right to mutilate children, as by all of our laws they are incapable of consent to such procedures, people do have a right to disagree with your lunacy and express such disagreement, that in no way violates your rights, it does however hurt your fragile egos, which again, is not protected.

Help me out. If you want your child to attend a Religious school. Can anyone prevent you? It’s your choice. And as an adult responsible for the child you get to say. That’s right isn’t it?

If you want to allow your child to ride dirt bikes competitively it’s your choice. You are the parent and nobody can tell you not to.

If you want your sick child to receive an experimental medical procedure or treatment to save them from certain death. Is it anyone’s business but you and the Doctor?

My point in all of those is the parent decides. The parent or guardian decides. Unless that decision offends your feelings. Unless that decision hurts your feelings. Then the decision isn’t allowed.

You accuse the left of reacting with feels. But you are the one. You are the one reacting with feels. You are enraged that parents might make a decision in consultation with their doctors that you disagree with. You feel it is wrong and you won’t allow it. Because you feel that it is an abomination.

So you label everyone who thinks libraries should have books as the worst. Because you feel that such insults are justified. You hope that the people you label will react with anger. Because of your own pathetically insufficient ego.

It is you who is angry. Not me. I find your rants hilarious. It is you reacting with hurt feelings.

I posted a link above. Why was the book about Rosa Parks removed from the school library? It wasn’t to protect someone from sex or homosexual was it?

It is the Right that supports lawlessness. Not the left. It is the RW celebrating criminals. They celebrate the Rancher in Arizona charged with Murder. They celebrated the McMichaels in Brunswick. This thread is about two women who trespassed into a school to pursue their political agenda. Yet those criminals are all great people.

There is nothing in the Constitution that allows people to storm the Capital to prevent the orderly transition of power. But the people who did are political prisoners according to the RW.

It’s you all who react with feels. You can’t stand the actual written laws. You can’t stand the laws that prevent you from being the Fascist thugs you fantasize about.
 
hrc-angry.jpg


536aca05ecad04b858fb3b23


636552565653204446-MCT-US-NEWS-VOTINGRIGHTS-2-LA-65927460.JPG


1e130488-3838-41df-bf10-3e03ed2dc645.jpg


T5IWBAFBP4I6RA6SOAQDXDL3IQ.jpg


151030192506-barack-obama-october-27-2015-super-tease.jpg


o-VICTORIA-NULAND-facebook.jpg


AP_18193744348280-1024x682.jpg


Christopher-Wray-sheepish-800x420.jpg


View attachment 814365
Thread.
 
No books are being burned, and you are being intentionally dishonest by making the comparison.

There is no actual educational value to teaching little boys how to give blow jobs or engage in anal sex and give them instructions on how to hook up with adult men to do it. None, Zilch, Nada.

Any person who is actually EDUCATED realizes that.
Ugh most of us are not interested in Other kinds of sex. You seem to know a hell of a lot about unusual sex .
 
Sure Q-NUT.
Why didn't Trump shut down Comet pizza, when he had the chance?

Pizzagate, the fake news conspiracy theory that led a ... - Vox

View attachment 814655
vox.com
https://www.vox.com › policy-and-politics › 2016/12
Dec 8, 2016 — The Sunday shooting was far from the beginning of threats that Comet Ping Pong has faced over the past few weeks. Cecilia Kang reported at the ...


Since you are one of the last of the leftists still using qanon as a thing, you really are dumb.........you should be calling us "Christian Nationalists." That is the last smear created by the democrat party leadership to attack people who disagree with them....qanon is so 2020....
 
Help me out. If you want your child to attend a Religious school. Can anyone prevent you? It’s your choice. And as an adult responsible for the child you get to say. That’s right isn’t it?

If you want to allow your child to ride dirt bikes competitively it’s your choice. You are the parent and nobody can tell you not to.

If you want your sick child to receive an experimental medical procedure or treatment to save them from certain death. Is it anyone’s business but you and the Doctor?

My point in all of those is the parent decides. The parent or guardian decides. Unless that decision offends your feelings. Unless that decision hurts your feelings. Then the decision isn’t allowed.

You accuse the left of reacting with feels. But you are the one. You are the one reacting with feels. You are enraged that parents might make a decision in consultation with their doctors that you disagree with. You feel it is wrong and you won’t allow it. Because you feel that it is an abomination.

So you label everyone who thinks libraries should have books as the worst. Because you feel that such insults are justified. You hope that the people you label will react with anger. Because of your own pathetically insufficient ego.

It is you who is angry. Not me. I find your rants hilarious. It is you reacting with hurt feelings.

I posted a link above. Why was the book about Rosa Parks removed from the school library? It wasn’t to protect someone from sex or homosexual was it?

It is the Right that supports lawlessness. Not the left. It is the RW celebrating criminals. They celebrate the Rancher in Arizona charged with Murder. They celebrated the McMichaels in Brunswick. This thread is about two women who trespassed into a school to pursue their political agenda. Yet those criminals are all great people.

There is nothing in the Constitution that allows people to storm the Capital to prevent the orderly transition of power. But the people who did are political prisoners according to the RW.

It’s you all who react with feels. You can’t stand the actual written laws. You can’t stand the laws that prevent you from being the Fascist thugs you fantasize about.

It is the Right that supports lawlessness. Not the left. It is the RW celebrating criminals. They celebrate the Rancher in Arizona charged with Murder.


You have democrat party policies allowing mobs of looters to raid stores, to the point they are leaving democrat party controlled cities....you have democrat party prosecutors refusing to prosecute criminals, and democrat party politicians lowering the penalties for all crimes, and creating no cash bail revolving doors of monsters on our streets....

You truly are insane...
 
I'm just glad you folks aren't mistaking Sikhs for those muslims you hate so much....






Muslims? Since when in the last few years has anyone actually cared about muslims, in any way?

They haven't been murdering people in our cities so no one cares about them.....the democrats are doing their best to give the Iranians lots of cash and nuclear weapons, so they might become an issue again in the future....but what the fuck are you talking about?
 

Forum List

Back
Top